Maria Detects Breast Cancer | Mammography | Screening Shield Concerns Thyroid Cancer | Homeopathy & Thermascan

All rights reserved © copyright Debby Bruck 2012 updated January 2015

The woman's breasts fit into cups without pressure or pain. Radio waves bombard the tissue for only 8 seconds with immediate test results.
The woman's breasts fit into cups without pressure or pain. Radio waves bombard the tissue for only 8 seconds with immediate test results.

BREAKING NEWS

Radiation Research | Standard radiation treatment meant to kill a rare form of breast cancer may actually make the cancer worse. Inflammatory breast cancer represents only 1 to 5 percent of all breast cancer cases, usually diagnosed at younger ages than other breast cancers, posing the highest risk to African American women. Duke University researcher Dr. Mark Dewhirst found radiation, intended to kill the cancer, actually stimulates the tumor cells to move.

  • http://www.wral.com/radiation-research-may-hold-key-to-rare-cancer-treatment/13308371/

GreenMedInfo | Radiation Therapy Can Make Cancers 30x More Malignant

  • http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/study-radiation-therapy-can-make-cancers-30x-more-malignant

The Washington Post | The use of routine mammograms over the past 30 years has done little to lower the death rate from breast cancer but has sharply increased the number of women (over 1 million) who are wrongly diagnosed with the disease and pay in financial, emotional and long term side-effects, such as lymphedema after surgery, radiation therapy, hormonal therapy and chemotherapy.

  • http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/2012/11/21/269fc076-33f0-11e2-bb9b-288a310849ee_story.html
  • Source NEJM http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1206809

New York Times | An analysis of data from six European countries suggests that mammography screening has had no effect on breast cancer mortality.

  • nytimes.com/health/guides/test/mammography/overview.html
  • nytimes.com/2011/08/02/health/research/02screening.html
  • nytimes.com/health/guides/disease/breast-cancer/overview.html

British Medical Journal Entry

A study compared three sets of European country's breast cancer screening methods and their outcomes from collection data. Those included in the study were: Northern Ireland (United Kingdom) compared to the Republic of Ireland; the Netherlands compared to Belgium and Flanders (Belgian region south of the Netherlands), and Sweden compared to Norway. Data was collected from World Health Organization mortality database on cause of death and data sources on mammography screening, cancer treatment, and risk factors for breast cancer mortality.

Results

From 1989 to 2006, deaths from breast cancer decreased by 29% in Northern Ireland and by 26% in the Republic of Ireland; by 25% in the Netherlands and by 20% in Belgium and 25% in Flanders; and by 16% in Sweden and by 24% in Norway. The time trend and year of downward inflexion were similar between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland and between the Netherlands and Flanders. In Sweden, mortality rates have steadily decreased since 1972, with no downward inflexion until 2006. Countries of each pair had similar healthcare services and prevalence of risk factors for breast cancer mortality but differing implementation of mammography screening, with a gap of about 10-15 years.

New 3D Mammography Scans Increase Risks For Cancer Dr Mercola says that women can strengthen the immune system by minimizing exposure to ionizing radiation in devices and tests such as mammograms and airport scanners. Think of ways to boost your immune system to eliminate cancer cells on its own, such as daily sunlight, omega3 oils and vitamin D3.

  • http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2013/08/27/3d-mammogram-risks.aspx

Mammograms Are Close To My Heart

As a breast cancer survivor I've had my own personal experiences with mammograms and over the years formed my own opinions. Women have to weigh the benefits and risks.

Listening to the Diane Rehm Show this morning I knew I could not keep quiet about the mammography screening controversy. The more I read, I hear that women are angry about the new Task Force Guidelines. http://thedianerehmshow.org/shows/2009-11-18/#28909

It is good to air out the arguments on all sides, but I'm not sure we will ever settle on a happy note and make everyone satisfied with the outcome.

Diane makes sure she touched on all aspects of this issue and pointedly asks questions to find answers. You will be able to read the transcript on her site and listen to the podcast. It is a must ‘listen’ to show.

