Five Best Digital Single Lens Reflex Cameras SLR

86
rate this page

By Mark Knowles



If you have read my other camera hubs, you will know I am a big Nikon fan. But, even I have to admit that there are other great Digital SLRs on the market. The Nikon D3 is top of my list as the best digital camera, but Canon, Olympus, Leica, Fuji, and even *spits* Sony, make a comparable SLR. They all have their pros and cons.

This is the top-of-the-line we are talking here. No, mid price, compact, half measures here. These are the best digital cameras money can buy and aimed squarely at the professional photographer (or wannabe with lots of cash).

So, what are the best five digital single lens reflex cameras on the market at the moment?


Nikon D3 D-SLR
Nikon D3 D-SLR

Number One – The Nikon D3

Call me biased if you will, but Nikon make arguably the best cameras and lenses. They rarely turn out a lemon, and the Nikon D3 does everything you could ask of a pro-quality digital camera. Fast doesn’t even come close. This thing will have fired itself up, taken 200 frames, emailed them to your editor and sent the invoice out before you even realized there was a photo op.

I am just kidding, but it’s fast – faster than you are, and that’s the point. I won’t bother going into the specifications – it’s been done before. Incredible color saturation, insane ISO range, eleven frames a second and more accessories than enough thank you. All for a lousy five grand. What are you waiting for?



Nikon D3 Professional Camera

Nikon D3 12.1MP FX Digital SLR Camera (Body Only) Nikon D3 12.1MP FX Digital SLR Camera (Body Only)
Price: Too low to display
List Price: $5,450.00

Canon EOS 1Ds Mark III
Canon EOS 1Ds Mark III

Number Two – The Canon EOS 1Ds Mark III

And a very, very close number two. The Canon EOS pro camera features a 21.1 megapixel sensor. I will say it again. Twenty one point one MP. That’s insane. Big. A little slower than the Nikon, but that’s what you get when you go this big. A stunning $8,700 – body only. If you are a Canon fan, which I gather there are a few of – this is the one for you. Nikons are for press photographers, Canons are for sports photographers, Olympus…. We’ll get to Olympus.

  • 5 fps at shutter speeds 1/500 second or faster (for bursts of up to 45 Large/Fine JPEGs or 15 RAW images)
  • sRAW mode; 35-zone metering system; 45-point AF; integrated Self-Cleaning Sensor Unit
  • Powered by LP-E4 lithium-ion battery pack; stores images on CF, SD, or some SDHC memory cards

This thing rocks. If only it said Nikon on the front. Oh well, you can’t have everything. Nice, solid camera though.


Olympus E3
Olympus E3

Number Three – The Olympus E3

If Canons are for sports and Nikons are for Press photographers - Olympus are for fashion photographers. I like Olympus cameras – mainly for the lens characteristics. A little softer and perfect for fashion. Olympus have tried to make their pro D-SLR a little tougher and more rugged than previous models, but it just isn’t. It feels a little less solid than the others. Having said that, it takes incredible photos and you would be hard pushed to see any difference in quality between any of these cameras. Once again, fantastic specifications that have been reproduced all over the ‘net. And much, much cheaper than its competition. Usually available for around $1,700 – big difference.


Sony DSLR A700
Sony DSLR A700

Number Four – The Sony Alpha DSLR A700

This is Sony’s first real attempt at the pro DSLR market. But, really, it’s an amateur camera rather than a professional quality one. The price point ( around $1,500 with lens) brings it into competition with the major manufacturers second string models such as the Nikon D300 DSLR. Which makes for too much choice. Sony hooked up with Minolta/Konica to make this one and, whilst it’s a reasonable camera, I would opt for a Nikon D300 instead. It’s on this list because – even though I don’t particularly like the idea of a Sony still camera, they have a good reputation and it’s a pretty damn fine camera. Too many other choices at this price to really make it stand out from the crowd though, and the alpha DSLRA350 may turn out to be a better bet.


