create your own

Did man really evolve from apes?

82
rate or flag this page

By Michelle Reed

 http://www.scheissprojekt.de/evolution.htm
http://www.scheissprojekt.de/evolution.htm

 

The issue of whether humans evolved from apes would seem as difficult a question to answer as: What came first, the chicken or the egg? There are numerous similarities between apes, chimpanzees and humans. Because of these similarities we are classified into the same taxonomic group: Primates.

Chromosome and DNA testing has revealed that we are almost identical to chimpanzees. The genus to which we are classified does not make us the same species; it classifies us as different species that are similar. There is about a four percent difference between us, and that four percent is actually more complex than you would think.

http://www.swr.de/swr2/sendungen/radioakademi
http://www.swr.de/swr2/sendungen/radioakademi


 http://www.lmpc.edu.au/Resources/Science/Prim
http://www.lmpc.edu.au/Resources/Science/Prim

Research indicates that the first apes appeared around twenty five million years ago. The first homo sapiens appeared about 195,000 years ago. Both are classified under the order Primate, suborder Haplorhini, family Hominidae, subfamily Hominini. Features that were discovered through classification of fossil remains lead to the link between man and ape. Most mammals have eyes located on the side of their heads, but primate skulls have eyes located in the front, creating an overlapping vision and depth perception. Primates also have a center of mass over their limb structure, nails over their fingers, and sensitive feet and hands that allow them to explore their environment.

http://www.zooschool.ecsd.net/primate%20class
http://www.zooschool.ecsd.net/primate%20class
 http://instruct1.cit.cornell.edu/courses/biog
http://instruct1.cit.cornell.edu/courses/biog

Evolutions of primates differ between species. Over twenty million years ago weather patterns created shifts in temperature and geological conditions. What was once a vast tropical region became broken fragments of forests and savannahs. The change in environmental habitats forced an evolutionary change to apes, chimpanzees, gorillas and orangutans. Before, they were tree dwelling, and now they were becoming more terrestrial. Changes in diet caused physical changes also. Primates evolved to bipedal locomotion, upright postures. This allowed them to locate predators and use their hands for domestic needs. The creation and use of tools were also adopted through this evolutionary change.

The very definition of evolution is evolving over time to a different and more complex or better form. The evolution concerning the previous mentioned primates did not alter DNA structure; it advanced social and behavioral skills through environmental conditions. We still have the same species today that lived millions of years ago.

Natasha, a black macaque in a zoo near Tel Aviv, Israel, walks upright these days. She nearly died of a flu bug, recovered and began walking on her hind legs.    http://www.azstarnet.com/specialreports/31013
Natasha, a black macaque in a zoo near Tel Aviv, Israel, walks upright these days. She nearly died of a flu bug, recovered and began walking on her hind legs. http://www.azstarnet.com/specialreports/31013
 

Homo sapiens, or humans are primates due to our similar patterns and characteristics. Our eyes are located in front to give us depth perception and three dimensional vision. We also have a center of mass over our hind limbs that creates balance for bipedal locomotion. We have nails to protect our fingers and toes, and these appendages assist us in testing our environment. The difference in characteristics is in the skeletal framework as well as surface appearance. To name a few, our spines become larger as you go down the cervical, thoracic and lumbar regions. Apes spines are enlarged and the size is relatively the same throughout, this allows for muscle attachment to support their enlarged head. Our toes, especially the big toe is not opposable like an apes, it runs parallel with our other toes. This feature gives us balance and creates a structure for weight bearing. Our thigh bone, the femur is centered for gravity, where an apes is turned, and causes the ape to amble rather than walk smoothly.

http://www.skullsunlimited.com/greatapes.htm
http://www.skullsunlimited.com/greatapes.htm
http://www.uta.edu/student_orgs/pdsa/chordata
http://www.uta.edu/student_orgs/pdsa/chordata

The evolutionary changes to humans were more complex. We used our hands for domestic needs and can see predators by being an upright species. We also learned to make primitive tools. The difference is the four percent. Humans have evolved through culture, beliefs and behaviors. The earliest humans classified as Homo sapiens, not Neanderthal, learned survival skills. These skills were changed over time through cultural changes, not genetic ones. Each generation improved the quality of life and skills by passing on information learned over time. Our brains were improved by the development of regions that were unused previously. We learned from trial and error to make structures, establish communities, trade between different cultures and advanced through the centuries up to the technological age we enjoy today. The four percent difference created inventions and education that continues to evolve.