The points of contention that face us today contain these issues:

Is it all about a monolithic system that has been put into place over the years which recommended routine annual mammograms to millions of women beginning at age 40. The new recommendation suggests beginning this type of program at age 50.

PREVENTION:

My definition of prevention is different than the medical system. They consider diagnostic tools and reading clinical numbers as "prevention" to disease. I do not. It is simply a reading. Prevention is taking steps to "prevent" a disease from manifesting. Prevention is a change in lifestyle to create wellness and a strong healthy mind and body.

INSURANCE:

My friends have concerns that thermascans are typically not covered under most medical insurance policies. Even with the policy I have, it is not covered because these medical procedures have still not be formally recognized as viable detection methods by standard medical practice. This unfortunate set of circumstances will turn people away. However, I would like to stress the peace of mind, the earlier detection period, the absence of physical trauma, the ease, convenience and rapidity of this exam makes the cost most worthwhile as an out-of-pocket cost.

MAMMOGRAMS AND CANCER:

Mammograms Linked To An Epidemic of Misdiagnosed Cancers | Here is an excerpt from the GreenMedInfo article that throws caution on the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer today.

  • For most of the twentieth century, mastectomy was the first line treatment for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS), and younger patients were more likely to undergo the procedure. Even after lumpectomy and radiotherapy were shown to be at least as effective for invasive cancer as mastectomy, still in 2002, 26% of DCIS patients were still receiving mastectomy.1
  • http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/mammograms-linked-epidemic-misdiagnosed-cancers


  • The most common scenario today following diagnosis of DCIS is for the oncologist to recommend lumpectomy, followed by radiation and hormone suppressive therapies such as Arimidex and Tamoxifen. The problem here is that women are not being educated about the nature of DCIS or the concept of "non-progressive" breast cancers. There is still the black and white perception out there that you either have cancer, or do not have cancer.


  • In a poll on DCIS awareness published in 2000, 94% of women studied doubted even the possibility of non-progressive breast cancers.2 In other words, these women had no understanding of the nature of DCIS. And why would they? Major authorities frame DCIS as "pre-cancerous," implying its inevitable transformation into cancer. When the standard of care for DCIS is to suggest the same types of treatment used to treat invasive cancer, very few women are provided with the information needed to make an informed decision.

Source

Can Mammography Increase Cancer Risk?

According to the World Health Organization, breast cancer ‘is the most common cancer among women worldwide, claiming the lives of hundreds of thousands of women each year. Breast cancer reaches all countries, whether developed or developing in contemporary technology.

Mammograms Are Not A Form Of Cancer Prevention

Mammography actually increases the risk of breast cancer. In 2011, a study published in the British Medical Journal, confirmed that conventional breast cancer screenings may actually cause more harm than good – especially during the early years – because women are subjected to unnecessary interventions like lumpectomies and mastectomies.

In a 2009 Cochrane Database Systematic Review of breast cancer screening and mammography, the authors wrote: “Screening led to 30 percent overdiagnosis and overtreatment, or an absolute risk increase of 0.5 percent. This means that for every 2000 women screened for 10 years, one will have her life prolonged, and 10 healthy women who would not have been diagnosed if they had not been screened, will be treated unnecessarily.” In addition, if you’re a woman considering mammography, read what Dr. Samuel Epstein – one of the world’s leading experts on cancer prevention – said: “The premenopausal breast is highly sensitive to radiation, each 1 rad exposure increasing breast cancer risk by about 1 percent, with a cumulative 10 percent increased risk for each breast over a decade’s screening.”

Dogs have the ability to smell cancer in people
Dogs have the ability to smell cancer in people | Source

Scientific Research Implicates Mammography

Pub Med published a paper in 2006 entitled : Enhanced biological effectiveness of low energy X-rays and implications for the UK breast screening program. This abstract is open to the public to read. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16498030

Heyes GJ, Mill AJ, Charles MW. Source Department of Medical Physics, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK.

Radiobiological studies show evidence that low energy X-rays used in mammography are approximately 4 to 6 times more damaging than higher energy X-Rays to produce mutation.

The authors conclude the risks of radiation-induced breast cancers from mammography X-rays are underestimated by the same factor.

