create your own

In Defense Of The Class System

67
rate or flag this page

By kephrira



My Name's Not Mary, But I Am Quite Contrary

I like to think that taking pot shots at sacred cows is something of a hobby of mine. I just love to seek out those ubiquitous opinions which have become so implicit in our thinking that we don't even notice them any more, which nobody ever challenges or even thinks of criticising; and when I find them I make it my mission to shoot holes in them and find their flaws, whatever my personal feelings may be (or whether I even have any). I guess I'm just what you might call an awkward b~'#}*d. The latest sacred cow that I have set my sights on is the idea that the social class system is discredited and undesirable, and the unchallenged ideals of universal aspiration and equality of opportunity that have replaced it. I would like to argue that an entrenched class system, in which people are born into a particular well defined social class and generally stay in that social class all of their lives, is a good thing. This, I know, is a highly controversial position to take, and many people will think that I am a bit suspect for even considering it, let alone arguing it, but then as a committed controversialist that is really the reason why I wanted to.

In a way it is ironic that the opinion that the class system is utterly wrong has become one of the west's major sacred cows, given that the Hindu culture who gave us the sacred cow is also notable for having one of the most rigid class systems ever created.

The Death of the Working Class Hero

I think it was John Lennon who said that "a working class hero is something to be". I sometimes wonder what happened to that sentiment, and I am rather inclined to mourn it's loss. People (in Britain at least) used to be proud to be working class, but outside of the socialist movement that is rare today. In Britain the pas few decades have seen politicians in universal agreement that we should be moving towards a 'classless society', that we should be adopting the american dream that anyone can be anything regardless of where they begin. One result of this is that people don't grow up wanting to be working class any more, they all grow up wanting to be rich and famous. Many people would say that this is a good thing - that people should aspire to something more and have every opportunity to be succesful - but I firmly believe that it has also had dire unintentional consequences.

The Rise of The Underclass

Decades of struggle have succeeded in all but destroying the working class. But there has also been a paralell trend - the birth of a new social group that has come to be called the 'underclass' - and the two things are most definitely related.

The problem, as I see it, is that not everyone can be rich, famous or successful. You can make opportunities available for everyone to get to the top, but most people will never get there, and somebody still has to be at the bottom. By encouraging aspiration at all levels of society, by teaching people to aim for the stars, the British have destroyed the social value, culture and pride that used to be attached to being working class. Being at this level of society is no longer seen as something good itself, but something that everyone should be trying to escape from. People employed in low paid working class positions, deprived of this pride and feeling of social value are left feeling like failures. People are conditioned to expect more from life than they are likely to acheive, and this leads to unhappiness, whilst others, seeing that they cannot get the social position they are taught to feel that they deserve, and not having the cultural conditioning to value the role in life that is open to them, simply drop out of society. This is what has created the so called 'underclass' which is characterised by economic ghetto's, entrenched unemployment, crime, and violence which are all passed down in families of 'sink estates' in the same way that working class values used to be. These people, their place in society having been taken away by middle class poilticians who think that everyone should want to be like them, have literally dropped out of society. This underclass also exists in America.

The struggle for a classless society has failed. The high level of gang culture, crime, and entrenched economic ghetto's, which Britain now shares with the US after adopting the 'American dream', can only be tackled by a return to a traditional class system in which a working class hero is, once again, something to be.

Should People Know Their Place And Stick To It?

  • Yes
  • No
See results without voting

Print   —   Rate it:  up  down  flag this hub

Is the Class System Immoral? Does the 'American Dream' lead to Crime and Disenchantment? Share your thoughts here.

RSS for comments on this Hub

Strophios profile image

Strophios  says:
4 months ago

This is silly. You are attacking a straw man. The notion that we must always be questing to "get ahead," to be richer and more famous, is indeed a dangerous and destructive notion. But it does not have anything to do with a classless society or a class system. A much healthier notion is: every function has merit, from janitor to CEO, and to back that up with income equality. You get a classless society when you realize that, simply because your function is rarer (i.e. you can pitch a fast ball) doesn't make you a more valuable human being.

kephrira profile image

kephrira  says:
4 months ago

thanks for the comment strophios, and I agree that that is a worthy ideal, but is it a realistic one?

