You were designed.

1. 80

   skyfireposted 14 years ago

   Really ? Link please or else you lied as usual.
   
   
   Please find his journals and scientific work, i'm waiting.
   
   
   That is typical indian personal attack pattern. If you can't prove yourself show someone wrong. Can't you do better than that mr mishra. Raise your level, come up with better personal remarks when you get pawned

   replyreport
2. 60

   tantrumposted 14 years ago

   Is 'go figure' the new phrase learnt by mohit ?
   
   
   
   go figure !
   

   replyreport
   1. 0

      lyricsingrayposted 14 years agoin reply to this

      who the hell was my designer
      
      Gucci?  Channel, maybe Macy's
      
      

      replyreport
3. 81

   earnestshubposted 14 years ago

   Science has not worked out what life is yet, so naturally a fairy did it!

   replyreport
4. 61

   Cly Walshposted 14 years ago

   A body being intelligent and a person living inside a body? Huh?

   replyreport
   1. 59

      Disappearingheadposted 14 years agoin reply to this

      The point posed is that the intelligence in the design and the how the body works, regulates and protects itself, is of a higher order than the concious intelligence of the person living inside. If man could create a new being, it would never be as good as the being that man is.
      
      You might want to consider say a cat. A cat also is marvelously designed, but the cat could have no comprehension of that design.

      replyreport
      1. 57

         Mark Knowlesposted 14 years agoin reply to this

         Unless you are prepared to accept the hogwash statement that we are incapable of understanding the design, this is nonsense.
         
         You are assuming a design and running away from backing that up with anything other than "you are too feeble minded to understand."
         
         How odd - that is what religion always does. People claim knowledge from no where and then demand that they do not have to back it up. This may have worked in Merthyr Tydfil in 1750, but it does not today. Your lack of knowledge, insight and wisdom is obvious.
         
         A cat is no more "designed," than you or I. It evolved that way. The same as you and I.
         
         If you can back up your statements with something practical and quantifiable - please do, but no one is accepting your easy peasy lemon squeezy answer.

         replyreport
         1. 59

            Disappearingheadposted 14 years agoin reply to this

            Doh! No one ever said that we are incapable of understanding this design. It is only now in the 21st century that we are beginning to understand the workings of the brain for example. There is still much more to learn and given time we might get somewhere nearing understanding it all.
            
            But man is the Johnny-Come-Lately to this party. The design pre-existed when we were banging rocks together and going "ugghh". All we are doing now is gaining an understanding of how things work. None of this how it works could have come about by our original thought, it is a process of discovery of what already was.
            
            Left to you, you think this marvelous design occured by evolutionary accident with no intelligence behind it - just random chance. Just think for a moment about how illogical that is.
            
            Still if you believe that a million monkeys with a million typewriters after a million years could come up with the works of Shakespear then that is even more illogical and unintelligent that believing in the existence of a creator.

            replyreport
            1. 57

               Mark Knowlesposted 14 years agoin reply to this

               LOL
               
               So come up with an argument that is not "I don't understand it, therefore there is a god."
               
               Evolution is anything but random chance. The fact that you do not understand it does not mean there is a god.
               
               Logical is an invisible super being who left you instructions written in ancient Greek? How logical is that? LOLOLOLO
               
               Dear me. Keep on repeating that you do not understand therefore there is a god is silly.

               replyreport
               1. 75

                  rocketjsquposted 14 years agoin reply to this

                  I would be interested in hearing what you understand about evolution.  The way I understand it, it is a theory of a collection of scientific propositions that have been assembled to draw people to a conclusion.  Is Darwin the primary originator of the theory of evolution?  Are there any scientific records that pre-date Darwin?  It seems to me that a science as important as evolution would have ancient records describing the beginning phases of the evolutionary process.  A history of a God dates back to the beginning of mans record keeping thousands of years ago.  Do historical records account for anything or is all history a big fable?  If you are not an eye witness, how do you know which history to believe?

                  replyreport
                  1. 57

                     Mark Knowlesposted 14 years agoin reply to this

                     Sorry - that is too many questions all in one go. Please ask one question at a time if you genuinely want an answer.
                     
