The Curse of the Odd-Numbered Trek Film is Over

Odd Numbers are My Favorite Symbols

A proverb that has threaded through fandom and critical opinion is that the even-numbered Star Trek® films are losers. At least, they seem not as good overall and not as was well received as the even-numbered movies in the franchise have been.

Until 2009, my favorite film was Star Trek IV®: The Voyage Home, because of its humor, its handling of time travel, beating the odds in danger, diversity of species, a focus on conservation, inter-species communication, surviving in a unfamiliar cultures (a true measure of intelligence), and some other aspects. It is the only movie that I could watch every day.

Star Trek® 2009, an odd-numbered Trek film at Number 11, is the second movie of any kind that I could watch every day. J.J. Abrams, not having been connected with Trek previously, made his own film and broke the curse of the odd-numbered Trek disappointment.

[My favorite numbers are odd, anyway - prime numbers, those that cannot be fractured by 2. Indivisible.]

Star Trek 2009: Star Fleet Academy

(flickr USER: Dallas1200am; Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.0 Generic )
(flickr USER: Dallas1200am; Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.0 Generic )

Fan Art (click to enlarge)

(flickr User: Las Valley 702;Attribution 2.0 Generic)
(flickr User: Las Valley 702;Attribution 2.0 Generic)

Power in Sight, Sound, and Heart

ST:2009 is powerful in many elements. The treatment of the space-time continuum is a new one in science fiction. It ties together the cannon of the Star Trek® films and novels in a fresh way - cannons that otherwise diverge. Moviegoers, immediately enthralled by the surprising early storyline, begin to shake their heads at some of the early circumstances and then sit up in surprise as the timelines deal a surprising hand that can be played out well, even logically. Drama and comedy come in equal proportions.

Star Trek® is fun again.

In addition, after 43 years, the characters actually transcend the actors, in a positive way that draws in the engagement of the original ST:TOS cast. Leonard Nimoy cried during its premier. William Shatner smiled during a long trailer shown to him on a talk show. During the showing I attended, I did both.

This film is powerfully visual, in dark and light. The impact of film noir is captured even in the colors of this work, a background for visual effects that have caused Lucasfilm's Industrial Light and Magic® to outdo themselves by a magnitude of a hundred.

The background featured in several scenes is filled with giant stargoing vessels larger than several of our biggest ocean cruiseline ships put together (g.e., several-cities large). They brought gasps from several in the audience. Ships and starbases are larger and brighter than they have been in any other Trek film to date.

Looking at this visual wonder, the musical score and sound effects practically slam the audience back into their seats with a magnified energy provided by music-encouraged emotion and professional sound work. We hear new symphonies and old TV themes combined. Entry phrases from ST:TOS and ST:TNG leading into different parts of the score make one's hair stand on end. Among all of this impact, we hear a few certain phrases from past films and TV episodes as if for the first time, in normal conversation, and not, "He's dead, Jim!" Effects combine to becomes a homecoming for the older Trekker and a sure welcoming for a younger audience. Star Trek® is back.

This is first an action-adventure film. ST:TMP was more a thought film and seemed drawn out. The intelligence and philosophical questions are still there in 2009, but woven into a set of vital high-energy missions and purposes with ever changing problem solving demands. The action is fast moving and dangerous, with men flying through the atmosphere, huge beasts attacking out of nowhere, alien thugs we have not seen previously as they are here, and unexpected tragedy. There is also redemption, but at a price.

Star Trek(R) - A New Generation


People, Places, and Things

Person, Place, and Thing is a measure of psychological orientation - Do you know who you and others are, do you know where you are and the date, and do you remember what things are called and how you use them? During the viewing of Star Trek® 2009, you can forget all three.

At the same time, the familiar combines with the new to anchor the whole phenomenon more deeply into the viewer's experience. Older Trekkers might need to lie down after seeing this film. For another generation, the film will be like the TV show This Is Your Life, with everything in your timeline, including your future, being presented to you in a room all at once.

