Youtube Censorship
53The Soros Connection to Google & Youtube
Larry Page, Eric Schmidt, Sergey Brin
Youtube is "in the tank" for Obama
I just wanted to pass this along. Apparently, those who are expressing their opinions on youtube are now facing censorship. I know this from a friend who was commenting on the horrible smears of Sarah Bernhard.
I don't think I will repeat it, because it is really too gross an insult towards Governor Palin. Just another classic example of a 5th rate comedian, ugly Cinderella step sister", trying to derail the rise of Governor Palin.
In any case, by citing this in his video, youtube removed the video that he made about it and threatened to take down his channel. Now, this is not an isolated incident.Conservative blogs have been attacked by those associated with the Obama campaign, and, of course, we just recently heard of the 20 yr old college student who hacked into Governor Palin's personal yahoo account.
Of course, Google owns youtube and Blogger.com. Of course, since they designed the algorithms for the Google spiders, any webpages containing youtube will be ranked higher in their engines. That is why you will always see on page 1 references to your query that are from youtube. That's how they designed it. Of course, youtube does not charge for its' services, or so it seems to the unsuspecting. Anyone paying for advertising on Google pays and that is why the Google owners are multi-billionaires. I have nothing against them. They are very young and, of course, in Senator Obama's base. Younger people are motivated by ideology and that is perfectly fine, but it is important when running a country to have someone at the helm who acts as an overseer. That is more, or less, the definition of the president's position: to defend and protect. The President's position is not necessarily to invent.
Now, another friend sent me a video on youtube disclosing the close relationship between Google founders, Larry Page, Sergey Brin and their CEO, Eric Schmidt with a left wing think tank, New America Foundation.
Now this sounds all fairly naive until you find out who is the president of the New America Foundation: Jonathan Soros, the son of George Soros. You can see his name here leadership Council. But, if it's gone tomorrow, that's because they might be scrubbing the information. You can see the screenshot in the attached video.
I am going to give you the link on popmodal, just in case the other youtube video posted is removed. However, since Larry and Sergey can manipulate the algoritms, possibly that video service will not get high page rankings. That remains to be seen. It is in beta right now. There would have to be a Search Engine Revolution.
As is explained in the video, George Soros is the man behind Barack Obama and one of Soro's main objectives is the destruction of America as we know it and the establishment of socialism. So, if you value your liberty and First Amendment rights, open an account at popmodal.com
Sometimes, we think that socialism is a great idea and, for a while, even some of our legislators thought that too. However, with socialism comes many constraints on freedom. You may have noticed that Senator Obama, even though he had pledged not to, actually voted for the FISA bill which severely limits Freedom of speech.
Another unusual thing about Senator Obama is that he clims to be a "world citizen" and seems to be ashamed of America. Several times he has referred to the diminished position of America. I believe that because his father returned to Kenya and his mother chose to live aroad in her adult life, he cannot find any remembrances of their achievements in the US. So, unfortunately, he projects that experience on to Americans.
That is why some feel that he is "dangerous" because he does not seem to be putting the interests of America at the forefront., and he even has written the World Poverty Act, which will send 845 bilion dollars abroad under the direction of the UN. Obviously, now at a time when the US is in a severe economic crisis, such ideas are, obviously ludicrous an, as Bill Clinton once said, "a fairy tale."
Please subscribe
- It's The Brzezinski Factor, Duh!
Everyone is in a state of alarm, now that inside sources at the Obama administration have reported that our Golfer-Snorkeler-in-Chief knew about the "Crotch Bomber 3 days before he took off for his sunny... - 3 days ago
- Maureen Dowd Slams Obama
Whoah..it wasn't Limbaugh, Cheney, Beck. No, Maureen Dowd, summed it all up: "Heck of a job, Barry." Sammy, YidWithALid, put it a little more bluntly. the only thing people need a government for is security,... - 5 days ago
- Just Like Clockwork
Yeah, it sure is "clockwork' ,Ms. Napolitano. You've got a tight ship there. Too bad, it's more of a clock used by Al-Quaeda to schedule their friendly reminders to the "Infidels." Ms. Napolitano is from the... - 8 days ago
PrintShare it! — Rate it: up down flag this hub
Comments
There's some weird things going on in Missouri where the legal authorities are trying to suppress freedom of speech of anyone contradicting the Obama campaign.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XIenDGSAdPA
Governor Blunt had to issue a Stern press release:
“St. Louis County Circuit Attorney Bob McCulloch, St. Louis City Circuit Attorney Jennifer Joyce, Jefferson County Sheriff Glenn Boyer, and Obama and the leader of his Missouri campaign Senator Claire McCaskill have attached the stench of police state tactics to the Obama-Biden campaign.
“What Senator Obama and his helpers are doing is scandalous beyond words, the party that claims to be the party of Thomas Jefferson is abusing the justice system and offices of public trust to silence political criticism with threats of prosecution and criminal punishment.
