Homeopathy: More Than Faith In Homeopathic Practice

Belief is All in Your Perspective

How do you see the world?
How do you see the world?

Homeopathy is NOT Placebo or Faith Alone

Bias in the News

Simon Singh wrote an article that shows his bias towards alternative healing. Many others continue to write negative articles and blogs making fun of CAM and specifically homeopathy. Most of these people call themselves a skeptic or raise themselves to the status of a scientist. Their only purpose is to give homeopathy a bad name. We also know that media can put a spin on any article. One person viewing a video presentation may find it validating one side or opinion or another depending upon their point of view.

When detractors use the term 'bias' it is a pegorative against an objective judgment. Assumptions and conclusions are made that may not be a consensus. For instance, when declaring how the health of a pet is assessed by the pet owner. People's own prejudices can muddle clear thinking and point to an obvious distain for natural healing methods.

These people wear the badge of "skeptic", defined as someone who habitually doubts accepted beliefs, with pride. That seems to say it all. I believe we have run up against a wall. There is no opening to hear the opinion of others in order to get a broader view on issues.

Perhaps we should inquire whether all scientists are skeptics, but that is for another story.

Every person has been influenced by his upbringing, his education, his family life, his political views and everything that makes him who he is today. Each and every person has a unique perspective on the world. That is what makes us beautiful. The sad part of this story is that he would like to eliminate all options for all these beautiful people who want to treat their pets in a natural way. He thinks its his way or the highway. He wants to determine what others should do based solely upon his belief system, without regard for another's belief system.

And if you think that science is foolproof, without bias, without having a theoretical starting point, then you are a fool. He belongs to a group of people who call themselves 'scientists' which means providing proof. The question is what is proof and who are you proving it to?

I personally do not feel we should prevent people from seeking out healing modalities for themselves or their animals, just because one or another person gives it a derogatory label.

What's Your Opinion?

Do You Believe Everyone Has a Bias and Cannot Be Completely Objective?

  • Yes
  • No
See results without voting

Freedom of Choice

I beg to differ with those whose theories put alternative medicines on trial. They make claims and demonstrate their personal opinions that show total irreverence to the healers of the world.

Who wouldn't prefer to get well from the power of a placebo instead of taking a drug filled with harmful side-effects. Read the label! Drugs are not only costly, they usually require many more drugs to follow all the side-effects that suppress symptoms and lower the immune system.

  • After all, the placebo effect only works because the patient believes that a pill is supposed to be effective, and presumably Tiddles has no such belief system. So what is going on?

Homeopathics are usually given in the pet's water dish, thus there is no association with pills. And the pet may not even know there is a remedy dissolved in the water. What about the placebo effect for all allopathic medications that are given? Is Tiddles conditioned to feel good when they get their special treat?

  • First, if Tiddles has been conditioned to associate taking pills with improved health then it is conceivable that there is a placebo effect.

Total Hypothesis and without proof. And you call homeopaths unscientific?

  • Second, and more likely, it is possible that the owner selectively sees signs of recovery and falsely attributes them to the homeopathic pill, when they might have been due to natural healing processes or a conventional treatment that was happening in parallel.

The owner is no more biased than the veterinarian. The owner would be the BEST person to assess the health of their own pet from day-to-day living s/he knows the pet's personality and typical behavior. The owner would certainly go back to the physician or homeopath if their pet had not improved. The owner is more likely to observe and record differences in mobility, hunger, thirst, pain, comfort, and energy level based on the pets normal activity and behavior.


What exactly is the mystery they are trying to get at? Can they not see that pet owners love their animals and have found an effective, gentle, time-tested method for alleviating symptoms in homeopathy based upon human observation? I call that true science. Is it because the vets are 'hard-working' that they desire special recognition? Clinical trials do not always have a positive outcome. Let us not make assumptions.

No one is holding a gun to anyone's head or in ANY WAY preventing the use of conventional medicine. Everyone is FREE to attend the physician of choice. HOWEVER, the stance the author is taking in trying to demean and remove the ability of alternative health care professionals to practice their art and craft DOES LIMIT the freedom of the public to decide the care of CHOICE for their pet. Not everyone agrees with Singh's position that alternative medicines are based upon myth, faith and dare-say fraud.