Zack Quinto has portrayed Spock so thorougly that any departure from the TV character is believably a function of the youth of the actual character Spock. The physical similarity between Quinto and Leonard Nimoy is so one, that they walk with the same angle of movement between the left hip and shoulder.

Doctor McCoy is not the actor, he is the Doctor. This portrayal may be the most thorough of the film, and the interplay between Bones and Kirk is funny enough to make you fall out of your seat laughing.

Scotty shows up later and is as funny as he was in the TV series. Uhuru is younger than in the TV series, as are all the characters, but she is still intelligent and at times a spitfire, even though some critics have not enjoyed this character as much as they did others. Chekov is so ambitious, energetic, and over-Russian, that he makes you laugh as well. Sulu is believable from his first lines and enjoys a lot of action scenes, including sword play.

If you miss Star Gate Atlantis, you'll see some of the actors from that series, as well. On the silly side, I can envision Mad TV or SNL presrenting a Star Trek 2009 sketch with Denny Crane and Alan Shore in the midst of it.

Seeing this film will reorient your brain and fill it with energy and renewed hope, for that is what Star Trek® represents on one level: hope for the future. This one also shows how to use emotion for motivation and bonding and how to refuse to allow it to lead you into an uncontrolled, wasted reactionary response.

More by this Author

Reactions 9 comments

mulberry1 profile image

mulberry1 7 years ago

I'd like to see this, I was a Star Trek fan as a little kid (the original and Next Generation). My hubby isn't so I may have to go it on my own.

Patty Inglish, MS profile image

Patty Inglish, MS 7 years ago from North America Author

You'll love it!

Paper Moon profile image

Paper Moon 7 years ago from In the clouds

I cant wait to see it. Your hub was great. :D

Patty Inglish, MS profile image

Patty Inglish, MS 7 years ago from North America Author

Thank you, Paper Moon. I'm going to see it again at least once. I am so happy that it was not poorly done. Sure it will make a lot of money, but it's something people can enjoy over and over and take to heart - it will become a classic, I think.

cashmere profile image

cashmere 7 years ago from India

When they make a Star Treck Movie my husband sighs. He knows I have to see it and since they don't get released in our local cinema halls he will have to run around and get me the cd. Thankfully the internet has reduced his tensions. Great Hub.

jycmba profile image

jycmba 7 years ago from Los Angeles CA

This is funny - something my nerdie Trekkie friends used to joke about.. the odd-number curse - interesting to see someone actually write about it! :)

After getting into the Lost series, I've become a big fan of J. J. Abrams and am now devouring even his older work, even Felicity - interesting to see the beginnings of his craft in storytelling and character drama.

Can't believe I haven't see the new one yet. I'm holding out to see it with my brother on Memorial Day weekend when I'll be visiting him & his family. Gotta keep myself busy between now & then! ;-)

Lissie profile image

Lissie 7 years ago from New Zealand

I thought you might like it! I cant remember the last time I was so absorbed in a film - it was a like being an 8 year old watching Amok Time for the first time - in black and white LOL! I liked the little touches - how the TOS tricorders morphed into "modern" ones thru the film. The only set I didn't like was engineering - it was a bit industrial and seemed too big in proportion - but I can live with that cause they actually got the characters right and did a stunning plot twist. I have to go and eee it again!

The Good Cook profile image

The Good Cook 7 years ago

A great hub - but I shan't be rushing to see the film. I may kick myself later of course but I just don't like prequels, sequels and remakes. I loved ST Next Generation and would like to continue to remember it fondly, unsullied by other ST 'stuff'.

Patty Inglish, MS profile image

Patty Inglish, MS 7 years ago from North America Author

Lissie - I had to see it at least twice. Engineering to me looked more like TV's Enterprise series, but bigger.

Good Cook - I see what you're saying. McCoy and Kirk are so funny in this tough. There is one character that reminds me of TNG in a good way. I'll just say that this film is different from any of the other films, but I liked TNG very much too and would not want to ruin it, either.

    Sign in or sign up and post using a HubPages Network account.

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked. Comments are not for promoting your articles or other sites.

    Click to Rate This Article