Is the word 'Pervert' applicable only to men?

Jump to Last Post 1-22 of 22 discussions (68 posts)

75
Rishy Richposted 13 years ago
Is the word 'Pervert' applicable only to men?

If yes, then why so?

If no, then how would you define a 'Female pervert'?
reply report
1. 0
  Kerry43posted 13 years agoin reply to this
  How about pervette? I caught my neighbor "perving" on my husband through our office window Sunday. I did actually feel like using a different word, but I am a lady.......
  reply report
63
Mishaposted 13 years ago
Pervertess?
reply report
1. 60
  Chaotic Chicaposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  I like that!
  
  perversion is in the way a person thinks and that has nothing to do with genetics. the only reason men are more apt to be considered perverts is they tend to forget to use that little filter that keeps him from shutting his mouth before putting his foot in it.
  reply report
2. 76
  Kangaroo_Jaseposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  interesting Misha
  reply report
59
paradigmsearchposted 13 years ago
Pervert can be a relevant term to a small percentage of both genders. In other words, women are people too.

As to definitions, a pervert is someone of either gender who commits deviant or depraved acts.
reply report
59
paradigmsearchposted 13 years ago
Examples of deviant or depraved acts (by either gender):

Voting for an incumbent.

Buying something from a telephone solicitor.

Other examples anyone?
reply report
91
akirchnerposted 13 years ago
A spade is a spade is a spade - a pervert is a pervert is a pervert.

The other difficulty I guess comes in trying to define pervert!

What one person thinks is 'normal behavior' and what another thinks is sometimes very frightening!
reply report
59
Ron Montgomeryposted 13 years ago
Thankfully, my wife is evidence to the contrary.
reply report
1. 59
  wildorangeflowerposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  LOL
  reply report
61
TMMasonposted 13 years ago
Is there actually such a thing as, perversion, or a, "pervert", anymore?

Most behaviours that were once looked upon as immoral, have been flipped and twisted by the moral relativists into, "normal", behaviour.

ie; a genetic component to homosexuality, or a genetic component to pediphelia, etc...

Moralism only applies to those who actually believe man is above the animals. Other-wise, it can all be chalked up to animal instict.

So.. if there is no moral standard... then how can anything be counted as immoral, or moral.

The relativists have destroyed morality under the guise of it being bigotry. And since so many in this world wish to rid us of religion, and man has no innate standard of morality, (or that standard varies so widely between all individuals.), to which we can hold ourselves. Then how can we measure morality in our lives and society in any meaningful way?

How do we uphold a moral standard? When that standard is up to each individual, and not recognized, nor embraced, by society as a whole?

We have thrown away morality.

So who then is a, "pervert"?

I submit, by todays standard of moral relativism, no one.

And I am sure I will be ran into the ground for this post... but I do not care.

I will not throw away my moral compuss, for anyone.
reply report
1. 59
  Ron Montgomeryposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  Hatred is a perversion of society's basic values. An example of such perversion is when a microscopic portion of a society tells the overwhelming majority of the society that the hatred should be practiced by all.
  reply report
2. 59
  Ron Montgomeryposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  Com-puss?
  
  Your term possibly indicates less than moral thoughts.
  reply report
  58
  Dave Barnettposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  Or a need for anti-biotics
  reply report
3. 62
  Daniel Carterposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  Yes, I suppose that's one way to look at it. Kind of like the race riots of the 60's. Lettin' all them black people get out and make such a fuss over nuthin' I guess you would say.
  
  Until you wake up in the 21st century and can't even believe there were battles over human rights to begin with. Wow. We were stupid hateful, people. ALL of us. Unfortunately, we still are, but I think (gratefully) less so than then.
  
  Ignorance breeds hate and violence. Understanding has a way of uniting people.
  
  I don't think the general public is without morals. I think views about sexuality have changed because more people have gained a greater understanding. While there are still big set backs about sex as a business, most people have morals despite it. Opinions about specific behaviors remain opinions, unless they are harmful to the person and to others. Morality is about not harming self or others. I think it's fair to clarify the difference.
  
  Pervertress. Yes, I believe there are some posing as teachers in the public schools, tempting young pubescent boys into lurid sex acts. They are in the news these days.
  
