He wants to shoot Clinton WHERE?

1. 77

   Mighty Momposted 10 years ago

   I can see the government agency next scandal brewing here, when the FCC puts Mr. Santilli's request through extra scrutiny.
   Once again, where was the outrage when American troops were sent to Iraq under false pretenses? Did we see anyone calling for SOS Rice to be shot in her private parts?
   
   Radio host Pete Santilli made shocking remarks about former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, claiming she should be "shot" for being "involved in the killings of American troops."
   
   Santilli hosts a show on his website, but says he's "ready to take my show to national syndication; that is, of course, if the FCC regulated AM/FM radio stations can handle my truth & honesty."
   
   "Hillary Clinton needs to be convicted. She needs to be tried, convicted and shot in the vagina," Santilli said, Right Wing Watch reports. "I want to pull the trigger."
   
   Santilli criticized Clinton over the Sept. 11, 2012 attack on the U.S. consultate in Benghazi, Libya. He also slammed Clinton over what he called "the fake hunt down of this Obama bin Laden thing":
   
   I want to shoot her right in the vagina and I don't want her to die right away; I want her to feel the pain and I want to look her in the eyes and I want to say, on behalf of all Americans that you've killed, on behalf of the Navy SEALS, the families of Navy SEAL Team Six who were involved in the fake hunt down of this Obama, Obama bin Laden thing, that whole fake scenario, because these Navy SEALS know the truth, they killed them all. On behalf of all of those people, I'm supporting our troops by saying we need to try, convict, and shoot Hillary Clinton in the vagina.
   
   Santilli also criticized Obama, saying he deserves the same punishment as Clinton.
   
   "Barack Obama needs to be tried, convicted, and shot for crimes against the United States of America," Santilli said. "And if anybody has a problem with that, then you are an enemy of our state."

   replyreport
   1. 87

      Zelkiiroposted 10 years agoin reply to this

      I wonder where Santilli wants Obama to be shot...

      replyreport
      1. 67

         ccdursinaposted 10 years agoin reply to this

         I wonder something similar....

         replyreport
2. 0

   JaxsonRaineposted 10 years ago

   Stupid people on all sides... shouldn't be newsworthy.

   replyreport
   1. 72

      Quilligrapherposted 10 years agoin reply to this

      +1

      replyreport
3. 0

   Nancy's Nicheposted 10 years ago

   Wow, this article regarding Mr. Santilli's comments certainly comes from a deep seeded anger. We, who pay attention to the infractions by our government, are angry over Benghazi, the IRS, recent AP violations by the CIA, and King Obama’s continual shredding of the Constitution through executive orders to mention a few of our concerns. I believe Ms. Clinton, along with anyone else who ignored the cry for help, should have been relieved of his or her post, tried and imprisoned for treason; that is what his or her actions concerning Benghazi was --- TREASON! But shooting them --- nah, that would be a waste of good bullets...

   replyreport
   1. 79

      Uninvited Writerposted 10 years agoin reply to this

      Obviously, you are not basing this on any facts whatsoever... Oh, and you forgot to mention the umbrella

      replyreport
      1. 77

         Mighty Momposted 10 years agoin reply to this

         No kidding.
         With Ombrellagate and now Vaginagate,
         we have officially passed the "boy who cried wolf" stage into complete lunacy.
         When absolutely everything the President does becomes the subject of equally overblown
         hysterical outrage, the people who are hysterically outraged lose any credibility
         to be legitimately concerned about anything.
         They just want to be outraged.
         
         Real birthers don't accept evidence. They just make up new sh#t to ignite.
         P.U.

         replyreport
   2. 72

      Quilligrapherposted 10 years agoin reply to this

      
      In the entire history of this nation, US courts have overturned only two presidential executive orders out of over 13,000 and neither was one of the mere 155 issued by President Obama through May 18, 2013. {1}{2}
      
      Treason, on the other hand, is a much more serious accusation. The same Constitution you claim the President has shred states, in Article III, Section 3: "Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.”
      
      {1} http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_ … _conflicts
      {2} http://1461days.blogspot.com/2009/01/cu … bamas.html

      replyreport
4. 65

   maxoxam41posted 10 years ago

   As if Navy Seals were angels? Isn't it their job to die for personal interests? Yes, to the eyes of our politicians, Clinton or another, we are all disposable. Why are we so outraged about it? Sept 11 was the perfect example of the detachment of our politicians when it came to the people.

   replyreport
   1. 77

      Mighty Momposted 10 years agoin reply to this

      Do you mean Sept 11 the original or 2012? Or both?

      replyreport
5. 0

   Motown2Chitownposted 10 years ago

   After reading the article, I had to chuckle that he was planning an apology to anyone "who took his comments out of context."  Seriously?  There wasn't really ambiguity in his statement that might have required one to search for its meaning in context.
   
   Phew.

   replyreport