Misha wrote:
HubTub wrote:
Apparently you do not work alone. If this were true, you would not be participating in this forum.
Why?
Because if "she" worked alone "she" would not be spending tremendous hours on the forum making thousands of posts. Therefore, it only stands to reason that "she" does not work alone.
tksensei wrote:
Lita Sorensen wrote:
as I'm sure you know, surveillance and knit picking students doesn't help them.
Actually, many students of English as a Second Language respond very well to specific correction and seek it out eagerly. Generalisms are too darn general.
Didn't they ban you? Just asking.
HubTub wrote:
Misha wrote:
HubTub wrote:
Apparently you do not work alone. If this were true, you would not be participating in this forum.
Why?
Because if "she" worked alone "she" would not be spending tremendous hours on the forum making thousands of posts. Therefore, it only stands to reason that "she" does not work alone.
False assumption. ![]()
Lita Sorensen wrote:
tksensei wrote:
Lita Sorensen wrote:
as I'm sure you know, surveillance and knit picking students doesn't help them.
Actually, many students of English as a Second Language respond very well to specific correction and seek it out eagerly. Generalisms are too darn general.
Didn't they ban you? Just asking.
Didn't you swear never to return to the forums? Just asking.
tksensei wrote:
Lita Sorensen wrote:
tksensei wrote:
Actually, many students of English as a Second Language respond very well to specific correction and seek it out eagerly. Generalisms are too darn general.Didn't they ban you? Just asking.
Didn't you swear never to return to the forums? Just asking.
No. But I'm sure you confuse all your targets. I'd heard from an inside source you were banned.
And good luck with the antelopes, as usual.
Lita Sorensen wrote:
tksensei wrote:
Lita Sorensen wrote:
Didn't they ban you? Just asking.Didn't you swear never to return to the forums? Just asking.
No.
Really? I could have sworn I read a post by you about promising yourself you'd never post again after the last time YOU were banned.
Misha wrote:
HubTub wrote:
Misha wrote:
Why?
Because if "she" worked alone "she" would not be spending tremendous hours on the forum making thousands of posts. Therefore, it only stands to reason that "she" does not work alone.
False assumption.
I don't think it is a false assumption. "She" works with others on the forums (nothing wrong with that), yet "she" claims to work alone. ![]()
tksensei wrote:
Lita Sorensen wrote:
tksensei wrote:
Didn't you swear never to return to the forums? Just asking.No.
Really? I could have sworn I read a post by you about promising yourself you'd never post again after the last time YOU were banned.
That would be incorrect. Political pressure, lol, was applied,
Just fyi.
Bye bye now.
Lita Sorensen wrote:
tksensei wrote:
Lita Sorensen wrote:
No.Really? I could have sworn I read a post by you about promising yourself you'd never post again after the last time YOU were banned.
That would be incorrect.
I guess honesty is overrated anyway.
HubTub wrote:
Misha wrote:
HubTub wrote:
Because if "she" worked alone "she" would not be spending tremendous hours on the forum making thousands of posts. Therefore, it only stands to reason that "she" does not work alone.
False assumption.
I don't think it is a false assumption. "She" works with others on the forums (nothing wrong with that), yet "she" claims to work alone.
She does not "work" on the forums. She hangs out here, which is obvious. Also, your original quote was materially different from what you are saying now. ![]()
HubTub wrote:
Apparently you do not work alone. If this were true, you would not be participating in this forum.
tksensei wrote:
Lita Sorensen wrote:
tksensei wrote:
Really? I could have sworn I read a post by you about promising yourself you'd never post again after the last time YOU were banned.That would be incorrect.
I guess honesty is overrated anyway.
Please. Nobody here takes you seriously...takes you for anything other than what you are at any point. So that to assume I EVER am genuine or ever was towards you proves something over and over and over again that is obvious to all but evidently, your self.
I know, woosh. Luck with the antelopes.
Misha wrote:
HubTub wrote:
Misha wrote:
False assumption.
I don't think it is a false assumption. "She" works with others on the forums (nothing wrong with that), yet "she" claims to work alone.
She does not "work" on the forums. She hangs out here, which is obvious. Also, your original quote was materially different from what you are saying now.
HubTub wrote:
Apparently you do not work alone. If this were true, you would not be participating in this forum.
She's messing with your mind. But at least SHE'S entertaining.
