But the list is clearly biased one way, without exception. And whether or not arguments are overused, they are still valid - seems like you're trying to nix all arguments that non-believers have against Christians in these forums, such as questioning belief in supernatural figures (hence the common "Santa Claus" argument), historic atrocities that Christians have committed ("Crusades") and calling out hypocrisy ("pot calling the kettle black"). "Interpretation" is certainly not a pro-Christian key word, either, as non-believers would argue that there are many interpretations of the Bible, and not all are literal.
I find this pretty unbelievable, not to mention incredibly biased toward your own faith - for, if my memory is correct, you too have participated in religious debate forums. Furthermore, considering these words are all non-offensive (with the possible exception of delusional, depending on the context), this seems just ridiculous.
If you are banning things, direct attacks and derogatory words would be understandable ("you're going to hell" seems a lot more attacking than anything you've stated). And there's certainly a difference between "You are stupid and delusional" (direct attack) and "Your argument is stupid and delusional" (not an attack on the person). But trying to ban arguments that you don't like is blatantly restrictive, and, I feel, doesn't represent Hubpages' encouragement of open discussion and idea exchange.
EDIT: So you made a "joke" thread... trying to convince people this was true, or what? Wow, even less respect from me.