The quality of life, a transformational model debating the moralistic to the individualistic. What are the pros and cons of both morals and material wealth. Does both create a balance, or does one outweigh the other?
IMO, they're mutually exclusive. Moralality is subjective.
That's my first answer. On second thought, people's morals tend to bend a bit in the need for money. I'm not talking about greed, just survival.
So here's the crux: I might believe the phone company is rich so if I'm inadvertantly not charged for for a service I know I used, and I know this is technically stealing, I'm happy to not tell them about it.
If the young checker at Publix gives me $100. too much (and this actually happened) I'm personally morally obligated to tell him because I know he's responsible for that money. So perhaps both money and morality are subjective where they coexist.
If we don't have a good, solid foundation of morals and values, will we have material wealth? What is the use of materials if we always get ourselves ensnared in fights, quarrels while pandering to selfishness and greed?
by paarsurrey6 years ago
Scientific advancement without morals and spirituality to control from Word revealed from the Creator-God Allah YHWH could destroy humanityThat is the most danger posed to humanity. A man living in Hiroshima or...
by R. Fritz23 months ago
Is it right or wrong even though it is legal?
by cjhunsinger2 years ago
"Are atheists really so different from everyone else? Well, yes – but not in a bad way. Catherine Caldwell-Harris of Boston University has studied atheists and found that they share certain personality types,...
Copyright © 2016 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.