Lita Sorensen wrote:
Misha wrote:
HubTub wrote:
I don't think it is a false assumption. "She" works with others on the forums (nothing wrong with that), yet "she" claims to work alone.She does not "work" on the forums. She hangs out here, which is obvious. Also, your original quote was materially different from what you are saying now.
HubTub wrote:
Apparently you do not work alone. If this were true, you would not be participating in this forum.
She's messing with your mind. But at least SHE'S entertaining.
Messing with my mind is not THAT easy Lita, I thought you learned this already
Or should it be learnt?
Either way, it's almost 2am now here, night everybody ![]()
Lita Sorensen wrote:
tksensei wrote:
Lita Sorensen wrote:
That would be incorrect.I guess honesty is overrated anyway.
Please. to assume I EVER am genuine or ever was proves something over and over and over again .
Yeah, I guess so...
Misha wrote:
HubTub wrote:
Misha wrote:
False assumption.
I don't think it is a false assumption. "She" works with others on the forums (nothing wrong with that), yet "she" claims to work alone.
She does not "work" on the forums. She hangs out here, which is obvious. Also, your original quote was materially different from what you are saying now.
HubTub wrote:
Apparently you do not work alone. If this were true, you would not be participating in this forum.
Sorry but I disagree. "She" does not "hang" on the forums; "she" is "working the forums." ![]()
HubTub wrote:
Misha wrote:
HubTub wrote:
I don't think it is a false assumption. "She" works with others on the forums (nothing wrong with that), yet "she" claims to work alone.She does not "work" on the forums. She hangs out here, which is obvious. Also, your original quote was materially different from what you are saying now.
HubTub wrote:
Apparently you do not work alone. If this were true, you would not be participating in this forum.
Sorry but I disagree. "She" does not "hang" on the forums; "she" is "working the forums."
oh boy.
she's still at it
"working the forums". can you spell P-A-R-A-N-O-I-A?
i believe she is attempting to take the spolight off of herself and her own horrid behavior by posting slander and ignorant assumptions about others.
i am going to report this. this is supposed to be a fun place and unfortunately some mentally ill person has to come in and start ruining the fun for everyone. hopefully HP will address this problem.
p.s. "work alone" is an expression.
it means that, while i have fun in the forums, i am for the most part, a solitary hubber. mostly because i don't know anyone very well.
got that?
good!
i have told you that i wasn't interested in continuing any dialog with you and went on to post on other topics and yet here you are, slandering me and casting ignorant assumptions about me and my character, which i do not appreciate. if they decide to ban me over this, whatever. but i am not going to let you lie about me. "thousands of posts"? um, i have 608, can you even read?
ok, will anyone on this forum who feels that i am "working" them or this forum or schmoozing them for sinister purposes only HubTub knows about or who doubts my sincerity please raise their hand?
thank you.
good night. if i don't log on tomorrow that means i got banned.
meh.
cosette wrote:
HubTub wrote:
Misha wrote:
HubTub wrote:
Misha wrote:
HubTub wrote:
Misha wrote:
HubTub wrote:
Apparently you do not work alone. If this were true, you would not be participating in this forum.
Why?
Because if "she" worked alone "she" would not be spending tremendous hours on the forum making thousands of posts. Therefore, it only stands to reason that "she" does not work alone.
False assumption.
I don't think it is a false assumption. "She" works with others on the forums (nothing wrong with that), yet "she" claims to work alone.
She does not "work" on the forums. She hangs out here, which is obvious. Also, your original quote was materially different from what you are saying now.
Sorry but I disagree. "She" does not "hang" on the forums; "she" is "working the forums."
oh boy.
she's still at it
"working the forums". can you spell P-A-R-A-N-O-I-A?
i believe she is attempting to take the spolight off of herself and her own horrid behavior by posting slander and ignorant assumptions about others.
i am going to report this. this is supposed to be a fun place and unfortunately some mentally ill person has to come in and start ruining the fun for everyone. hopefully HP will address this problem.
Feel free to do as you wish, cosette. I will in turn report you for continually attacking me and now labeling me as being "mentally ill." I have tried numerous times to apologize for my actions on this forum; however, you continue to harass me and now are resorting to name calling.
Em. According to just quick research, she seems to be a real person living on the East Coast who just made a point--but did it kind of in a bad initial tone. And if Misha actually saw her picture, he'd be flirting with her like there is no tomorrow, lol.
I say: Let there be peace among the forum threads. This one was just too silly.
Stalker to the rescue!

working