George S. Patton vs. George W. Bush - A Question of Leadership

65
rate or flag this page

By Metallitrek


George S. Patton vs. George W. Bush

In trying times people always look to their leaders for guidance, strength, and reassurance. Even the strongest, most iron willed of us can lose faith or begin to question ourselves and our place in the world. At this point, a strong and well defined leader is needed.

George S. Patton is a hero of mine, and he is on a short list. He has been for many years since I started researching World War II history in my early teenage years. I have come to understand his critical role in history and how it can be replicated again to destroy another scourge on the Earth. In Patton's time, it was Nazi (National Socialist Party) Germany. In our time, it's islamic fascism.

About 65 years later we have George W. Bush for President. While Patton was never President, and never wanted to be, he is certainly far beyond anything George W. Bush could ever hope to be. I will illustrate my point as follows:

First, Patton was unquestionably America first. Whereas G.W. Bush is an internationalist, obsessed with too much free trade, that likes to hold hands with Saudi Princes.

Second, Patton is far superior in military matters and strategy. Whereas G.W. hired one of the most incompetent political hacks in Donald Rumsfeld. Additionally. Patton was trained and taught at West Point and the Virginia Military Institute, while G.W. was playing secret society games at Yale.

Third, Patton is a veteran of two World Wars and put down several attempted communist uprisings in the 1930's alongside General Douglas MacArthur. Whereas Bush was hiding in the National Guard pretending to be a pilot during Vietnam.

Fourth, Patton was a stirring speech giver and knew how to get his men pumped up and focused. Whereas G.W. can barely string together a sentence without stumbling all over himself. There are many times where Bush just sounds incoherent.

Fifth, Patton scared the living hell out the Nazi's, not to mention the Soviets. Even the Third Reich's best general Erwin Rommel refused to face him. Whereas, Bush only scares the American people with his obsession of too much free trade that is raping our industrial complex, a tepid war policy, and an out of control government corporate complex.

Sixth, Patton was an accomplished athelete and a dead eye shot with a gun. Whereas, Bush seemed more interested in games of drinking and does not know how to let the military use it's guns. Just look at the phony, made up cases against our troops of Haditha and Hamdaniya in Iraq. Of which, Bush has allowed to continue as a charade, with the government's case weak and falling apart.

Seventh, Patton was an accomplished and astute historian. Whereas, Bush is supposed to be a history major, but cannot even pronounce the Magna Carta correctly. He called it Magna Carter. Is there a new hollyweird star I don't know about?

Eighth, Patton was only interested in total victory and looking good while accomplishing it in the fastest time. Whereas, Bush seems to think that needlessly long and protracted war is good for the country. Any history major or amatuer historian knows that long protracted wars are never good for a nation and become increasingly unpopular as they drag on.

Ninth, Patton was not afraid of getting into someone's face, stepping on toes, or even disregarding an order to get the job done. Whereas, Bush seems to be playing where's waldo whenever leadership is needed.

And tenth, Patton could not stand politicians. He believed they were all whores. And those are his words. And even though he was governor of Bavaria after World War II and could not stand being an administrator, he still did a far better job, with fewer resources, than Bush could ever hope to do. Whereas, Bush has near limitless resources to do what needs to be done, and he just won't do it.

That's Patton ten and Bush zero, with an extra two points going to Patton for making the Nazi's deathly afraid of him.

Don't listen to the Bush butt kissers that are Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh. They are party hacks driven by drivel and agendas. They make every excuse for Bush and don't put his feet to the fire as any impartial person would do.

I will leave you with a Patton quote, ";A good strategy can be ruined by bad tactics, good tactics can save a bad strategy.";

Think about that...

Alan W.

Print   —   Rate it:  up  down  flag this hub

Comments

RSS for comments on this Hub

John Seoung  says:
5 months ago

Your an idiot

Metallitrek profile image

Metallitrek  says:
5 months ago

Well Mr Seoung, it sounds to me like you are the idiot. An idiot is a person who takes a shot at someone without backing up their point. An idiot makes a blanket statement without providing any support for it. Again, you calling me an idiot without backing it up fits into that category.

So, if your feeble brain is capable, I dare you to repudiate or challenge anything I mentioned in this hub. All of what I have stated is either fact, a resonable presumption, or has a specific basis. As such, what have I said that can be construed as ignorant? You called me someone of an ignorant position, hence an idiot, now prove it.

By the way, get your grammar correct. It is not Your, it is You're. Again, that makes you the one who is of an ignorant nature, hence an idiot.

Check and mate.....

arnuld  says:
4 months ago

@ Metallitrek

Your and You're are two different words. Do *you* know English ?

Metallitrek profile image

Metallitrek  says:
4 months ago

Hello arnuld. Once again, someone did not pay attention to what I said and filtered my statements through a particular prism. I know Your means something of yours, something that belongs to you. You're means you are. It is a contraction/combination of the two words. It is 2nd grade English. The point I made is about someone of an ignorant position, someone who could not even get "your" correct, let alone cogently make an argument for or against something.

So, once again, this illustrates that many people are not paying attention to the actual issues or themes, and are making diversion points because they have nothing better to say.

And arnuld, if you want to attempt to insult me, you need to do much better than that. That was not even preschool level insulting.

john  says:
3 weeks ago

you're still an idiot!

Metallitrek profile image

Metallitrek  says:
2 weeks ago

Hey John, elaborate on why you believe I am an idiot. Is it because you are a Bush bot butt kisser? Is it because you have no clue what leadership really is? Or is it that you have nothing better to do because your vacuous life only permits you to take shots at others because you are that worthless? Why don't you try to elucidate an idea or concept instead of masturbating around one?

Submit a Comment

Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.


optional


  • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
  • Comments are not for promoting your hubs or other sites

working