Atheism is just wrong concept nothing else

Jump to Last Post 1-47 of 47 discussions (135 posts)

60
shakeelzposted 14 years ago
According to aethism is only a wrrong and illogical concept. We can not say that there is no God. How could this be possible? Does this whole great universe made at its own? Did a human make itself?
reply report
1. 63
  Lady_Eposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Shakeelz, for as long as this world goes on, there will always be Aethists. I have noticed though that sometimes it takes something extraordinary to happen in their life and then they believe there is a God.
  reply report
2. 61
  chukra Gposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  do you know theism is totally wrong too
  reply report
3. 60
  usmanali81posted 14 years agoin reply to this
  reply report
  59
  Ron Montgomeryposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  That's an amusing image, but really a stretch. Einstein and Franklin were agnostics, not atheists.
  reply report
  0
  sandra rinckposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  gnostic and agnostics can be atheist too you know.
  reply report
  61
  JonTutorposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  according to his definition..... anybody non moslem is an atheist
  reply report
  60
  mohitmisraposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  even someone ranked over the Quran is not good enough, one must be a Muslim
  reply report
  59
  Ron Montgomeryposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  WORD HISTORY:
  An agnostic does not deny the existence of God and heaven but holds that one cannot know for certain whether or not they exist. The term agnostic was fittingly coined by the 19th-century British scientist Thomas H. Huxley, who believed that only material phenomena were objects of exact knowledge. He made up the word from the prefix a-, meaning "without, not," as in amoral, and the noun Gnostic. Gnostic is related to the Greek word gnosis, "knowledge," which was used by early Christian writers to mean "higher, esoteric knowledge of spiritual things"; hence, Gnostic referred to those with such knowledge. In coining the term agnostic, Huxley was considering as "Gnostics" a group of his fellow intellectuals"ists," as he called themwho had eagerly embraced various doctrines or theories that explained the world to their satisfaction. Because he was a "man without a rag of a label to cover himself with," Huxley coined the term agnostic for himself, its first published use being in 1870.
  
  In your face loser!! I am the smartest.........
  
  Just kiddin'. My understanding is that atheists believe that there definitely is no god, whereas agnostics believe that its existence cannot be proven.
  reply report
  0
  sandra rinckposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  atheist say their is no "deity" which gets confused with "Jesus" as some refer to Jesus as god. So when an atheist says there is no god, they are saying god (deity) does not exist.
  
  I am a gnostic atheist. work that one out smarty pants! j/k. In your face!
  reply report
4. 60
  fishmoxposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  It is not a concept.
  It is a faith.
  
  An atheist is a self-worshipping person. His idols are himself, his wisdom, his science, his dialectics. These are the things he believes in. He is a man of the physical, who believes there is nothing else beyond other than this miserable existence, and when he dies, he goes to dust to nourish the soil, and rot away in his pretty coffin.
  
  Since an atheist does not believe in God, you would think that if he wanted sex, he would do it in public when he felt like it, since he believes there is no soul, no God to account to, no hell to face, and so on.
  
  But if you want to rile an atheist, ask him about his morality and you will get an earful. Questions like "since you do not believe in God and accountability, would you screw your own mother, or sister, or aunt, or maybe an attractive three year old boy or girl ?", or, "would you without hesitation kill another human being for any reason at all, even for him just staring at you ?".
  
  You will get an earful, I kid you not.
  reply report
  80
  Uninvited Writerposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Most of those things are covered under the law. Just because you do not believe in God does not mean you are going to break the law or kill anyone. What a ridiculous argument.
  reply report
  60
  fishmoxposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Ridiculous argument. Exactly what the atheists I've discussed with said. Word for word.
  
  Okay.
  