This does not bode well for larger breasted women and those with a family history of breast cancer.

  • greenmedinfo.com/blog/how-x-ray-mammography-accelerating-epidemic-cancer

Thermascan Explained By Mercola

Andrea Moritz on Airport Scanners

Shown Right New Mercola Video

TIME WITH YOUR PHYSICIAN

Part of the recommendations are not only to reduce the mammogram but to eliminate the diagnostic instruction for self breast exam each month. Again, I understand that this procedure can cause anxiety. We know stress leads to disease. If every month a woman does an exam and is searching for some malignancy or defect, is it possible that will eventually manifest?

One aspect of reducing the time spent on educating the woman about this important self exam, since a majority of tumors are found in this way, is a time-cost ratio. Are the insurance agencies dictating to the physicians the time spent with their patients? I wonder.

My approach would be to definitely teach women of all ages manual breast lymphatic massage. This technique helps to move the fluid from the breast and does not allow stagnation. If you are familiar with Traditional Chinese Medicine you would know that "stagnation" can also contribute to disease.

It is only after a women has a mastectomy or lumpectomy which may result in lymphedema does she learn about this healing technique. I also feel that self care through lymph drainage enables a woman to become very comfortable and familiar with her breasts so that she would notice any changes in any color, sensitivity, shape or hardness right away.

Dr Mercola has just opened a thermagraphy center because of his belief in the benefits of this type of diagnostic tool.

Breast Thermography Detects Cancer Early

Dr Gupta Reports on Lymphnodes

CNN (Health.com) -- Women with early stage breast cancer that has spread to their lymph nodes may require less extensive surgery than previously thought, according to a new study in the Journal of the American Medical Association. For years, doctors have tested whether breast cancer has infiltrated a woman's lymph nodes by injecting a dye into the tumor and identifying the nodes where the dye appears. If these so-called sentinel nodes don't contain cancer cells, doctors assume that the lymph nodes farther away from the breast are cancer-free too. If, on the other hand, the sentinel nodes are found to contain cancer after being removed and dissected, a patient typically goes on to have most or all of the lymph nodes in her armpit area removed. That additional surgery appears to be unnecessary in some cases, the study suggests. Women in the study who had only their sentinel nodes removed had the same survival rate and were just as likely to be cancer-free at five years as women who underwent the second round of surgery.

Please think twice about having all lymph nodes removed. You may end up with Lymphedema your entire life. A debilitating disease of discomfort, swelling that may spread through your whole body.

  • cnn.com/2011/HEALTH/02/08/lymph.node.breast.cancer/

Old Technology Used In A New Way

MailOnline | They call her "Maria"

Micrima, a UK company, designed radio wave technology that discerns changes in material density, typically used for detecting land mines on the earth, may portend a safer, less expensive, and better method for all ages.

  • http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2068870/The-second-scan-detect-breast-cancer.html

Safer than X-rays

Authorities rescinded the recommendation for young women to undergo mammograms because of the difficulty in reading scans of dense breast tissue. With this new technology, the digital geographical maps of the breast will more easily show any changes in tissue density. The sixty antennae within the cup help to detect accumulations of blood and water based on the concept that tumors form a network of blood vessels to feed its growth.

Projection For The Future

Technicians hope this technology will prove a better solution for all concerned. With the lower costs, less need for highly trained radiologists to read the scans, improved detection in all ages and tissue densities, they predict "Maria" to be instituted world-wide in just five years.


THINGS TO THINK ABOUT ~

  • Check out the Anti-Radiation Bra Below
  • Listen to the Diane Rehm Show

  • Is this a Political Issue?

  • Are Women the Guinea Pigs?

  • Video: Watch Mammography Procedure

  • Confusion Abounds: Changing Our Belief System

  • Women versus Doctors versus Researchers versus Politicians


:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

Dana Ullman has written a new article entitled Doctors Answer Mammogram Concerns

One of his comments to a reader states: Statistics suggest that for every woman between 40 and 50 who is found to have breast cancer, they have to screen almost 20,000 women...and the yearly exposure to radiation increases the number of cancers. Are we creating more cancers than we are preventing? Then, there are those women who are found to have an early stage of breast cancer and who are treated convention ally...but whose bodies may have healed the disease on their own...but now, their bodies are burdened with additional radiation and chemo.

