British Prime Minister Announced New World Order. Anyone Catch That?
The new world order is the economic control of the world by international bankers. It is a one world economic system that has abused the middle classes through liar loans and scam rules from Basil 2 that allowed banks to hide toxic assets OFF balance sheet. This international banker class has now robbed treasuries to bail itself out after having become massively rich by scamming.
Some say the CFR is a front for this group. Bill Clinton and Newt Gingrich are members. It doesn't matter whether they are repubs or dems. They all seek this new world order. The battle is between the international bankers and the middle classes that can be subject to easy money scams and raids on their treasuries at any time.
Gordon Brown announced this new world order on 4/2/2009. They don't even bother to hide it anymore.
96- earnestshub
- 7293 posts
- Joined: 15 months ago
- Hubs: 68
- Fans: 556
bgamall wrote:
The new world order is the economic control of the world by international bankers. It is a one world economic system that has abused the middle classes through liar loans and scam rules from Basil 2 that allowed banks to hide toxic assets OFF balance sheet. This international banker class has now robbed treasuries to bail itself out after having become massively rich by scamming.
Some say the CFR is a front for this group. Bill Clinton and Newt Gingrich are members. It doesn't matter whether they are repubs or dems. They all seek this new world order. The battle is between the international bankers and the middle classes that can be subject to easy money scams and raids on their treasuries at any time.
Gordon Brown announced this new world order on 4/2/2009. They don't even bother to hide it anymore.I did not see or hear it, but am only mildly surprised.The theft has got to the stage where no one should be surprised by anything these sick money grabbers do!
Thanks for the heads up. I will catch it on BBC.
96- pgrundy
- 1905 posts
- Joined: 2 years ago
- Hubs: 221
- Fans: 2064
And yet, no matter what happens I seem to make the same no money I've always not made.
Seriously, I think it will all collapse at some point, and when it does what will this cabal have if it truly exists? Do they want my woodpile? My dog? My Goodwill wardrobe? I don't know, I don't HAVE anything of value (not even unwanted gold and silver jewelry to trade in for cash today!), so, you know, it's going to be hard for them to take all the crap I don't have anyway.
I guess I could become soylent green or something. But there again, I've already outlived my parents so taking my life, big deal. Already had a great one.
What is their purpose? World domination? To what end? What do they want to do with all that power? I mean, there has to be some motive doesn't there?
90- marisuewrites
- 330 posts
- Joined: 2 years ago
- Hubs: 209
- Fans: 816
Some things are out of our control now. Makes me feel helpless, yet as Pam said, I have nothing anyone would want, but I hate to lose even that. Just don't touch my satellite TV and Remote or computer, baby!! Or the dog. The husband? WELLLLL
) They'd bring him back, they always do.
Is there some giant kill the world plan? Perhaps. Guess something has to get us.
Meantime, plant those tomatoes.
97- Amanda Severn
- 410 posts
- Joined: 16 months ago
- Hubs: 49
- Fans: 357
If you've any doubt about the respect our Gordon commands from his electorate, then catch up with this glorious Youtube clip. It's proving popular with the British viewers. Already around two million hits inside a week:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94lW6Y4tBXs
Really, does anyone believe this nonsense about world leaders scamming the electorate via the banking system? The truth is that they have to be seen to do something, and this is that something. They can't come out of that high profile meeting hanging their heads and saying, Ohmygod, we're so screwed, even if that's what they're thinking (which it probably is!)
100- Mark Knowles
- 10424 posts
- Joined: 2 years ago
- Hubs: 264
- Fans: 2202
Amanda Severn wrote:
If you've any doubt about the respect our Gordon commands from his electorate, then catch up with this glorious Youtube clip. It's proving popular with the British viewers. Already around two million hits inside a week:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94lW6Y4tBXs
Really, does anyone believe this nonsense about world leaders scamming the electorate via the banking system? The truth is that they have to be seen to do something, and this is that something. They can't come out of that high profile meeting hanging their heads and saying, Ohmygod, we're so screwed, even if that's what they're thinking (which it probably is!)This is not about scamming. It is about transferring wealth from the middle classes to the very tiny upper crust. Power. Control. Wealth. I hesitate to use the word "money" because I can't even say for sure we will still have money by the time this has finished going through it's inevitable cycle - electronic world credits? possibly?. You think the banking sector lost a lot of money last year? Wait till this year's losses come out. And be sure the governments will print more money to fill the gap.
The problem Amanda is this: The treasuries would not have been raided by these fascist (socialism controlled by the private sector) banks if the nations would have had the power to take these banks temporarily into nationalization. They refused to do so but if they had done so the BONDHOLDERS of the bank corporate bonds would have had to give up some of their investment, and we would not be facing the possibility of massive inflation down the road.