  So, now, tell me, IF, in the slightest chance, there was no civil law, or human law, to violate and who will run after an offender, will you do "most of those things" ?
  reply report
81
RooBeeposted 14 years ago

You may want to try getting in on the seventy five trillion threads already going on exactly the same topic.
reply report
1. 74
  Eaglekiwiposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  love that pic RooBee!!!! and sums up the situation purrrfectly
  reply report
0
Leta Sposted 14 years ago
Yeah! Instead, let's make this a thread about funny cat pictures:

http://www.funnycatpix.com/_pics/Sunglasses_Cat459.htm
reply report
1. 0
  L. Andrew Marrposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  HAHA,
  Fantastic, I love the way you did that =P
  reply report
81
RooBeeposted 14 years ago
I'm in!!!
reply report
80
Uninvited Writerposted 14 years ago
reply report
81
RooBeeposted 14 years ago
reply report
1. 0
  Leta Sposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Seriously LOL!
  reply report
60
Colebabieposted 14 years ago
reply report
80
Uninvited Writerposted 14 years ago
reply report
81
RooBeeposted 14 years ago

However, I am VERY easy to amuse (obviously). *wipes laughter-induced tear from face*
Yes, Lita, Monorail Cat is pretty awesome isn't he?
reply report
59
Teresa McGurkposted 14 years ago

reply report
80
Uninvited Writerposted 14 years ago
reply report
59
Ron Marianoposted 14 years ago
Wow hahaha

it really became a cat thread! Fun stuff!
reply report
61
JonTutorposted 14 years ago
Really funny....LOL
reply report
0
Leta Sposted 14 years ago
reply report
1. 61
  JonTutorposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Dude couldn't have imagined.... his Atheism topic being hijacked by cats.....ROFL
  reply report
88
Paragliderposted 14 years ago
(This cat clearly believes in Dog)
reply report
0
wordscribe41posted 14 years ago
reply report
81
Jewelsposted 14 years ago
Thank the Flying Spaghetti Monster this thread was overtaken by felines. I just couldn't take another circular discussion today. Purrrr!
reply report
1. 0
  wordscribe41posted 14 years agoin reply to this
  All hail the Pastafarians!
  reply report
67
B.Z. Alixandreposted 14 years ago
well since this thread has been taken over by cats, nows a good time to ask, what is the allure of the pictures. i'm not trying to pick a fight I am genuinely curious. I admit, some of them are cute (I did like the Earthquake one) but the ones lacking in wit, sarcasm or humor, far outnumber the ones that have it. is it just looking at cats in different positions? or the cats themselves. I admit I'm a dog person, but I don't find the humor in the dog versions either. maybe i just don't have a similar sense of humor, which is fine, I'm just curious.
reply report
1. 81
  Jewelsposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  B.Z. it's definitely your sense of humor. Alas, not to worry. It's preferable to the topic though. I'm not a cat person either, nor a dog person!
  reply report
68
waynetposted 14 years ago
Atheism + Religion = boredom
reply report
1. 57
  dingdongposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  What about Ahteism Vs Religion?
  reply report
  68
  waynetposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  No...them two topics together = boredom!
  reply report
2. 82
  quicksandposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Perfect!
  
  ¡Ole!
  reply report
74
Eaglekiwiposted 14 years ago
Why not let the main players fight it out( God and Satan) and
the rest of us go have a global picnic

Let Freedom Ring
reply report
1. 59
  Ron Montgomeryposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  They already did in an episode of Southpark. Satan lost.
  reply report
  81
  earnestshubposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  I find South Park makes a lot more sense than the Bible!
  reply report
  59
  Ron Montgomeryposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  It has better writers.
  reply report
  67
  B.Z. Alixandreposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  I concur...until the tenth season at least, no even then.
  reply report
  81
  earnestshubposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  The Simpsons are another source of truth!
  reply report
  0
  sandra rinckposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Praise Jebus!
  reply report
  81
  earnestshubposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  ... and the writers of that episode!
  reply report
  59
  Ron Montgomeryposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Careful with that; some very vocal folks from another forum will blast you for praising the Simpsons and then will preach the gospel of Ayn Rand. You don't want that to happen do you?
  reply report
  81
  earnestshubposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  I don't know Ron, that does sound like a bit of sport!
  reply report
2. 0
  \Brenda Scullyposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  how did you come up with such a good idea well done....
  reply report
  60
  fishmoxposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  That was over and done with, at the cross, more than two thousand years ago. God won, andSatan knows he's really running out of time, literally, and will soon step out into an eternity of fire,just that he's kinda like trying to show he can still dance around the ring.
  reply report
59
martinrocks_88posted 14 years ago

