Election 2008: Disenfranchised Conservatives & Partisan Stone-Waller's

61
rate or flag this page

By R. Martin Basso


George W. Bush... By Basso's clinical definition, Bush himself classifies as a 'Disenfranchised Conservative.'
George W. Bush... By Basso's clinical definition, Bush himself classifies as a 'Disenfranchised Conservative.'

The Republican Party has ...

  • Splintered and formed two distinct conservative movements, each dedicated to polar opposite voting tactics in ELECTION 2008 (THE BASSO THEORY)
  • Is more solid than ever and will unify in an 'October Suprise' of unity and support against the OBAMA juggernaut
  • Accepts defeat at the momentum of the 2008 Obama juggernaut.
  • The entire Republican Party is too damaged now to recover from the follies of George W. Bush and must reform for any hope of future direction.
See results without voting
'PARTISAN STONE-WALLERS':                    McCain's entrenched "October suprise" and strongest hope for election victory in ELECTION 2008.
'PARTISAN STONE-WALLERS': McCain's entrenched "October suprise" and strongest hope for election victory in ELECTION 2008.
'DISENFRANCHISED CONSERVATIVES':  Barack Obama's "best friends" at this important ELECTION 2008 junction.
'DISENFRANCHISED CONSERVATIVES': Barack Obama's "best friends" at this important ELECTION 2008 junction.

Follow ELECTION 2008 through the journalistic musings of social commentator R. Martin Basso, moderate conservative.

.


The traditional Republican Party splinters into two distinct groups with different political objectives, ideological objectives and presidential candidates.

.

My endorsement of democrat Barack Obama has elicited a voluminous collective of e-mails, from the sublime to the ridiculous, from supportive to threatening, from genuine inclusion to overt racism.

Since having announced my support of Mr. Obama's quest for the Presidency of the United States, one of the more common laments I've received is a general misconception that I've somehow ‘betrayed' conservatives, or even traitorously changed my party affiliation.

The reality is that, as a moderate conservative, I reserve the American privilege and right to formulate my own political convictions. I never claimed to be ‘Republican,' nor ‘Democrat'; both parties have become a murky, muddy gray and are antiquated reminders that, indeed, change is needed in restoring the two-party system on which this Nation was founded.

Each have become equally ridiculous, embracing self-aggrandized decay of modern America's geo-political landscape. Since I had no ‘party' from which to ‘change sides' in the first place, I now find myself in the tedious position of having to sift through ignorant e-mail assertions from overly emotional knee-jerk partisans from both political camps.

No, I have not "changed sides," politically, as numerous e-mails to me over the past days have suggested. Since I am a moderate conservative without Party leanings, I base my political overtones on personal conviction, social indicators, contemporary morays, apolitical analysis and, yes, even a wee bit of the religious values around which I was raised, bohemian as they might have been.

As a Moderate, I do not blindly polarize to a term, but weigh each issue an each issue's potential for merit and shortfall alike. In as much, I have not ‘changed sides.' Rather, the parties, the issues, the candidates have transcended America's new 2008 geo-political frontier and, collectively, changed me.

As a Moderate, I still hold true to my core beliefs and idealistic leanings, the roots of which take seed in equally, the liberal movement AND the conservative movements. In no particular order, my personal core beliefs and political idealistic leanings include, but are in no way limited to, the following....

  • That a woman's body is her own and not subject to legal interpretation;
  • That Roe Vs. Wade should stand and remain unchanged;
  • That illegal immigration is a threat to America and our nation's Southern boarder should be sealed with military enforcement;
  • That homelessness is a governmental issue deserving of a government's solution;
  • That hate crimes targeting any legally protected class, to include homophobic hate crimes, should be tried as Capital offenses.
  • That the war in Iraq is concluded and our troops must begin an immediate rotational drawback for immediate return back to our Nation's soil;
  • That upon their return, our Nation's returning troops should be deployed along our Southern boarder utilizing Deadly Force as necessary to dissuade illegal immigration into our UNITED States;
  • That our Nation's schools are in need of serious revamping with our Nation's deserving teachers compensated at a salary rate-of-pay equal to that of any Fortune 500 CEO;
  • That AIDS should be eradicated and that without appropriate funding, this will not happen;
  • That animals have rights to non-torture and non-suffering even in mass food production environments;
  • That our natural resources must be harvested completely regardless of potential for environmental impact;
  • That environmental impact standards must be devised and employed to maintain our Nation's ecological beauty;
  • That ‘Global Warming' is naturally occurring phenomena, exacerbated by human intrusion into the environment;
  • That the death penalty is deserved and reserved anti-social nitwits incapable of rehabilitation;
  • That The Beatles, David Bowie, Led Zepplin, Michael Jackson, Green Day, Pulp, Oasis and Peter Murphy are all musical geniuses (sorry... HAD to slip this in to lighten the mood!);
  • That same-sex ‘relationships' should be recognized as ‘legal unions,' but that defining them as ‘marriage' imperils traditional family values and forces upon all citizens the private personal sexual agendas of select individuals;
  • That Road Rage' and DUI's need to carry mandatory and immediate felony convictions;
  • That a violent crimes against children will incur mandatory life-interment prison sentences;
  • That one unified currency, such as the proposed ‘Amero' for Canada, Mexico and the United States would be catastrophic to not only North American commerce and free trade, but globally and specifically all G7 nations
  • And, last but not least (nor in any way the ‘end') that in post-divorce situations, fathers have rights, as well.