As for prostate screening...you (mellowrant) obviously have not reviewed the literature which has been strongly critical of it in younger ages.

  • huffingtonpost.com/dr-jon-lapook/doctors-answer-mammogram_b_364213.html

This is my feeling exactly.

The Secret History of Mammography by Devra Davis, Ph.D.n at Huffington Post

We read what we already knew. Four decades ago cancer specialists realized that detection of a tumor occurs up to ten years or more after cancer growth had begun. Before an X-ray can detect that one-cell gone awry. In addition, annual radiation testing could itself carry the risk of cancer. Mammography for younger woman has the difficulty in detecting abnormality due the breast density. And, there is a political agenda attached to mammography, too. Devra points out the problems with standardization and testing of radiation equipment [see my article on radiation effects].

She mentions the increase in biopsies, re-testing when exploring for abnormalities. There is also the statistical risk that for each increased X-ray and biopsy there is increased chance of damage to tissue.

  • http://www.huffingtonpost.com/devra-davis-phd/the-secret-history-of-mam_b_364733.html

Thermascan Image

RADIATION OVERDOSES ARTICLE

  • REPORT: Americans now get 6-fold more exposure than in 1980
  • Radiation Overdoses Point Up Dangers of Misused CT Scans
  • Healing Uses of Radiation
  • Methods of Radiation Protection
  • Kinds of Scans
  • Radiation Symptoms
  • Homeopathy & Radiation Sickness
  • http://debbybruck.hubpages.com/hub/Homeopathy-Effects-of-Radiation-Overdoses
  • http://health.usnews.com/articles/health/healthday/2009/10/27/radiation-from-medical-scans-soaring.html


:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

Thermascan

What I'm mostly surprised at is the obvious absence of any information about the Thermascan procedure which can detect cellular abnormality years ahead of a mammogram.

A thermascan is completely harmless. It does not crush the breast tissue. It only takes 15 minutes. After holding the hands in ice-water [that isn't fun] a digital photo is taken without touching the breasts at all. The images come up on the screen in living color like a topographical map detecting the areas of heat. The photos are analysed by a trained physician.


REAL PREVENTION

Also absent is the recommendations to take Vitamin D and sunshine and exercise. All three of these items have been shown to reduce the incidence of breast cancer.


Homeopathy

Homeopathy is a holistic approach to healing. When a person chooses to take the advice of a homeopath, they will learn about improving their nutrition, using herbs, and having an in-depth interview to learn about their genetic predispositions, historical background, physical symptoms and emotional stability and outlook and whatever else is of concern to the individual.

An energetic matching remedy is selected to help the person's general constitution. This may be of significant support in general well-being in mind and spirit. Since everything from above comes below. If the spirit is lifted then so the body will also be vibrating in alignment and attunement disabling the ability of disorder and overgrowth of cells in the body.


Women Question The New Guidelines


  • Bras: Breast Thermography, Breast Health and Cancer Prevention

    Breast Research Awareness Support | List of Thermography Providers and more information. http://breastresearchawareness.com/

  • Mammogram Debate Took Group by Surprise | New Guidelines Become Political

    November 20, 2009 Republicans and some groups, like the American College of Radiology, said the guidelines were made in response to the Obama administrations wish to save health care dollars. nytimes.com/2009/11/20/health/20prevent.html

  • Wall Street Journal: In Cancer Testing, Less Is Now Better

    American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists revised recommendations for Pap tests to later age for women. http://www.wsj.com/news/articles/SB125875596169058039

Time Online: Mammogram Guidelines: What You Need to Know

The debate to new guidelines goes online with complete magazine chock full of articles. Every major cancer organization and physicians' group including the American Cancer Society, Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation & Many More...

http://content.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1941700,00.html


The New Anti-Radiation Bra | Created by a surgeon who was beginning to see radiation effects!

