The Amazing Spider-Man (2012)

Source
Source
Source

Origin and history of Spider-Man

The Amazing Spider-Man

Director: Marc Webb

Writers: James Vanderbilt, Alvin Sargent, Steve Kloves, Stan Lee, Steve Ditko

Cast: Andrew Garfield, Emma Stone, Denis Leary, Rhys Ifans, Martin Sheen, Sally Field, Irrfan Khan, Campbell Scott, Embeth Davidtz, Chris Zylka, Max Charles, C. Thomas Howell, Jake Keiffer, Kari Coleman, Skyler Gisondo, Charlie DePew, Jacob Rodier, Stan Lee

Synopsis: Peter Parker finds a clue that might help him understand why his parents disappeared when he was young. His path puts him on a collision course with Dr. Curt Connors, his father's former partner.

MPAA Rating: Rated PG-13 for sequences of action and violence

Origin and history of the Lizard

With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility.

When it comes to making movies in general, it takes a tremendous amount of responsibility on the film maker's part to give the audience the experience they come to expect; while sometimes surprising them with a few nice touches to make the movie stand out on it's own merit. Plus, it's not like a major film studio like Sony doesn't have the power to make a great "Spider-Man" movie; hence why Uncle Ben's infamous line from the "Spider-Man" comics seems to ring so well when it comes to determining whether, or not, Sony did all it could to make up for the follies of "Spider-Man 3." Hence the term, "With great power comes great responsibility."

As most movie goers know, "Spider-Man 3" underwhelmed most audiences upon it's release, contrary to it's successful box office results; which inevitably led to the franchise being rebooted. Some have argued saying that the "Spider-Man 3" film wasn't that bad, and demanded that Raimi would've been allowed to do a "Spider-Man 4." While others, they claim that Raimi's trilogy never did justice to "Spider-Man" at all, and they used "Spider-Man 3" as the primary example. Granted, there's more to the story, but in the end, Sony decided to reboot the franchise completely. Whether we like it or not, this is the result. Having said all that, how do you reintroduce a character's origins when the last movie that did it was released almost a mere ten years ago? Wouldn't audiences be tired of hearing the same origin story again twice?

Luckily, "The Amazing Spider-Man" puts all fears to bed upon it's release, as I can safely say that this is probably the best "Spider-Man" film that I've ever seen. Don't get me wrong, I loved Sam Raimi's first "Spider-Man" movie, and I liked how he choose to introduce the character. Plus, I was one of the few old school comic book fans that really liked the ingenuous idea of Spidey having organic web shooters versus mechanical ones. In fact, I still consider "Spider-Man 2" one of the best superhero films ever made. However, as much as I enjoyed the first two Raimi films, I have to admit Marc Webb does a damn good job reintroducing the character.

Not only did he manage convey the character's origin in a more grounded yet plausible tone, but he also manages to make the villain more intricate to the plot; which is something even Raimi's trilogy struggled with sometimes.

However, that isn't the case with "The Amazing Spider-Man" film. I know some people are still thinking that this is probably just some darker toned rehash of Raimi's first "Spider-Man" movie, but you'd be wrong to assume such a thing. Granted, it does go back to the beginning, and it does serve as something of an origin story for "Spider-Man", but there's more to it than that. This film serves to have somewhat of a deeper insight into Peter Parker's past. Not only delving in the mysteries about Peter Parker's parents, but it also keeps the character in high school this time; which is already a huge difference from the first Sam Raimi "Spider-Man" film, where it took the character from high school into college in one movie.

Heck, even the circumstances on how Peter (Andrew Garfield) got bitten by a radioactive spider are completely different than the Sam Raimi version of it. I won't go into detail about that, as I wouldn't want to give away too much, but these are just some of the examples of how this film differentiates itself from the previous "Spider-Man" movies produced in the past. And, for all you comic book fans out there, this version of Spider-Man goes back to the mechanical web shooters; which should put an end to the classic debate of "organic web shooters" vs. "mechanical web shooters."

The film delves deeper into Peter Parker's past concerning the mysterious disappearance of his parents. As the movie plays out, it leads to a series of events that inevitably cause Peter Parker to turn into Spider-Man, while simultaneously creating a deadly adversary simply known as the Lizard. And, that's pretty much all you need to know about the plot without spoiling anything major for most fans.

Although I would hesitate to call any "Spider-Man" film realistic, I would say that "The Amazing Spider-Man" comes damn near close to presenting as plausible of adaptation of the character as humanly possible. Unlike the Raimi version that wasn't shy at incorporating tidbits of camp elements, Marc Webb's version seems to go for more of a darker, and grounded route; while adding bits of mystery for good measure. Avoiding the camp elements if were like the wrestling scene, as it was portrayed in the original comic book origin, for example.

Peter Parker isn't so much nerdy like he was in Raimi's version, but he's more of a loner and outcast this time. Sure, he may not be the most popular kid in school, but he still has the mannerism of a teenager. He's smart and kind, but he's also reckless and sometimes a bit selfish. Although Garfield is way too old in real life to be deemed a teenager, he certainly did his homework to mimic the behavior of teenagers of today's generation.

