Poisoning our children

Immunizations are aweful!!
Immunizations are aweful!!

Vaccinations, Are They Safe? You Decide.

 

We as parents have a difficult decision to make: To vaccinate, or not.

 

     As a first time parent, right after the delivery of your child you are bombarded with the question of immunizations. The Hepatitis B vaccination is the first shot doctors try to push on you parents. Your baby isn’t even a full day old and they want to pump them full of impurities. They make it seem normal. “Every baby should have this Hepatitis B shot, it is used to boost immunity”, FDA and doctors say. Besides that, what baby is going to be having sex and or using intravenous drugs? Because people targeted for getting hepatitis b are sexually active. But what they neglect to tell everyone is the side effects of pumping your children full of poisons. Some side effects include but are not limited to: long term effects like autism, some childhood cancers, leukemia, and many more. In many cases death has also occurred because of immunizations. There are a lot of latex allergies. Latex is in hepatitis b.

The FDA's website hides nothing, if you take the link you will find disgusting facts. Proof that the FDA is aware of what they are doing to our children.

The dangers behind the needles

It's very confusing trying to raise your child let alone keep them healthy.

Battle of the shots.
Battle of the shots.

 

     In 1997 there was a compensation of over $800 million dollars paid for child deaths, and serious adverse reactions due to the use of immunizations.

      One of the ingredients in most immunizations is formaldehyde. “Pungent gas: a colorless gas with a distinctive smell. Use: manufacture of resins and fertilizers, preservation of organic specimens.” World English Dictionary. Formaldehyde can lead to nerve damage. It can also cause damage to the liver and kidneys. Some of the side effects of formaldehyde are as follows but not limited to: anemia, coma, eczema, depression, inability to concentrate (ADD, ADHD), asthma, loss of memory, ringing or tingling of the ear, sterilization, and many many more.

Looks too happy.
Looks too happy.

 

 

     Another ingredient is mercury. “Liquid metallic element: a poisonous heavy silver-white metallic element that is liquid at room temperature.” World English Dictionary. A few of the side effects of mercury are; renal failure, mental retardation, dermatitis, hallucinations, loss of teeth, tremors, and many more.

Very funny video on vaccine

 

     Antifreeze is another ingredient in immunizations. “A liquid causing low freezing point: a substance added to a liquid to lower its freezing point.  An antifreeze such as ethylene glycol is added to or substituted for the water in a vehicle's radiator to stop it from freezing in winter.” World English Dictionary. Antifreeze has been linked to convulsions, central nervous system disorders, and blood disorders to name a few.

 

     Animals used in the immunization process are monkey, kidneys; cow, hearts; calf serum; chicken, eggs; pig, blood; sheep, blood; dog, kidney; horse, blood; and rabbit, brain to name a few. Aborted human fetal tissue is also used in the process of immunizations.

Getting poison ready!
Getting poison ready!

 

     It is also speculation that the smallpox vaccine was responsible for AIDS. That it was accidentally contaminated by animal viruses, in some aspects people think it was used deliberately to attack the black race and homosexuals.

 

     We inject children with these poisons every day. It’s become second nature. People who choose against immunizations are criticized. The doctors warn against the child being able to infect the immunized children, but if they thought about what they were saying before they said it, because if they were immunized what would they have to worry about, (in their defense)? Our doctor tried saying this to us. The doctors must get a cut from pushing poison (medication, and immunizations).

Georgia Guidestones
Georgia Guidestones

 

     In my opinion, I think there is a link associated between vaccines and food allergies, possibly ADD, and ADHD, SIDS, leukemia and many more childhood illnesses. I think the FDA and pharmaceuticals are making so much money off of each and every vaccination that they don’t care about the children. They are trying to cut back on overpopulation any way, just think of it as abortion, only after being born and being subjected to poison. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones It’s just postnatal abortion. So many children are suffering due to immunization reactions. If only doctors and parents would arm themselves with the vaccine ingredients, I think they would choose not to immunize. This is my opinion and my thoughts.

 

     My husband and I do not participate in immunizations any more. Our oldest child has not had shots since he was 5, now he is 8. He has some food intolerances. Our second born has not gotten injected since he was 4, now 7 and he is allergic to milk, eggs, peanut, honey, wheat, shell fish, and tree nuts, and has eczema and asthma. Which never started showing up until about four months of age. Babies are not supposed to have those foods until after one year of age. Some of the immunizations are grown with these being some of the ingredients. Our third born son also has these same food allergies, and asthma and eczema, only his don‘t seem as severe as our older son, I nursed him until he was 19 ½ months old. I believe this helped boost his immunity. He has not been infused since he was 3, now he’s 4. Our fourth child is 2 ½ and hasn’t had her shots since she was 1. She still has no known allergies. I nursed her until she was 17 ½ months old. Our youngest is 1 and hasn’t had her immunizations since she was 2 months. She also at this time has no known allergies. I am still currently nursing her. I feel that if possible every mother should breast feed their babies, it’s useful for both you and the baby. In my family I see differences where I did not breast feed my oldest two children.

