How Many Times Does Your Money Get Taxed In A Year?
75Before I studied economics, I was rather simple
At least, when it came to economics. I thought I was taxed once, and that was it. Now, having run a business and grabbing an MBA along the way, I discover that I am being taxed left, right, and centre. (Yes I know most of you spell centre wrong, but I am a Brit). Now, not all of this will apply to people outside these islands, but the principles are the same.
I accepted and understood that I am taxed on my wages. This varies, but essentially we get so much tax free allowance a year. That means, that if we have a tax-free allowance of (say) £6000 a year, we can earn £500 a month without paying tax. Then, anything we earn over the £500 a month is taxed in several bands. The first band may tax us at 25% on the next twelve thousand say. So if we earn £18,000 a year, we pay nothing on the first £6000, then £250 per month or £3000 per year on the next twelve thousand. Say after that we pay 45% (guessing here, but I am talking principles), so for the next £100,000 (assuming you're earning a bit more than me) you would pay an additional £45,000.
That is not strictly true, because we also pay national insurance, which is a tax by any other name, and I think this has a lower threshold at which we start paying it. Not only us, but our employer has to pay a chunk of NI as well. But so far the score is two taxes on our wages.
Now, if you are like me, (and you may be better or worse), come payday you will have spent your money, and be desperate for the next lot. So where has your money gone over the last month?
A big chunk of it will have gone on VAT. Assuming our cousins across the Atlantic do not pay VAT (although Europe does, so they may do) I will explain exactly what VAT is. Value Added Tax is an incremental tax, that each business up the manufacturing chain adds a little to (hence the Value Added bit).
So if you are baking cakes, the miller of the flour will buy wheat at a price. This price includes the price the farmer wants for the wheat, plus VAT, (normally 17.5% but temporarily down to 15%).
The farmer will send the Government the 17.5 percent he has charged. Then the miller will grind the wheat into flour, and sell it on to the baker. The miller will charge what he paid the farmer (but subtracting the VAT he was charged), plus his margin for the work he has done, plus VAT at 17.5%. Then he will pay the government the 17.5% he has charged, less the smaller 17.5% that the farmer charged him. Confused? Why not. But anyway the net effect is everyone in the chain is a tax collector.
Now I have been a bit simplistic here, because not all businesses pay VAT. For example, necessities such as food are not subject to VAT, unless they are fancy food, or you eat them in a restaurant, where you are charged VAT. So it is a little bit complicated.
Added to which we pay tax at a very high rate as we drive. Car tax, which varies according to the carbon footprint of your car, and tax on petrol (which is very high). Why bother with car tax, when you could just add ten pence per litre to the petrol and not have to bother collecting the different tax? Too efficient perhaps?
Now, we also pay housing tax, to pay for the local services. We pay tax called Stamp Duty when we buy a house. And what are parking fees if not tax? We have already paid car tax to use the road, then can't we park on the road without paying more for the privelege? We do not receive anything in return for parking fees, and because the local councils determine where they are going to slap fees we have very little choice as to whether we pay them. Tax, don't you just love it?
Now here is the punchline - if you think that is a lot of tax we have been talking about, when you spend what little they have left you, it goes to a business... that uses it to buy services and goods and pay wages, and that gets taxed all over again... and again... and again...
PrintShare it! — Rate it: up down flag this hub
Comments
I'm with CWB on that. I never used to object to paying taxes. In fact, when people would say things like, "If we get socialized medicine there goes half your paycheck to taxes," I was fine with that. Take 60%! Take what is necessary so people have a decent safety net, live indoors, and can get care if they need it. But now that I see they are just taking money from poor people to wage wars we don't want and bail out bankers that steal from us, I don't want to donate a penny. This year I apparently will not owe any taxes if I keep earning what I earn--I'm at the bottom of the food chain. I plan to stay there. Good hub!
Thanks Folks, I have been tied up elsewhere and have not been able to get back on hubpages much, so it is nice to pick up the odd comments still!
I agree, I don't mind paying taxes, but there is an element of unfairness about it that grieves me. One of the business correspondents for the bbc, Robert Peston, has written a couple of books and I have just started reading "Who Runs Britain". We have a fairly simple tax structure, 25% on everything above a threshold of a few thousand, plus about ten percent 'national insurance' (for the national health service etc) augmented by an employer contribution of another ten percent, and 40% on everything above 32,000.
What I didn't realise, and what Peston points out, is that the labour (ie socialist) government has given tax breaks on private equity investment so that they were only paying 10% on personal income of millions for senior partners, and by manipulating the rules they get away with 5%. The British high street is owned to a large extent by a single person, (not the queen :-) ) who recently paid his wife over a billion tax free because she is not domiciled here for tax purposes.
My feeling is the tax breaks should go to the smaller businesses which would give encouragement for growth, and via this encouragement a bigger tax take on employees and employers that would then occur.
And what really kicked me off on this rant was the sight of dozens of traffic wardens being sent out to book motorists who haven't parked in the alloted slots or paid the £1.20 an hour meter money. We are allowed to park a car for four hours, which is not enough to work a full day without returning to the car to move it, and try to find another parking spot - you cannot meter feed. If you forget or are late you are hit with a £60 fine. For what? As far as I am concerned, these people add nothing positive to the economy apart from subsidizing inefficient councils.
Enough of my bitching, hope to catch up with you both again soon!
If your labour party is guilty as charged they are in no way to be considered "socialist". No more than amerika can be defined as a "democracy" or even a functional republic at this point.
The actions of labour all point back to one thing only, capitalism. A system that rewards greed, dishonesty and callous self interest produces a government that does the same, whether you call it socialist, communist, democratic or monarchy. You can put a cat in the oven. That doesn't make it a biscuit.
Until the money worshipers are removed from power and the financiers who take unearned billions from those who produce are stopped and imprisoned, the cycle of subjugation, oppression, exploitation and bloody revolution will continue as it has for millennia.











ColdWarBaby says:
11 months ago
Personally Ken, I have no problem with taxes. It's the uses the money gets put to that send me stark raving.
Money collected by government is supposed to be applied to programs that will provide the most good for the most people. Evidently nobody has caught on but our, and your, tax dollars or euros or whatever, are bringing extreme wealth to a very few people while driving the rest into poverty.
This isn't just the fault of the government of by any means. In fact, with capitalism ruling the world, there really isn't any government to speak of in amerika. I'd say the same pretty much holds true in britain. It was mother england that spawned amerika after all. I suppose a few of the social democracies extant are trying to hold out but the cancer of the free market is spreading everywhere and will soon bring a global economic collapse. Maybe, after the dust clears, the survivors can put together a global social democracy that will actually perform the function for which it was intended.