fund nasa to the hilt

1. 67

   awareposted 14 years ago

   the NASA budget is 9 billion. that's a drop in the bucket compared to the money we've wasted in bailouts and war spending. not to mention forien aide . many see space as a waste of money .but were wasting money left and right. if were gona waste money lets at least do it wisely .

   replyreport
2. 72

   dyonderposted 14 years ago

   Too true; when a species such as ours adamantly refuses to admit coevolution with all the others on this planet (& subsequently destroy them, perceiving many as 'yucky') it's high time we got off it: where else to go than space.

   replyreport
3. 0

   sneakorocksolidposted 14 years ago

   It's a hell of alot better use of money than where it's been going!

   replyreport
4. 61

   tantrumposted 14 years ago

   I don't know nothing about nasa, but aware asked me to post. So
   Hi aware! Good thread! It will be overcrowded eventually

   replyreport
5. 67

   awareposted 14 years ago

   ty for reply the ? isn't spurring much interest. 90 % of all  life that has been on earth is now extinct . thats what this planet does best . if we dont leave it we will face extinction to i think

   replyreport
6. 60

   VENUGOPAL SIVAGNAposted 14 years ago

   For our planet Earth's good, it is better to reduce its population by going to the moon. But what does it mean? Another colonisation? That process will take more than a millennium to colonise it. Imagine... From bricks to cement and labour to finance, all have to go from our earth. What impact will it have here?
   
   We have not yet used more than 50% of earth's surface yet... Siberia... Canada.... Tibet... Brazil.... polar regions.. all these places have plenty of spaces to accommodate humanity. Why should we look for the moon?

   replyreport
   1. 61

      zadrobiposted 14 years agoin reply to this

      I found the moon last night! The search is over.

      replyreport
7. 66

   Make Moneyposted 14 years ago

   A portion of NASA's research is just another arm of the military armaments complex.  I've read that everyone on the face of the earth could live in an area the size of the state of Texas.  Overpopulation is a myth.  Instead of giving up on our planet we need to take care of it better.  We know more about space than our own planet.  Our oceans are now just starting to be mapped.  It is fiction that we will be living on other planets in the future, besides it's not needed, unless we destroy our own planet, with possibly new technologies coming from NASA.  The money spent on NASA could be better spent elsewhere.  Scrap NASA.

   replyreport
8. 79

   jiberishposted 14 years ago

   All I have to say is was it worth all that money to Bomb the Moon, I mean really?

   replyreport
   1. 66

      Make Moneyposted 14 years agoin reply to this

      Possibly new technology for our mining industry here on earth.  Yikes.
      
      Besides zadrobi has already found the moon.  There should be a crater named after him.  The Zadrobi Crater 

      replyreport
   2. 60

      VENUGOPAL SIVAGNAposted 14 years agoin reply to this

      It is a waste of funds to bomb the moon's surface by the NASA. It has not bombed the place where the previous moon missions landed. It just bombed the place where the Indian Chandrayan mission found traces of water. It would have been better if a sharp instrument was sent to dig the surface. The impact on the moon's surface may be dangerous for the moon itself.

      replyreport
   3. 60

      VENUGOPAL SIVAGNAposted 14 years agoin reply to this

      It is a waste of funds to bomb the moon's surface by the NASA. It has not bombed the place where the previous moon missions landed. It just bombed the place where the Indian Chandrayan mission found traces of water. It would have been better if a sharp instrument was sent to dig the surface. The impact on the moon's surface may be dangerous for the moon itself.

      replyreport
   4. 60

      VENUGOPAL SIVAGNAposted 14 years agoin reply to this

      It is a waste of funds to bomb the moon's surface by the NASA. It has not bombed the place where the previous moon missions landed. It just bombed the place where the Indian Chandrayan mission found traces of water. It would have been better if a sharp instrument was sent to dig the surface. The impact on the moon's surface may be dangerous for the moon itself.

      replyreport