now lets start wid DOGS!!!
reply report
61
David Bowmanposted 14 years ago
reply report
61
David Bowmanposted 14 years ago
reply report
1. 74
  Eaglekiwiposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  That is the cutest !!!
  reply report
59
Ron Montgomeryposted 14 years ago
reply report
82
LondonGirlposted 14 years ago
Wonderful cat pics - the monorail is a particularly good one!
reply report
81
earnestshubposted 14 years ago
That is very funny!
reply report
88
Paragliderposted 14 years ago
Who's the one with the pipe?
reply report
1. 81
  earnestshubposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  It's mark twain Paraglider.
  reply report
  88
  Paragliderposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Thanks - I thought it looked like what Mark Twain should look like, but don't remember ever seeing his picture before.
  reply report
0
kasanovaposted 14 years ago
No Scientific evidence that God created the Universe. But for sure, the Humans Created the God. 3000 years back, we didn't know/have this many God..not sure how many more Gods will come up in 3000 years into the future.
reply report
80
Uninvited Writerposted 14 years ago
This is perfect for HubPages:

reply report
1. 60
  onthewritesideposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  How perfect is that!
  reply report
2. 60
  usmanali81posted 14 years agoin reply to this
  LOL
  reply report
50
tormentedsoul666posted 14 years ago
so...all of you hypocritical backwashes think that just because people like me believe differently than self-centered ones as yourselves...means people that believe the bible is a load of crap, go to some place Christians call Hell? well, im Agnostic, and Thelema Athiest. I believe that what you "Christians" seem to not understand. Following your own rules. Dont force things on other people. Do not judge, for you will be judged in the end. No fictional Character named Jesus is coming back. dead means dead. Thats it.
reply report
1. 60
  fishmoxposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  gosh, you ARE a tormented soul.
  reply report
0
wordscribe41posted 14 years ago
I think we should get back to the cats now:

reply report
80
Uninvited Writerposted 14 years ago
Of course not. You can be a decent person and not be religious...
reply report
1. 60
  usmanali81posted 14 years agoin reply to this
  decency is, you don't rape and if some one rapes JUST KILL HIM. But you people don't and let them rape repeatidly after being freed from jail.
  
  Religion guides you in this regard specially ISLAM
  reply report
  60
  mohitmisraposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  But Islam doesn't mean fanaticism. Do you think the prophets before Muhammad did a useless job??
  reply report
  81
  earnestshubposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  So your solution is... kill. How sophisticated of you!
  reply report
  0
  sandra rinckposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Seems to be the solution to everything. No chances, no repentance, no forgiveness just kill them all and then focus on killing each other because they are all sinners and deserve to die....blah, blah, blah.
  reply report
  81
  earnestshubposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Yep! Same old same old.... No revelations here!
  reply report
  60
  usmanali81posted 14 years agoin reply to this
  I am asking both of you.
  
  If a rapist comes and rapes you, your innocent mother, sister, wife or juvenile daughter which punishment will you prefer for him ???
  reply report
  60
  fishmoxposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  The spiritual man in me would say: God said, "vengeance is mine, saith the Lord, I will repay".
  
  But the old man, the flesh ?
  
  Heehaw !
  
  I ain' gon' kill him.
  I'll douse him with gas, light him up, then extinghuish the flame and take him to hospital as quick as I can AFTER I cut off his tongue, gouge out his eyes and pierce his eardrum, AFTER I cap him in both knees and shoot off his arms from the elbow.
  
