The only reason you would lose weight by smoking is because you smoke instead of eat.Smoking does nothing but kill you.
Of course!! one cigarette lessens the five minutes of your life. This is the risk involved in smoking.
http://www.healthproductreviewers.com/r … eanse.html
What difference does it make?
To begin smoking in today's society, one cannot be help know what they will be doing to themselves.
So, it boils down to choice.
Life's too short to be thinking about risks before taking a puff to unwind!
Society's perception of certain activities such as sun bathing and smoking have changed so much in recent years. Older smokers can argue they didn't know the risks and / or accept them.
Young people taking up smoking have no such excuse. It is a tax on the ignorant where the currency is years of your life.
Smoking (and caffeine) actually protect against some neurological conditions such as Parkinson's Disease but this is of course irrelevant if you don't live long enough to get Parkinson's. Stick with the coffee people.
i agree. The badass persona of smoking a ciggerette is being switched with the notion that if you smoke you might be trashy. I simply believe smoking is a personall choice and should not ever have to label people. Some people like caffeine, others like ciggarettes, and some need both.
No plus your breath smells, your teeth turn yellow, and your skin wrinkles easily.
No, I don't think it's ever worth it. Smokers might say that you have to die of something, yet smoking doesn't usually lead to an immediate death, but a low quality of life that can drag on for years. Imagine if you couldn't even walk to your own bathroom, literally metres away, without taking half an hour to get there because you can't breathe well enough to go quicker. That can be the reality.
It's definitely NOT worth it. When young, it's cool to be hanging with people who smoke, and join in, but if addicted, it's not only the cost, but the breadth - totally nauseous to non-smokers. Moreover, I have friends who are in all kinds of health issues, more due to smoking than anything else. In a country without proper health care plan, it can be expensive for something which could be avoided.
For me, personally, I don't think it is. There are absolutely no benefits to smoking, but there are many cons. It just isn't worth it.
cigarette smoke has high amount of carcinogens and it will cause cancers.
personally smoking is worth a risk.
it will reduce the appetite and you will be reluctant for eating.this is the major reason that people will become slim who are chronic smokers
Having smoked for a while in my youth (long past), I can understand the addiction because that is what it is. It did keep me slim and definitely took away my appetite, but it also made me stink - and made me irritable when I could not smoke. It also aggravated my bronchitis.
As Cagsil said though, today, we all know the risks and the health benefits are zero while the rate of developing cancer sky rocket. As in all things I look at the addiction possibility and the potentials for not only cancer but arterial disease, stroke, etc. and give it a pass. As much as I'd like to light up sometimes, the cons outweigh the pros every time for me.
no, not considering all the adverse effects including the cost $. it seems many who smoke are least able to afford it.
Nope . . . increased chance of major illness and death -- cancer, lung disease. Increased medical costs borne by everyone. Ton of money -- the price of a pack continues to rise along with sales taxes.
Smoking is considered bad which really it deserves. Actually cigarette contains Nicotine and smoke compound.
Nicotine is not bad, really its not. Its a lower level addiction.
The main thing is Carbon Mono Oxide which is created from partially burning and which causes cancer.
Cigarette is bad due to this reason, and it definitely decreases your life. If you say that life is not without risk then why you fasten your seat belts while driving car and why you drive carefully...
Well addiction of anything is bad and smoking addiction is one of the worst thing.
I have to come in here - I have never heard such a load of b*****ks regarding smoking - it is a politically generated stunt that boggles the imagination. What the **** does it have to do with YOU what I do to MYSELF !!!!!!!!
To not smoke around you and your whining over-indulged kids, your whingeing little shrew of a wife is OK - I would not want to impose my occasional wafts of cigarette smoke into the fuel and industrial polluted air that you seem to like so much.
But out here in the open air, sitting at my table with my wine and my food that I ordered and paid for - go find soemwhere else to sit!
