Information the Right Way!U.S.A Founded on Christianity?

61
rate or flag this page

By svencill


Is the U.S. ultimately a christian nation?

I am absolutely sick of this issue. I have seen all kinds of debates on the subject, but is it really that difficult to find the truth? I did some research and found things that would outrage the fundamentalists: undeniable proof that this country was, in fact, not founded on Christianity.

So in my research I ran into the Treaty of Tripoli. Though not very interesting as a whole I discovered something that made me ecstatic. Article 11 of the treaty begins:

"As the government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion;.........."

It goes on to state that we will remain peaceful because we do not discriminate against religion and therefore will not go to a war over religious beliefs.

And I know this is not quite iron clad enough for people but what about this: the treaty was written by President John Adams' administration. He was considered one of the most influential of our founding fathers. And to make it even more obvious that this was the intent of our country this treaty had to be passed by congress. In fact, it was only the third document to ever be ratified unanimously at the time.

And with the belief that we are a Christian country comes the argument over Separation of Church and State.

Even before that, separation of church and state was an issue. Though not named exactly, the first amendment of the constitution lays out certain requirements of our country and states that ultimately make it impossible to mingle government and religion. It reads:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Then to make it even less likely, congress included the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, which has generally been interpreted to prohibit 1) the establishment of a national religion by Congress, or 2) the preference of one religion over another or the support of a religious idea with no identifiable secular purpose and they included the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment .

I know that the First Amendment is one of the most referenced items in most debates about the Separation of Church and State. It does not state it directly but many of our founding fathers viewed it necessary to separate government and religion in order to avoid religious persecution and discrimination. Actually, the phrase "separation of church and state" came from a letter written by Thomas Jefferson to a group calling themselves the Danbury Baptists. He wrote:

"Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man & his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation between Church & State."

In conclusion, with the first amendment in place our Founding Fathers made sure that we could not be a theocracy. They knew that being a theocracy would take away many of our rights. They eliminated religious persecution and discrimination and helped make it possible for us to be the well diversified country that we are today.It is clear that they did not found this country on any single religion or belief.

A Christian Nation?

Do you believe the U.S. was founded on Christianity?

  • yes
  • no
  • maybe
See results without voting

Seperation of Church and State

Do you believe there should be seperation of church and state?

  • yes
  • no
  • maybe
  • don't know
See results without voting

Print   —   Rate it:  up  down  flag this hub

RSS for comments on this Hub

svencill profile image

svencill  says:
2 months ago

I want to thank everyone for reading and would love to read your take on the subject.

Rob-Jr profile image

Rob-Jr  says:
6 weeks ago

Your right the United States was not created on Christian doctrine or it's beliefs directly but instead on the values and morals that were given to them by living in a environment that Christin values were not silenced by its government. Even though the colonies were established by people seeking religious freedom. It was common to encounter public prayer, religious statements of faith, and hear scripture quoted while debating issues and conducting business. It was never the founding father intent to silence one belief or the right to exercise that belief over another. Many people today have distorted the idea of separation of church and state to mean the banning of any act of faith on public property or forums. Instead of what it really means, which is the preventing of organized beliefs from using government to enforce their belief over another. i.e. atheist over Christian or even scientific theory over faith. All beliefs are suppose to have equal protections and rights to exercise that belief in public or in congress if so chooses and we cant stop it. What we can stop is laws that mandate a particular faith or doctrine. Yet it doesn't mean we cant make laws based on our beliefs, just that our beliefs can not be established through laws.

Just a point of view

Rob

Rob

Sarah  says:
6 weeks ago

I completely agree, however the extremes that people are going to today have made it difficult not to regulate things a bit.

Bibowen profile image

Bibowen  says:
5 weeks ago

Thanks for writing on this important subject. I have several hubs that, for the most part, take the opposite view you have presented. In my hubs I give my reasons why I believe that the Treaty of Tripoli does not support the secular thesis, that the Establishment Clause has a much more narrow meaning than the one prescribed by judges today. Furthermore, I would say that Jefferson's "Wall of Separation" is better interpreted as a political attempt on Jefferson's part to align himself with Northern Republicans than it is a comprehensive statement about Jefferson's legal philosophy. Anyway, I would say that his statement is irrelevant as to the Christian nation question.

Thanks again for addressing this topic.

Submit a Comment

Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.


optional


  • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
  • Comments are not for promoting your hubs or other sites

  • Sex, thighs, 'Videocracy': TV, women and politics entwined in Berlusconi's ItalyTimes & Transcript1 second ago

    Take a sex scandal dogging Silvio Berlusconi, add plenty of scantily clad young women on Italian TV and throw in some of the first serious scrutiny of a national culture where television lies at the nexus of power and politics.

  • Local mediamen throw hat in politicsSun Star2 hours ago

    AS IF being in media doesn’t have its own risks, some journalists have shown they are willing to push the envelope further by entering the murky world of politics read more

  • Editorial: Industry’s Smartphone Politics Unlikely to Unseat AppleThe Mac Observer24 minutes ago

    When Apple came out with the iPhone, it changed the entire smartphone industry. Now, we're moving into the smartphone politics era: lots of players, lots of technologies and lots of opportunity for political maneuvering. Will ordinary customers care? Not likely.

  • Ottawa accused of playing politics with Olympic flightsCBC.ca26 hours ago

    The federal government is playing politics over airplane flights during the upcoming Olympic Games, small airlines and regional airports in the B.C. Interior say.

  • Japan: Recasting politics, and opening up strategic 'space'Australian Policy Online21 hours ago

    Creator:  Rod Lyon This paper looks at Japanese domestic politics and the implications for Australia, focusing on the two major stategic issues: the US-Japan alliance, and Australia's bilateral strategic relationship with Japan. International

  • Talking Politics: One Year Since Rod BlagojevichWSIL 3 Southern Illinois17 hours ago

    WSIL-TV-- One year after the arrest of Rod Blagojevich, we look at what's changed in Illinois politics, and what remains the same. Lawmakers have approved some ethics reforms.

  • Under Murdoch, Tilting Rightward at The JournalNew York Times1 second ago

    There are growing indications in the news pages that Rupert Murdoch, a lifelong conservative, is looking to use The Wall Street Journal to play politics.

  • Rupert Murdoch accused of using Wall Street Journal to 'play politics'Guardian Unlimited1 second ago

    When Rupert Murdoch bought the Wall Street Journal two years ago, Manhattan's media observers predicted it wouldn't be long before battle lines were drawn between the two US newspaper titans. And today the antagonism that has been simmering between the Journal and its liberal rival, the New York Times, boiled over, with editors of the esteemed organs trading a series of barbed comments ...

working