                     But - to answer your overall statement. No - Darwin was not the first to suggest the theory of evolution. Amimaxander suggested  the development of life and the evolutionary development of man from other animals some when around 600 BC.
                     
                     The Christian church attacked and destroyed much of the knowledge that contradicted it's dogmatic belief during the dark ages.
                     
                     So - yes - evolution predates your religion by some time.  I do not think earlier religions were quite so aggressive in attacking knowledge that we learned rather than had handed to a select few by an invisible super being.
                     
                     But - I agree - God is the easy answer.
                     
                     So - you think your religious tomes are the same as the fossil records? And your political book counts as "history" even though this record started million of years after the event? The fossil records are the same as writing written to control you a few million years after the event?
                     
                     This is some of what I understand about evolution:
                     
                     http://hubpages.com/forum/topic/7572

                     replyreport
                  2. 58

                     Beelzedadposted 14 years agoin reply to this

                     Don't you mean the history of many gods, in which one religion replaces another or the fact there are many gods under the banner of various religions?
                     
                     Never mind which history to believe, which god to believe is the question?

                     replyreport
               2. 59

                  Disappearingheadposted 14 years agoin reply to this

                  OK I'm wrong. Million monkeys it is then. Doh!

                  replyreport
                  1. 57

                     Mark Knowlesposted 14 years agoin reply to this

                     As I said, demonstrating your ignorance of evolution is not going to persuade me of anything. All you have said is "I don't understand biology, therefore there is a god."
                     
                     Not a convincing argument.

                     replyreport
            2. 58

               Beelzedadposted 14 years agoin reply to this

               Where was religion at that time? If creationism was true, man could walk, talk, write and read scriptures from the get go. There were no cavemen going "ugghh" in the bible.

               replyreport
            3. 61

               Cly Walshposted 14 years agoin reply to this

               There are no accidents.

               replyreport
      2. 61

         Cly Walshposted 14 years agoin reply to this

         "does it not seem strange that the body is more intelligent than the person living inside"
         
         Like I said, "A body being intelligent and a person living inside a body? Huh?"
         
         The original post you pose as a challenge is quite different from your explanation in reply to my original post. The two are antithetic.

         replyreport
5. 80

   skyfireposted 14 years ago

   Spot on.

   replyreport
6. 0

   Twenty One Daysposted 14 years ago

   Theory only proves the existence of ideology, possibility.
   history -recorded or verbal- is the only factual evidence to base any consideration upon....
   
   ...else all is speculation, conjecture and does no common good to prove the argument nor for humanity as an individual or collective entity...
   
   philosophy 101.
   
   
   
   ps, the burden of proof always lies upon the shoulders of the one seeking. It is because of such considerations one looks for 'answers'. Whether by ration or madness, the evidence of any thing is provable only to the seeker when found.

   replyreport
7. 0

   Twenty One Daysposted 14 years ago

   Evolution: there is no substantial proof or factual evidence to support the argument of the existence of this particular possibility. It is theoretical. So the burden of proof falls on the shoulders of the one attempting to prove or disprove. Same as water on mars, time travel, fairy dust or 'god'. The one trying to prove or disprove must do so in order to 'stake-the-claim' of argument -pro or con.
   
   the one who already believes has no cause to prove, for in some manner they have evidence or fact/history discovered, learned or experienced to support their belief.

   replyreport
8. 81

   earnestshubposted 14 years ago

   I was not designed by a fairy!

   replyreport
9. 0

   china manposted 14 years ago

   If there is a designer / creator it is obviously a committee.
   
   Only a committee could design the sexual parts of a human body and put a toilet in the middle of the playing field !

   replyreport
   1. 81

      earnestshubposted 14 years agoin reply to this

      Good observation!

      replyreport
10. 81

    earnestshubposted 14 years ago

    Woof! Woof! Hilarious! Woof Woof!

    replyreport
11. 80

    skyfireposted 14 years ago

    How do you know that ? Call from skype ?

    replyreport