The Anxiety of Alien Influence: Ridley Scott's Prometheus

Another empty Hollywood sequel/prequel


I saw Prometheus on Friday, and at the behest of a friend I decided to do a write up of what I took away from the film. Let me start by saying that I didn’t hate the movie, but I really wouldn’t say that I liked it either. Half way through I found myself growing both confused and incredulous with some of the events. There appeared to be some glaring holes in the plot that either were edited out on the cutting room floor or were simply left out of what is somewhat of a sloppy script. The visuals are convincing (as with pretty much every big budget sci-fi/action flick that’s come out in the past ten years) but the character development is nil.

Almost every core sci-fi trope that’s been popularized over the past 100+ years of the genre is used to some extent in Prometheus; present on the roll-call are the cybernetic android that is human in all but flesh and soul, the young scientist(s) with a personal stake in finding answers to pertinent questions about humanity and outer space, mysterious allusions to solving the origin of the human race through myth, super powerful/intelligent alien beings that may or may not be malevolent, an aging corporate mogul hell-bent on figuring out the secrets of existence (a nearly unrecognizable Guy Pearce in a silly old-suit that surely registers as the film’s dumbest moment)…so you get the idea, the film borrows a lot and hints at even more, but delivers little in the way of answers or actual plot payoff. Michael Fassbender plays the android who is some kind of a cross between the intelligent but emotionless Data of Star Trek the Next Generation and the ambiguous HAL of 2001 fame. Noomi Rapace takes over the central female role, which at times appears to be a little too similar to Officer Ripley from the original Alien trilogy. Charlize Theron and Idris Elba (my man Stringer Bell from HBO’s The Wire) are thrown in for good measure as mission leaders but figure little in the actual plot. As you might guess with so many underdeveloped characters and themes, it gets a little confusing at several points.

In addition, the screenwriters borrow halfheartedly from Zecheria Sitchin and Erich Von Daniken’s work on the ancient alien origins of the human race in what ends up feeling like a History Channel/For Dummies…treatment of the subject. To some people these may be cutting edge theories, but they’ve been popular since at least the 70s when both authors’ books (The Twelfth Planet and Chariots of the Gods respectively) gained notoriety for being both titillating but somewhat plausible. Basically, in the world of these speculative historical writers, humanity was created by another race of super-beings, sometimes referred to as the Nephilim, whose traces can be seen all through Sumerian, Egyptian, Babylonian and even Hebrew text and culture. (It’s worth noting that these beings are mentioned in the Old Testament several times by name, but have often been interpreted by scholars as being giant angels that coexisted with man at some point. Go figure!) In Sitchin’s interpretation, the Annunaki/Nephilim (sometimes spelled nefilim) flee from Earth after mining all the gold they can, eventually dooming humanity to extinction in the form of a flood. Similarly in Prometheus the “Engineers,” a group of large and bald humanoid creatures with the same DNA as man, flee the Earth and plan on destroying humanity by sending the aliens from the original trilogy (and the three following films) after us. Interestingly enough, Rapace’s character opines at one point a singular line that appears to be taken directly from the closing remarks of Sitchin’s Twelfth Planet when she wonders aloud if the Engineers created man, who created the Engineers?

I’ll confess that the sci-fi genre is one that is often very self referential and highly derivative of its antecedents. If you employ a lifelike robot or android in your film, you most likely owe a significant debt to Isaac Asimov and his robot novels that included the three laws of robotics (Asimov himself is said to have coined the term “robotic” in the 1940s), just as if you write of strange alien civilizations coming into contact with man, you might be borrowing from Arthur C. Clarke or Ray Bradbury. That’s not even mentioning the host of popular sci-fi films that have come to define the genre (E.T., Close Encounters of the Third Kind, Metropolis, Star Wars, Star Trek, 2001 etc.) and which are often directly or indirectly responsible for much of the schlock turned out by Hollywood these days. However, modern sci-fi films like Sunshine, Gattaca and District 9 succeed where copycat material fails, by adapting older ideas with aplomb and never trading plot or character development for special effects (Damn you George Lucas, damn you!). We get none of that here in Ridley Scott’s latest film.


Does this film suck?

It’s never clear what the situation really is between the namesake aliens from the older films and the Engineers, although both have lain dormant on a distant moon until the ship Prometheus comes from Earth. We never learn whether the Engineers created the aliens solely to wipe out humanity or whether they simply stumbled upon them, but either way it’s implied the aliens got out of hand and destroyed most of the Engineers present on this world. Once Prometheus does arrive, all are reawakened by the unsuspecting earthlings and we get a few scenes of the nascent aliens doing their face-sucking thing. Largely jettisoned, however, are the horror/suspense elements that were so convincing and effective in Alien and Aliens.