  Better than killing him.
  reply report
  65
  aka-djposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  O U C H !
  Maybe death would be a preferred option, in this case.
  reply report
  60
  fishmoxposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  That is the point of punishment.
  Killing a proven rapist/murderer is much more merciful than inflicting pain and punishment.
  Tell the truth, the penal system in "civilized" countries is no longer "penal".
  Criminals get to finish college, or get a GED, they get 3 square meals a day, fresh clothes, good medical attention, somethings they don't get outside prison.
  Not to mention sex anytime they want it.
  The question is : is this type of approach working ?
  I don't know the statistics, but given the number of repeat offenders getting in the news I don't think it's working all that well.
  Prison ought to be what the name denotes, not just loss of freedom, but pain, pain, pain.
  I don't mean torture, but pain can be inflicted many ways.
  Loss of dignity, for one.
  Hell, these criminals are treated with more dignity than they accorded their victims.
  Sheriff Arpaio over in Arizona is getting it, but just a little.
  reply report
  88
  Bibowenposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  People that rape and murder should be put to death by the government. They should not be perpetually tortured in prisons by prison guards or whomever. Unbelievers often chastise God because of hell, but they, in turn, want to torture prisoners for the rest of their life (in essence, creating a hell for those they disapprove of). Prisons should not be perpetual hell-houses. A man that exercises life-threatening force against others should be killed for it. If he steals, he should pay back what he steals. Our prison population would diminish rapidly if those were enacted.
  
  I'm not saying that because of pragmatism (if we kill them, it would reduce our prison population). Rather, it is just for a man to die who takes another man's life (and I think that extends to rape and kidnapping). Furthermore, it is just for a thief to pay back more than what he stole.
  reply report
  60
  fishmoxposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Oh, I hear what you're saying.
  Unfortunately, things don't work that way in the real world nowadays.
  Like I said, the freakin' criminal gets more rights and compassion than their victims, and given the luxury of most prisons that prisoners enjoy, hey, nobody minds going back there anymore, even if they get sodomized.
  Hell of a lot better than living conditions outside, you know what I'm saying ?
  
  While it is true that some death penalty convicts who were executed and/or about to be executed may have been or may be innocent, doing away with the punishment of death is still not the answer.
  The answer should be sought in the way investigation, evidence, and trials were conducted and gathered.
  That being the case, though, if I were to take the law into my hands, what I described would exactly be what I will do.
  Cut off his dick and immobilize him in such a way that he has to suffer the indignation of having somebody wipe his butt for him and hold his twang while he leaks.
  Plus the pain of daily therapy for his burns.
  I mean, what I described was not fictional.
  Actually happened in my country.
  This guy murdered this kid's father, went to prison, came out ten years later, the boy was grown, in his twenties, kidnapped him, burned him, put out the fire, then took the guy to hospital.
  The perpetrator did not go to prison more than two years, because they couldn't charge him with even attempted homicide.
  As a matter of fact, the act of bringing his father's murderer to the hospital was so well exploited by his defense lawyer it was considered a mitigating circumstance by the judge.
  For the rest of his life, he was an invalid in a hospital who had to be fed by his wife, his grandchildren, and his nurses.
  The psychological pain hurts more than the physical.
  reply report
  59
  Ron Montgomeryposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Fish, your commentary is wise and enlightening but worthy of broader exposure. I invite you to join our discussion in the second ammendment forum.
  reply report
  60
  fishmoxposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  will look for it, ron. right now, am catching some shuteye. too much sugar in my system. just came from my grandson's birthday.
  there was this big cake......catcha later.
  reply report
  88
  Paragliderposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Garbage. Unbelievers don't waste time chastising that in which they don't believe. Because that would be stupid, wouldn't it?
  reply report
2. 60
  fishmoxposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Oh, I'm not going to argue that, sir, not one bit.
  On the other hand, I've known a lot of "religious" and "free thinking" people who are so indecent I've got a good mind to beat up on them if I find them within a mile of people I cherish, so to speak.
  
  As I understand it, Billy Joel, my all time favorite, is an atheist, and I find him to be a pretty decent fellow.
  reply report
82
quicksandposted 14 years ago
Let's not forget cats. Someone suggested that they be brought on.
reply report
1. 81
  earnestshubposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  I've run out of fresh cats, but I second the suggestion!
  reply report
59
martinrocks_88posted 14 years ago

Don't talk rubbish in my place!!!
reply report
1. 81
  earnestshubposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Well done.. and timely.
  reply report
  82
  quicksandposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Cats "is" the goodest thing that could happen to a forum!
  reply report
2. 80
  Uninvited Writerposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  I love this
  reply report
59
Ron Montgomeryposted 14 years ago
Anyone remember Fritz?
reply report
1. 81
  earnestshubposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  No just Felix
  reply report
2. 0
  wordscribe41posted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Absolutely! I love Fritz the Cat. How about Eek the Cat?
  reply report
88
Bibowenposted 14 years ago
Great way to shut down a debate. Plenty of scorn; lots of kitty litter. No argument.
reply report
1. 59
  Ron Montgomeryposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  "According to aethism is only a wrrong and illogical concept. We can not say that there is no God. How could this be possible? Does this whole great universe made at its own? Did a human make itself?
  "
  
  This gobbledy-goo is the thesis to be debated?
  
