create your own

Which Republican Will Challenge Obama in 2012?

72
rate or flag this page

By bgpappa


Nominee Obama accepting his party's nomination before an estimated crowd of 84,000.

He Said Yes We Can: And People Believed Him.


A little over five years ago, very few people in American knew who Barack Obama was. It wasn't until the Democratic convention that nominated John Kerry as President that Obama was introduced to America. At that convention, Obama burst onto the political scene as a new leader of the Democratic Party. Still, nobody considered him to really be a challenger for the Presidency in four years.

After George Bush won re-election, everyone believed Hillary Clinton was going to be the next Democratic nominee. The democrats were going back to what had worked a decade before and stay the course. Little noticed when Barack Obama declared that he too was running for President. Then Iowa happened. And before anyone had time to breath, Barack Obama, this man with a funny name and big ears, was inspiring a nation. Thousands stood in the cold to hear him preach about hope and opportunity in places like Iowa and New Hampshire. Young people devoted their time to see that their candidate won. Minorities across all racial divides participated in politics like never before. Americans across the country who never cared before got involved, donated money, time and energy. And he won. In less than five years, Barack Obama inspired a nation and made history.

So my question, who in the Republican Party can inspire their own party and the Country the way Barak Obama did?


Whether you agreed with him or not, it is hard to deny that Reagan was a force of change.
Whether you agreed with him or not, it is hard to deny that Reagan was a force of change.

The Republicans Have Done It Before

Most democrats will claim that the Republicans do not have anyone like Obama and never will. This is simply not the case. Republicans have inspired a nation before. It wasn't all that long ago when Ronald Reagan soundly defeated Jimmy Carter and then won 49 states to secure re-election. Reagan won despite his party being disgraced by Richard Nixon only six years before. While Reagan may have been older and conservative, he inspired many young people to take a part in government. Many of those young people became the leaders of the Republican Party in the 1990s through today. John McCain and Newt Gingrich are unapologetic Reaganites.

Reagan also brought democrats to the Republican Party. Today, a whole section of the democratic party is termed "Reagan Democrats." And remember, Reagan won California both times.

Can the Republicans do it again?


Bobby Jindal's time in the spotlight may be over.
Bobby Jindal's time in the spotlight may be over.

Bobby Jindal

The Governor of Louisiana's name has been thrown around as the potential nominee for the Republican Party in 2012. But after his performance rebutting President Obama's address to Congress, it does not appear that he has what it takes to inspire a nation. Even Republicans have blasted Jindal's performance. David Brooks, a conservative New York Times columnist, who has criticized aspects of the stimulus plan, called Jindal's arguments "insane" and tone-deaf given economic challenges the country faces.

And can anyone really argue that watching Jindal speak inspired confidence and moved them to action? I am sure he is a decent and smart man, but he is not a tranforming figure.


For a moment Governor Palin seemed to be a force of change, but that moment has most likely passed.
For a moment Governor Palin seemed to be a force of change, but that moment has most likely passed.

Sarah Palin

The Governor of Alaska burst onto the scene and for a moment brought hope and inspiration to the base of the Republican Party. The Country even had a love affair with her for a moment. But then as quickly as she came onto the scene, she fizzled. Everyone began questioning whether she had what it took to lead a Country.

And, can anyone really say that when Governor Palin spoke she inspired confidence? She appears to be a more divisive figure than one that can bring people together. In many ways, she is much like Secretary Clinton. She is capable and there are those who love her, but just as many that hate her. There is not a whole lot of middle ground. She does not appear to be galvanizing force that inspires a people to greatness.


Can Mitt Romney Lead Or Is He Better Suited To Be A Department Head?
Can Mitt Romney Lead Or Is He Better Suited To Be A Department Head?

Mitt Romney

The former Governor of Massachusetts ran for President in 2008. A former businessman, Romney's focus was on building economic strength under conservative values. Romney won the Michigan primary and faired well in Iowa and New Hampshire, but his campaign fizzled after John McCain won New Hampshire and South Carolina. Romney was on the short list to be McCain's running mate but was passed over.

Romney is building an organization to run for President again in 2012. He has strong business and organizational credentials. But is he a leader that can inspire a nation?  There are those that question his religion (which is not right) and others that question his toughness (fair).  It appears he may be better Department Head than President but only time will tell.


Huckabee is likeable, but do his beliefs alienate too many moderate Republicans?
Huckabee is likeable, but do his beliefs alienate too many moderate Republicans?