And I have been almost given up for nearly two years - and I still get p***ed off with the whole fabricated baloney.
is it worth it? what kind of question is that?
Oh, sure, definitely worth it! and worth getting told off because you do it a bazillion times, too! eh? are we leading this into another forum to get people posting as many cliches as we can come up with? what's the prize for best or most cliches?
Cigarette smoking can be worth the risk if you know what you're up against before you start and you make an informed decision. It's your choice, isn't it?
Is it worth it to quit smoking? Depends...how much longer is a persons life going to be?
At the age of 72, is it worth it to have surgery to remove lung cancer? Is it worth it to quit smoking afterward? Before? I think it depends on the individual and whats most important to them in life. Everyone has the right to choose for themselves, don't they?
Don't mind my rambling....I haven't been online all day!
Whether cigarette smoking is worth the risk or not is entirely a personal choice. What's more important to you, the pleasure you get from smoking or your health? When you are young and healthy you may not care that your breath stinks, your skin is aging, or that you are causing damage to your lungs and heart, but your point of view might change some day when you find yourself suffering from lung cancer or heart disease.
It's not your personal choice. Your kid (or smb.else's) is sitting behind you and inhaling that sh*t! It's dangerous and expensive addiction(another clishe).
It hasn't actually been proven to be dangerous. There are other causes of cancer and lung cancer. As for addiction...I personally see that as a personal view on life. I quit easy as pie, after the nicotine left my body. Smoking is a habit and habits are choices. A personal choice.
As for expense, let's just say there are a few people in this world who are more greedy than others and those people would be the ones who set the prices on the things some people choose to have and use on a habitual basis. You know, things like cigarettes, gas (oil), housing, cars, health insurance.
Now, having said that, that is precisely the reason why smoking is quickly becoming an illegal activity, depending on where you choose to smoke. Because one groups personal choice is more important than the other.
Don't get me wrong, I'm glad I quit smoking. It was my choice. I feel much better, physically and maybe even mentally. But, I still feel the non-smokers choice takes precedence over a smokers choice. Is it a bad thing? Only when it infringes on a smokers right to freedom.
Smokers right to freedom? What about killer's right to kill? Or rapists right to rape, when they feel like it? You inhale poison, POISON! And your neighbor too if you smoke, whether he likes it or not.There are lots of proofs. Just look for it. And it is not a personal choice, it is an addiction. My husband tried 5-6 times to quit, may be more, without any success. Until stroke and another addiction "finished" him. Of course if you smoke like one cigarette a day, light, it is probably easy to quit. Ask chain smoker to quit, most can't do it easily. Smokers right to freedom indeed!
Don't be too harsh ...
I don't blame people for being smokers, especially not if they started long ago. When I was younger, it was the thing to do, and if you didn't do it, you were the odd one out. Back then, even the Doctor's waiting room was a fog of cigarette smoke. If the Doctor smoked, he was smoking in his consultation room. People were smoking on TV. People were smoking on trains and buses. Elegant Movie Stars were smoking on the Red Carpet. It was everywhere. It was the sophisticated, grown up thing to do. And the government was promoting it for the revenue it earned. It seemed (seemed) a normal thing to do that wasn't harming anyone.
It's a convention, but let's hope all the bans are making it a dying one.
Back to the original question: The medical risks were confirmed in the 60s(?), but still the risk was being widely taken. What were the pros and cons of smoking? Not to take the risk would be a bit unsociable. Besides, smoking mostly only kills old people It was better to be a smoker ...
Nowadays - we know the risks 100%. We're not encouraged to do it. There are few places we can do it (at home, outside). It is widely considered anti-social (the complete reverse of the old days). Why would anyone want to start smoking nowadays? That, I really can't understand ...
For those who started back in the truly smokey days ... many have succeeded in giving up, but unfortunately, some haven't because they really can't.
Let's see, I smoked 1-2 packs per day for 25 years. Does that qualify me as a chain smoker?