  I'd rather look at cats.
  reply report
  88
  Bibowenposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  The thesis isn't well-stated. However, rejection of God is 1) wrong and 2) illogical. I think that is the point the author is making. Our best observations point us to an initial Creator of the universe.
  
  As for looking at cats, knock yourself out. Why don't you do that on another site devoted to cats (I'll answer it for you)? It's because you desire to stop any rational discussion about the illogic of atheism. Since you have no argument, you fill this thread with kitty litter to pretend there is no issue. People that tire of the discussion have run out of things to say and those people ought to go do something else. It's the response of the solipsist. It all has to center around him and what he wants. The topic is not going his way, so he has to ruin it for everyone else.
  
  It's actually a perfect illustration to see the atheist's approach. Now that he has no argument, he throws garbage in the way of rational discourse (like "If you say that God created the universe, then who created God"?). There is no positive argument from atheism, just heaps of doubt and scorn on the believer's position.
  
  I'm not the moderator; I have no power, only moral authority to say that if you're not on topic, get out.
  reply report
  63
  Mishaposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Even more Christian. Thank you for reminding me why I don't sign up for any cult, and yours in particular
  reply report
  59
  Mark Knowlesposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  LOL
  
  What observations are those? LOL
  
  It is clever, therefore there must be a god?
  
  Let's talk logic:
  
  100% lack of evidence for a god. Logically, there is no god. Allow me to introduce you to evolution. If you genuinely understand evolution, you must understand that there is no room for a guiding hand - none. Therefore evolution proves there is no god. Thank you and good night.
  
  You are wrong. And have been proven so.
  
  reply report
  59
  Ron Montgomeryposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Welcome back Mark, unfortunately you're probably gonna get snipped. We decided while you were away that dead babies(and probably baby sandwiches) aren't funny.
  reply report
  59
  Mark Knowlesposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  We shall see. I see nothing funny in dead babies, especially when they are used to make a religious point.
  
  Fortunately - this is a joke and the baby lived on to be a happy, productive atheist. Albeit with a strange dislike for lettuce.
  reply report
  88
  Bibowenposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Who are "we" Indianapolis? Is this atheist censorship? Look, MK gets his kicks from posters like that. I mean, I think that someone that would even post something like that should be locked up. But, you are not really going to censor him, are you?
  
  MK, don't let them get away with it! Stand up for your rights! They're taking away your free speech! Atheists, you're not going to let them get away with is, are you?
  
  Actually, the baby poster has a lot more truth to it than the one that has Ben Franklin and Thomas Jefferson in it (where do you guys get this soft-core propaganda anyway?). Most atheists go to bat for doctors that will stick a stiletto in the back of a baby's neck, suck his brains out, and crush his skull. I'll admit, it's not exactly the same thing, but it's only a few steps away. I mean, I just don't trust people would would stab an infant in the back of the neck or burn him to death with salt, would you?
  
  Also, MK, while you're fighting off the censors I'd pull out the science books too. I'm not sure why you brought up evolution based on the post I gave. The only thing you proved is that you need to get someone to proof your posts before you press "submit."
  reply report
  59
  Ron Montgomeryposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  You may have missed it, but someone published a hub on dead baby jokes a couple of days ago - it got yanked.
  reply report
  59
  Mark Knowlesposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  LOL
  
  You said:
  
  I asked you to back this up and pointed out the fact that evolution proves there is no god.
  
  Surely this is the rational approach? No?
  