Mike Huckabee

Mike Huckabee, the former Governor of Arkansas, ran a strong Presidential campaign in 2008. Huckabee won many primaries, including the Iowa Caucuses, Alabama and Arkansas. Huckabee stayed in the race until March when he gracefully withdrew his name from nomination. Huckabee then worked hard in support of John McCain.

Since the Presidential run, Huckabee has done much to stay in the public light. He hosts a highly rated show on Fox named "Huckabee." There, Huckabee discusses national issues, interviews politicians and celebrities and even plays in a "rock band" made up of people who work on the show. Huckabee has also authoried a new book "Do The Right Thing."

While Huckabee is likeable he may not be the right fit for the Republicans in 2012. He is an ardent and unapologetic right wing politician. While his beliefs appear sincere, his beliefs alienate the moderates in the Republican Party. But, if the Republican Party decides to embrace the evangelicals and the "Christian Right," Huckabee very well could be their man.


Who will inspire the Republicans and challenge Obama?
Who will inspire the Republicans and challenge Obama?

What Are The Republicans Left With ?

 Many names are being thrown around about who is face Barack Obama in 2012.  Jindall, Palin, Romney and many others.  But where is the unlikely candidate that builds a grass roots organization and inspires people to devote their time and energy to put a good man in office?  I don't see him or her yet.  Even though I am a liberal who believes Obama can do a great many things to improve the Country, I would like to see a sincere conservative who inspires the same amount of passion run against him in 2012.  It would great to watch a sincere debate between two candidates who inspire each side.  I think it would be good for the Country to have both sides articulated in a respectul manner but with passion and purpose.  I hope the Republicans find that person. If they don't, the Republicans may learn what a 49 state sweep feels like from the other side.


Who Will The Republican Nominee For President be in 2012?

  • Bobby Jindal
  • Sarah Palin
  • Mitt Romney
  • Charlie Crist
  • David Petraeus
  • None of the above
See results without voting

Comments

RSS for comments on this Hub

The Electronic Cigarette  says:
8 months ago

Depending on what he does in his first term, a vote for a Republican candidate may just be a vote AGAINST Obama. The stakes and expectations have never been higher for a president coming into office. If he can't live up to those expectations (I'm not sure anyone could) it may not matter who the GOP chooses to run against him in 2012. Anyhow, isn't that the year it all comes crashing down?

bgpappa profile image

bgpappa  says:
8 months ago

Some fair points, thanks for reading.

tony0724 profile image

tony0724  says:
6 months ago

Interesting stuff bgpappa, I ama bit of an anomaly I guess as I consider myself a democrat that leans a little to the right . I voted for Obama , and do not really see a Republican who Is very Inspiring.

But with the likes of Barney Frank , Pelosi , and Harry Ried and the policies they are trying to enact like the gun control Issue and alot of the financial policies , they might vote In PeeWee Herman If he goes ont he GOP ticket coming up . But we really do need a third party . And I say It all the time vote out all Incumbents !

Mighty Mom profile image

Mighty Mom  says:
6 months ago

Very thoughtful hub. It's very true that the Republicans need a candidate who INSPIRES. I think they would do well not to choose someone divisive. But first, they need to figure out who they are and what they stand for anymore!

I agree that Romney's business background is impressive. It's a shame that his religion is held against him. But ain't that America?

I'll tell you who I'd like to see run. And who I might even cross party lines to vote for: Stephen Colbert!

bgpappa profile image

bgpappa  says:
6 months ago

Thanks for the comments.

I would vote for Stephen Colbert in a heartbeat, even just for the entertainment value.

Reid and Polosi are horrible.  I am a liberal and they are giving us a bad name.  Spineless and without direction; not what we need right now.  Barney Frank is ok, just shouldn't be out in front.  Doesn't give confidence to anybody.

Thanks.

tony0724 profile image

tony0724  says:
6 months ago

But bgpappa ya gotta admit , Palin Is pretty cute !

bgpappa profile image

bgpappa  says:
6 months ago

I admit it, I admit it. As long as I don't have to talk to her.

Tom Cornett profile image

Tom Cornett  says:
6 months ago

I think we are very close to a one party system....Republicans are giving Democrats the rope to hang themselves with.....the higher ups in the party...I believe...know this. The Democrats are destroying themselves with their own arrogance and neglecting to see what is going on. They really underestimate the Republican powers.

bgpappa profile image

bgpappa  says:
6 months ago

Well fair comment. I think Congressional Democrats are doing horrible right now. But what are Republicans doing, nothing. Will they have a leader that can defeat Obama?