I'm not trying to say smokers have more rights than non-smokers, but at the same time I am saying non-smokers don't deserve more rights than smokers.
Seriously, if you think about it, smokers don't intentionally do harm to anyone. It's the tobacco companies that do. Why punish the smoker when it's the tobacco company that puts the poison in the cigarettes? You honestly need to look at where the fault lies....
Who's to blame for a robber shooting the gas station attendant? The gun maker or the robber?
Who's to blame for a man raping a prostitute? The man or the prostitute?
Would smoking be such an issue if tobacco companies didn't add poison to their cigarettes? Maybe they should be held accountable for what they do....
Nobody starts smoking with the intention of harming others. And once you've started, it's very hard to stop, in spite of knowing you're harming both yourself and others.
In spite of my not understanding why anyone would start smoking in this day and age, I do remember that I never, ever thought I'd become addicted to cigarettes when I started ... Now I know there are no exceptions - anyone who starts (not just tries, it takes a little more) will become addicted.
I don't agree with you. When I started smoking, I told myself it was a habit. 25 years later, after living with a family of addicts (drugs, alcohol, food, gambling...) I managed to quit smoking on my first serious attempt by breaking the habit of smoking. The first day was the worst when it came to nicotine withdrawal, after that it was easy - but I didn't trust myself for a couple days. I really wanted to continue that habit! But, I wanted to quit. So, I did.
Smoking is a habit, once that's understood it isn't so difficult to quit - IF you want to.
Yes, I agree with you.
Smoking isn't a physical addiction for the most part anyway, so you have to be right.
But, it seems that not everyone can do what you have done, or at least not establish the frame of mind to be able to so.
Unfortunately, I agree with you about the frame of mind. I think it's because so many people said it's an addiction so now everyone believes it.
I don't know...perhaps I shouldn't be commenting since I've never been a smoker, yet the people I have known who smoked seem to fall into two categories - for some it seems to be a persistant habit that they do at certain times of the day, every day, yet in the end can take it or leave it, if they choose to. Then there are some, like my partner who smoked for 22 years (starting at 14) - for him it was a completely physical addiction that he tried time after time to get over. He never succeeded, the craving was too strong. Now he has not smoked for a year, but only after being prescribed Champix by the doctor, which he took for about 3 months (I can't rememeber exactly). He did want to quit before, but never could.
No of course it's not. I wouldn't recommend smoking to anyone. I started smoking with the intention of not getting addicted. I had just quit drinking and needed something else to do in bars/clubs when I was getting bored, I bought a pack and that was that.
I've wasted hundereds of pounds on cigarettes. In my opinion, I'm not addicted severely anymore, but I am addicted. There is something about smoking that has an appeal to me, but I can't explain it. I've cut down from 20 to 1 cigarette a day at the moment and I don't plan on smoking much more.
by Dr. Helen Borel8 years ago
"Poor vocabulary and low verbal fluency" are hallmarks of the early dementia suffered by smokers. Smoking is thought to lead to cognitive deficit and cognitive decline, known risk factors for the subsequent...
by Timothy Brakhage5 years ago
Why are cigarettes so expensive now days? With the cost of gas prices going up to $3.75 per gallon and the shipping cost for postages on the rise, this explains a part in prices going up. However Marlboro is one of the...
by dinkan536 years ago
Researchers say that you can lower your risk of getting Alzheimer's disease by making some simple changes in your life style. need suggestions?
by mr. daydream6 years ago
Do you think the public smoking ban is too extreme?
by Muttface3 years ago
Hey there,I quit smoking in January and so far so good, I'm not consumed by the need to smoke. My main problem is when I socialise and have a few glasses of plonk (and before anyone suggests giving up booze, let me tell...
by Cassie Smith4 years ago
More and more companies aren't hiring smokers because they are not a protected class and they increase a company's group health insurance premiums. Should it be allowed?
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.