This picture is of a child having an allergic reaction to vaccinations.  How horrible.
This picture is of a child having an allergic reaction to vaccinations. How horrible.

 

     Vaccinations are unnatural. They are processed like most of the foods we eat every day. Everything we eat, drink, or inject into our body should only be pure, fresh, healthy foods. Yes the processed brownies, bread, juice, hotdogs, and many more foods are delicious but not good for us. Usually if it goes through a process it’s probably not good for you. No I’m not a health nut, but I should be! I’m sure I’d probably feel better.

     Now knowing what I have discovered about immunizations, I will be telling everyone I know about the dangers of them.

     But please don’t take my word for any of this, check out the links for yourself. I myself am just a concerned parent and I try to research things on my own. But we all have chosen the wrong source from time to time. The internet can be full of lies, we just have to take out the trash. Decipher what is right and wrong.

     Thank you everyone who reads this, I hope it sparks interest in learning more about immunizations.

The death of a innocent child!
The death of a innocent child!

More by this Author


Comments 18 comments

ReuVera profile image

ReuVera 4 years ago from USA

Great hub. I came to this hub from another hub where the author is going his best to persuade others how it is important to vaccinate children. I tired to show what dangerous stuff is there is the vaccines, I was telling reasons. But he just didn't allow my last comment.

The funny thing is that they say as if unvaccinated people put at risk others. But, how? How a HEALTHY unvaccinated person can put at risk anyone?


Megan 5 years ago

Of course parents have a choice and granted for the few people have have had adverse reactions to vaccines or whose children have adverse reaction fair enough don't keep vaccinating. But the kids who don't get vaccinated are the ones who help spread disease. All you parents who don't vaccinate their should be happy some do because that is the only thing protecting YOUR children.


ursulamargrit 6 years ago

Anybody who thinks that vaccines are saving lives ought to do their research. The unfortunate reality is, that not a single vaccine has ever been proven to be either safe or effective.

I just shake my head when there is another article on a measles or mumps outbreak, and despite quoting accurately that about 95% of the victims were fully immunized, the last sentence usually reads something like, "Please make sure you keep up on your child's immunizations". How insane is that?

Most of the time those outbreaks also start with immunized children. The reality is, that those vaccines, rather than preventing you from contracting the disease it targets, it makes you more susceptible to it.


taylor 6 years ago

I totally agree with you Florence! I think that far too many people are blinded with ignorance and that they don't know how to look for the accurate information out there. I think that it is lame-ass that people based a huge percentage of their beliefs on information that they can't even prove is true... Learn how to research correctly or shut-up.


malcolm horrocks 6 years ago

hi i imunised my youngest child yesterday and now he looked the child pictured above i am worried and angry that something used to prevent ilness would have such an adverse on my 7 month old son aaron.

will this reaction goaway or do they have it for life who know but in answer to the question would i do it again? yes cos i was immunised as a child and i never got polio or any of them ilnesses.

i dont know i just feel cheated cos my health visitor didnt say anthing about allergic reaction i WONDER WHY


Florence 6 years ago

Scarlet fever is the worst according to ??? Please look up Evidence Based Practise and Scientific Method. Just because a web-site or book tells you something doesn't make it true. Where is the credibility?


Sara W. Harding profile image

Sara W. Harding 6 years ago from South Carolina

@Florence, thank you for taking the time to respond to my comment. I had no idea anyone had commented and just last night randomly decided to check. Otherwise, I would have responded sooner.

One thing I'd like to clear up is the difference between mortality and incidence of these diseases. The records referenced in the article I linked to proved that deaths from pertussis, measles, diphtheria, scarlet fever (which was the worst killer and a vaccine for it was never developed) all but disappeared before vaccines were introduced, but the incidence of these diseases remains a separate topic. If changes in conditions other than vaccines first brought about the dramatic decrease of mortality, should we not first look to the extreme poverty in the former Soviet Union as the root cause of the diphtheria fatalities?