  Maybe if I put it more simply for you:
  
  What "best observations" have "we" made that point "us" to an initial creator?
  reply report
  60
  mohitmisraposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Hi Mark good to have you back
  reply report
  59
  Mark Knowlesposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Thanks Mohit. I had a great vacation - I did not look in a computer for two weeks.
  
  Heaven.
  reply report
  60
  mohitmisraposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  great.
  reply report
  60
  usmanali81posted 14 years agoin reply to this
  LOL
  
  Hey Mark,
  
  Where were you, i thought you were dead. But now it seems you were hibernating
  
  reply report
  60
  mohitmisraposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Mark guess why Usmanali doesn't put his picture on his profile.
  He is a crusader against the Freemasons who are after him as he is a very important man, all the money of the Freemasons is going to be used to hunt him down.
  reply report
  59
  Ron Montgomeryposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Moral authority? I don't recall FSM granting you such authority. "rejection of God is wrong" Brilliant. I think the cartoon cats could have written a more meaningful statement.
  
  For the record, I am not an atheist, but I am tempted to become one whenever I read posts such as yours and those of the death penalty cult. I've always had difficulty reconciling the notion of a perfect god that could create such evil minds.
  reply report
82
quicksandposted 14 years ago
Shut down?
reply report
60
Colebabieposted 14 years ago
There are just some religious people who judge others and have no right to do so. What some religions deem as "decent" is such a strict narrow vision. "Billy Joel has been married and divorced three times, has abused illegal substances, and attempted suicide."- is all that some people will see without seeing that as a person he could be so much more. Someone can't say "If you have done this you are a bad person." I don't feel it is right to be judged by others, especially when all they see is your faults.
reply report
1. 88
  Bibowenposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Who are those religious people who have a right to judge and who doesn't? Second, your attitude appears to be highly judgmental. Who are you to say who has a right to judge and who doesn't?
  
  Just more kitty litter; although there is a little more argument now.
  reply report
  63
  Mishaposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Very Christian of you
  reply report
  60
  Colebabieposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  No one has the right to judge. That's what I'm saying. What? Me saying that others shouldn't judge is judgmental of me? Oh please.
  reply report
  88
  Bibowenposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Your accusation that religious people are judgmental (your original point) is judgmental. You presume to characterize "some" religious people as being judgmental. But, who do you think you are to make such an indictment? Second, it's disingenuous: we (yes, that includes you) make judgments all the time. We judge that the Nazis were wrong to kill the Jews, for example. Furthermore, we berate men like Adolph Eichmann that did not judge what the Nazis were doing. At his trial, Eichmann said "I was just following orders." He did not judge the Nazi behavior; he went along with it like a good little boy. Maybe he didn't want to appear judgmental either. But he was put to death: he participated in the Holocaust because at some point earlier, he refused to morally judge the Nazis. People who do not judge evil behavior usually become moral coconspirators in those wrong actions.
  
  There are plenty of people on this post that judge Christians regularly all the while scorning them for being judgmental!
  
  If you think that religious people are judgmental, then set the example--stop judging others. But a better choice is to stop the hypocrisy that you're not judgmental and exercise good judgment.
  reply report
  60
  Colebabieposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Maybe I wasn't clear in my original post. Of course we all judge. We have to. We have to make judgement calls in decisions in life. I didn't say that I wasn't judgmental. I didn't generalize all religious people either. There are a select few that feel it is there duty to impose their religion on others. We judge others to determine if we want to be friends with them, hire them, etc. I suppose what I meant to say is that it is frustrating to me to be judged by a person based on their religion when that is not my religion. I know that that is what they believe, and it is appropriate to keep it to themselves. But I just don't like being told that I'm going to hell for being me.
  reply report
  48
  badcompany99posted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Cole, my fav beach girl without yer reply this person is nothing. You are the fuel that keeps his fire burning, remove the fuel Cole, you are too good for this crap !
  reply report
  88
  Bibowenposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  OK, good. But on what basis do you dismiss religiously-based judgments but accept other other kinds of judgments? What's your criteria? We receive offensive comments regularly, but those comments can't be dismissed merely because they're offensive. Furthermore, the most important thing about religiously-offensive comments like "you're going to hell" is whether or not they're true. I could understand a response that says "I don't believe in hell for the following reasons..."; it least it's rational, even if I don't agree with it. But the fact that you don't like the comment is trivial.
  