What social environment / mechanism can lead to a person feeling that a janitor is a worthy profession in an aspirational society, other than a working class identity?

Strophios profile image

Strophios  says:
4 months ago

It's relatively simple, all it takes is the realization that it is an important function and you are fulfilling it. A world without janitors would be an unpleasant world indeed, some aspects of it would not run at all. Once you realize that, it's easy to be proud of your profession. In some ways easier to be proud of being a janitor than a professional athlete.

kephrira profile image

kephrira  says:
4 months ago

Yes, but that pride in being a janitor is inconsistent with the metality it requires to be a business leader, brain surgeon etc. and is therefore necessarily a working class pride - a pride in the vital role of the worker. If you put an ambitous high flyer in the role of the Janitor it would require a psychological shift out of the aspirational mind-set of the middles classes into the working class mind-set in order to experience that pride and satisfaction of a vtial job well done.

Strophios profile image

Strophios  says:
4 months ago

You can simply have pride in what you do. If I'm a professor, I can take pride in doing my vital work of educating. If I'm a doctor, I can take pride in doing my vital work of healing the sick. If I'm a janitor, I can take pride in doing my vital work in keeping both of their buildings running. I don't see how the kind of pride in each situation needs to be different.

kephrira profile image

kephrira  says:
4 months ago

take a doctor and give him the janitor's job, then tell him that.

Strophios profile image

Strophios  says:
4 months ago

One, that's not his function. A doctor has, at this point, become a doctor, so it would seem silly to make him work as a janitor. This is not to say, however, that he should not still take pride in his work, because what I've said thus far is still true. I'm aware that he probably wouldn't, which is why we need a major cultural shift. But this cultural shift has nothing to do with recreating a class system and everything to do with respect, devaluation of money, etc.

kephrira profile image

kephrira  says:
4 months ago

But let's say the person hasn't become a doctor yet, but they are raised in the kind of middle class household where that is the kind of job that they are expected to end up in, then they probably wouldn't be happy or feel like they were doing something worthwhile with their life if they ended up in a job doing manual labour. On the other side of the equation a person who grows up surrounded by people doing that kind of manual job, and with the atitude that it is worthwhile and good work, probably wouldn't spend all that time and money getting qualified as a doctor.

Two different sets of social values are therefore required for those two different kinds of social roles for people to take those jobs and be happy in them.

You don't neccessarily need a very rigid class system in which it is impossible to move from one to another, but I would suggest that you do need a class identity to provide these different social value, otherwise you get people who end up unhapy because their social values and sense of identity don't match with their actual role in society.

Strophios profile image

Strophios  says:
4 months ago

Your argument for the necessity of class identity is a bit more reasonable, certainly because it no longer requires a restriction on social mobility. However, I still think that you can accomplish the same kind of respect and pride in profession in all professions in all levels. It would certainly require a major cultural shift, but so would shifting back to strong class identities.

kephrira profile image

kephrira  says:
4 months ago

I think your position and mine might not be as opposite as they look. I still think that a happy doctor and a happy Janitor will neccessarily have a different outlook on life and a different perspective on defining their self worth, but I think if people did have the kind of respect and pride that you are talking about this would probably come naturally, so you would have social classes (perhaps more than just the traditional 3) with their own class identity whether you actively tried to create and nurture them or not. What really motivated me to write this was the absence of this kind of pride and repect in groups of people who would previously have got it through a working class identity, leading to the relatively new phenomenon (at least in Britain) of the 'underclass'. It is my opinion that the best way to get it back is to recreate the social value of the 'working class hero' and the pride and sense of identity that goes with it, but the point of it is to regain the sense of self worth and pride, which are the most important things.

connecttoheaven profile image

connecttoheaven  says:
4 weeks ago

I like how you are thinking and questioning assumptions. As a United Statesan who has lived for years in Europe I can see so many American beliefs that are just plain wrong. That anybody can be anything and everybody should aspire to be rich makes for a cruel and callous society.

Submit a Comment

Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.


optional


  • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
  • Comments are not for promoting your hubs or other sites

working