We are primates, but did we evolve from apes, chimpanzees, gorillas and orangutans? I think not. We are classified as different species that are similar, not the evolution of one species to a new and improved being. If we were, why are there still gorillas, apes, chimpanzees and orangutans? If we had evolved from them, why didn't the rest of them evolve over time? Surely they would have advanced in intelligence and improvement of communities as we have. Four percent in this case is a lot bigger number than it seems.

Print   —   Rate it:  up  down  flag this hub

Comments

RSS for comments on this Hub

Rochelle Frank profile image

Rochelle Frank  says:
17 months ago

You have obviously put a lot of thought and research into this.

I haven't, but my understanding is that those who subscribe to evolution theory do not say that man evolved from apes, but rather that they both are branched from a common ancestor.

Some day we may know for sure, but untill then it's interesting to think about.

Good hub.

Michelle Reed profile image

Michelle Reed  says:
17 months ago

Thank you Rochelle.

It is still a debate in colleges, in Zoology class it got a bit out of hand listening to everyone's theories about mans evolution. Many of them thought we did evolve from apes, but I just don't see it. I hope we do find out one day. :)

Health Conscious profile image

Health Conscious  says:
17 months ago

Very interesting. Some people I know make me believe one way and others make me believe the opposite. :-)

Michelle Reed profile image

Michelle Reed  says:
17 months ago

I wonder if we will ever discover the truth behind this theory, and the missing link between Neanderthal and Chromagnon. I know a lot of people believe that we may have evolved from one or both of those, however, science has proved that there are too many discrepencies between all theories.

compu-smart profile image

compu-smart  says:
17 months ago

What ever the actual truth really is, its a fascinating subject covered really well!

ps, the above pic which is brilliant, is my "Boot screen" image!

Michelle Reed profile image

Michelle Reed  says:
17 months ago

Thank You compu-smart. I love animal pictures, especially baby animals. The funny thing about writing this, is that my University mascot is the Gorilla. We are the only College or University in the country with the Gorilla mascot. His name is Gus.

jkk  says:
12 months ago

hey so i like this story.

Michelle Reed profile image

Michelle Reed  says:
12 months ago

Thank you jkk

Kerri  says:
8 months ago

Hello, I agree with your theory. I have been a 'truth seeker' all of my ilfe ( the past 40 years at least ) I have explored religions, read much about evolution, and cannot digest any concept that we evolved from apes. However I continue to battle with my athiest husband and Biology - driven son....the theory of reincarnation is much more acceptable to me!

Marc Pearton profile image

Marc Pearton  says:
6 months ago

The simple answer, If you are talking about modern apes, is no. However, as already alluded to, modern apes and humans did share a common ancestor, which would have looked more ape-like than human.

jkk  says:
5 months ago

but who are the homo sapiens??that teyre look like apes right?

Michelle Reed profile image

Michelle Reed  says:
3 months ago

jkk....that would be us, homo is the genus we belong to, and sapiens is our specific epitat to distinguish us from our fellow primates.

Marc Manint  says:
2 months ago

Very interesting theory. However, you should look more into Anthropology. The study of man can better clarify mankinds evolution from ape to man. This evolution didn't just happen over a couple hundred thousand years. Otherwise, I enjoyed your article.

Elwar  says:
3 weeks ago

Read my hub on Ardi because it demonstrates why evolution did not happen. Evolution is only a religious philosophy applied to science. Darwinism has been disproved for the past 60 years.

Submit a Comment

Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.


optional


  • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
  • Comments are not for promoting your hubs or other sites

working