Atheism Vs. Theism
60Religion, Ignorance, and [Dis]beliefs
Here in the US, or even the world, we as people learn to accept and embrace one simple concept: we're different. Not only looks or languages, but rather, our personal beliefs.
Or lack thereof.
To consider it for a moment, there are truckloads of issues and standards of which we have become tolerant in others.
Vegetarian?
That's cool, man, we'll take the meat out of your dish.
Gay?
Fine with me; I respect your life choice.
Atheist?
...Leave.
Why is it that of all the things that we can handle in the world, atheism is completely and totally, in the full sense of the word, unacceptable? Is it because the meaning of the word "atheist" is misunderstood? Frankly, atheism is simply the opposite of theism. Some people seem to immediately interpret the meaning as "worships Satan", where in reality, an atheist doesn't believe in Satan. It is the definite disbelief in gods, deities, or other religious standards.
I think it comes down to something bigger than misunderstanding the word. People understand atheism, and it's from said comprehension that hatred and fear spawns. It's almost as though the world is purposely living in denial and pushing away all who disagree. Could it be that the religious public as a whole is living in willful ignorance?
I can [and do] respect the belief in the presence of a god or greater being; it's not my intention to disclose my preferred theories. But when does it end? Somehow, despite the leaps and bounds achieved by modern science, it is honestly accepted that God is every bit as much of a truth as "this table is solid". It is, without doubt, a fact.
With all due respect, that is simply not true.
There is a line between respecting those beliefs and blatantly lying, and that is a line that I refuse to blur. There's nothing factual about religion. The entire basis of religion is blind faith. If you are questioning any piece of religious aspects, and there is undoubtedly plenty to question, your fellow believers will reassure you that you simply must believe. You must know within yourself that it is all real and true.
I'm not denying for a moment that some things can't be proved. Just because you don't have the ability to prove it doesn't mean it isn't true.
But really, that's a completely different story from religion. Take religions themselves, for example. You already know someone must be wrong. All of the gods and punishing sentences can't exist together in this universe. And we do know that death is the end of biological function.
The [partial] problem comes back to humans complicating life more than it needs to be complicated. Look at other creatures. Look at cavemen. They all exist without the frills in which we engage ourselves, here in the present. What we have is a good thing, yes, but only to a certain degree. The bottom line is, we are biological creatures. Animals. A mass of living cells. Period.
People ask me where we came from, hinting smugly at their alleged 'proof' of a higher being. I don't know. I don't know where we came from, but that doesn't prove any part of any religion. What it proves is, we as humans do not know where it all began. It proves that we haven't figured it out yet, and we may never get there. All we can do is speculate. I'd love, more than most, to know exactly how the universe began. But I refuse to hash it up to spirits and gods. Wanting answers doesn't justify inventing answers.
With so many concrete and proven facts sitting right in front of us, it's hard for me to understand how people confidently throw in their beliefs as if those beliefs are just as factual. It's even harder for me to understand how I'm in the minority for saying that. At the same time, I don't see a world of billions of people throwing their hands up some day and admitting, "I'm wrong."
It's not to ban the idea of religion; who can be sure? My last point, however, was that it's never easy to admit you're wrong. Especially if you've believed you were right your entire life. My own sister speculates that people hold onto their beliefs in order to ease their souls. She elaborated to explain that some people need to know that there's more after death. They have to be assured that their loved ones cruise out of this life into a better place.
In the end, we all continue to disagree. But you still see atheists putting up with, and understanding, their neighbors' beliefs. Why can't theists return the same courtesy and respect instead of reminding all atheists that they're going to Hell? [And to a Hell that atheists don't even believe in, mind you.] Would God want them to accept that theism is the only way? I think not. I think that God would encourage tolerance.
All that being said, acknowledge the irrelevance of my beliefs and see that I speak from a neutral standpoint. It's a valid argument to be made, and I've only scratched the surface.
If that strikes your fancy, you can find more blogs like it on Octember.
This outcome is far too common:
PrintShare it! — Rate it: up down flag this hub
Comments
I'm an atheist. I find my personal reasons for my stance convincing, and feel no need to justify them at all. As you say there is a lot of pressure regarding atheism. But most of the time, I find that once I've taken the time to express them, we part as friends.
Secondly, I like to point out that Atheism isnt a belief. It isnt a stance, nor a position. Thus, there is nothing I do really have to say to explain my position. Athesim by definition is simple a way of saying you're a non-theist, nothing more. It doesnt entail believing in a set of beliefs. There is nothing to explain.
I was once told that my atheism meant that I lacked morals. Something which made me bark a laugh. I am a good person, simply because I choose to be, I am offered no rewards (heaven). That to me, is moral.
Your points are well taken! And as you can tell, it made me think! Something I wish every Hub i read made me do!
I may come across a little harshly, but I am not against Theists, who am I to question their beliefs. In a certain sense, I envy them. But I simply cannot believe what my senses and thoughts deny.
Great Hub,
Thoog.
I would describe myself as a converted agnostic, and I appreciate your take on religion. My closest friend is still a proud atheist, and I would never want to argue him into faith...not that I could.
I think religion has accomplished little more than excluding and segregating people into different sects. But, religion is not faith. Faith is something altogether different. Religion, I think, IS often the result of blind faith, so, to that extent I agree with your criticism of religion. And you are right, it is unacceptable to answer theological questions by saying, "you just have to have faith." That's a cop out for an inability to answer tough questions. I came to faith not blindly (quite the contrary, I argued against most religious ideas), but through truly seeking answers to questions which most religious people were unable answer. Finally, I just had to go to the source Himself and pose those questions to Him to see if He was really there.
What religious people don't seem to get is that it's not unfaithful to question God. Similarly, it's not contradictory for an atheist to question God. Any search for truth must include a search for God, if only at the possibility that He exists. Otherwise the search is only an attempt to disprove, rather than to find truth.
There is no distinction for believers or unbelievers, God is either faithful to those who seek Him out or He's not. Who would want to serve a God that is not. I had to get past trying to decide for myself, or prove to myself one way or the other. It is impossible to do. You beliefs ARE NOT irrelevant. Remember, God claims to be the supernatural one, not us.
I think this is a very important point. Richard Dawkins' God Delusion book actuallky points out that Americans would rather vote for Mormon, Muslims or Jews above an atheist...don't get me wrong, I'm not saying they shouldn't vote for Mormons, Muslisms or Jews...what I'm saying is that everyone knows that there is prejudice against these groups, but odn't realize there is even more prejudice against atheists.
The other thing is that I don't think atheism is really a choice. See http://spiritualinquiry.com/articles/why-atheism-o to sum up my views on that. Really, we believe or we don't, and we can't really help that...it's just hypocrisy to pretend you believe when deep down you don't (which I think is what most people do).
Luren
There is a difference between faith and religion (guessing). We are born with faith. “You must have a faith” is incorrect statement. We have faith. The faith determines our actions. Atheists are believers in nonexistence of God. They are religious. There is not proof there is not God. God is outside of our realm, time and space. Why then we should believe the “conffusors” and liars? Everybody has a religion based on information. Since information is fragile since everything changes it is best to stick with God. I reject religion, including my own. The reason is because all are wrong. Just check how many religions are on the earth. The fact is that Christianity is not religion but relationship. There is excellent and well-written book by Dinesh D’Souza: What’s so great about Christianity. God protect our freedom even we are wrong. And this is an awesome thing. But if we are wrong it is disaster.












Rudra says:
2 years ago
This is very interesting. 2 sides of the same coin.
http://hubpages.com/hub/Satan