Leica M-8
Leica M-8

Number Five – The Leica M8 Digital Rangefinder

Wait a minute – this is not a DSLR. No, it’s not, but you can’t have a list of the five best digital SLRs without throwing in a Leica. Leica are different, no question, but the usability and quality of this camera put it firmly alongside the other on this list. It’s incredible. Nikon-Press, Canon-Sports, Olympus-Fashion, Sony-Amateur, Leica – Different – Simple, superb quality, analogue lenses and an extremely small package. And it’s upgradeable. As new technology becomes available, Leica will upgrade your camera. How to describe the Leica M8? Sophisticated and discrete. Pocket sized. Leica-Candid. Take a look at Tim Ashley’s website. Then come back here and buy it ☺


Conclusion

Too many choices, my head is going to explode. Really, there are two that are head a shoulders above the rest and it also depends on what sort of photographer you are. The Leica is very interesting, because it dares to be different. I very much doubt either your eyesight or mine is good enough to be able to tell the difference in quality between any of these cameras. Go to a shop, pick them all up, handle them and then come back here and buy the one that you like the most. For my money, they are all good buys and whichever one you choose, with the possible exception of the Sony – You will never need to buy another camera ever again. Think of these as the last camera you will ever buy – it puts the prices more into context. Here is an example of the sort of quality you can get from the M8. Of course, the guy with his eye to the viewfinder may have some bearing on the end result also.

Comments

RSS for comments on this Hub Small RSS Icon

Lissie profile image

Lissie  says:
2 months ago

So what do I get for my extra $4000 over an "amateur" DSLR? Or is that another hub?

Mark Knowles profile image

Mark Knowles  says:
2 months ago

That's about 200 hubs LOL

bogey047  says:
2 months ago

Great info on digital cameras

Zsuzsy Bee profile image

Zsuzsy Bee  says:
2 months ago

Mark! Sorry I can't resist... you've changed your hairstyle!!!!! Back to serious matters now. Great information on Cameras... I've always had a soft spot for the Leica products as I used to have one of their better models (film type with zoom lenses etc.) but they're just a bit too good for my wallet now. The Minolta (film) and Digital Canon (which I'm still learning of how to use) will just have to do for now.

regards Zsuzsy

Mark Knowles profile image

Mark Knowles  says:
2 months ago

LOL - They are a lot of money, but that Leica is gorgeous. Takes a good photo too.

elisabeth reid profile image

elisabeth reid  says:
2 months ago

Excellent information -- clear, concise and very easy to understand, even for me.

I've always been partial to Nikon, with Canon as a second choice -- but that was pre-digital. When I was younger, didn't have kids with sticky fingers, and had the money to invest in a good camera.

There were a few of these that practically made me drool. One day...one day.

*sigh*

Mark Knowles profile image

Mark Knowles  says:
2 months ago

I go with Nikon too - as you can see LOL

stressrelief profile image

stressrelief  says:
2 months ago

Wonder why my old pentex is worth... :) Great information!

Ralplh Deeds  says:
2 months ago

I have a Canon Digital Rebel SLR and a Canon D40 both of which I'm happy with. I've been a Canon fan since my first SLR an FT or FTB, I can't recall. Then I bought an early Canon EOS film camera and collected several autofocus lenses which work with the Canon digital SLRs. I've been very happy with Canon. I wish I still had my FTB I had a great 50mm 1.2 lens for it, and I shot a lot of rolls of TriX black & white film with it. But it was stolen 15 years ago. And I spent a lot of hours in the darkroom making prints black and white prints.

The Canon D40 offers several improvements over the Rebel--it boots up faster and it is not as easily damaged by water, not waterproof but more resistant than the Rebel. There are other improvements also which I don't recall at the moment.