The heightened incidence of whooping cough following the decrease in the populations receiving the DTP vaccine would be far more alarming if the death rate were not so small. If this was a statistic for death occurring because of adverse reaction to the vaccine, it would be reported as "extremely rare cases". Incidentally, death rates from the vaccine itself are comparable. "In a year-long investigation of the Vaccine Adverse Reaction Reporting System (VAERS) operated by the Food and Drug Administration, NVIC/DPT analyzed VAERS computer discs used by the FDA to store data on reports of deaths and injuries following DPT vaccination. A total of 54,072 reports of adverse events following vaccination were listed in a 39-month period from July 1990 to November 1993 with 12,504 reports being associated with DPT vaccine, including 471 deaths." http://www.whale.to/vaccine/nvic4.html

Is disease eradication really something we want? I think a better approach would be to allow diseases to continue to exist along with us in a non deadly form. If we concentrate our energies on keeping our bodies healthy to fight these illnesses through nutrition, etc. they will not be forced into more virulent forms in order to survive extinction, but will continue their life cycle in forms which a healthy human can survive. The idea behind vaccines is not contrary to this, which is to create immunity to diseases by exposure to weakened or killed forms. This was in practice already before Jenner decided to monopolize on an inject-able , manufacture-able, elitist controllable form. So instead of methods that could be taught and practiced among the common folk, it became a tool of power controlled by corporations and governments.(Another concern among vaccine skeptics in the medical field is that by injecting into muscle tissue the first line of defense- the nose, mouth, skin, lungs and GI tract- are bypassed, interfering with the mechanism of immune response we are naturally programmed with).


Florence 6 years ago

"Diseases had already begun to disappear before vaccines were introduced, because of better hygiene and sanitation."

Statements like this are very common in anti-vaccine literature, the intent apparently being to suggest that vaccines are not needed. Improved socioeconomic conditions have undoubtedly had an indirect impact on disease. Better nutrition, not to mention the development of antibiotics and other treatments, have increased survival rates among the sick; less crowded living conditions have reduced disease transmission; and lower birth rates have decreased the number of susceptible household contacts. But looking at the actual incidence of disease over the years can leave little doubt of the significant direct impact vaccines have had, even in modern times.

For example, there have been periodic peaks and valleys throughout the years, but the real, permanent drop in measles incidence coincided with the licensure and wide use of measles vaccine beginning in 1963. Other vaccine-preventable diseases show a roughly similar pattern in incidence, with all except hepatitis B showing a significant drop in cases corresponding with the advent of vaccine use. (The incidence of hepatitis B has not dropped as much because infants vaccinated in routine programs will not be at high risk of disease until they are at least teenagers. Therefore a 15-year lag can be expected between the start of routine infant vaccination and a significant drop in disease incidence.) Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) vaccine is another good example, because Hib disease was prevalent until the early- to mid- 1990s, when conjugate vaccines that can be used for infants were finally developed. (The polysaccharide vaccine previously available could not be used for infants, in whom most cases of the disease were occurring.)

Are we expected to believe that better sanitation caused incidence of each disease to drop just at the time a vaccine for that disease was introduced? Since sanitation is not better now than it was in 1990, it is hard to attribute the virtual disappearance of Hib disease in children in recent years in countries with routine Hib vaccination (from an estimated 20,000 cases a year to 1,419 cases in 1993, and dropping in the United States of America) to anything other than the vaccine.

Finally, we can look at the experiences of several developed countries after they allowed their immunization levels to drop. Three countries —Great Britain, Sweden and Japan — cut back the use of pertussis (whooping cough) vaccine because of fear about the vaccine. The effect was dramatic and immediate. In Great Britain, a drop in pertussis vaccination in 1974 was followed by an epidemic of more than 100,000 cases of pertussis and 36 deaths by 1978. In Japan, around the same time, a drop in vaccination rates from 70% to 20%-40% led to a jump in pertussis from 393 cases and no deaths in 1974 to 13,000 cases and 41 deaths in 1979. In Sweden, the annual incidence rate of pertussis per 100,000 children of 0-6 years of age increased from 700 cases in 1981 to 3,200 in 1985.

It seems clear from these experiences that not only would diseases not be disappearing without vaccines, but if we were to stop vaccinating, they would come back. Of more immediate interest is the major epidemics of diphtheria that occurred in the former Soviet Union in the 1990s, where low primary immunization rates for children and the lack of booster vaccinations for adults resulted in an increase from 839 cases in 1989 to nearly 50,000 cases and 1,700 deaths in 1994. There were at least 20 imported cases in Europe and two cases in U.S. citizens who had worked in the former Soviet Union.

http://www.who.int/immunization_safety/aefi/immuni...


