How about this: no blog source will be allowed. posted 32 hours ago
Okay, you could open with that for the judges to rule whether or not a source will be allowed. So be specific.
As it is, both think each others sources are opinion so... posted 32 hours ago#
If each questions is allowed a week, then the judges should have enough time to fact check anything in question.
We could open a thread specifically for anything the participants find in question.
Does that work? posted 32 hours ago#
Okay but I am pretty good at leading questions and am trying to give garden a fair shot but if he decides that this works for him then I shall shut up. posted 33 hours ago#
Whaaaat! What a waste of my time. posted 33 hours ago#
Okay but that could turn messy and hard to follow.
I think stating all your questions first would be more ideal because this would allow the opponent to rebuttal in a more organized fashion.
The way you have it... posted 33 hours ago#
Okay so you are saying that all the questions that proponent intends to ask must be presented in his opening argument.
The opponent will have the chance to answer each of the 15 questions with no more than 250 word... posted 33 hours ago#
8.The extent to which quotes and references from outside sources will be allowed. I suggest quotes from reputable sources will be allowed up to a max of 30% of the total statement. Judges decision will be final as... posted 33 hours ago#
6. I suggest a maximum of 1500 words in each statements, a maximum of 15 questions of max 100 words each with 250 words allowed for each reply to each question.
Please be more clear.
The opening argument is no more... posted 33 hours ago#
Great, I was just reading the site.
I suggest a format that is one on one. Since you have been challenged. I would suggest allowing truth to ask the first question.
The think a reasonable number of... posted 34 hours ago#
4. The length of the debate, in number of rounds.
Open for suggestions from the participants Mark and truth. posted 34 hours ago
Isn't it the point though. To have a variety of judges to discuss amongst ourselves and decide.
It's like having a jury decided the fate of a white man with an all black jury. (sorry if that is a bad... posted 34 hours ago#
Not to be rude, but if you have nothing to offer as far as setting up the criteria for the debate then find another thread. posted 34 hours ago#
Please resubmit your links so we can move on to the next order.
Sufi, what is the next on the list? We need to decide time lines. What do you think? posted 34 hours ago#
Try finding some resources that he will accept. The bible is one of them so that is a very good start.
If you guys cannot agree then allow the judges to decide.
Since Evans is a Christian,
Sufi is more... posted 35 hours ago#
