How the President of The United States is Elected
76
This is, hopefully, a not-too-direly-doomed attempt to clarify a process that confuses U.S. citizens and fascinated foreigners alike.
|
Our Country's Presidents: Completely Revised and Expanded (National Geographic)
Price: $35.98
List Price: $45.90 |
|
|
The Complete Book of U.S. Presidents--6th Edition: Includes Material through 2005 (Complete Book of Us Presidents)
Price: $63.59
List Price: $21.00 |
The Candidate
According to the U.S. Constitution, qualified candidates for President of the United States must be:
- A natural-born citizen of the United States, and
- At least 35 years of age, and
- A resident of the United States for at least 14 years.
(U.S. Constitution -- Article II, Section 1)
Further, no individual can be elected President more than twice. And no individual who has served as President for more than two years of a term for which they were not elected (e.g., a Vice-President who assumes the office after the disability or death of a President) can be elected more than once.
(U.S. Constitution -- Amendment XXII, Section 1 [ratified February 27, 1951])
The Presidential candidate chooses the Vice-Presidential candidate (aka "running mate"). The two candidates are popularly known as a "ticket."
Should the Electoral College Close Its Doors?
The Electoral College has been with us since the country's infancy. It was a compromise made at the 1787 Convention. Some convention delegates believed the legislative branch (now Congress) should choose the President, and other delegates advocated direct election by the people.
Today, many question the need for an Electoral College, given that we now have mandatory education which presumably prepares citizens to read and understand the issues facing the nation, and the speed of our communications technology (like the thing you're reading this on).
Here are some of the questioners and advocates for reform:
The Electoral College
The Electoral College is not a fancy private school for future Presidents ... but this institution does determine a candidate's fate.
It is not a place, but a body of 538 persons, known as "electors," representing all 50 states plus the District of Columbia (D.C.). Electors are chosen by candidates and political parties.
We don't vote directly for the Presidential ticket. We vote for electors, and our vote is known as the "popular vote." They do the actual voting, known as the "electoral vote." The candidate who receives a majority of electoral votes wins the Presidency.
This is why there can be ... discrepancies ... between the electoral vote and the popular vote.
If no candidate receives a majority of electoral votes, the decision falls to the House of Representatives.
(U.S. Constitution -- Amendment XII)
(HUBBER'S NOTE: I know, I know ... things went a wee bit differently in 2000. Any attempt to explain that fiasco is far, far beyond the scope of this Hub.)
|
Presidential Elections: Strategies and Structures of American Politics (Presidential Elections: Strategies & Structures of American Politics)
Price: $62.50
List Price: $84.00 |
|
The Routledge Historical Atlas of Presidential Elections (Routledge Atlases of American History)
Price: $19.99
List Price: $27.95 |
|
|
Presidential Campaigns: From George Washington to George W. Bush
Price: $13.46
List Price: $16.95 |
|
Presidential Races: The Battle for Power in the United States (People's History)
Price: $16.00
List Price: $31.93 |
Primary Elections and Caucuses
Each of the 50 states chooses its favored nominee, either by a primary election or a caucus vote.
State Primary Elections: A statewide election is held to determine that state's choice for the Presidential nominee for each political party. If the state holds an open primary, voters may choose candidates for any party they wish. In a closed primary, voters may choose candidates only for the party they are registered in, or have declared.
Caucuses: Meetings for every political party are held in precincts, districts or counties. Registered voters attend their preferred party's meeting. Participants form into groups according to favored candidate (or undecided). Speakers for each candidate try to convince people to move from one group to another. A state convention may be held at a later date to determine the final result, as in Iowa. Most Republican caucuses are winner-take all -- one candidate gets all the national convention delegates. Most Democratic caucuses require candidates to win a certain proportion of votes, and national convention delegates are distributed proportionally.
Influence: Political forecasters and the media race to separate the frontunners from the rest of the pack. Iowa and New Hampshire do not bring in huge gobs of national convention delegates or electors, but because the Iowa caucus and New Hampshire primary are (for now), the first two elections held, those two states wield a great deal of influence.
In recent years, other states -- notably California, Michigan and Florida -- have pushed their own primary/caucus dates ahead so that they can have some say in who the nominees will be. A growing trend? Perhaps, but the Democratic National Committee ruled that Michigan and Florida held their primaries too early, and stripped those states of their convention delegates. It is expected that the final act in this drama will play out at the Democratic National Convention to be held in Denver, CO on August 25-28, 2008.
National Party Conventions
Each political party holds its convention in late summer or early autumn. But the party nominee is usually known, and all other candidates have dropped out, many months before the convention. After a single and to-all-intents-and-purposes ceremonial vote, the convention makes the nomination official.