“This abuse of the law for intimidation insults the most sacred principles and ideals of Jefferson. I can think of nothing more offensive to Jefferson’s thinking than using the power of the state to deprive Americans of their civil rights. The only conceivable purpose of Messrs. McCulloch, Obama and the others is to frighten people away from expressing themselves, to chill free and open debate, to suppress support and donations to conservative organizations targeted by this anti-civil rights, to strangle criticism of Mr. Obama, to suppress ads about his support of higher taxes, and to choke out criticism on television, radio, the Internet, blogs, e-mail and daily conversation about the election.
“Barack Obama needs to grow up. Leftist blogs and others in the press constantly say false things about me and my family. Usually, we ignore false and scurrilous accusations because the purveyors have no credibility. When necessary, we refute them. Enlisting Missouri law enforcement to intimidate people and kill free debate is reminiscent of the Sedition Acts - not a free society.”
Bravo to Gov. Blunt.
I heard just yesterday that Youtube clips from the U.S. Senate were taken down without explaination. They were of Barney Frank on the floor stating that no oversight was needed of Fanny Mae and Freddy Mac. We are fast approaching a thought police from the far left.
I received hate email from a comment i made on a YouTube video calling Gov. Palin really hateful names. My comment was - knock it off, don't be a hatemonger. I reported the user for YouTube bullying after getting the email and hate speech against a woman (Gov. Palin) - which is against the YouTube user agreement. My report of abuse was denied and returned to me. Add to that, I've been looking for the Barney Frank footage for a week and it disappeared. I've also found it very hard to find footage of the Palin Carl Cameron interview. There's only one clip showing in searches - poor quality - I find this all hard to believe. I'm really concerned and blogging about this: http://redgirlrising.blogspot.com/
Crl Cameron http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KUBQ53CinVo
full transcript of Carl Cameron interview
http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2008/10/full-transc
democrats & subprime http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVVVzEKauzY
scam coverup http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MGT_cSi7Rs
Ummm, last time I checked Google was a private company, not a government entity, and because of that free to censor content any way they deem appropriate.
You are right. so isn't the media. The point is that people need access to vital information, so if a company purports to be a media company, it should provide free access and freedom of speech.
Otherwise, the public is fickle and can move over to http://popmodal.com for example.
The public brought down keith Olberman and Chris Matthews and will do the same to anyone who tries to shove their provate opinions down our throats.
Nope, they shouldn't :)
If you run your own interactive site, you do exactly the same - censor. It's called "to moderate", but it is the same. :)
Of course if you do this in a way your cutomers think unjust, they will flee to other sites - but that does not mean you SHOULD do this their way :) Nobody can force you, really...
good point Misha. there is now a "truth Squad" on CNN for Obama. they are policing any negative statements about the travesty known as barack Obama.
I am not into elections Vrajavala. There is enough dirt from both sides, and I just stay aside trying to keep my clothes clean :)
Misha,
When a company as large as Google, or youtube enter the media arena, they have a moral, if not legal obligation, to disclose their prejudice.
I personally consider it an obamanation.
Guess what. Jerome corsi is in Kenya checking out Obama and will be on the radio tonite from kenya.
http://www.monksmedia Show times are as follows; 5 PM Pacific, 6 PM Mountain, 7 PM Central, 8 PM Eastern
also update on Berg lawsuit
Talford,
I don't think businesses have a moral :)
Actually I read somewhere recently that American media in general are skewed to the favor of democratic party. While I did not see any supporting evidence, I tend to believe that based on what I see myself.
I wouldn't be concerned about it. This has been happening since 2006, and perhaps earlier. Most videos won't be deleted if no-one is pissing off some political agenda or powerful group. And censorship is nothing new in that regard. It was around about the same issues long before YouTube. Politics are politics for a reason.
Are they publically traded companies??
I really appreciate you. I've been censored countless times myself, not in posting video but in posting comments. This prompted me to look you up, so I'm glad that I found your site. Apparently on a number of videos about Obama, it's not okay to say, "This is phony, lame, etc." I really wanted to say this, because it was that phony accesshollywood video that was so based on the cosby's it was scripted to be that way from the outfits to the banter. Though my comments were not abusive and were just opinion, they didn't make it past a review, so that only all the positive comments are on the site. People who see this site think that everyone's in happy agreement, so that's supposed to be okay, like a crappy poll. It's really offensive to me that so many things seem to be screened, like the comments that become closed, when there are so many problematic videos and comments out there.
sounds like you need to discover http://www.lanlamphere.com/audio/livejava.php
Well, the video owners do have a right to moderate comments. I do this myself especially if people use foul language call me a b***ch etc.
Also there are a growing number of people conslidating a reall opposition to the censorship and to the possiblity of imposing theFairness doctrine and eliminating talk shows
I am a conservative actress in Hollywood and have started posting political satire videos on Youtube. After hearing the censorship issues and seeing friends accounts being taken down I am moving my videos.
there are a number of different video sites; popmodal, vimeo etc. that are building support.
talford says:
15 months ago
Great hub! A real eye opener.