  I also believe MLM's are a perversion. Along with political parties, religion and a few other things. They seem to be nongender specific.
  reply report
  61
  TMMasonposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  Just like leftists to try to turn this into a discussion of race or bigotry.
  
  As I said above... you all just supply the examples of the destruction of morals on the basis of hate.
  
  Too bad.
  
  The conversation is about perversion, and in relation, morals. One can not, and does not exist, without a belief in the other.
  reply report
  59
  Ron Montgomeryposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  Should morality be based on the views of so few people?
  reply report
  61
  TMMasonposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  Are you saying that most Americans do not believe in God, and by relation, morality?
  
  I think the question better asked would be...
  
  Should morality be relativised based on the desires of so few?
  reply report
  59
  Ron Montgomeryposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  The overwhelming majority of Americans do not share your understanding of a hateful, bigoted god. They do understand that moral issues have to be thought through rather than being based on empty claims of myth-based morality.
  reply report
  61
  TMMasonposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  Um-hum...
  
  Right.
  
  Just cause we Americans believe in free choice and individual liberty... doesn't mean we agree certain behaviours are morally correct.
  
  Big leap from one, to the other.
  
  And you leftys have a way of inflating and exagerating the position of your views, in the American mind-set.
  reply report
  78
  mega1posted 13 years agoin reply to this
  What would you have to say at all, if there weren't "leftys"? hmmmmmmmm? Your knee jerk reactions are laughable but not even in the realm of real discussion on any topic! You sound like those under-educated who envy people who actually have an education, so they continually try to put them down as "liberals" and "leftys" - as if those were bad things! pathetic.
  reply report
  61
  TMMasonposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  Yes.
  
  Anyone who doesn't agree with you all are under-educated and envious.
  
  What a joke.
  
  And my opinion of leftists inflating the facts and figures to meet their own requirements, is based on long standing observations in discussions with said leftists.
  
  Wow that sounds almost scientific.
  
  Observing the same results over and over... hmmmmmmmm?
  reply report
  59
  Ron Montgomeryposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  "we Americans" all 13 of them who believe that tripe?
  reply report
  61
  TMMasonposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  So your saying that I can believe someone has the right to do something immoral.
  
  And because I believe they have the right to do it... means I agree on its morality.
  
  Wrong.
  reply report
  59
  Ron Montgomeryposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  I'm saying your concept of morality is baseless and not accepted by American society.
  reply report
  61
  TMMasonposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  And your free to think that, Ron.
  
  Your issue, as with many on the left, is with morality in general, not me.
  
  Oh and your wrong again.
  
  The ONLY difference between me and the majority of Americans, is I have the balls to say it. And many, many, of my fellow Americans do not, for fear of being called a bigot, or homophobic Christian, or hater, etc...
  
  Not I though... I will speak my mind regardless of the hate from the other side.
  reply report
  78
  mega1posted 13 years agoin reply to this
  so, let me get this straight? You're saying that homosexuality is a perversion? see, that's just so uninformed and wrong and empty headed to even say that! And are you trying to compare homosexuality to pedophilia? Then you're saying that "leftys" exaggerate and inflate things? Man, you're so transparent and uninformed it is funny. I can see that any logical discussion here in the HP forums is always going to get derailed by you! It happens everyday. Well, now I've had my say - been wanting to say this to you for awhile now, not that you will listen with your self-righteous, bigoted ears!
  reply report
  61
  TMMasonposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  Yes.
  
  I see homosexuality as a perversion, an imorality, as many in this country and the world do.
  
  Yes. I am a bigot because I have a moral standard. I am a bigot because I refuse to bow to the moral relativist.
  
  Now... You, as all, have the freedom to choose to act in almost any immoral way you wish to, (as long as it is not illegal also.), but that doesn't mean I have to except your immoral behaviour, as moral.
  
  See how that works?
  
  And again.
  
  If you don't like my opinions and views... too bad.
  
  And why shouldn't I equate the two, homosexuality and pediphelia, moral relativists equate all things, all the time.
  