Tom Cornett profile image

Tom Cornett  says:
6 months ago

It will have to be one who steps out of the shadows like Obama did. He or she must be able to talk with common sense and without a teleprompter.

bgpappa profile image

bgpappa  says:
6 months ago

I think so too, although they all read off of a teleprompter, except for the one that could barely read.

Tom Cornett profile image

Tom Cornett  says:
6 months ago

Both parties had better fix our main problems quickly...the people are becoming very restless and angry. This whole mess could blow up in our polititian's faces. Any march of protest could turn extremely bloody and spark a war within.

tony0724 profile image

tony0724  says:
6 months ago

I think parties should be eliminated that way a candidate has to run on their own merits !

bgpappa profile image

bgpappa  says:
6 months ago

Washington would agree with you Tony. I agree, they need to come together. The good thing about a little revolution, is we can have one every few years at the ballot box. Congressional elections in just a year and a half. Grass roots putting up actual candidates could help. Scared politicians could help too.

thinking out loud profile image

thinking out loud  says:
6 months ago

I agree with tony0724, the party system has gotten out of hand. If there must be parties, let them all put up the names of their choice, and vote seperately for pres and vp. Or list all names seperately and the top two vote getters get the jobs. It would create a more inclusive system, and probably neither party would lay claim to the white house. Once a candidate is designated, the party affiliation should be removed. The process should be about the competence of the person, not the party they belong to.

bgpappa profile image

bgpappa  says:
6 months ago

Originally, the Constitution mandated that the top vote getter was President, the person who came in second was Vice President, regardless of Party Affiliation. That is why Jefferson was Adams' Vice President, despite the fact the two hated eachother at the time.

Fair points and thanks for the comments.

tony0724 profile image

tony0724  says:
6 months ago

And might eliminate some special Interest funding as well .

bgpappa profile image

bgpappa  says:
6 months ago

I am all for that!

Tom Rubenoff profile image

Tom Rubenoff  says:
6 months ago

When Mitt was Governor of Massachusetts he never missed an opportunity to throw us under the bus for his own advancement, and when he announced his candidacy for president, he did it from the most insulting location possible, New York City, home of the Yankees, for crissakes. All I can say is if there is ever a Mitt Romney presidency, it's going to be all about him, not us.

bgpappa profile image

bgpappa  says:
6 months ago

Interesting. I thought it was odd he spoke more about Michigan, where his dad was governor, than his own state. Thanks for the comment.

gs  says:
5 months ago

a monkey wil be able to beat Obama in 2012. by then we will be so far in debt that the country might even put him behind bars! he is finished in 2012

bgpappa profile image

bgpappa  says:
5 months ago

ok, but which Republican Monkey will beat him?

goldentoad profile image

goldentoad  says:
5 months ago

republicans don't have to inspire. They have to promote fear. Fear of socialism, fear of being weak against terrorism, fear of constitutional rights being taken away. The one who creates the illusion that he is best to handle the anticipated crisis is their choice.

bgpappa profile image

bgpappa  says:
5 months ago

Thanks for the comment golden

I think the last election rejected fear. I agree that is what got Bush elected the second time but people want something new.

goldentoad profile image

goldentoad  says:
5 months ago

if it weren't for the downward spiral in the economy they would have thrown inspiration out the window and chosen fear. One slip up by Obama and the Republicans will pounce on him and then the "inexperienced" thing will come up again and the seeds of doubt will be watered again.

Mighty Mom profile image

Mighty Mom  says:
5 months ago

Goldentoad raises a good point. Republicans have always been better at fear mongering. And as long as there are issues that lend themselves to fear, they can capitalize on that. Fear is the strongest motivator in the world.

They have 3.5 years to figure out their strategy. And I also agree that the vast Republican machine is not sitting idle. Reps are sooo much better at framing issues than Dems. Just wait.

I don't think Obama will be a one-term president, tho. It seems people are happy with his actions and his transparency. If the economy turns around, he should be able to ride it to another term. Then again, all could be tossed out the window if there is another Al Quaeda strike on US soil... MM P.S. Agree Pelosi is a shrew.

bgpappa profile image

bgpappa  says:
5 months ago

Well Pelosi is horrible and needs to go. We all agree on that.

