Did Neil Armstrong Land On The Moon?Quite Amazing

60
rate or flag this page

By sagar_cameo


THE EVIDENCES ,THE PHOTOS ARE AT LAST.

 

Issue 1 :

Since the Moon has only one light source, the Sun, the shadows must be in line.

But in this cases, it looks as if there are multiple light sources in moon,

which is not possible.

 

Issue 2 :

The foreground of many images of the astronauts on the Moon are filled in with light,

while the shadows remain absolutely black, again proving that there are multiple light sources.

 

Issue 3 :

There are no stars in the background from pictures taken on the Moon.

 

Issue 4 :

In some images, a huge light source can be seen reflected in the astronaut's visors.

This has to be a very bright, nearby source. There is no possibility of external light source in moon.

 

ISSUE 5 :

How could NASA take TV images of the LM ascending on Apollo 15, 16, and 17

if there was no one on the Lunar surface to man the camera?

 

ISSUE 6 :

There can't be any pictures taken on the Moon because the film would melt in the 250° temperatures.

Any film exposed to 250° would indeed melt at that temperature.

 

Issue-7 :

The LM engine was very powerful. How come it did not leave a crater below the spacecraft?

Why didn't it kick up any dust when it landed?

 

Issue 8 :

The footprints left by the astronauts are proof that the Moon landings are fake.

This one is also essentially a two pronged argument. First, the Fox show charged that the LM engine was so powerful that the upper layer of dust should have been blown away around the LM, so there should not be any footprints. Others have charged that the footprints should not be there since in the absence of water as a bonding agent,

they should not maintain coherent shapes and sharp outlines.

 

Issue 9 :

There is no dust on LM footpads. -- According to Kaysing and Fox,

this is the strongest evidence that the Moon landings are faked.

They allege that with the swirling dust from LM descent engine,

the foot pads should be covered with dust.

 

Issue 10 :

The pictures below show that flags are waving.

And they never will. The flag was on the airless Moon, just as we all knew.

 

THERE ARE MANY MORE ISSUES ON THIS,

BUT

THOSE ARE TOO TECHNICAL FOR US.

.....NEIL ARMSTRONG WAS NOT THE FIRST PERSON TO LAND ON MOON

 

Issue 1


Print   —   Rate it:  up  down  flag this hub

Comments

RSS for comments on this Hub

anon  says:
6 months ago

I'm afraid I disagree with your point, there is a stick across the flag to hold it up and wouldn't they have any ideas to bring the camera to the outer space. Also, they wouldn't show people the wrong photos.

kyra  says:
5 months ago

its not rell

Mike  says:
5 months ago

Well, it was part of the cold war’s.USA was so desperate to catch up with USSR Space Programme at that Era

USA is always claiming that, they are the best, but, the time has come for new powerful nations, USA Can not compete with them anymore. They have to admit it

Thanks to Bush

Jason  says:
4 months ago

I think this may page may be telling the truth. If you search "Apollo's land on the moon" on Google, half the websites are ones contradicting the Apollo 11 flight.

According to another website, it states that the astronauts were at Vegas the day before, and they headed to a deserted place for the "filming" and the rocket launched in Florida was sent to the South Pole.

All of this seems to do something with the government trying to say "We're better" to the Russians during the Cold War by faking photos and videos and spreading lies all over the world. Indeed, Armstrong IS NOT the first man to walk on the moon.

nidia  says:
4 months ago

this page is very interesting . i think the same with the writer . for the first time i heard that news, i guess it was not real .

sorry 4 my bad english .

danielevans16  says:
3 months ago

What you people do not understand is that heat cannot conduct in a vacuum i.e space, the ground would of been 250 degrees centigrade but anything above 2cm will be instantly cooled by the vacuum, seeing as the camera was at least 50 centimeters above the ground, heat wouldn't melt the film. Learn Physics people heat cannot conduct unless it has air, heat vibrates water molecules in the air which warms out planet and is stopped by Greenhouse gases, which puts it back to the moon, the moon doesn't have an atmosphere so heat cannot conduct, please go back High School and stop faming Humanities greatest dream for hundreds of years, seem like you people who think it is fake just are jealous and sad people. As with the flag, didn't you learn anything with inertia, when you shake a pole it vibrates or sways side to side until it stops, since the flag was in a vacuum, a simple push would put it into a long wavy because of the inertia in the flag due to no atmosphere and very much less gravity. You also make yourself stupid even more saying the dust would of blown the footprints away, you SAID THERE WASN'T AIR ON THE MOON, so when they launched off the dust would of been blown up and would have slowly drifted back to the surface due to the very small amount of gravity. Do not try to change the facts of Science, the moon landing was indeed real, face it and let the real scientists do things without the mindless public annoying them with petty ramble.

alihandra  says:
4 weeks ago

gayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy

d3thm4d3r  says:
3 weeks ago

danielevans16 i agree to uer point of view and yes i do believe its real. Ur onli partly rite the flag waves because there's radiate waves on space. The suns heat wave makes the flag wave and yes the dust thing u r correct due to the gravity little dust flow slowly. There can be footprints also wat makes me sya dis is bcoz wen theres gravity u walk u can make dent on the mud. Same thing on the moon. But not as much gravity on it but u still can make a footprint. Also dey and film and take picture it wont melt. They already know wut equipment dey need wen dey go into space. If dey kno the Camera is ganna melt y bother filming?. And theres not stars bcoz the reflection of the light from the sun is not relfected. Wen u asked dese questions do u think b4 u post it? ok lemme ask u do we see stars at daytime? same thing on the moon? all dese r common sense and if u got anymore questrions feel free to ask me. I will prove u wrong. who eva post this is stupid i can prove u wrong dese facts are full of misunderstanding.

d3thm4d3r  says:
3 weeks ago

the camera have a protection from heat or cold weather so it can b filmed at space. they hav special equipments.

d3thm4d3r  says:
3 weeks ago

jus to let u kno russia didnt land on the moon neil armstrong IS the 1st person up there. Russia was too poor dat time didnt even hav enuf money to make a spaceship. While Amrerica hav a big advantage coz they hav the money. Russia and America was fighting to say who's going to b up der it was America who succeded. Russia want to show the world dat even dey dnt hav the money dey can go up on spcae but dey were wrong it turns out to be Neil Armstrong from America who was the 1st person on the Moon guys face the fact no matter how u fool people and uerself the truth is always the truth. So dnt make it hard for uerself and other peoples. And i hav proof facts the back my evidence and answer.

Submit a Comment

Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.


optional


  • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
  • Comments are not for promoting your hubs or other sites

working