At least, that's how it's been since the mid-20th Century. The now-unlikely event where no candidate has decisively won the nomination before the convention would result in a "brokered convention." Horsetrading, hard-sells and extra voting sessions would ensue. But for better or worse ... the media's focus on early front-runners, the Democratic Party's "Superdelegates" who are not bound to honor the results of any state primary or caucus, and the Republican Party's winner-take-all caucuses all work to ensure an early selection of a Presidential nominee.
National conventions also feature training sessions, speeches and approval of the National Party Platform.
The 4 Presidents Who Lost the Popular Vote -- and Took the White House
- John Quincy Adams (1824) -- electoral votes tied, elected by the House of Representatives)
- Rutherford B. Hayes (1876) -- more electoral votes than popular votes
- Benjamin Harrison (1888) -- more electoral votes than popular votes
- George W. Bush (2000) -- election decided by the Supreme Court
|
|
The Betrayal of America: How the Supreme Court Undermined the Constitution and Chose Our President
Price: $4.23
List Price: $9.95 |
|
|
Was the 2004 Presidential Election Stolen?: Exit Polls, Election Fraud, and the Official Count
Price: $1.64
List Price: $17.95 |
|
|
What Went Wrong In Ohio: The Conyers Report On The 2004 Presidential Election
Price: $2.81
List Price: $14.95 |
The General Election
After a few more months of campaign ads and whistle-stops, voters across the nation get to have their say -- that is, they get to elect electors to the Electoral College -- on the 1st Tuesday following the 1st Monday in November.
(This year, 2008, Election Day is November 4. Don't forget to vote! Remember ... if you don't vote, you can't complain.)
The President-Elect
Assuming no major irregularities occur in 2008:
The Electoral College will vote in December. Electoral and popular votes usually yield the same result, but exceptions are not unknown (see sidebar).
The President of the Senate and the National Archivist should receive all electoral votes by December 24. The votes will be transmitted to Congress on or before January 3. Congress will count the votes on January 9.
The new President and Vice-President will be sworn into office at noon on January 20.
PrintShare it! — Rate it: up down flag this hub
Comments
Excellent work, Marian. This is very important information that everyone should learn if they are not now familiar with it. There is growing controversy over the Electoral College and the primary process. I don't think it's a good idea to start tinkering with the U.S. Constitution, so I would oppose changing the process to modify or eliminate the Electoral College. But I would like to see the Democratic Party make improvements in its primary rules. I would also like to see legislation that would dramatically shorten the campaign season. I am also opposed to campaign finance reforms that would have the government pay for campaigns because the amount of money currently spent on campaigns is outrageous. I would only note that Election Day takes place on the first Tuesday following the first Monday in November, not necessarily the first Tuesday of November. I commend you on a valuable contribution to our knowledge of the election process.
Many thanks, William!
...gleep... on the first Tuesday bit. Just corrected it. I liiike factual corrections, even as I try to avoid the need for them.
Amending the Constitution is -- fortunately -- not an easy thing (see: Equal Rights Amendment). But any guiding or regulatory document will require occasional updates, and the Constitution has not gone un-amended over the centuries. I believe it's time for another look at Article 2.
I'm in total agreement on campaign spending outrage (public funding programs should be mandatory and include a spending cap) and the need to streamline the Primary process.
I understand the desire of many to "update" Article II of the Constitution, but heaven only knows what amendment might come out of such efforts. I am also fearful that this could lead to further efforts for a Constitutional Convention, which could turn out to be a total disaster. There are too many Americans who would stand still while many of our Constitutional rights are lost to more "practical" solutions. Our entire Constitution could be eviscerated.
Hi, William!
Actually, I fear the Constitution is already undergoing evisceration with no say from the people (e.g., questionable Presidential elections, the PATRIOT ACT, certain uses of Presidential signing authority, etc.). But that's fuel for several different rants.
Legally, the Constitution can only be amended after either 2/3rds of both Congressional houses pass a bill, or a Constitutional Convention is called by 2/3rds of all 50 State legislatures. An amendment would have to be compelling to gain that much support; no Constitutional Convention option has ever (yet) convened. But that is just the first stage. The still-proposed amendments must then be ratified by 3/4ths of the States, either via State conventions or State legislatures (and I must admit that the latter is both the more worrisome, and the more frequently used, of the two).
It is an extremely serious and difficult undertaking, as well it should be.
But if there is a need for the rare, but necessary amendment, I am glad that there is an open path for doing so.
And yes, the do-nothings among us worry me, too. Unfortunately that stance, or lack of any stance, is equally damaging no matter what else may be going on.
William, I get the feeling we agree on many of the problems, and are both working on solutions in our own way. I'm enjoying this dialogue, and hope you are too.
|
A People's History of the United States: 1492 to Present (P.S.)
Price: $9.58
List Price: $18.95 |
|
A People's History of American Empire (American Empire Project)
Price: $5.98
List Price: $17.00 |












GoogleCashMoney says:
17 months ago
WoW Great Information.