But Bernanke came along and said that the United States lacked the sovereign power to nationalize the international banks like Citibank. Roubini has said failure to nationalize the weak international banks will DOUBLE the bailout money necessary from the taxpayers.
Think about it Amanda. First they stole from the middle class by selling liar loans. Then they scammed investors and pension funds by selling the crap bonds created from the liar loans. Then they made money off the taxpayers by being too big to fail and by not allowing their corporate bondholders to take a hit. They were protecting their swaps, their derivative positions and their bond positions.
Here are some quotes about the New World Order from http://www.crossroad.to/articles2/006/migration-2.htm
"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis..."[1] David Rockefeller
"I see a world of open borders, open trade and, most importantly, open minds; a world that celebrates the common heritage that belongs to all the world's people.... I see a world building on the emerging new model of European unity. ... [T]he United Nations is the place to build international support and consensus for meeting the other challenges we face.... the threats to the environment, terrorism... international drug trafficking... refugees.... [W]e must join together in a new compact -- all of us -- to bring the United Nations into the 21st century."[2] Former President George H. W. Bush
"Globalization is not a random-walk process. It moves forward according to a tangible, coherent and well-planned strategy." Patrick Wood, The Globalization StrategyMy point then, Amanda, is that these people seem to have a lofty goal, but really they are just thieving money changers. Nothing has changed. Just the plan is more comprehensive.
Your video proves the point, Amanda, that the taxpayer is getting hit with a potential devaluation of both the pound and the dollar down the road. That is stealing. Jefferson warned about private banks manipulating currency through deflation and inflation to steal from the people. The revolutionary war was fought to rid the US of banker prison.
And yet the middle classes, including the American one most of all, are simply asleep as they are being robbed. And the robbers are the formulators of the "global village".
Even the stock markets are manipulated by these people through the hedge funds.- 97
- Amanda Severn
- 410 posts
- Joined: 16 months ago
- Hubs: 49
- Fans: 357
You're talking about America in the main here, which is fair enough if that's where you come from. The British government has gone about their banking bail-outs in a different way. We can, and have nationalised, or part nationalised. Other countries have had to take similar steps. The USA is keen to preserve the right of the individual to get as wealthy as possible off the backs of others, but this doesn't apply globally.
- 97
- Amanda Severn
- 410 posts
- Joined: 16 months ago
- Hubs: 49
- Fans: 357
Mark Knowles wrote:
Amanda Severn wrote:
If you've any doubt about the respect our Gordon commands from his electorate, then catch up with this glorious Youtube clip. It's proving popular with the British viewers. Already around two million hits inside a week:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94lW6Y4tBXs
Really, does anyone believe this nonsense about world leaders scamming the electorate via the banking system? The truth is that they have to be seen to do something, and this is that something. They can't come out of that high profile meeting hanging their heads and saying, Ohmygod, we're so screwed, even if that's what they're thinking (which it probably is!)This is not about scamming. It is about transferring wealth from the middle classes to the very tiny upper crust. Power. Control. Wealth. I hesitate to use the word "money" because I can't even say for sure we will still have money by the time this has finished going through it's inevitable cycle - electronic world credits? possibly?. You think the banking sector lost a lot of money last year? Wait till this year's losses come out. And be sure the governments will print more money to fill the gap.
Mark, they can print more money. Of course they will do so. After all, they've thrown away the rulebook now. But the more money there is in the pool, the less it is worth. Money has a value when it is scarce. Less so when it is plentiful.
Amanda, you need to realize that the British and American definition of nationalization is confusing the public. They define nationalization as the government taking the bad assets on their books and giving the banks good treasury debt. That nationalization is NOT nationalization. The bad bank plan is a rip off of the taxpayer. The PPIP in the US is a bad bank plan. If the toxic loan bonds tank, the taxpayer will bear the risk. Same for what Britain is doing.
REAL nationalization requires the bank corporate bondholders to share the pain (like the US is making General Motors do) and take a haircut. That is NOT the nationalization that the Obama or Brown regimes are talking about.
I don't personally dislike these people. But remember they have sold their souls for money. They have catered to the international bankers who are raiding the treasuries of BOTH the USA and Britain!
Amanda, you must see that this is all smoke to confuse you. Britain is in massive debt and the pound is in big trouble.- 97
- Amanda Severn
- 410 posts
- Joined: 16 months ago
- Hubs: 49
- Fans: 357
I don't doubt that for even one second. I know that they are in way over their heads, and so are we. Life here in the South-east of England still has a veneer of normality, but fresh cracks are appearing daily. I now know six people in my immediate circle who have been made unemployed since October last year, and not a one of them has been re-employed. House prices are tumbling at a dizzying rate. The high streets are looking worryingly empty as shop after shop closes. If this is all part of a grand plan to rob us all of our money and relocate it in the coffers of some tiny elite, then it's a pretty sick plan, and it's also one doomed to failure, because if everyone's unemployed, then who is it that will be providing the fantasy lifestyle that this so-called elite must surely crave. There has to be strata in society in order to prop up that elite, and if they're bright enough to mastermind the corralling of 99% of the world's assets, then they must surely know that.