Another thing that impressed me about Andrew Garfield was his performance as "Spider-Man" himself. Granted, I thought both Tobey Maguire and Andrew Garfield have done a great job portraying Peter Parker; while each actor was able to put their own relative spin on the character. Unfortunately, as much as I loved Tobey as Peter Parker, he was never able to capture the mannerism of his alter ego in Raimi's trilogy. Sure, it wasn't his fault that Raimi never gave him too many lines as Spider-Man, to portray his sarcastic humor he dishes out to his adversaries like the character does in comics. However, that doesn't seem to be the case in this reboot, as Garfield not only manages to capture the human side of Peter Parker, but he also manages to portray the other side of the character quite well.

As for the rest of the cast, I thought everyone played their parts rather well. Plus, the special effects were great, as to be expected. Fortunately, most of the web slinging scenes in this movie were not shot in "first person perspective", as it was originally feared. Although, I have to admit when it was used to show the appearance of Spider-Man in the movie, for the first time, that it was kind of clever.

Sadly, this isn't to say the film doesn't have it's share of flaws. For starters, the pacing of the film tends to drag a bit around the beginning, and the "3-D" cinematography is barely noticeable most of the time, so I wouldn't bother seeing the "3-D" version of this film.

Overall, "The Amazing Spider-Man" is arguably the best adaptation that I've seen of the character on the big screen, and it's definitely worth seeing the "2-D" version in theaters. In the end, I would have to give this movie a three and a half out of four. Also, I would highly recommend staying midway through the credits, as there's definitely room for a possible sequel.

The Amazing Spider-Man Game Trailer

Comments 8 comments

josh3418 profile image

josh3418 4 years ago from Pennsylvania

Steven,

Great review! Well-written and concise! Informative and straight to the point! That is what a movie review should look like. And good selection of pictures!


Flightkeeper profile image

Flightkeeper 4 years ago from The East Coast

Hi Steven, I can't seem to keep up with all the superhero movies. I am curious to see how this spiderman stacks up to the Spiderman 2002 with Tobey Maguire. I really liked that version and your review makes me want to see how different and what stayed the same. Thanks!


schoolgirlforreal profile image

schoolgirlforreal 4 years ago from USA

Looks like a really good movie :)


ChristyWrites profile image

ChristyWrites 4 years ago from British Columbia, Canada

I saw the movie and liked the new take on the series. Neat in 3-D of course too. You review the movie well and you are right that the movie is not just a recreation of the prior series.


Stevennix2001 profile image

Stevennix2001 4 years ago Author

@Josh, Flightkeeper, Schoolgirlforreal, Christy Writes

Thanks for the comments guys. I deeply appreciate it. :)


Nickalooch profile image

Nickalooch 4 years ago from Columbia, MD

I thought the villain was honestly kind of disappointing. Although i cant say enough about Andrew Garfield in this. His movements as Spiderman is what stunned me. In one of his big fight scenes...he actually moved like a SPIDER! lol


Fullerman5000 profile image

Fullerman5000 4 years ago from Louisiana, USA

I have to agree with you. I was very surprised on how good this new spiderman film was. Some of the shots made you feel as if you were spiderman. The cast, storyline and direction were some of the best a summer blockbuster has to offer. I really did enjoy this film and think that it is by far the best in the franchise so far. Althought, Toby McGuire was a great spiderman, looking back at the films now they kind of seem cheesy. Great review. Looking forward to the Dark Knight Risese review.


Stevennix2001 profile image

Stevennix2001 3 years ago Author

@nickalooch

To each their own. Thanks for stopping by to comment on this hub, and I'm sorry it took me so long to reply to you as i had completely forgotten about it until now. lol. anyways, you take care buddy.

@fullerman

Yeah it'll be interesting to see where the next one goes. Although I don't know if i would say the previous trilogy was that bad, as i still like the first two raimi films a lot. however, this one is definitely the best one that i've seen so far. anyways, thanks for stopping by and sorry it took me so long to reply to this hub. lol

    Sign in or sign up and post using a HubPages Network account.

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked. Comments are not for promoting your articles or other sites.


    Lizard Throughout the Years

    Stan Lee's Cameo in "The Amazing Spider-Man" video game

    Electric Company Spider-Man

    Spider-Man throughout the years

    More by this Author

    • Batman v Superman:  Dawn of Justice
      11

      Fearing that the actions of Superman remain unchecked by society, Batman takes it upon himself to take down the Man of Steel. Meanwhile, Lex Luthor has other sinister plans in mind.

    • Captain America:  Civil War
      1

      Political interference in the Avengers' activities creates a rift between Iron Man and Captain America, which causes the rest of the team to pick sides.

    • Ben-Hur (1959)
      0

      When a Jewish prince is betrayed and sentenced to slavery by his Roman best friend, he regains his freedom and vows revenge against those who have wronged him, while saving his family.


    Click to Rate This Article
    working