The Hurt Locker (2009)

Casualty of Warfare

Unlike the movies, war isn't always glamorous or pretty. There's no "rah, rah, go get' em boys" type speech, nor is there always a happy ending. It can be confusing, and strenuous on both the body and mind. It can even be like an addiction, where some men lose their sanity, in the midst of combat. As the path of war is never clear, many men risk their lives as there is no guarantee that any of them shall come back. If you can imagine such a harsh and cruel reality, then you've entered into the world of "The Hurt Locker."

The movie essentially follows an Elite Army Bomb Squad, set in the current War in Iraq, mixed up in a "cat and mouse" game, where anyone could be a potential enemy. Every object could be or contain a deadly bomb, and getting out alive is always a gamble. Lead by their new sergeant, William James, who surprises his two subordinates with his urban combat style and recklessness to danger. James continuously shows little fear when it comes to death, as it causes problems for his unit to have to control him. However, his reckless exploits, and the element of danger lurking around each corner, drives everyone close to the edge.

Kathryn Bigelow does an excellent job capturing the cold and harsh realities of modern warfare. As it seems Kathryn and writer, Mark Boal, really did their homework on this. Not only making every scene and set up authentic as humanly possible, but giving it a gritty real world type feel to it. Cutting away from the typical Hollywood cliche drama, but rather allowing for the harsh environment of war set the tone instead. Indeed, everything from the uniforms to the weaponry, and how the actors carried out military protocol was very realistic, to say the least. Indeed, "The Hurt Locker" is by far one of the most realistic war movies ever made.

Sadly, the story doesn't delve into the main protagonist's persona, as one would hope. As it only uses two or three scenes, to really dive into SFC William James' (Jeremy Renner) background. In which to allow the audience, to understand why William is such a risk taking hot shot, despite knowing he has a family to come home too. Even around the ending, when William tries to explain why he's such a hot shot, during their routine missions, he's unable to come up with any kind of real answer to that. Which is exactly how the audience feels, as it doesn't provide that clear connection so the viewer can figure out the main protagonist's journey. Often, coming off as vague. However, that's not to say this is a bad movie by any means.

I thought the actors in this movie played their parts rather well. Despite some bad dialogue, the actors were able to fill in their perspective roles nicely. Offering realism to their characters, without resorting to over dramatization. Indeed, each actor provides just the right amount of emotion, to make their characters believable and grounded.

Although "The Hurt Locker" does fall short on character development and poor dialogue, at times, it's still one of the best war movies out there. As I loved how they were able to bring that realism about modern warfare, and allow for the environment itself to set the tone. Kathryn Bigelow and Mark Boal really did their homework, on the military, as everything came off as authentic. Overall, "The Hurt Locker" is a must see film for anyone that loves realistic war based movies.


Comments 10 comments

Ann Nonymous profile image

Ann Nonymous 6 years ago from Virginia

Unfortunately I don't think my heart/emotions could tolerate this! I've been watching real footage on the news so I think your great coverage/review will have to suffice until I am brave enough!!!!!! Thanks anyways, Steven!


Stevennix2001 profile image

Stevennix2001 6 years ago Author

Your welcome. Yeah, I think it's rather sad that the war is going on a lot longer than it was expected, and it looks like it might not end anytime soon. Anyway, thanks for stopping by again. :)


Paradise7 profile image

Paradise7 6 years ago from Upstate New York

I don't know if this is "my" kind of movie. I'm just not into war, not the nitty gritty real thing or the glamorization of it. But thanks for the review.


Stevennix2001 profile image

Stevennix2001 6 years ago Author

Your welcome. Anytime paradise.


satomko profile image

satomko 6 years ago from Macon, GA

Good review. The style and subtly of the film encourages multiple viewing because few of the characters are articulate enough to explain why they keep doing what they are doing.


Stevennix2001 profile image

Stevennix2001 6 years ago Author

Thanks Satomko. I'm glad you liked the review. I do agree with you, I thought the subtle style and authenticity of the movie truly made it worth watching. Although I just wish they had explored Jeremy Renner's character a bit more that's all. However, other than that, it was a great war movie.


Faybe Bay profile image

Faybe Bay 6 years ago from Florida

Excellent review. I think you will one day "take it to the papers" and leave us all behind. But no, you like it here. :)


Stevennix2001 profile image

Stevennix2001 6 years ago Author

lol. maybe, but you are right. I do like it too much here on hubpages. :)


Beth100 profile image

Beth100 6 years ago from Canada

Looks like we're agreeable when it comes to most movies! :) I enjoyed this one -- both the review and the flick.


Stevennix2001 profile image

Stevennix2001 6 years ago Author

thanks beth. i guess it's true what they say about great minds thinking alike. ;)

    Sign in or sign up and post using a HubPages Network account.

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked. Comments are not for promoting your articles or other sites.


    More by this Author


    Click to Rate This Article
    working