Mark Knowles profile image

Mark Knowles  says:
2 months ago

The D40 is a good camera - not in the class of these though. The Canon EOS 1Ds is insane, LOL

sligobay  says:
2 months ago

Great information for the 'haves' but I 'have not' and am delighted to own a Fujifilm FinePixA700 7.3 megapixels digital camera with rechargeable batteries. I paid €120 for the pleasure. Cheers,

Mark Knowles profile image

Mark Knowles  says:
2 months ago

Quite right - there are dozens of other, cheaper alternatives - these are professional level only. Horses for courses. :)

Susan Ng profile image

Susan Ng  says:
2 months ago

These cameras are making me drool. :-p Only thing I don't like about DSLR's is that they're so bulky and heavy. It ends up being reserved for special occasions. I like to keep a handy camera in my bag all the time to capture those everyday "Kodak moments" if I may borrow the phrase. Do you have any preferences on point and shoot cameras?

Mark Knowles profile image

Mark Knowles  says:
2 months ago

I like the Sony cybershot range as a good point n shoot

Mark Knowles profile image

Mark Knowles  says:
2 months ago

LOL - I just prefer Nikons - There's not much to choose - The Nikon is faster, but the Canon has a bigger image.

moonlake profile image

moonlake  says:
2 months ago

Enjoyed your hubs. Thanks for singing my hub. I just have a kodak digital camera. Works for the pictures I take. The only thing I wish it would do is take night time pictures that's when Mom bear brings in her three cubs.

Mark Knowles profile image

Mark Knowles  says:
2 months ago

Thats why you need the Nikon D3 - You can damn nearly take action shots in teh pitch dark LOL

Susan Ng profile image

Susan Ng  says:
2 months ago

Really? Sony Cybershot? I'm surprised. :-o I've tried using several different Cybershot point and shoot models and I've always found them too slow. There's a moment or two after I press the shutter where the lens slides forward and backward before the camera takes the shot (even when I've half-clicked to autofocus already). And the lens isn't wide angle - have to stick to the wall to take a classroom picture.

Of all the point and shoot cameras I've tried, I've really grown to like the Canon Ixus 900Ti (I think it's known as SD900 or something in the US). It takes pictures instantly when I press the shutter and the lens is wide enough so I don't have to make like wallpaper to take a picture of the entire classroom. Plus the picture quality is very good both on screen and print. :-)

Mark Knowles profile image

Mark Knowles  says:
2 months ago

Yes - the slowness is a problem with most point and shoot cameras. It depends what yoy want I guess. I have not tried that Canon, but I have two Sony Cybershots and have found them to be extremely good quality - except they are slow LOL

Susan Ng profile image

Susan Ng  says:
2 months ago

Haha. You're right, it really does depend on what you want. :-)

Angela Harris profile image

Angela Harris  says:
2 months ago

Wow. I'm really wanting to get a new camera. The Leica is on my wish list.

Mark Knowles profile image

Mark Knowles  says:
2 months ago

Me too !

edifier83 profile image

edifier83  says:
2 months ago

I'm working on it and maybe soon, I will buy it one

RFox profile image

RFox  says:
2 months ago

You're biased!! Lol. All these brainwashed Nikon-ites out there. I don't know how we're going to de-program you all. I'm working on a subliminal messaging system sent via email. One day you'll say Canon is the best and you won't even realise it. Mwah haha ha ha......Mwah ha ha.....

ripplemaker profile image

ripplemaker  says:
2 months ago

My cousin who is also into photography would love you Mark. He simply adores Nikon. I have a Sony Cybershot for point and shoot and yes, it is slow LOL well, at least I already know what to buy if ever the need arises to upgrade. :-)

-michelle

rolandfrasier profile image

rolandfrasier  says:
5 weeks ago

Hey Mark! Thanks for the great hub and info. I'm a Nikon shooter myself. I had the original D1 and have enjoyed several models since then. I'm wondering if you have had a chance to play with the D300 and if so, what you think of it? Cheers, Roland

Mark Knowles profile image

Mark Knowles  says:
5 weeks ago

I have had a play with it and yes - definitely worth the money. I have some more hubs on cameras :)

Thanks everyone else for the comments. I have decided the next one I buy will be the leica though - I have always wanted one.

bluerabbit profile image

bluerabbit  says:
2 days ago

Nikon rocks! Actually, I'm waiting for the consumer version of the D3 so I can update my D80, which is a great camera, but every new one is better than the last.

Submit a Comment

Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.


optional



working