create your own

How Birth Order Affects Your Child’s Psychological Development

89
rate or flag this page

By Kathryn Vercillo



 There is a lot of debate among psychologists and child development experts about whether or not birth order has an impact on a child’s personality and behavior. In other words, there are some people who believe that whether a child is the “oldest” or “youngest” in a family may determine some of his or her personal characteristics but others say that these theories about the impact of birth order simply aren’t true. The real truth is probably that birth order can play a role in impacting your child’s personality but it is only one factor out of many factors that contribute to the total personality that your child develops.

Some Basic Birth Order History

The first person to suggest that birth order was important to a child’s psychological development was a psychologist named Alfred Adler who worked in this field during the early twentieth century. Adler believed that children born first in the family ended up having to take on an abnormal level of responsibility than the other children which could result in psychological problems. Likewise, he believed that the youngest children in the family would lack any need to take responsibility for themselves or others and therefore would have issues related to this lacking. The birth order theories that have developed over time expand upon and alter those ideas suggested first by Adler.

Some Common Beliefs About Each of the Birth Order Traits

Here is a look at some of the most common traits that are believed to be associated with specific birth order placement:

Oldest Children

Oldest children often bear the brunt of responsibility for their younger siblings. They are placed in a care providing and protective role for the younger siblings and therefore may tend to be more responsible in their lives in general. This can result in a desire to control the people and situations around them. Oldest children are usually the “good” children of the family who follow the rules and set the examples for younger children. Positive traits that are typically associated with oldest children include their leadership abilities and ambition.

Middle Children

Middle children often have a difficult time trying to figure out who they are and what their role is within the family. The middle child is always competing with both the oldest and the youngest children in the family. This often causes the middle child to do things to get attention which may be in the form of acting out or may simply be developing outgoing characteristics that garner him or her the attention that is desired. Positive traits that are typically associated with middle children include an ability to get along with almost anyone and a generally easy-going approach to life.

Youngest Children

It is typically believed that youngest children are used to having things taken care of for them and therefore don’t develop a strong sense of responsibility. They may suffer from low self-esteem because they don’t learn to do things for themselves and are always trying to catch up to older siblings. At the same time, this child is usually spoiled and expects to receive what he or she wants. Positive traits associated with being the youngest child include a strong sense of creativity and a sense of humor.

Only Children

Only children are considered to be in a different category than other children because they do not have sibling interaction and therefore grow up primarily around adults. Only children who grow up as the sole center of parental attention may have trouble separating from parents, difficulty getting along with other children and may seek to always be the center of attention since that is what the child is used to at home. Positive traits of the only child include a sense of maturity and a strong sense of self-control.

Beliefs about the Variations on Birth Order Placement

Psychologists today who believe that birth order does have an impact on psycho-social development tend to believe that this is far more complex than just simple traits of “oldest”, “middle” and “youngest” children. It is believed that big gaps in age between siblings, differences in gender, blended family issues and other factors can significantly alter standard traits of birth order. It is also believed that many other factors within the household environment and the family dynamic can significantly change the way that a child behaves in terms of birth order issues.

Some Common Sense Thoughts on Birth Order

My personal opinion is that some merit can be given to the role that birth order plays in creating personalities but that it isn’t the defining characteristic for most people’s psychological development. The interaction between siblings certainly plays a role in teaching kids how to interact with the rest of the world around them so it makes sense that someone growing up in the role of an eldest child / caretaker may behave differently in society than someone growing up in the role of a baby of the family. However, there are so many other things that happen within the interaction between family members that it doesn’t seem safe to assume that birth order along will determine how your kids act.

How Parents Can Deal with Birth Order

You obviously can’t determine in which order your children are born. And for the most part, you probably shouldn’t worry about the birth order of your children. However, parents can benefit from a basic understanding of birth order issues. This allows parents to compensate for some of the areas that may have the most significant impact on development. For example, a parent who knows that putting too much responsibility for caretaking on the eldest in a family can make proper accommodations for an outside care provider to play that role so that the eldest child in the family can develop in a healthy manner without that sense of responsibility.

Enjoy Your Children For Who They Are!

Ultimately you probably aren't going to be able to have a huge impact on whether or not birth order helps to shape who your child is. That's okay. Your child is unique because of all of the things that have contributed to create him or her including the relationship with siblings. Celebrate your child's individuality no matter what the birth order situation is in your family!