  So what is your, or the, problem with applying their logic and reasoning here?
  report
  78
  mega1posted 13 years agoin reply to this
  nothing you say sounds like logic and reasoning to me. But you, of course, have every right to say anything you want and sound as stupid as you do! Just don't believe that anyone who isn't already in your camp could possibly take your "moral relativist" stance seriously!
  report
  59
  Jim Hunterposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  What don't you see as his logic?
  
  He thinks homosexuality is wrong therefore it equates to a perversion to him.
  
  You think homosexuality is not wrong and therefore it is not perverse to you.
  
  Its called a differing opinion.
  
  And you should be more tolerant of differing opinions.
  
  After all, tolerance is what you are wanting is it not?
  report
  62
  Daniel Carterposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  Well, yeah, I went over board on that post. You're right, you got me, TM. I shouldn't have brought in the race thing at all. I concede. Apologies.
  
  However, I think you set your self up by hijacking the thread and changing it to morality instead of addressing the OP. (Just so ya know....)
  
  I should have stuck with MLM's being a perversion, which they are, and there are pervertresses in a lot of areas in life, just as there are perverts.
  reply report
59
wildorangeflowerposted 13 years ago
necrophilia, child pornography and bestiality are the ones that comes to my mind,
reply report
1. 59
  Ron Montgomeryposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  Are we just throwing out random perversions?
  
  Watching Fox News naked.
  reply report
  59
  wildorangeflowerposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  LOL
  reply report
  63
  Mishaposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  I wouldn't call this a perversion - they show a lot of Sarah
  reply report
  59
  Ron Montgomeryposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  OK, if you turn the sound down it could be classified as a normal heterosexual activity.
  
  Have a kleenex.
  reply report
  62
  Daniel Carterposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  No, Ron, the box. Get the whole box of tissues.
  reply report
  59
  Ron Montgomeryposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  Only if I also watch O'Reilly.
  
  mmmmmmmm, Bill O'Reilly (drooooool)
  reply report
66
kmackey32posted 13 years ago
IDK but my boyfriend calls me a pervert almost daily....
reply report
1. 59
  Ron Montgomeryposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  Don't we all?
  reply report
2. 75
  Rishy Richposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  Hey kmackey32...I believe I was looking for you
  reply report
60
theirishobserver.posted 13 years ago
In recent years more women are coming before the Courts in Europe charged with sexual criminality. Traditionally men were believed to be the sole perpetrators of sexual crime. However, recent high profile cases show that women without any assistance from men are capable of committing some of the most heinious crimes imagainable. Yesterday in Ireland another case came before the courts and here are the details:

A WOMAN charged with 87 counts of indecently assaulting a number of girls may face further charges.

Tullamore Circuit Court was told a jury would be required for the trial of the 61-year-old, who is pleading not guilty to offences that allegedly took place at an Offaly school between 1973 and 1977.

A number of the alleged victims were in the court, as was the defendant.

The book of evidence refers to seven named female victims, with 20 offences each alleged to have been committed against three of them, 10 against two other victims, six against one and one charge against the final victim.

I simply use this case as an example of the latest to appear before the Irish Courts. The correct forensic psychological term for a woman sexually abusing female children is a Homophile. Men who abuse young boys are also Homophiles. Men who abuse young girls are Hetrophiles. Women who abuse Boys are Hetrophiles. People who abuse boys and girls are known as peadophiles.

You may ask why make a distinction, surely they are all scum bags. The answer to that is simple. If we dont make these very important distinctions then we are giving parents and children the impression that there are certain sections of our society who do not abuse children.

Over 98% of those members of religious orders who abused children the world over were Homophiles. These were men abusing pre-puberty boys. Or women abusing pre-puberty girls as in the case alleged above. If we as a society create the impression that certain people dont abuse children then we are guilty of facilitating that abuse.

Children can only be protected by vigilence and education. If we fail to educate our society that sexual crime is not the preserve of one group of individuals, then we facilitate sexual crime. For generations Social Services and the Criminal Justice system have dealt with men and women differently when it has come to sexual crime. It was always believed that women were not capable of sexually abusing children.

