I'm looking into Aspartame, and I plan on sharing any interesting studies I can find, but what do you think of Aspartame?
Chemical name: N-L-alpha-Apartyl-L-phenylalanine 1-Methyl Ester
Acute Health Effects: Harmful if ingested or inhaled. Minimize exposure to this material. Severe overexposure can result in injury or death.
Follow safe industrial hygiene practices and always wear proper protective equipment when handling this compound.
Chronic Health Effects: Repeated exposure to an highly toxic material may produce general deterioration of health by an accumulation in one or
many human organs.
Accidental Release Measures: Harmful material. In case of a spill or leak, always shut off any sources of ingnition, ventilate the area and exercise caution. Use a shovel to put the material into a waste disposal container. Rinse contaminated surfaces with copious amounts of water. Consult federal, state or local authorities for assistance on disposal.
Use MSHA/NIOSH approved respirator, splash goggles and protective clothing when handling this substance.
http://www.chemspider.com/Chemical-Stru … 18630.html
And the FDA has approved this for human consumption.
"The additive meets the specifications of the Food Chemicals Codex"
Really? The world government is full of dangerous people. Protect yourself. Join the revolution against processed foods, chemicals, cosmetics.
I'm not convinced by the health concerns. If you feed anything in large enough quantities to a rat, it will cause damage.
However for me, there's a much more persuasive reason for avoiding it.
It increases appetite!
So if you drink an aspartame-sweetened soda, you're going to feel hungrier after it,which means you're likely to eat all the calories you were trying to avoid. Pointless.
Honesty it is better to just consume sugar. Aspartame is extremely bad for you and actually used in the morg to preserve dead bodies. I do not know all of the effects that it has on our bodies, but that is enough info to make me stay away from it.
Aspartame should be banned! We do not survive on chemicals.
It does for me as well, but that has more to do with things I've heard than actual research I've done. I always feel weird when I have a strong opinion about something, but can't substantiate why to myself.
Here's the first study I'm looking at.
http://ehp03.niehs.nih.gov/article/fetc … /ehp.10271
Three groups of rats were observed from birth to death. One group was given no aspartame, one was given a dose of 400ppm aspartame in their food, and the last given a dose of 2000ppm aspartame.
Control Group - 24.2% of males and 44.2% of females had at least one tumor at death.
400ppm Group - 25.7% of males and 44.3% of females had at least one tumor at death.
2000ppm Group - 40% of males and 52.9% of females had at least one tumor.
Between 64 and 112 weeks of age(mid-life for these rats), the survival rate for the 400ppm and 2000ppm groups was 10-20% lower than the control group.
The paper mentions that the toxic effects are worse for the rats if they start them on it at a young age, and raises concerns over aspartame-containing drinks that human children often drink. It also shows indirectly that the effects take time to build up, as differences in the groups didn't really show up until 64 weeks.
Although I have heard bad things about aspartame that haven't been proven, I do think it is possible that consuming it in excess can cause negative effects on health in the long-term.
Obviously sugar can cause health problems as well, but at least it tastes good.
Well lets see. Aspartame has been banned in Japan. It has been found to cause blurred vision, migraine headaches, memory loss, ringing in the ears heart palpitions,emotional disorders, and shortness of breath. In addition, testing on mice revealed that it produced microscopic holes and tumors in the brain and testing on monkeys of this sweetener produced seizures. Now would you want to sweeten your food with something that caused such harm to other living organism?
I've heard things like this, but now I'm looking for the primary sources for these studies.
As one of my hubs written recently, I touched upon the fact that diet and environment contribute to mental health/illness.
It's very important to avoid asparatame, good info. Good to write a hub on.
There are many concerns with it, even in moderate amounts(1 soda per day). I've got a list of over 50 studies I'm going to go through.
In addition to those studies, the fact that it gives me headaches and its addictive nature says to me that I should avoid it. It's just common sense in the way that people avoid tobacco because of the health issues. There really is no difference between their dangers, but the mainstream media doesn't touch upon Aspartame, so it is ignored to a large degree.
I'm currently trying to get off of soda, I have a mild addiction and get headaches if I don't have any. But, I'm not sure what ingredients are causing that...
