Hero or Vigilante A Comic Book Hero's Moral Code

79
rate or flag this page

By Daniel Greenfield


Watchmen Watchmen
Price: $10.50
List Price: $19.99
Punisher MAX, Vol. 1 Punisher MAX, Vol. 1
Price: $15.50
List Price: $29.99
Punisher MAX Vol. 2: Kitchen Irish Punisher MAX Vol. 2: Kitchen Irish
Price: $7.95
List Price: $14.99
Punisher: Frank Castle Max - Six Hours To Kill TPB Punisher: Frank Castle Max - Six Hours To Kill TPB
Price: $9.14
List Price: $16.99
Punisher Max, Vol. 5 Punisher Max, Vol. 5
Price: $19.98
List Price: $34.99

Right and Wrong in Halftone Colors

A superhero may fight crazed villains, towering monstrosities and mutated supergeniuses, but along the way the hardest battles are usually with himself and with some of the big questions. Golden Age and Silver Age comics might take it for granted that a man could put on a costume, remain entirely stable and sane and be accepted by the military and law enforcement as an axillary member of their team.

That assumption still pervades many titles, but rarely with the same glib self-assurance as before. The X-Men represented the ultimate alienated superheroes, mutated and despised and persecuted, by the very people they were trying to help. But increasingly many superheroes fall in the same category. After all beneath his bright cape and All American color scheme, what is Superman really but an alien from another planet? What is Daredevil, but a human with a mutant power. Or Spider Man for that matter? What is Batman but a borderline schizophrenic in freakish costume?

A man or a woman, in costume, can no longer expect to have a comfortable relationship with the rest of society.Nor can we expect such a person to be too well grounded sometimes.

Cut off in this way a superhero then has to make his own moral decisions and set his own rules? What is justice? Can you kill a villain, or only incapacitate him and deliver him to Arkham Asylum? Uncomfortable questions for unstable superheroes begin arising.

How many times has Batman hunted down and imprisoned the Joker, only to have the Joker escape again and resume killing people. How many lives would Batman have saved, had he killed the Joker, instead of repeatedly capturing him? And doesn't the same go for so many of Gotham's other villains? The Joker is certainly the worst with a body count in the thousands if not the hundreds of thousands by now, but he's certainly not alone.

Guided by an ethos that says "Spare your enemy because you are better than him" and "extend your hand to the lunatic mad scientist as he's falling off a cliff after the explosion of his laboratory", are the superheroes really living by a sane moral code?

But what is the alternative? Superheroes step out on a limb by becoming freelance police officers. Most do not also choose to become judge, jury and executioner as well.

Primarily superheroes fill gaps in abilities and powers by conventional law enforcement forces and the military. Superheroes may fight organized crime that is too ruthless and deeply embedded for law enforcement to deal with. They may and do fight villains who have superhuman abilities, that are beyond the conventional abilities of police forces to combat. They may fight extrasolar entities who come from outside our solar system to wreak havoc on earth, which is beyond the ability of ordinary military forces to combat.

Stepping beyond such auxilary roles into confronting and destroying villains, puts superheroes outside of society altogether, no longer merely aiding, but either denying outright the laws and values of society or claiming the right to supersede them.

The integration of superheroes into a society remains a point of contention, reflected in numerous storylines including Marvel's recent Civil War storyline. Legislation is often passed that restricts or limits superheroes and what they can do, such as the Keene Act in Watchmen. Superheroes are already very strange and different, a superhero who ruthlessly kills crosses the line into outright terrifying.

Superman is an alien with virtually unstoppable powers. A Superman who dispensed freelance justice, would no longer be a partner, but a tyrant. There is only so far outside society's rules a superhero can step and still be any different than the villains he or she fights.

It is no surprise that those heroes who step over that line and become murderous vigilantes, most prominently, are all too human. Consider Rorschach in Watchmen or Marvel's Punisher. Frank Castle is a former police officer, with no superpowers but his guns and grenades. ("Who needs superpowers when you have a hand grenade?" asks a character as a superhero association in an issue of "The Tick.")