Ah Amanda, but you need to realize that these people are gamblers. They also are in a position of strength in the time of weakness. Look at this, Amanda. This link shows what people predicted. Banks will buy up each others assets and the losses will be on the taxpayer, not on the banks. This is such a CONTINUING scam.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Bailedout … ;ccode=TBD
98- Dolores Monet
- 231 posts
- Joined: 10 months ago
- Hubs: 93
- Fans: 472
If I remember, George Bush, the elder, made a lot of noise about the new world order back during his presidency. It's not new, he let the cat out of the bag long ago.
Yes Dolores and so did Gerald Ford speak about the New World Order. I wrote a hub about One World Government. What I said essentially is that the governments are remaining separate, but the global banking system is virtually integrated and the bankers in control control the finances of the world.
Whether the next step of more sovereign power being given up will come to pass remains to be seen. The US balked at a financial zar who would have controlled all governments. Europe wanted that.- 100
- Mark Knowles
- 10424 posts
- Joined: 2 years ago
- Hubs: 264
- Fans: 2202
Amanda Severn wrote:
Mark Knowles wrote:
Amanda Severn wrote:
If you've any doubt about the respect our Gordon commands from his electorate, then catch up with this glorious Youtube clip. It's proving popular with the British viewers. Already around two million hits inside a week:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94lW6Y4tBXs
Really, does anyone believe this nonsense about world leaders scamming the electorate via the banking system? The truth is that they have to be seen to do something, and this is that something. They can't come out of that high profile meeting hanging their heads and saying, Ohmygod, we're so screwed, even if that's what they're thinking (which it probably is!)This is not about scamming. It is about transferring wealth from the middle classes to the very tiny upper crust. Power. Control. Wealth. I hesitate to use the word "money" because I can't even say for sure we will still have money by the time this has finished going through it's inevitable cycle - electronic world credits? possibly?. You think the banking sector lost a lot of money last year? Wait till this year's losses come out. And be sure the governments will print more money to fill the gap.
Mark, they can print more money. Of course they will do so. After all, they've thrown away the rulebook now. But the more money there is in the pool, the less it is worth. Money has a value when it is scarce. Less so when it is plentiful.
Exactly my point. When you discover that your money is worthless - you will be more inclined to accept the new world currency. Every pound printed makes the pounds you own now worth less.
Hey Mark I can see the inflation vigilantes just chomping at the bit to drive the price of oil higher. I mean we have gasoline coming out the ying yang (whereever that is) and the price keeps gong up.
If we get a whiff, even a half a whiff, of inflation down the road oil will be like gold before the governments decided at G20 to sell gold:) Oil will be really high and we will pay heavily.- 100
- Mark Knowles
- 10424 posts
- Joined: 2 years ago
- Hubs: 264
- Fans: 2202
bgamall wrote:
Hey Mark I can see the inflation vigilantes just chomping at the bit to drive the price of oil higher. I mean we have gasoline coming out the ying yang (whereever that is) and the price keeps gong up.
If we get a whiff, even a half a whiff, of inflation down the road oil will be like gold before the governments decided at G20 to sell gold:) Oil will be really high and we will pay heavily.I was trying to explain this to some one else the other day. Simple fact is - if you own it, it will be worth less. If you need to buy it, it will cost more.
The die is cast and I, like everyone else, am totally unsure which way to jump. 
94- Misha
- 10899 posts
- Joined: 2 years ago
- Hubs: 18
- Fans: 1885
still conspiring? uh-oh
Misha you really need to pay attention here. The banks will have the power to artificially bid up their own assets or the assets of the other big banks. if they all bid up each others assets in the auction the taxpayer will get killed, unless everything works out. The risk is on the taxpayer Misha and that is a ponzi against the taxpayers. Maybe it will work out, but maybe it won't. If it doesn't the taxpayer could be on the hook for trillions of dollars more.
You haven't studied Basel 2. Who do you think allowed the banks in the first place to have off balance assets? Who do you think paved the way for toxic loans? Who do you think paved the way for massive derivative bonds based upon those loans? Who do you think allowed the pillaging of small investors and pension funds?
I will give you two international banker names. Phil Gramm and Robert Rubin working within the framework of Basel 2, 1998. There, one a repub and another a dem. And this war is a class war against the middle class waged by the international bankers. It is a war they are winning because people like you don't take this seriously. Don't take it personally:)
When gas goes to 6 dollars a gallon you can remember this post.