Just like the dentist who gives X-rays day-in-and-day-out is in the vicinity of radiation exposure, even though behind a shielded wall. Radiation rays are emitted.

They are using this bra to shield the family from exposure when a woman is treated. No wonder the result of all my breast cancer radiation treatments were benign [thanks to G-d] tumors of my thyroid. So many woman now have abnormalities of their THYROID. Even when you go to the dentist you must specifically ask for a lead apron with a NECK SHIELD if you get bi-annual X-rays to check for cavitation.

The Cancer Bra keeps the radiation bouncing around within the woman's body and, I imagine, if they are not under-going treatment the purpose is to shield from outside sources of radiation coming into the breast tissue.


We Are The Guinea Pigs

And with this knowledge, what are the recommendations for annual mammograms? Where do we take it from here? Do we have answers? Who is right and who is wrong? It seems with all medicine and treatments the general population become the guinea pigs. Just one huge experiment and we find out the results many decades down the line.

Visit Tatjana's Hubpage | Hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism, most successful is natural healing and another on Mammogram

  • http://tatjana-mihaela.hubpages.com/hub/hyperthyroidism-hypothyroidism-succesful-alternative-healing
  • http://tatjana-mihaela.hubpages.com/hub/mammograms

NEWS

Routine Mammogram

More Health News

RESEARCHERS DISCOVER | A growing body of research now indicts conventional cancer treatment with chemotherapy and radiation as a major contributing cause of cancer patient mortality. The primary reason for this is the fact that cancer stem cells, which are almost exclusively resistant to conventional treatment, are not being targeted, but to the contrary, are encouraged to thrive when exposed to chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

  • collective-evolution.com/2013/07/22/researchers-discover-radiation-treatment-leads-to-increased-malignancy-of-cancer/

NEW CANCER TREATMENT THERAPY | A key has been found to treat various forms of leukemia and lymphoma with only very minor side effects. The drug ibrutinib has proven sufficiently safe and effective in early clinical tests by physicians at Ohio State University that it has been given breakthrough drug status by the FDA.

  • gizmag.com/lymphoma-treatment-cancer-ibrutinib/28085/

NATURAL SOCIETY | According to a recent study, conventional cancer treatments are on the rise, and many experts are now revealing that the increase is without a reasonable cause.

  • naturalsociety.com/experts-reveal-unnecessary-cancer-treatments-accelerating-death/

Breast Cancer Risk By Age

Age
Risk Equals
25
1 in 19,608
35
1 in 622
45
1 in 93
55
1 in 33
65
1 in 17
75
1 in 11
85
1 in 9
over 85
1 in 8
The longer you live, the higher the risk it appears from the chart. However, I imagine, the longer you live without a cancer diagnosis the more likely you will not contract the disease.

Judge for Yourself. Injury to Breast Tissue? Radiation Exposure?

Bra to Prevent Radiation Exposure | Now How To Resolve The Controversy?

Obesity Cancer & Depression: Their Common Cause & Natural Cure

Dr. Kaur's book contains a wealth of information for all of us. When I picked up this book I had no idea how helpful it would be in my own battle with breast cancer. The information is detailed, well referenced and so attractively organized and presented that you feel a very personal touch coming through. I recommend this book to women who have been diagnosed with breast cancer as well as those interested in making positive changes in their lifestyle aimed at preventing breast cancer. If you get one book, this is all you will need. Dr. Kaur is clearly someone with great integrity who has uncovered every aspect of this issue. As a medical doctor, my own perspective has changed and I have recommended this book to many of my colleagues.

****

The Complete Natural Medicine Guide to Breast Cancer: A Practical Manual for Understanding, Prevention and Care REVIEW:

An intelligent and straightforward healing program. A 42-day vegetable juice fast is provided using a special recipe and diet with greens to remove toxins and let the inner body rest.