Which Birth Order Placement Would You Most Like To Be?

  • Oldest Child
  • Middle Child
  • Youngest Child
  • Only Child
See results without voting

Print   —   Rate it:  up  down  flag this hub

Comments

RSS for comments on this Hub

Adi  says:
9 months ago

informative, well written, and eminently readable...

lyubansk profile image

lyubansk  says:
8 months ago

Adler's treatment of birth order was also quite complex. He too discussed a "psychological" rather than a "chronological" order that was influenced by a variety of factors including gender and age of siblings. In general, we now know that there are three main determinants of people's personality: genetics, shared environment, and unique environment. Birth order and relationship with siblings fall into the latter two categories. On the one hand, the siblings may share the same parents and home environment. On the other, they often have unique relationships with each other and often unique roles in the family. Psychologists are still studying the relative influences of shared and unique environments.

MotherHubber profile image

MotherHubber  says:
8 months ago

Kathryn, thank you so much for writing this hub (it was my request that you answered). It was informative, yet accessible.

As a mother of 3 young children, ages 6, 3, and 1, I found the information that you provided to be really useful. Additionally, I am married to an "only" child, so I was pleased to see that you addressed that distinction, as well.

Thanks once again for a very well-written hub. I will be sure to join your fan club!

All best,

Mother Hubber

Dolores Monet profile image

Dolores Monet  says:
7 months ago

i remember when they said the middle child suffers because he felt left out and was kind of neglected being in the middle and all, but that later thought came to see the middle child as mentally healthy because they are left alone to become thier own true selves, they don't have to prove themselves like the oldest control freak, attention hogging oldest child and are not infantilized like the youngest...so who really knows

dawnella66 profile image

dawnella66  says:
7 months ago

This article from my own experience is dead on accurate~ thumbs up~~

Lisa HW profile image

Lisa HW  says:
5 months ago

Dolores, what you've said rings a bell for me. I'm a middle child (although there is 4/5 years between all of us, and more spacing is said to mean being less impacted by birth order). For the most part, most of what is said about middle children doesn't match my own experience. I do get along with everyone, so that much is true. I never competed with either sibling. I was happy to be "smack dab in the middle". I did not want attention because I saw my older sibling enjoying a lot of attention and doing things that pleased our parents, and I thought (not using these words at the time), "How undignified". I wasn't about to try to please anyone. Since I wanted to be taken seriously, I certainly did not envy my baby brother. I'm probably the most "inward" of us, but I'm definitely the most sociable as well (it's a weird combination, but it's a matter of learning to overcome the inwardness by becoming very sociable). While I didn't have the "attention" in the family, I guess I took my sociable personality outside and was kind of a "quiet leader" among friends. What you said about middle kids being free to "find their own true selves" really rings a bell with me. My elder sister always said she admired that I did what I wanted to do, rather than what would please our parents. I never "acted out". I had far more attention from adults than I wanted and wished they'd "get their minds off me". :) The biggest thing for me was having people watching for signs that I had "issues" because of being a middle child. That, alone, was enough for me to think, "Get your mind off me because you don't know me." My parents were great, but the world is so often misguided when it comes to truly knowing what's going on in a child's head. I'm probably closest to both my siblings, which, to me, is the nicest place to be in the birth order. I did have something of an "issue" with being seen/treated as "the little one" (of two sisters), and as if being "the little one" equalled being just a little less important. That taught me not to look for any validation or sense of importance from anyone else; and I suppose, in some ways, it taught me to feel kind of less important (not a good thing). That's probably what made me kind of "bypass" my famly (in terms of trying to establish myself as "equal") and take my "identity-building" directly to the outside world. Sometimes, though, not growing up feeling like a Big Cheese helps a person develop an appropriately small ego. :)

Sambodhi Prem  says:
3 months ago

I recently read Frank J. Sulloway's book 'Born to Rebel' about the impact of birth order and family niches on personality and by extension on history.

link: http://bit.ly/XkFrG

He's a science historian who has applied Charles Darwin's evolutionary principles to the research of personality development, through a statistical research project that took 26 years to complete.

An interview with the author: http://bit.ly/xTLl9

His website: http://www.sulloway.org/

best regards

Sambodhi Prem

Submit a Comment

Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.


optional


  • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
  • Comments are not for promoting your hubs or other sites

working