The reality is that the 14 Health Boards in Ireland show that women are in fact the greater abusers of children. While men are periodically dragged before the courts and paraded in the tabloids, women are more often given councilling or sent off for a few weeks holidays having committed the exact same sexual crimes.

Our Political System and Criminal Justice system are dominated by men, and these men appear in most cases to be unable to deliver the laws necessary to address the sexual criminality of women. Indeed in the latest piece of sexual crime legislation introduced in Ireland, a male under the age of 17 years can be charged with rape while a woman cant.

It is this type of blinkered law that facilitates and condones the sexual abuse of many thousands of children and others each year at the hands of women. Of course those so called 'victims' groups that are mainly run by men haters are not going to highlight the sexual criminality that is committed by women.

So we have in Ireland a Moral Quagmire in which the female sex criminal can continue to ply their trade. It is shameful and disgusting to think that our politicians are incapable or unwilling to stand up and be counted, to address the rape of a child by a woman, with equal outrage as that by a man. However, our politicians have been bullied in to silence. They fear that if they openly and honestly address the rape of children by women, they will be lambasted in the lurid tabloids in which they have so much faith.

Yes many of our legislators are at the dictate of the lurid tabloids, the same tabloids that facilitate and promote the sexual objectivication of men, women and children with their lurid sex chat lines, their pornography and filth. This tabloid filth facilitates and normalises the rape of men, women and children, yet out legislators sit like baying dogs, as they seek applause from the filth mongers.

The rape and sexual abuse of human beings by other human beings has been about since time began, however, in 2010 there is no excuse for our legislators to facilitate the rape and sexual abuse of men, women and children by failing to address the sea of legislative unertainty that allows these deviants to swin in their moral quagmire.
reply report
78
mega1posted 13 years ago
I believe any human can get perverted. I haven't ever known any perverted women, though I have met a few with real filthy minds! But there are probabl MORE men out there who act on their perverted fantasies than women. Women probably keep it to themselves. and anyway, we would have to define perversion and I really don't want to go there!
reply report
62
Greek Oneposted 13 years ago
I searched far and hard.. very hard... for female perverts during my single days
reply report
1. 59
  Ron Montgomeryposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  I married the only one...
  
  ...gotta go now.
  reply report
2. 62
  Daniel Carterposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  It must have been very, very lonely out there....
  reply report
3. 75
  Rishy Richposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  lolz...beware of the transexuals
  reply report
61
TMMasonposted 13 years ago
Mega said... "But you, of course, have every right to say anything you want and sound as stupid as you do! Just don't believe that anyone who isn't already in your camp could possibly take your "moral relativist" stance seriously!"

Yet I tell someone they are playing stupid and I am suspended for it.

yeah... the admins are so very non-biased.
reply report
78
mega1posted 13 years ago
I say you sound stupid to me - so what's the problem? I am not calling you half the names you call others! but anyhow, this is not a discussion of whether women can be perverts! I believe pervert is a non-gender term. Not that it matters to you. I just wish you'd stay on topic and not start flogging at liberals and leftys everytime you come online. Doesn't it get tiresome to hear yourself talk? Or do you listen to yourself?
reply report
1. 61
  TMMasonposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  Who do I call what? Leant leftists?
  
  I have been called a racist, a bigot, a hateful person... and stupid, all because I espouse a different view than yours and others.
  
  And.
  
  I have not dis-agreed that "pervert" is a gender nuetral discription.
  
  Have you read my posts?
  
  Perversion is an act... many an act is perverted, mega.
  
  And you are welcome to have whatever moral standard you want.
  
  You, though, do not get to set my moral standard.
  
  Gee you wouldn't be one of the Admin, would you?
  
  Is there a list of the admins on here somewhere?
  reply report
92
habeeposted 13 years ago
I'm female, and according to my hubby, I'm a pervert.
reply report
1. 78
  mega1posted 13 years agoin reply to this
  omg - habee a pervert? not even. These other guys really seem to know ALL about perverts and perversions - seem to have made a study of it! and believe me, sister, you don't qualify in the definition there. hehehe! But I bet you can get pretty "raunchy" - in a good way!
  reply report
2. 62
  Daniel Carterposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  Women should aspire to the kind of perv you are, my dear.
  reply report
  92
  habeeposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  It sure is a lot more fun, Daniel!
  reply report
92
habeeposted 13 years ago
Lol, Mega! Love it!
reply report
92
habeeposted 13 years ago
TM, I'm curious. Do you think any sexual acts between a man and wife could be considered perversions? No kids and no animals involved - just 2 consenting, married adults.
reply report
1. 61
  TMMasonposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  Yes. I do.
  