The main issue here seems to be that this film doesn’t know what it is or what it wants to be, which is a criticism you could lay on the screen writers as much as the director. Is or isn’t this film a prequel to the Alien franchise that Ridley Scott began in the late 70s/early 80s? Well, it is and it isn’t. Is it more of a hard sci-fi flick that attempts to raise important questions about our own reality? Well, it wants to be at times but it never really succeeds at doing so. Hinting at deeper material (that is mostly borrowed from other sources) does not make this film or any other film profound in any sense in the same manner that Biodome was not a treatise on the green movement simply because it showed an awareness of the actual biodome. Prometheus’s treatment of complex issues of human origin and spirituality is not as ham-handed as when Michael Bay attempted to deal with race relations in Transformers II or when James Cameron attempted to champion environmentalism in Avatar, but it would be a close second in my book.

Prometheus fails mostly because it isn’t based in reality and doesn’t pose relevant questions that reverberate outside of the world of the film. Instead, we’re presented with a second rate reality based on a previous series that is still churning out sequels because the studio recognized a cash-cow when it saw one. In other words, we’re dealing with something similar to the Star Wars prequels/J.J.Abrams school of work: slick, special effects laden film making that relies more on flash than traditional story elements and unabashedly borrows from wherever it can. To quote Randy Quaid from Independence Day (a scene that coincidentally is echoed in this film when Idris Elba’s character pulls a kamikaze with the Prometheus), "All right, you [Hollywood] assholes! In the words of my generation, UP YOURS!"

Vote on Ridley Scott's Prometheus

How did you feel about the film Prometheus?

  • I liked it.
  • I didn't care for it.
See results without voting

Your reaction to the article

Do you agree or disagree with the author of this critique?

  • I mostly agree with him
  • I completely agree with him
  • I completely disagree with him
  • He's an arrogant bonehead know-it-all
See results without voting

Comments 6 comments

Keith Ham profile image

Keith Ham 4 years ago from Niagara Falls, Ontario

A lot of the moments in this felt either rushed or drawn out too much. There really wasn't much to it except 'You saw this in Alien!'. No answers were given at the end and it seemingly turned the main character into a crazy woman hellbent on discovering the truth that should have been explained in this movie.

What really got me, and I would consider this a spoiler but it was so off the wall... was the scene with the somehow resurrected crew member going on a rampage? It made no sense and came off as nothing but a needless unexplained fight-scene.

But, I honestly have to say that Ridley Scott directed it pretty well. As usual he was far too overambitious with the project. I only wish he'd of kept it a singular story rather than making it a attempt at a whole new trilogy or something.


Jean Valone profile image

Jean Valone 4 years ago from France Author

If a script fails to address basic character development and plot elements that make sense, then it's a failure in my book. This movie simply doesn't make sense or add up to any satisfying denouement.


fromMarkHall profile image

fromMarkHall 4 years ago

Alien wasn't that scary, it was just slimy. A dog with metal, oily teeth is jettisoned into space by a race of human rats. Oh, and they expect to be rid of it...I GET IT!


Keith Ham profile image

Keith Ham 4 years ago from Niagara Falls, Ontario

fromMarkHall: Ridley Scott, god bless the man, has a nasty track record. His movies are always hit or miss, but Alien was most certainly his best movie. I don't know if it was the presentation - that was probably more boring in parts rather then scary - or just how great the idea was. But it hit.

To say the Alien was a dog with metal teeth is a disservice to H.G. Giger, however. You should really look up the original design for the Xenomorph.


fromMarkHall profile image

fromMarkHall 4 years ago

Keith: exactly what the filmmakers were most interested in exploiting--what the creature looked like. So, we know what a shark look likes and it worked in JAWS why not ALIEN?--ANSWER: It didn't. The fake shark is only used at the end. The best time for it. Couldn't have been used any sooner or the fear level would've dropped. As for a disservice none was intended. His art has obvious dog elements. In fact, I kinda wanted it to bark or growl instead of screech...ah well.


Jean Valone profile image

Jean Valone 4 years ago from France Author

Blade Runner is Ridley Scott's best, even with all the alternate versions/endings. I'd agree most of his stuff is hit or miss, which might lead one to believe that the relative quality of a lot of his films are based on the script rather than his direction. He does have an eye for flashy visuals though.

    Sign in or sign up and post using a HubPages Network account.

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked. Comments are not for promoting your articles or other sites.


    Click to Rate This Article
    working