Caffeine, sugar and artificial sweeterners, artificial coloring are all harmful but it's probably the caffeine withdrawal that's giving you headaches. If you're used to waking up to caffeine, try 20 grams of fast digesting whey (protein) powder with some nitric oxide booster and 20-30 grams of slow digesting carbs (fruit) in a morning shake. You'll wake up naturally. You can add some cold coffee in diminishing amounts (if you like the flavor) or some low dose caffeinated boost drink like Red Bull until you get weaned off caffeine. But some caffeine is not all bad. It acts as a vasodilator so keeps things flowing easily. The source of your caffeine should be coffee beans, though, loaded with over 1,000 phytochemicals and suspected of acting on improved intracellular signaling.
All roasted coffee destroys some polyphenols but Life Extension puts out a coffee that removes the polyphenols using water, then roasts the bean, then puts them back in the water to reabsorb the polyphenols. They claim the resulting bean contains 186% more chlorogenic acid (polyphenol) then conventional coffee.
Innersmiff the difference is everyone now knows smoking is harmful and bad for you. Aspartame isn't labelled as such and should be. I believe it was blamed for the Gulf War Syndrome(all those diet pops being shipped over) The Aspartame breaks down at temperatures over 27celcius and people experience MS type symptoms.
JaxsonRaine, perhaps the real investigation is how much the FDA got bribed to ok Aspartame?
It is addictive and poisons the body. A relative has an addiction and numerous Health problems from diet coke. Please drink water. It is so goof for the body.
Yes i know of someone who drank buckets of the diet coke and ended up being "MS"
You see the cop out here is drink in "moderation" which hands the ball in your court, the people;although vaguely, because what is moderation? One can,5 cans or 10 litres? It gives you, the individual, to choose(what we call freedom/democracy/capitalism) just like smokers choose to smoke.
What to do? Boycott the product and then it won't be a cost effective poison.
As for that term "in moderation" "eat and drink things in moderation".... hogswash. I drink 2litres of water a day, if i go for a 10km run i drink about 2 litres straight afterwards. This should apply to vitamin deficiency dependent diseases....ooh let me stop i could write forever:)
The problem is that there aren't many studies into long-term effects of low dosages. Just because something doesn't kill you in small doses right away, doesn't mean it's not killing you slowly. The study of the rats suggests that aspartame is harmful even in small dosages.
I wish they could put a warning on diet pop or all soda pop about the danger of drinking more than two per day. But it would never work, because of the marketing factor and the large industry that it is. The best bet is to join a consumer group trying to get the FDA to take action. At least some of the soda pop has been removed from the schools, I hear. Don't get me started about aspartame. I could go on and on. People who are addicted just don't believe anything will happen to them.
I have yet to hear anyone argue that Aspartame is healthy.
But here's a report that doesn't condemn it, coming out in the decidedly 'neutral' category.
http://www.time.com/time/health/article … 16,00.html
hi Mighty Mom. The article was interesting, but very poor. It detailed the effects of sweetners as causing deformities and cancers then closes with, there is no evidence that faux sweetners make you fat??! Well i think that is the least of ones worries, and seems to present to the reader that they are safe. The other tests, over 200, did they test one cold can of 330ml(aspartame breaks down into its' poisons over 27celcius--what's the average human body temp?) In which case, yes the tests would be favourable to aspartame(a memeber of the cyanide family) In fact if you smoked one cigarette a day, you'd get the same confirmation that smoking is not harmful, or fattening:) This is what they call controversy in the business, i.e setting up studies to show a predetermined result. Take for instance i am an alcohol baron alcohol is in danger of being banned, i can create a double blind scientific study giving the active participants 25ml(one tot) of vodka a day only--what would be the outcome?....alcohol does not make you drunk. (i could even add...when drunk in moderation)
I don't think that aspartame is safe. If it is something that one drinks or eats just once a month or year, I doubt it would cause harm, but there is no proof that it is safe. Until something is proven either way, it is probably best to avoid it. I must note that manufacturers are not 100% honest and many will hide this ingredient and many others under various names or simply not list it in the ingredient list at all. Buyer beware.
