SNL's violent Jesus clip

1. 0

   Onusonusposted 11 years ago

   Last year the president went to the UN and apologized to all the Muslim countries for a crappy anti- Mohammed video saying, "The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.”-BHO
   To my knowledge the producer of that film is still in jail. So where is the media uproar for this? When will the president apologize to Christians, denounce the creators of SNL, and throw them in jail?
   http://www.wnd.com/2013/02/nbc-skit-has … s-rampage/

   replyreport
   1. 60

      Josakposted 11 years agoin reply to this

      "It's so unfair that Muslims get more attention than my faith"
      Fixed it for you.
      Yes insults against Islam are more important because Islam is a growing faith still dominated by hardliners and thus have real world impacts, Christianity is a dying faith more and more dominated by moderates and thus jokes at their expense have little real world impact.

      replyreport
   2. 0

      Brenda Durhamposted 11 years agoin reply to this

      Obama?  Actually defend Christianity?
      I'll believe that when I see it.
      Probably when pigs fly.
      
      Yeah that skit is horrible.

      replyreport
      1. 59

         MelissaBarrettposted 11 years agoin reply to this

         
         
         http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-off … l-assembly

         replyreport
         1. 0

            Brenda Durhamposted 11 years agoin reply to this

            
            Pigs haven't flown yet.
            Despite rumors to the contrary.

            replyreport
      2. 0

         Onusonusposted 11 years agoin reply to this

         What are you talking about? He defends Christianity all the time!
         http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1RWHdQBMgb4

         replyreport
         1. 0

            Brenda Durhamposted 11 years agoin reply to this

            Yup. 
            I've seen probably all of those instances where he offends, not defends,  Christianity.
            He's a stubborn fool;  those are his two strongest assets.

            replyreport
            1. 0

               Onusonusposted 11 years agoin reply to this

               Did I say defend? Oops...

               replyreport
2. 0

   Onusonusposted 11 years ago

   Dang, Jesus gets swept under the rug again.

   replyreport
3. 0

   PrettyPantherposted 11 years ago

   You forgot the rest of the quote:
   
   "The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.  But to be credible, those who condemn that slander must also condemn the hate we see in the images of Jesus Christ that are desecrated, or churches that are destroyed, or the Holocaust that is denied.”
   
   Also, the man is in jail for unrelated charges having nothing to do with making the video.
   
   "The man, Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, who is also known as Mark Basseley Youssef, a name he legally adopted in 2002, appeared in Federal District Court here and pleaded guilty to four charges of violating a probation sentence imposed on him in 2010 after a bank fraud conviction. Each of his guilty pleas, worked out with prosecutors in advance, was related to his maintenance of the two identities."
   http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/08/us/ma … .html?_r=0
   
   Now, on to the next fake outrage.

   replyreport
   1. 63

      PhoenixVposted 11 years agoin reply to this

      Turned out it was just a bunch of disinformation propagated by the White House to cover up the truth behind Benghazi.  So there is no credibility there, one way or the other.

      replyreport
   2. 0

      Onusonusposted 11 years agoin reply to this

      Outrage is for liberals. Conservatives simply point out the raging hypocrisy that is constantly on display by liberals in office.

      replyreport
      1. 88

         Zelkiiroposted 11 years agoin reply to this

         It's a pretty nice view up there on Bullshit Mountain, eh?
         
         http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UfCBurnHCh8

         replyreport
         1. 0

            Onusonusposted 11 years agoin reply to this

            He has some interesting ideas. Here's a little tidbit about the facts of life made just for economically inept folks like Stewart.
            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lCXcU91QIGM

            replyreport
4. 55

   whoisitposted 11 years ago

   Do people still watch this irrelevant show?

   replyreport
5. 83

   psycheskinnerposted 11 years ago

   Feel free to threaten riots if that is how you want to get that kind of attention. 
   
   Otherwise you could just realize that freedom of speech includes offensive speech, and the president only gets involved when it is a matter of pressing national interest.

   replyreport
   1. 55

      whoisitposted 11 years agoin reply to this

      So its ok to use racial slurs?

      replyreport
      1. 83

         psycheskinnerposted 11 years agoin reply to this

         We are not talking about what is "okay".  We are talking about what is legal.  And yes it is.  Have you listened to the radio recently?
         
         You don't have to like it, but the President doesn't need to apologize for it either.

         replyreport
         1. 55

            whoisitposted 11 years agoin reply to this

            Two different stances on two different threads.

            replyreport
            1. 83

               psycheskinnerposted 11 years agoin reply to this

               Incorrect. Failure to comprehend. Once I realized the use of the slurs was not associated with a threat, I saw there was not hate crime.  And indeed, that he had not been charged with one.

               replyreport
               1. 55

                  whoisitposted 11 years agoin reply to this

                  Not at all correct.
                  
                  You
                  "If you use a pile of racial slurs and then say "I want to choke you to death" to a woman standing right in front of you on the sidewalk... well. It sounds both hatey and crimey to me."

                  replyreport
                  1. 83

                     psycheskinnerposted 11 years agoin reply to this

                     If he had done that (which he hadn't) it would be a crime because he threatened to kill someone for being black.
                     
                     Just saying black people are [bad thing] is not a crime, it's just ignorance.  Ignorance is legal.

                     replyreport
                     1. 55

                        whoisitposted 11 years agoin reply to this

                        Apparently not in New York where he could be charged with a crime for using offensive language.

                        replyreport