So, no, I have not "changed sides." Stop e-mailing me longwinded, bizarre, conspiracy-theorist e-mails with subject lines like ‘Bassodict Arnold,' ‘traitor' and ‘Jilted Conserv-i-Star.' I had "no side" from which to effectively ‘change' or ‘leave' in the first place and all of this 2008 Election collectively, has changed me.

.

Our nation sits upon a precipice of change with an important and historic Presidential election only 4 days away. At this stage, there are no ‘undecided' voters. Anyone claiming such political malaise at this juncture is either completely apathetic of the process, or had no intention of voting in the first place. Opinions and decisions are decided and have been tabulated; votes have been cast in record pre-election numbers by absentee and early voting ballots.

Yes, this election is now essentially concluded; all that remains id the tally of the count and the declaration of the results.

Contrary to Democratic theory garb, should Obama clinch the Presidency, it will not be the result of the Democratic Party's juggernaut push to resister record numbers of supposed new voters throughout the election process that led up to Election Day 2008. An Obama victory will be the result of a splintering Republican ideology and a division in Party agendas and ideals. Retired general and former Secretary of State Colin Powell's endorsement last week of Barack Obama a clear indication of that.

As our Nation now stares down these final days of this historic election, it will be the Disenfranchised Conservatives and the Partisan Stone-Wallers ultimately responsible for determining this Nation's 44th President.

Disenfranchised Conservatives, such as I, will place their votes behind Obama, not out of liberal duplicity of the Republican ideal, nor betrayal of the conservative movement, but due to the unsettled reality that, in pursuing the greater National good, this current path of Bushian Dismalism can not, nor should not, be maintained any longer. Further, because McCain is so clearly committed to four more years of the last eight years of status quo, any vote contrary to McCain (in this case a pro-Obama vote) is the only logical method of derailing the disastrous George Bush express from its tracks.

Conversely, Partisan Stone-Wallers rigidly unyielding, will continue to demonstrate blind partisan loyalty with little regard for a party-neutral broader assessment of today political issues now at hand. Maintaining the political status quo, as heralded by the 2008 Republican flag-bearer, John McCain, will be the only acceptable voting option.

In a Nation with more registered Republican's, and amidst those registered Republicans there are fragmented splinter theories, each voting in polar opposition to each other, this tight race for the 44th President of the United States of America long ago transcended Senator McCain and Senator Obama.

In these twilight days of this historic election, two opposing Republican factions each hold the keys to unlocking the door of Election 2008.

And when that door opens and our Nation's next President steps through that doorway, who will these small Republican factions have elected?

A change we can believe in or a staying of the course?

Your vote counts.

BE the process.

And, God bless these United States of America.

.

© 2008 - R. MARTIN BASSO & 3 Doves Media

Comments

RSS for comments on this Hub

t.keeley profile image

t.keeley  says:
14 months ago

You sound Libertarian in view. I'm not here to flaunt third party voting, but your views align. You, mixed with me and probably 25% of the republican vote will go to the Democrats or Third Parties. Ron Paul had a staunch following of younger voters who are pissed that McCain and the GOP withheld him from participating in the convention. This will more than likely result in at least two-thirds of his supporters voting for his endorsement, Chuck Baldwin. It's possible people will flock to the other counterpart, Bob Barr, as well. Either way, there's no way Obama can lose this election unless there's more crooked vote twisting in this election.

McCain killed his campaign. He died at the feet of W's endorsement and his own stupidity, both in disregarding the Republican voters and also in neglect of the real issues. Top that off with some interesting quotes from the VP pick that has really sickened many GOP members, and *voila*

End of the Republican party as we know it.

R. Martin Basso profile image

R. Martin Basso  says:
14 months ago

T. KEELEY~

Hello and welcome! I have been watching and reading your hubs and comments with much interest; thank you for stopping by and providing your input. I always appreciate new readers. Nice to have you.

Thakn you for the gracious words. Yes, I'm gonna have to agree with you on all points, although I am not sure, still, of the 'Libertarian' designation...lol.

Very valid points... And yes, this is the beginning of the forseeable end for the modern day 'Republican' party...

Sigh.

Reid

clarity profile image

clarity  says:
14 months ago

You know what, I agree with everything you wrote Reid. And T-Keely Libertarian is the word I've been looking for, thanks for the word. There are many times I don't agree with democrat and there are times where I agree with republican. I always affiliated myself as democrat even though I am not a strong democrat. A vote for a 3rd party candiate is always a waste that is why I voted democrat all the time. if there was ever a way a third party candiate could ever become president I would vote for the third party candidate.