While Frank Castle lives and fights in a world filled with superheroes, men and women who in theory should be capable of squashing like a bug, The Punisher holds his own.Garth Ennis' "The Punisher Kills the Marvel Universe" even famously shows him hunting down and killing all the superheroes of the Marvel Universe including Spider Man, Wolverine and Daredevil, after a superhero battle results in the death of his wife. Garth Ennis has always rather famously overestimated The Punisher's abilities and has traditionally been comfortable with rough men in guns, rather than superheroes, something he demonstrated equally well in his run on Hitman.

Loosely based on the Mack Bolan novels, Frank Castle is essentially a men's adventure cliche, in his own costume and focuses on the violence minus the sex. A killing machine with no principle besides killing the bad guys. As he finds them. Frank Castle's moral code is law and order, absent the trickier questions. He is the logical end result of the vigilante hero. Morality must come from the inside or the outside. As the comic book universe has grown darker and its heroes more alienated, their morality is no longer the confident projection of social norms, but must come from within.

Print   —   Rate it:  up  down  flag this hub

RSS for comments on this Hub

marveltshirtguy  says:
16 months ago

Impressive post.

Darryl Evans  says:
13 months ago

I think that tis page is fantastic a lot of thought and emphasis has gone into this page and it shows in the emotion of the wrighting.

These are isssues that everyone dfaces in our world today, not that the rest of the world's fate rests in their hands ut their own peronal deamons.

Scott W profile image

Scott W  says:
10 months ago

What you have written here is something I think a lot of comic fans have often pondered but quickly dismissed. There is much to be said of the moral stand point many heroes in comics today take, but I believe it is those decsions that define who they are as heroes. I completely agree with what you have written, as I found it to be both insightful and properly conveyed.

JC  says:
10 months ago

What you have written here is the best sumerization of the moral factors that go into a "superheros" thoughts, actions, and emotional status. Vigilante, superhero, watchfull protector, whoever it is I believe all have their own opion on what is right or wrong. And all have their own way to justify how they resolve the worlds problems

Melody  says:
7 months ago

Well put. This has been on my mind a lot lately as I've been getting into traditional pulp novel heroes like The Shadow. Pulp heroes are much darker than Golden Age, coming from an age before censorship, but they lack the cynical moral relativism of deconstructionist noir works.

The shocking thing about the Shadow for a superhero comic reader is that he does shoot his enemies when he feels it necessary, especially in the original novels. However, he only seems to shoot in the same situations where our own police would fire. He also strangely cooperates with the police: giving them tips, setting up criminals and calling the police to catch them in the act and so on--all without giving the authorities clear evidence of his existence. He is much like Rorschach, but reasonably sane and measured. He does go overboard in one novel when an agent of his is killed.

Which is more realistic: Rorschach, Batman or The Shadow? I think a person would indeed have to be a little crazy to become a vigilante, because it necessitates a separation from society. However I think such a person would have to be more functional than Rorschach to last any length of time. This leaves us with Batman and The Shadow.

Ignoring the issue of the batsuit, I think it hinges on morality. Batman's moralism seems heavy-handed and unrealistic, but perhaps such a mindset is required to take law and order into one's hands and not fall to the darkside.

The Shadow, while acting a bit more like a normal person (he would have shot the Joker a long time ago), may be more idealistic, because he can walk that fine line and only rarely cross it. However this is still possible if one considers that the motivation is a obsessive crusade stemming from his experiences during the war.

It is oddly the insanity of these characters that makes them work.

Batman may seem more moral, but I would rather have The Shadow watching my back any day.

What do you think?

Daniel Greenfield profile image

Daniel Greenfield  says:
7 months ago

Having heroes act as police auxilaries made things a lot simpler for the reading public by giving them a direct connection to the forces of legitimate legal authority. Same thing went for having superheroes work with the Federal government.

Batman could go in this direction and did, particularly under heavy censorship. You have to remember that there have been a lot of different visions of Batman over the years, the one we're most familiar with, the brooding vigilante who scares the hell out of criminals and walks a fine line between order and madness is an interpretation of Batman.

The Shadow is certainly a much more upbeat take on a superhero. A real life vigilante probably wouldn't be all that well integrated into society.

Submit a Comment

Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.


optional


  • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
  • Comments are not for promoting your hubs or other sites

working