*****

The Breuss Cancer Cure Kevin Trudeau blows the lid off a nest of deception and double standards concerning general and individual health in this new book, Natural Cures "They" Don't Want You To Know About. Kevin has risked government prosecution to bring you the full story of an intricate conspiracy. From the retail supermarket outlets of huge, publicly traded corporations comes processed, manipulated, engineered "food products" -- produced by other wings of the same corporation. These artificial, toxic treats are then sold with the blessings of the Federal Trade Commission and Food and Drug Administration -- government organizations charged with safeguarding the public good -- laying the foundations for future disease and chronic ill-health for the consumer, and a guaranteed source of revenue for the medical and pharmaceutical sectors. Kevin reveals the shocking truth of how drugs - which are being advertised directly to the consumer, pushing their use to an all-time high - are actually the cause of illness and disease climbing to near epidemic levels. And, though it sounds dire, Kevin offers a light in the darkness and directs the reader to scores and scores of alternative therapies, medical practices, philosophies and -- most importantly -- potential cures that help your body regain its natural state of health and vibrancy. So follow Kevin on an amazing journey through the behind-the-scenes world of corporate sponsored "nutrition" and "health," and learn about Natural Cures "They" Don't Want You To Know About.

****

Natural Cures "They" Don't Want You To Know About

Comments 19 comments

Tatjana-Mihaela profile image

Tatjana-Mihaela 7 years ago from Zadar, CROATIA

Great Debby, I am also preparing the Hub about the same topic, will be published int the following days, so I will link yours with mine.

Thermascan is certainly much better option, I also came to the same conclusion.

Thumbs up!


mulder profile image

mulder 7 years ago from Warnbro Western Australia

this is a touchy subject for me my mum died of breast cancer a few year ago she was high risk it was in our family my aunty died from breast cancer and my nah had it my mum had Mammograms all the time this time they found a lump but the so called doctors told her it was fine and not to worry about she went from doctor complaing about her lump in her breast until one my mum beg for help it was to late my mum died of breast cancer I wrote a hub about the saddest day of my life .My point is just because you have a Mammograms dosent mean you are safe Imk still very bitter about this and I guess I always will be .

Great hub my the way .


vrajavala profile image

vrajavala 7 years ago from Port St. Lucie

of course breast cancer is correlated with psychological aspects of the woman. For example, one who is too nurturing, who takes on everyone's problems is at a higher risk. Obviously, lifestyle changes would be appropriate for a woman who displays these characteristics. I believe breast feeding is also a good prevention


Debby Bruck profile image

Debby Bruck 7 years ago Author

Hi Tatjana ~ You are right on the ball with me. We need to inform the public about our point of view. If we respect our bodies, feed them, nurture them, find the natural G-d given resources and get back to nature we will be doing ourselves a favor.

You will read in numerous articles and even in the news that women can live 50 or more years with a lump, and if it is left alone they are fine. While, what concerns me is opening up a tumor and letting the cells proliferate throughout the body.

Dear Mulder ~ I hear the grief, loss, sadness, and resentment in your words. Your mom went looking for help and knew something was amiss. Still she did not receive the needed attention and care.

I pray that you will find what you need to grieve the loss and be joyous in the rest of your life. We both know there is a better way. No words can express the emptiness.

Dear Vrajavala ~ Thanks for reminding everyone about the benefits of breast feeding. I breast-fed three children and it did not prevent the disease. In addition, I had a clear reading on my mammogram the year before finding it myself through self exam. I believe this is also a common scenario.

Most breast cancers are found through self exam and a smaller percentage [maybe 15%]through mammography.

We can list more preventatives in this hub as you think of them.

many blessings

Debby


TrudyVan profile image

TrudyVan 7 years ago from South Africa

Great advice. Thank you for sharing. The more knowledge we have on breast cancer and the treatments there are the better. Lovely hub


Debby Bruck profile image

Debby Bruck 7 years ago Author

Hi Trudy ~ Let me know if you have any other information to share regarding this issue. It is major news and now woman of all ages will have to re-evaluate their self care and decisions regarding mammography. Tell your friends to visit. Many blessings, Debby


rmcrayne profile image

rmcrayne 6 years ago from San Antonio Texas

Great article Debby. I will have to come back to view the videos. I'm beginning to find my "Fringe-mates" (those of us moving away from Western Medicine thinking.