  • We have all sworn to uphold the welfare of animals in our care, yet we continue to allow practices which prevent the application of conventional treatments, which are proven to work, in favour of remedies which are based on myth, faith and possibly deliberate fraud."

It is a totally false claim that anyone can call themself a homeopath. There are institutions which educate professionals in this field.

  • Only fully trained vets are allowed to use homeopathic remedies to treat pets, but anybody can call themselves a homeopath and start treating peopl

What? You don't believe you have a soul? My goodness, I can't make any test that proves it is there. Yet, without that soul, surely there is no life. Who do you think you are that you can scientifically observe through some sort of mechanical man-made instrument the life force or the universal truth to the workings of humankind or animals?

What haughty being believes he is greater than G-d? There are things we have still to learn and understand about our universe. Having a "lack of ingredients" only means you have not explored deep enough to find that energetic substance that fine-tunes the physical self.


Just because you can't define something, doesn't mean it doesn't exist. And I do believe that faith does exist. Faith that prayer, love, kindness can heal; and even little pellets of energetic medicine have the power to heal when administered based upon the principle of the similimum.

Debby Bruck, Homeopathy World Community http://homeopathyworldcommunity.com

What's Your Opinion?

Do You Believe Pet Owners Have a Right to Bring Their Pets to Alternative Practitioners?

  • Yes
  • No
See results without voting

Comments 10 comments

reenchanter 7 years ago

Debbie is a great writer with a brilliant approach to alternative topics and imformation.


Debby Bruck profile image

Debby Bruck 7 years ago Author

Dear Reenchanter ~ I appreciate the compliments. I hope my topics speak for a large number of people who haven't yet started writing how they feel about delicate and controversial subject matter.


Debby Bruck profile image

Debby Bruck 7 years ago Author

Looking forward to reading more comments and understanding what people think about the poll questions. I feel everyone has a bias and leans one way or another on every subject. Basically, it seems almost impossible to remain absolutely neutral on any opinion.


sabu singh profile image

sabu singh 7 years ago

Debby just one comment on your first vote question above. It is actually two questions in one. So perhaps you need to reword as follows:

Do you believe most people can be objective? Yes or no.

The debate between science and faith is ages old and will not end soon. Personally I would agree with your opinions


Debby Bruck profile image

Debby Bruck 7 years ago Author

Dear Sabu Singh ~ I appreciate your kind remarks and ability to read my article without malice. Do you not feel that bias and objectivity are linked together? Can you have one without the other? There are many scientists, including Einstein, who practiced his science and, in addition, had faith in G-d. Was he not searching for the oneness of the universe? Some how, it is possible to meld both, even though there exist complications in reasoning and logic due to the fact that humans are limited beings.

I wish you only peace and freedom, as it should be for all.


santoion profile image

santoion 7 years ago

Very good info.Thank You !


Dr. Nancy Malik 7 years ago

Homeopathy cures even when Conventional Allopathic Medicine (CAM) fails


Dr. Nancy Malik 7 years ago

Not every physician is a homeopath physician, and not every medicine is allopathic


Dr. Nancy Malik 6 years ago


Debby Bruck profile image

Debby Bruck 6 years ago Author

Dear Nancy ~ It is an honor that you have visited my hubpage. Thank you.

    Sign in or sign up and post using a HubPages Network account.

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked. Comments are not for promoting your articles or other sites.


    About the Author

    Debby Bruck, CHOM is the founder of Homeopathy World Community and believes that homeopathy is the wave of the future that provides hope and healing to those who have tried every other approach. Follow Debby on Twitter.

    Disclaimer: This Information is for Educational Purposes Only

    • The information on this blogsite is posted for educational purposes only, and not intended to constitute medical or legal advice. As with any important medical or legal matter, you are advised to consult an experienced health care provider and/or knowledgeable attorney concerning your specific health & vaccine exemption or waiver concerns.
    • No attorney-client relationship or doctor-patient relationship is intended, implied or created by the posting or viewing of information on this site; nor is a doctor-patient or an attorney-client relationship created by the submission or exchange of questions or information via email or otherwise with Debby Bruck
    • Readers are responsible for their use of information provided on this blog or linked to from this site. Debby Bruck assumes no liability for the same.
    • Debby Bruck has made reasonable efforts to ensure the accuracy of information on this blog site, but absolute accuracy is not guaranteed.
    • Always check with your health care provider

    More by this Author


    Click to Rate This Article
    working