Also agree that the Republicans are much better at framing issues. The Spin Machine. I wrote a hub on that topic, actually a few of them. Too many democrats aren't willing to roll up their sleeves and slug it out. See Pelosi must go.

But Hillary tried the fear tactics on Obama and he beat her. Yes, the breakdown in the economy hurt McCain, but McCain hurt himself during that time as well. Obama's calm reactions during that time gave him credibility.

Hard to know the what ifs? But who are the Republican leaders that are to come forward?

Mighty Mom profile image

Mighty Mom  says:
5 months ago

I should read your hubs on the Spin Machine. The line of that song "When will they ever learn? When will they ever learn?" is coming tomind.

If I were the Reps right now I would not be publicly declaring anything. I bet they are in the back rooms right now plotting their takeover. I guess a lot will depend on how close America comes in the next 3.5 years to that state of "socialism" I read so much about here on HP. LOL.

Yeah, Hillary miscalculated the country's mood. When people finally decide to reject fear, they reject fear with a vengeance (I think they call that kind of reaction "knee-jerk"). McCain self-destructed. But on some level, don't you think the Reps KNEW they had to let the Dems have 2008 so they can go and regroup? After 8 years of Bush I don't think ANY Rep could have been elected in 2008.

As to who are the Republican leaders ...we still seem to be coming up empty.

bgpappa profile image

bgpappa  says:
5 months ago

Very good points MM. But I think Republicans thought they could defeat Obama with fear. Calling him a Muslim, Communist, Liberal - none of it worked.

But in three years, if the economy has not improved, and they have someone decent, they will defeat him. And rightfully so.

logic,commonsense  says:
5 months ago

I don't see anyone the Republicans have that can do much. One thing to remember though it wasn't that long ago that the pundits had the Democrats dead and buried. The worm will turn. The problem is that they are only different in name only. Look at what Obama preached during the campaign and now he singing a different tune. Even factions in his own party are pissed at him. Congress never changes. All they care about is reelection regardless of their party label. Just give their own constituents enough of other peoples money to make them want more and promise it to them, then they get voted back in. The majority of us get sucked dry to pay off the ones that scream the loudest. Of course most people believe that their Senator or Congressman is okay it's the others that suck. Myself, both our Senators suck and most of our Representatives nare worthless. But I could be wrong. :)

bgpappa profile image

bgpappa  says:
5 months ago

Logic, Thanks for the comment.

I agree, Congress currently is horrible. The Democrats are getting in Obama's way more than the other side. I appreciate checks and balances, but they are not doing it for any real reason, just they want business as usual.

The midterms hopefully will kick some of them from office. Even a Republican Congress would produce some debate. Right now it is everyone saying: MINE MINE MINE.

Thanks for the input.

Mighty Mom profile image

Mighty Mom  says:
5 months ago

I think the US is in a quagmire that is so deep and so complicated it would take an army of political geniuses to pull us out. The challenge is bigger than any one person -- Obama included. Being the cynic I am, I cannot help but believe that Bush and the gang engineered the current state of affairs on purpose. Knowing a Dem would inherit the position, and thinking ahead 4 years to buying time for the Reps to regroup and find their hole to drive through in 2012.

It will be very interesting to see who they come up with to challenge Obama in 2012. As of now, it could go in a number of directions. There is no obvious heir apparent.

bgpappa profile image

bgpappa  says:
5 months ago

As much as I dislike George Bush, I don't think he engineered the current state of affairs. I just think he was just that bad. Bad leadership can bring about results faster than good leadership.

Thanks for the comment.

Submit a Comment

Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.


optional


  • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
  • Comments are not for promoting your hubs or other sites

Can Republicans Find An Obama by 2012? in the News

  • Is This The Loneliest Republican In D.C.?NPR22 hours ago

    After voting for the House health care overhaul, Rep. Anh "Joseph" Cao has new Democratic friends, including President Obama. His next meeting with Republican leaders might be a little different.

  • GOP leaders agree to campaign contribution limitsProvo Daily Herald23 hours ago

    SALT LAKE CITY -- Some Republican legislative leaders say they will support placing limits on campaign contributions when the Legislature convenes in January.

  • Republican's health vote a 'decision of conscience'USA Today23 hours ago

    The lone Republican who voted for the sweeping health care changes that passed the House said Sunday that he "had to make a decision of conscience based on the needs of the people in my district."

working