Debby Bruck profile image

Debby Bruck 6 years ago Author

Hi Mary Rose ~ It's always wonderful to find others with similar belief systems and view points. This helps sustain us and keep the energy flowing. I have a creative way of putting together elements from different interest areas to create something new. I think age, education and life experience mold us to make a stand and come to our own conclusions about what is good, and right for each of us as individuals.


Judijo 5 years ago

I am a mammographer. I am good at my job, but I am not mammography's best advocate.

I understand that you don't want to examine your breasts. So don't. Most women don't and this non-compliance is the reason the American Cancer Society and other's guidelines are slowly moving away from the recommendation. Bottom line: education money is better spent elsewhere.

I understand you want to be protected. Wear your leaded bra, although you can't wear it during the mammogram. Request the thyroid shield. We will give it to you. But please keep in mind that the shield may block the very breast tissue that may have cancer lurking inside you.

Regarding thermography. If you want to spend the money, go ahead. But if a tumor is seen in thermography...if it is big enough to produce enough heat to show a positive reading...then it is big enough to kill you. (1 cm in size) That picture up there of a positive thermogram is a breast COVERED in cancer. NOT a fair representation of it's desired message, I am sure.

I do agree with the writer's discussion about prevention. I think there is a whole chapter about nutrition research and advances in cancer prevention that has yet to be properly written. Again, it is a matter of non-compliance. How many women talk to me about her friend or sister or co worker who is/was fighting cancer, while drinking from a "supersize" soda cup, or swallowing that last bite of mass-produced "granola" bar with 23 ingredients that none of us can pronounce?

I am a bit of a conspiracy theorist when it comes to cancer societies and programs. How many people are out of a job when the true link, whether a simple nutrition matter or a microviral anomoly is found, making cancer research no longer needed? I think about this daily. I will keep a job xraying broken bones and kidney stones.

Again, I am not mammography's biggest fan. I am just really good at my job and when you do come in, I will do it with ALARA (at least radiation reasonably allowed) and with kindness and swiftness that you will barely recognize the total one minute of discomfort (15 seconds MAX compression per view @ 4 views).


Debby Bruck profile image

Debby Bruck 5 years ago Author

Dear Judijo ~ Thank you for your viewpoint, concern, care and good treatment of women in need. We have a long way to go to understand cancer, screening, prevention and care. Many miles yet await us for a safe alternative to more radiation to living organisms that may have a threshold that will trigger the onset of tumor growth. I am concerned with dental X-rays, chest X-rays, barium screenings, mammograms and any imposition on the body. I worry about nuclear radiation of any kind and the present day threat of atmospheric fallout circling the globe. Thank G-d for people like you who are not a friend of mammography, and treat women with compassion with the least amount of exposure. Blessings, Debby


HealthyHanna profile image

HealthyHanna 5 years ago from Utah

As a breast cancer survivor, having a mammogram is next on my list for health checkup this year. I avoid them and your hub reinforces my 'why'. I need to get my family to read this hub so they understand my reluctance to go in and get one done.


Debby Bruck profile image

Debby Bruck 5 years ago Author

Dear HealthyHanna ~ I do believe that self exam works well, asking partner to help monitor and getting annual thermoscans also keep a check on progress. Keep the lymph flowing with massage, stay involved with support groups like spiritual communities to provide support and regular exercise and sunshine all add up to healthy living. Blessings, Debby


novascotiamiss profile image

novascotiamiss 5 years ago from Nova Scotia, Canada

Debby, I found your article very well researched and full of useful information. After having been falsly diagnosed with breast cancer I've been going for an annual mammogram for the past 4 years. I have recently developed a thyroid problem and wonder if it might have anything to do with the mammograms. The thermoscan seems to be a far gentler and healthier approach. Unfortunately I couldn't find anything about thermoscan in Nova Scotia. I have e-mailed the local breastscreening program with the question and hope that they will consider integrating theroscan to their current mammogram program. Even if I don't get any support I feel that if women are well informed and keep pushing we might be successful in the end. Thanks for helping to keep the public informed.