Sweet things, particularly those that are man made, tend to make you crave more sweet things making it more likely that one can overeat and become overweight. Once this happens all sorts of medical problems arise. The closer to natural that you eat and drink, the better. It is very difficult and the manufacturers and advertisers job is to make it difficult, however, it is your health at stake and it's not important to anyone but you and your loved ones.
I don't really think it takes a lot of studying to figure out that no sugar at all is healthiest, but that modest amounts of real sugar is still better than stuff that isn't natural (or even stuff that started out natural and was altered, like sucralose).
Besides, there's obviously something very wrong with a product that causes the kind of freakish digestive issues that Aspertame and some of the other fake sugars cause to people who consume even just a little bit of them. I know people who eat and drink "everything but kitchen sink" (when it comes to junky foods and beverages) without a hint of digestive issues. If these same people eat three hard candies or one six-ounce glass of something sweetened with "fake sugar", three hours later they feel like they're either having a heart attack or a baby - and then Aspartame has its own set of things people have to be concerned about on top of whatever other issues "fake sugar" brings.
No study in the world will ever convince me that that junk is at all safe.
@ Jaxson Raine -- my cousin who holds a PhD in kinesiology, performed this same experiment when aspartame was first introduced into the market. Her finding were much more detailed than this, including neurological damage to amounts found within soft tissue during the course of the experiments. The experiments were performed on more than 3 groups of rats for an extended period of time. I had read her results, and will not ever touch anything with aspartame in it. You might as well take up smoking or drink a bottle of cyanide.
Frankly, anything that is synthetically produced or chemically/biologically altered is not healthy for the body. Once again, it is buyer beware, or in this case, consumer beware.
The profit that companies gain from this industry is astronomical and the power that they hold will prevent any type of "hazardous to your health" labelling. Look at how much time, lobbying, illness and death it took before tobacco took the hit.
If you think that aspartame is unhealthy, you should check out margarine. Did you know that it is only one molecule away from being a plastic?!? Yet, people eat this on a daily basis -- perhaps several times a day. Then there is microwaved food -- the microwaves actually change the molecular structure which redefines what the substance is. It may resemble what we put in on the surface, but on the molecular level, it is no longer the food that it was originally. As a result, when the body digests this product, not only does it find it difficult, it has carcinogenic results.
Oh, I could go on and on and on.... like you. (think about wearing a bluetooth which is emitting radio frequencies over your ear drum and brain.... there's studies on the effects of this too, yet, it is being hidden by all the hype of "safer driving", "hands free driving", "hands free gaming" and so on.) I digress..... sorry.
I'll be waiting for your hub on your findings!!
Hello, Verizon? I'd like to order a case of Aspartame. hahaha
There's finding in Sweden that prove cell phone use increases the chances of tumors in the brain and surrounding areas.
Did you know that your keyboard, mouse and laptop emit a low frequency which can be one of the leading causes of carpel tunnel syndrome? Yet, we sit and type all day long at work and then head home to type some more. Gee, wonder why carpel tunnel is not so rare anymore.....
by the pink umbrella6 years ago
is there a real connection, or is that all BS?
by PoeticPhilosophy3 years ago
I decided to quit coffee to eliminate the caffine from my system because I looked into all the postive's and negative's it causes and there are only like 8 good benefits and atleast 50 BAD thing's coffee does for...
by lagirl13d6 years ago
I'm looking for advice on how to deal with my husband's emotional tie to his pictures and keepsakes from his first marriage of 13 years. He can't seem to part with a couple of boxes of momentos that he has stored...
by Ray Choiniere aka Cagsil6 years ago
Hey Hubbers.I'm doing a dedication to the Women Hubbers. Why?Because more people are interested in Women, than Women are in men only. Even women search for other women, someone who they can look up to or follow in their...
by Lynda Gary6 years ago
I've made the committment to quit smoking (again). And I'm looking for others who are on this journey or considering it. I've never approached this before with support -- and that may have been the reason...
by Burgeon4 years ago
Creating a pleasant reading experience depends on many factors. If we just look at word counts, what can we get? Personally, internet reading for me is more for leisure. I do remember I would lose patience myself if the...
Copyright © 2016 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.