Florence 6 years ago

@ Sara, your information, while outwardly compelling, needs further examination. The idea that diseases were already declining is a myth. Please read more on the subject from a variety of sources. It is scary to think that we could harm our babies by immunizing them, but they are far more likely to suffer disability and even death from the diseases immunizations prevent. Please read: http://wiki.medpedia.com/Vaccine_Safety


Sara W. Harding profile image

Sara W. Harding 6 years ago from South Carolina

I also choose not to vaccinate my children. What convinced me most was looking at charts from mortality records in the US and UK that showed how deaths from those diseases people are vaccinated against all but disappeared many years before the vaccinations became available. I have yet to see any shred of evidence that vaccines have ever saved lives, while it is clear that improved sanitation and nutrition, as well as genetics played a far more important role in ridding us of these diseases. http://www.vaclib.org/sites/debate/Vaccines.html


Florence 6 years ago

By the way, your bullshit "vaccination reaction" picture is actually depicting MEASLES! Are you deliberately misleading people, or are you just dumb enough to not really research what you post? Do you wonder that perhaps your misinformation doesn't stop at pictures but extends to your ideas on medical care? Please stop posting misleading information. Please research what you post. Please stop breeding.


Florence 6 years ago

Imagine your guilt when your child contracts a "childhood disease" and dies from it. Remember what it was like before the polio vaccine, or befor HIB vaccine, or MMR, or DPT? Know what tiny coffins look like? Remember sitting with your child, helpless as they couldn't breathe due to the membrane forming across their throat? Remember wondering if your child's illness would result in them having to live out their lives in an iron lung? Rermember worrying when you were pregnant that you might have been exposed to rubella, and that your baby would be born profoundly retarded, deaf, and blind? How about Rh incompatibility? Remember when your second baby died because your Rh factors weren't compatible and Rhogam hadn't been invented? Remember when your tiny newborn died a week after spiking horribly high fever and screaming piercingly for days because the tissues surrounding her brain were infected and pushing on the brain? Remember the days before surfactant, and your premature infant died because their lungs could not stay open? Remember the days before phototherapy and your jaundiced baby developed kernicterus and died?Remember???? No. You have always lived in times when we had the ability to combat these problems. You want to revert back to those days? Then quit taking your daily aspirin, insulin, beta blockers, ACE inhibitors, diuretics, antibiotics, prenantal vitamins. Quit washing your hands, too. After all, germ theory is just a theory, right? GO BACK TO SCHOOL AND FIND OUT HOW YOUR BODY ACTUALLY WORKS INSTEAD OF SWALLOWING WHAT YOUR FRINGE GROUP SPOON-FEEDS YOU. YOU ARE ENDANGERING LIVES WITH YOUR IGNORANCE.


Jeff 6 years ago

Way to be closed-minded and neglect the lives that have been saved by the invention of vaccines... And doctors are a tool in satan's hands? If God didn't want doctors, he would not have given us the abilities...


Everyday Miracles profile image

Everyday Miracles 7 years ago from Indiana, USA

I followed you over from APA! Hiya!

One of my daughters was affected by the pertussis vaccine and blessedly not permanently injured by the poisons that were injected into her body. She was very small for her age and given a full dose of the vaccines. Since then, we have chosen not to vaccinate.

It is a difficult decision. We are threatened and cajoled and doctors and the FDA want us to believe that it is necessary for us to vaccinate our children. I have been harrassed by ER nurses who have seen children affected by these diseases who were not vaccinated. I cannot imagine the guilt I would feel if one of my children got the disease *from* the vaccine.

Good hub!


Jesus_saves_us_7 profile image

Jesus_saves_us_7 7 years ago from Seeking Salvation Author

Vaccinations are scary to me. It makes you wonder about who invented them and if they give them to their children!!

Thanks for reading & commenting.


Qtpies7 7 years ago

We have something in common! I have a vaccine injured child. We are sure it was mercury poisoning. Now we do not immunize, at least until they are teens.


Jesus_saves_us_7 profile image

Jesus_saves_us_7 7 years ago from Seeking Salvation Author

Thank you for reading and commenting.

I think all parents should research immunizations. We do have a choice. We thought at first we didn't, but you do, they are our children, WE need to protect them. If we as parents arm ourselves before hand there probably wouldn't be as many childhood deaths. If we are aware of the facts than our decision will be easier against immunizations.


EmbracingTheTruth 7 years ago

I'm glad you stood up for yourself and your children by refusing immunization.

I don't believe in doctors...I thnk they are a tool in satan's hands!

    Sign in or sign up and post using a HubPages Network account.

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked. Comments are not for promoting your articles or other sites.


    Click to Rate This Article
    working