R. Martin Basso profile image

R. Martin Basso  says:
14 months ago

CLARITY-

You see? THIS is exactly what I am referring to and what my entire series has been leading up to... Exactly what you are saying here.... A third party being born out of malaise or disgust. Well said, Clarity!

t.keeley profile image

t.keeley  says:
14 months ago

I think everyone will be surprised at how many votes go to Nader or Baldwin this go-round. Whether a third party replaces the GOP or not (money still fuels american dreams), it will certainly allow Democrat control for what might be a straight 20-year term, with Obama fielding the first of the social democrats. Frankly I'm fine with either side running things so long as the government keeps out of my business and doesn't rip me off because I am a red head :P

R. Martin Basso profile image

R. Martin Basso  says:
14 months ago

T. KEELEY-

Redhead...FUNNY!

Yeah, I hear what you are saying. The premise of a 3rd party, I think saw its highest popularity when Anderson ran as an Independent. Didn't he get like 12% of the vote or something? I think that was the last actually viable atempt that a 3rd party candidate provided to U.S. voters for a choice other than Repub's or Dem's. Ever since then all I can remember is basically anyone voting for a 3rd party candidate basically 'throwing away' their vote in voting for candidates other than the 'big 2'. Same thing today... A vote for other than the big two is essentially a 'throw away' vote. However, with that said, if the voting process included an option of 'none of the above' I could honestly see that '3rd option' realistically impacting the vote.

As I've said previously, 'Mr. None' copuld seriously be elected President!

Reid

Chef Jeff profile image

Chef Jeff  says:
14 months ago

I'mwith you on th eIndependent front, my friend, and even if I too have thron myh vote to Obama, I am certain that some people will forever queston those who voted for him, even with our (pick you choices): Moderate, Independent, Libertarian, etc. political views.

I belive that if McCain had chosen Romney as his VP I could have suported him, but he would also have had to stay stable and find issues, expand upon them and fight for them. So far he has just seemed like me when I go fishing. I start at one spot and migrate all over the bank looking for a new spot. I rarely catch many fish!

I have no good thoughts about Palin as VP and possible POTUS. I also don't believe much of the garbage being sent around about Obama. having met him, I know only a little, but I liked what I saw and heard.

Those making him a Socialist because of this or that really need to learn exactly what it means to truly be a Socilaist. He's as far from that as McCain is from being a Fascist.

Great hub!

Cheers!

Chef Jeff

R. Martin Basso profile image

R. Martin Basso  says:
14 months ago

CHEF JEFF;

I really don't know what McCain was thinking in selecting Palin. Now that the 'honeymoon phase' of meeting Sara Palin in concluded, I must admit that I too was smitten by the uber-hottie Sarah Palin. After really delving into her politics and experience, or lack there of, as well as the rather tepid at best successes of her political run to date, I must really wonder about his logic in selecting her. She would make a decent Secretary of the Interior, but in no way is she qualified or prepared to take on the role of Vice President, let alone President ahould something happen to McCain in his senior years as potential Commander-In-Chief.

I too think that the vast majority of the bad press being spread about Obama is just a smeak campaign designed to cause panic, doubt and fear. It's all also quite racist on some fronts.

Good input and nice hearing from you again...

Reid

Crys Raffa profile image

Crys Raffa  says:
14 months ago

I am still reading some of the pieces in this series. I've been ill, so I'm a bit behind on my reading. Sorry!

I've read this one and all the comments. I admit up front there are certain points I disagree with you on, but that's human nature for you. It would be easy to sit around and argue why we disagree, but the fact is we do. I agree that Obama is the choice for America right now.

Palin looked like a rotten apple to me from the jump off point in all honestly. I don't have issues with all female republicans though. I grew up in Maine. Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins are just fine by me. They might have even made better choices than Palin, but I don't have enough details to make my case on that point.

I'm an out and proud liberal Democrat. Nothing held back on that one. My whole family is democrat, even the ones who marry in! I agree the parties have become a murky sludge and the need to return to a system we have long ago lost and very much forgotten is a desperate need.

Racisim will never stop being an issue in this country. It will stop being talked about openly, but it will never go away. Prejudice doesn't die, it just becomes quieter.

Crys

R. Martin Basso profile image

R. Martin Basso  says:
14 months ago

CRYS RAFFA-

Hi Crys;

I hop eyou are feeling well soon. Well, it is in our human nature to formulate our own views on vaious topics, so there is always disagreement between two people on SOME issue, even the 'closest' of folks, regardless of 2 folks who do not know one another at all, like you and me. But those variations in our respective fabrics of our individual lives is what makes us who we are and what gives us the tools to properly manage life. So, no worrie, no bothers that, as you point our, we differ in view points.

I agree that Palin is now a ridiculous 'rotten apple' as you term her and that John could have done much better in selecting a diffrent VP candidate to run with him. A VP should have qualifications better than just "being a hottie", which now that I dig deeper into the essence of the good Mrs. Palin, I discover seem to be her only leading 'talents'.

I absolutely LOVE your statement: PREJUDICE DOESN'T DIE, IT JUST BECOMES QUIETER. Additionally, I think that fellow hubber CLARITY would find that statement as deep as I do.

Cheers!

Reid

Submit a Comment

Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.


optional


  • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
  • Comments are not for promoting your hubs or other sites

working