  I'm done. You can have the last word on this if you wish.
  reply report
59
Ron Montgomeryposted 14 years ago
reply report
81
earnestshubposted 14 years ago
And I'm asking you... what difference would it make?
Your world is of vengeance and hate, so it is easy to see what you would do.
reply report
1. 60
  usmanali81posted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Yes, my dear, you are absolutly RIGHT. We HATE rapists because we love the victims.
  
  Regarding you, your answer clearly indicates who you love the most THE RAPISTS not your innocent mother ...
  reply report
  81
  earnestshubposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  No, my reply finds no victory in vengeance.
  reply report
  60
  mohitmisraposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  The fact is there is rape in Muslim countries like anywhere else in the world.
  Its man and not the religion who is to blame. No religion teaches you to rape.
  reply report
59
Ron Montgomeryposted 14 years ago

JUDGE NOT!
reply report
60
Colebabieposted 14 years ago
Thanks BC, as always I appreciate it. I guess I should just learn to cierre mi boca! It's raining todayyyyyy But I might be going to the west coast this weekend!
reply report
1. 48
  badcompany99posted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Yer way too good to take part in that shit Cole, I wouldnt even lower myself to reply to that. Have fun on the forums and dont let a loser wind you up, jeeez I wish I was going to the west coast but I may hit Amsterdam for 3 days in August, just some windowshopping, ya know
  reply report
  60
  Colebabieposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  They don't wind me up, don't worry. I reply between study sessions, keeps my comeback skills strong! Amsterdam sounds fun, I've never been. But I think you're too good for "windowshopping"
  reply report
  48
  badcompany99posted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Twas a joke moi friend, but hey its cheaper than all the wining and dining and then they end up being a moody cow. Saves all that grief
  reply report
60
Colebabieposted 14 years ago
But eliminates the opportunity for love. ♥
reply report
1. 48
  badcompany99posted 14 years agoin reply to this
  I knew there was a reason I really like you, a romantic like the Captain ♥
  reply report
59
Ron Montgomeryposted 14 years ago
reply report
59
Ron Montgomeryposted 14 years ago

And that's the way it is.
Walter Cronkat
reply report
81
earnestshubposted 14 years ago
I must have different lenses on, I see a loving Dad demostrating how much he loves his child in a humerous way. Nothing evil in that surely?
reply report
81
earnestshubposted 14 years ago
I can get that a lot of people would not appreciate that, but the guy eating the baby? I get a different warm feeling off that!
A bit like dressing a baby up in something funny, and how often do people say "my baby so cute I could eat him/her" Take it light folks.
reply report

Post a Reply

jump to first post

Necessary
HubPages Device ID	This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
Login	This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google Recaptcha	This is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
Akismet	This is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google Analytics	This is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic Pixel	This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web Services	This is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
Cloudflare	This is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted Libraries	Javascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)

Features
Google Custom Search	This is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google Maps	Some articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google Charts	This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host API	This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTube	Some articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Vimeo	Some articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Paypal	This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook Login	You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Maven	This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)

Marketing
Google AdSense	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClick	Google provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index Exchange	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Sovrn	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook Ads	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad Marketplace	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexus	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Openx	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon Project	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLift	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say Media	We partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing Pixels	We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking Pixels	We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.

Statistics
Author Google Analytics	This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
Comscore	ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking Pixel	Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
Clicksco	This is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)

Atheism is just wrong concept nothing else

Arts and Design

Autos

Books, Literature, and Writing

Business and Employment

Education and Science

Entertainment and Media

Family and Parenting

Fashion and Beauty

Food and Cooking

Games, Toys, and Hobbies

Gender and Relationships

Health

Holidays and Celebrations

Home and Garden

HubPages Tutorials and Community

Personal Finance

Pets and Animals

Politics and Social Issues

Religion and Philosophy

Sports and Recreation

Technology

Travel and Places

About Us

This website uses cookies

Atheism is just wrong concept nothing else

Related Discussions

This website uses cookies