Debby Bruck profile image

Debby Bruck 5 years ago Author

Dear NovaScotiaMiss ~ I will provide some resources found on the internet that perhaps you can use. In addition, please listen to the recent (over the last month) broadcast archive radio shows from HomeopathyWorldCommunity which have dealt with radiation and effects on thyroid gland. There are some health tips.

Directory of Canadian Women's Groups

http://www.womennet.ca

Breast Cancer Information

Breast Thermography in Canada

http://www.thermascan.com

http://www.medthermonline.com

I hope these resources are helpful. Blessings, Debby


novascotiamiss 5 years ago

This is very thoughful of you Debby, thanks. I'll look into the info.


Caroline 5 years ago

Hi, I was recently submitted to a chest CT scan and am only 25 years old. It was truly done unnecessarily and at the time I did not know much about them to say I didn't want the procedure. Now that I've researched it, I've become very scared of the possible effects this may have caused on my overall health. How dangerous are the effects of one CT Scan? Can I develop cancer because of this?


Debby Bruck profile image

Debby Bruck 5 years ago Author

Dear Caroline. As a healthy young woman, the body will most likely be perfectly fine. People who are susceptible to cellular injury and have weakened immune systems will carry the most risk. The data shows that repeated insults of radiation will have a cumulative effect upon the body. A one-time event will not make so much difference. Nourish the body with anti-oxidant healthy foods to improve the immune system. Always check with your medical care taker. Many blessings, Debby


christryon profile image

christryon 3 years ago

I am also a breast cancer survivor and I totally agree with the studies that mammography causes cancer. Most Dr's recommend having a baseline mammogram between the ages of 35-40. I HAD large, dense breasts and always needed an ultrasound assist to confirm anything suspicious on the mammograms.

I was diagnosed with stage one, invasive, estrogen + breast cancer on November 22, 2011. I underwent a double mastectomy and had my ovaries and 6 lymph nodes removed on December 16, 2011. I was fortunate that my cancer was caught early. I did not need chemo or radiation, but I will be taking Arimidex for 5 years. I am a year and a half into that program now. One of my sentinel nodes tested positive and my Dr is concerned that one cancer cell may have gotten away even though my CT and Bone scans came out clean.

Thank you for providing an extremely important and informative article.


Debby Bruck profile image

Debby Bruck 3 years ago Author

Dear Chris - Sending you prayers for continual healing. You were fortunate not to require chemo or radiation as you chose elective surgery and recognize the importance of healthy nutrition and lifestyle. May you have a long life. Blessings, Debby

    Sign in or sign up and post using a HubPages Network account.

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked. Comments are not for promoting your articles or other sites.


    Copyright DebbyBruck 2011-2012
    Copyright DebbyBruck 2011-2012

    Mammography, mammograms, and CT Scans help check for the growth of cancer tumors, but may also have repercussions and side effects. Learn your options, like thermography and preventative health care measures. Cancer concerns are a hot topic in current events and news articles.

    About the Author

    Debby Bruck, CHOM founded Homeopathy World Community social network. Debby believes that homeopathy is the wave of the future that provides hope and healing to those who have tried every other approach. Follow Debby on Twitter.


    Reflections On 30-Day Hubpages Challenge


    Disclaimer: This Information is for Educational Purposes Only

    • The information on this blogsite is posted for educational purposes only, and not intended to constitute medical or legal advice. As with any important medical or legal matter, you are advised to consult an experienced health care provider and/or knowledgeable attorney concerning your specific health & vaccine exemption or waiver concerns.
    • No attorney-client relationship or doctor-patient relationship is intended, implied or created by the posting or viewing of information on this site; nor is a doctor-patient or an attorney-client relationship created by the submission or exchange of questions or information via email or otherwise with Debby Bruck
    • Readers are responsible for their use of information provided on this blog or linked to from this site. Debby Bruck assumes no liability for the same.
    • Debby Bruck has made reasonable efforts to ensure the accuracy of information on this blog site, but absolute accuracy is not guaranteed.
    • Always check with your health care provider
    • If You Enjoy Hubpages You may want to Join Now.

    stumble

    User-agent: Mediapartners-Google

    Disallow:

    More by this Author


    Click to Rate This Article
    working