The President makes a comment that may cost him his office.

1. 60

   JSChamsposted 11 years ago

   http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article … TIMAL.html
   
   It seems it really doesn't matter about the deaths in Beghazi. It just wasn't optimal. There was a mother that had some things to say about that.

   replyreport
   1. 60

      Repairguy47posted 11 years agoin reply to this

      Obama truly is a scumbag!

      replyreport
2. 0

   JaxsonRaineposted 11 years ago

   Benghazi?
   
   Sorry, politics are already full of 'B' words.
   
   Big Bird's Bailout Binder Bought By Billionaires

   replyreport
   1. 60

      JSChamsposted 11 years agoin reply to this

      True but this is a valid thing. You learn lot's about the man when he opines on these things.

      replyreport
      1. 78

         Healthy Pursuitsposted 11 years agoin reply to this

         Like the 47% comment? If so, I agree.

         replyreport
3. 60

   eternals3ptemberposted 11 years ago

   Hahah the website actually talks about conservatives on the internet using his response as a sound bite. "President doesnt care about Americans" yeah, no s**t, otherwise those bastards would call for wars were we go to lovely sandy places to die in gunfire and IEDs

   replyreport
4. 83

   kathleenkatposted 11 years ago

   Many have already submitted their votes. This probably has little effect since its so late in the game.

   replyreport
   1. 60

      eternals3ptemberposted 11 years agoin reply to this

      It doesnt matter for whom I vote, because they will always want someones blood.

      replyreport
   2. 0

      JaxsonRaineposted 11 years agoin reply to this

      The undecideds don't normally vote early. They like to wait to see everything.

      replyreport
      1. 83

         kathleenkatposted 11 years agoin reply to this

         Only the undecided in a few particular states. I was undecided, but found out Obama won my state before I even got my ballot in the mail.
         
         This is a very close race, I am eager to see the outcome.

         replyreport
5. 84

   psycheskinnerposted 11 years ago

   I don;t see what is so outrageous about what he said.  When you send people into dangerous places, some will die.  The only way to have a casualty rate of nil is to not send them.  So all you can do is learn from mistakes and keep causalities as low as possible.

   replyreport
6. 60

   Hollie Thomasposted 11 years ago

   Am I missing something here? If four people lost their lives it's not optimal is it? If there were zero moralities, then that would be optimal. Classic case of the Daily Mail distorting the issues.

   replyreport
7. 79

   Uninvited Writerposted 11 years ago

   Obama could have handled it the way Bush did
   
   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3p9y_OEAdc

   replyreport