  Some acts are perverted by their very nature.
  
  Do you?
  
  Perversion does not mean age, nor consent, it is an act.
  reply report
78
mega1posted 13 years ago

peace
reply report
1. 62
  Daniel Carterposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  I've always wondered what you look like in real life, mega...
  reply report
2. 58
  Dave Barnettposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  Cool picture. Saw something like it, but those drugs are all gone now. Perversion is decided by the mores of the society in which you live. By some standards, America is a perverse society, by our own standards, those same societies which think us perverse are the ones who are perverted.
  reply report
  62
  Daniel Carterposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  You mean something like the pot calling the kettle black??
  NO....not in our world....
  reply report
92
habeeposted 13 years ago
No, TM. I think anything my husband and I do in the privacy of our own home, as long as we both consent, is fine and not perverted.

I disagree with your last sentence. For example, I'm sure you'd agree that "normal" intercourse between two heterosexual adults is not perverse. Yet, I hope you would think that that same act between an adult male and a 5-year-old girl is a perversion.
reply report
62
Daniel Carterposted 13 years ago
TM, I disagree with you, but I can see your intent is not to be a racist or bigot. However, you and I and a lot of other people know we're not going to agree on a lot of things. You may not even agree with my idea of "agreeing to disagree" but it works for me. It just means at the end of the day, I don't have to attack you personally for your beliefs (as long as you don't attack others).

You get attacked by attacking. The way that stops is not to attack. I think most of us are guilty of that at some point or another.

So, I disagree with you, but respect your right for you to have your opinions.
reply report
60
Evan G Rogersposted 13 years ago
pervert is like any other idiotic word without meaning - all that it does is explain that someone somewhere doesn't like something that someone else does.

"pervert" "hoarder" "libeler" "jerk"
reply report
1. 59
  Ron Montgomeryposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  And yet you just used the term "jerk" on another thread...
  
  Does hypocrisy actually mean anything?
  reply report
  59
  Jim Hunterposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  "Hypocrisy"
  
  A liberal way of life.
  
  I heard that somewhere.
  reply report
  59
  Ron Montgomeryposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  Had to have been Rush or Beck...I mean what other sources do you have?
  reply report
0
ralwusposted 13 years ago
so this is what got mega banned. silly
reply report

Post a Reply

jump to first post

Necessary
HubPages Device ID	This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
Login	This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google Recaptcha	This is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
Akismet	This is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google Analytics	This is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic Pixel	This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web Services	This is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
Cloudflare	This is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted Libraries	Javascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)

Features
Google Custom Search	This is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google Maps	Some articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google Charts	This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host API	This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTube	Some articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Vimeo	Some articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Paypal	This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook Login	You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Maven	This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)

Marketing
Google AdSense	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClick	Google provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index Exchange	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Sovrn	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook Ads	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad Marketplace	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexus	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Openx	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon Project	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLift	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say Media	We partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing Pixels	We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking Pixels	We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.

Statistics
Author Google Analytics	This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
Comscore	ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking Pixel	Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
Clicksco	This is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)

Is the word 'Pervert' applicable only to men?

Arts and Design

Autos

Books, Literature, and Writing

Business and Employment

Education and Science

Entertainment and Media

Family and Parenting

Fashion and Beauty

Food and Cooking

Games, Toys, and Hobbies

Gender and Relationships

Health

Holidays and Celebrations

Home and Garden

HubPages Tutorials and Community

Personal Finance

Pets and Animals

Politics and Social Issues

Religion and Philosophy

Sports and Recreation

Technology

Travel and Places

About Us

This website uses cookies

Is the word 'Pervert' applicable only to men?

Related Discussions

This website uses cookies