BIG BANG THEORY IS JUST BELIEVING
63I never have heard or believed that any explosion (or explosive event) would or could produce an organized purposely-planned design. An explosion is a forceful, disorganized, random event, which produces nothing else but a disorganized result. It was proposed by theorists who were in a position to be contrary to creation. I really do believe in a Big Bang as far as a noise is concerned. At the creation there was a summation of multiple noises, which came at one time, as we would expect as an example when order comes from disorder. An illustration would be this: the furniture rearranged in one second would produce noise.
The rest of the Big Bang theory is nothing other than scientific fiction. Background radiation, the expansion of universe does not explain that there was a valid Big Bang event.
It is inconceivable that something like a big massive universe occurred from nothing. One has to have more faith to accept those different theories than a simple one - believing in God and His creation.
The Big Bang would be acceptable only if God will be the author of it. Otherwise it is only a theory.
No 112706
© 2006 Vladimir UhriPrintShare it! — Rate it: up down flag this hub
Comments
Simple and clear said. I would rather believe in intelligent design (by a Creator) than in a Big Bang, as it makes more sense.
Just a thought- can it be that "a Big Bang" was a destroying of a previously bad system, like when they have to explode an old bad building before replacing it with a new one? :-)
"Quill" Thanks bro for visit and good comment.
Thanks ReuVera for reading and comment.
Vladimir...Someone once said that any problem proposed by the human mind can be solved by another human mind...This " creation " paradox has apparently been solved twice...First by the " intelligent design " creationists, and then by the proponents of the Big Bang Theory, or the Singularity Event...Take your pick...each could be just as correct as the other, depending on your belief system...
Thanks for this interesting take on Creation...Larry
Hello friend. I read many works, but I did not see anyone solved the problem. It is impossible. The deep space need telescope we cannot technically afford yet. Two telescope has to be too far apart.
By the way Big Bang nobody can repeat by experiment.
Thank you for visit and comment.
:)
It is only a theory after all and as such open to debate and probably impossible to prove either way.God Bless.
Absolutely.
The theory must be tested and proved.
Vladimir,
The stars closest to us are moving rapidly away from us, the furthest stars are moving even more rapidly away from us. http://ssscott.tripod.com/BigBang.html
In any explosion the lighter objects are thrown furthest and fastest. Look at the lighter densities of plants furthest from the sun.
To discover the truth requires pursuit. You appear to live in a 'belief bubble' and afraid to fly on your own.
I did study an astronomy and I know it. It is still not fact but theory.
There is not such a huge two point telescope which can show long distant and narrow "sliver" to prove theoretic assumption. Since no one was there cannot prove anything especially evolution. Explosion produces chaos and not design. It means being in bubble? That's fact. Then no one can say where came the explosion and material for such huge matter. Theories have more believing unexplained things than believing in God behind the creation.
another excellent hub Thanks
Thanks and have a beautiful day.
"Quill" says:
2 months ago
Bravo and told as it should be...only if God is the author
Blessings Brother Blessings