Are Ants Intelligent?
91
Intelligent Ants
Is it possible that ants are intelligent? The idea may seem preposterous to some - after all, how can something so small, with the brain the size of a pin head be smart? The very thought of bugs and insects being intelligent seems like an insult to us humans. After all, aren't we the dominant species. The only species that builds cities, uses tools, farms, and demonstrates the capacity to plan and think?
But if we look closer, we can see that ants exhibit many of the characteristics and behaviours that we associate with intelligence and civilization. In fact, if ants did not exist on Earth but we encountered them on, for example, Mars I am sure that we would wonder if we had encountered an intelligent alien race that builds cities, farms, raises animals, and organizes itself into a complex society complete with social ranks such as nobles, soldiers, workers and slaves. I am sure that we would conclude that these aliens were in fact intelligent.
So let's explore the alien world of ants right here on Earth and see whether they are intelligent or not.
The Ant City - Fungus Gardens and Urban Planning
Ants Build Cities
I know what you are thinking, ant hills aren't cities. They're, well, ant hills. But did you know that large ant hills contain complex ventilation systems that remove carbon dioxide and bring in fresh air, or that they have the equivalent of hundreds of miles of sewers that drain the ant waste into special chambers were the waste is recycled? Did you know that ant cities have a an incredibly complex transportation system including highways? Or that each ant city can hold millions of ants.
Sounds incredible, and for the most part it is difficult to imagine the engineering marvel which is an ant city because most of it is underground. In fact, if we were the size of an ant, most of an ant city would be the equivalent of three miles underground.
The video to the right shows what scientists discovered when they filled an ant city with cement and then dug the resulting cast out of the ground. They were able to see for the first time what an ant city looks like and explore the complex series of chambers, roads and ventilation shafts that allows millions of ants to live underground. The video is amazing and is well worth watching from beginning to end.
Farming Ants
Ants Farm and Cultivate Mushrooms
Ants are the only animal besides humans that farms food. All other creatures hunt or harvest their food where they find it and are dependent on the whims of nature, and climate for their survival. For example, wolves are smart, and they will exhibit cooperation and skill in hunting for food. But wolves do not capture deer and breed them. Deer will forage for grasses and other food, but of course they have no thought of sowing grass seeds to ensure a plentiful supply of foraging crops. In fact, not one animal besides man and ants has ever thought to keep their prey in captivity or to farm plants in order to feed themselves in the future. Even intelligent animals like wolves lack the foresight to plan beyond meeting their immediate needs.
Ants, like humans, farm plants and raise cattle. Sounds preposterous. It's true.
There are species of ants that collect leaves and take them to specially constructed chambers within their colonies where they grow fungus on the decomposing leaves. The fungus is then eaten by the ants.
The growing of the fungus requires a great deal of planning and forethought: an appropriate chamber must be constructed, the right leaves must be collected, waste must be removed so as not to choke the growing fungus beds, and the leaves must be seeded with the fungus spores. The spores do no grow naturally in throughout the ant colony; the ants must collect the spores and bring them to the leaves.
Fungus farming is an example of intelligence and creativity. Other animals and insects would recognize the food value of fungus growing on leaves if they came across it in the wild. But no other animal or insect, besides humans, would understand that by contaminating a new leaf with the fungus spore, it will result in more food later. This shows intelligence, understanding and the ability to think ahead.
The fact that ants farm is an achievement that sets them apart from the rest of the animal and insect kingdoms. What is even more amazing is that ants have been doing this for millions of years. Humans did not learn to farm until around 5 or 6,000 years ago. Prior to that, humans behaved as hunter gatherers just like the rest of the animal kingdom.
Ants Farm Other Insects
But ants don't just farm, they raise and keep other insects for food, just like humans raise cattle. Many species of ants will domesticate aphids and act like shepherds by taking the aphids to feed on plants, while protecting them from other insect predators. The ants will then "milk" the aphids by squeezing their abdomens and causing some digested plant juice to be released into the mouths of the ants which will then share this nutritious fluid with the rest of the colony.
The ants behaviour in keeping ants closely parallels that of human shepherds and cattle breeders: ants will take the aphids to different pastures, they will guard them against predators, and they will harvest them.
The ants' behaviour in this regard is markedly different from that of other animals or insects. Even though wolves display intelligence similar to that of dogs, they lack the foresight to control their instincts and avoid killing their prey in order to get more food in the long run. If a wolf gets his teeth on a rabbit, or a deer, it will kill it and eat it on the spot. No wolf would ever capture the animal, tend to its needs, protect it from other predators and then take food from it without killing it (for example milking a cow) in order to reuse this food resource.
The only animals that do this are humans and ants. And once again ants beat us to it: they have been farming aphids for millions of years. Humans discovered animal husbandry about 6,000 years ago.
Ant Wars
Ants Wage War
Ants are the only animal besides humans which wage war in organized batallions, against other organized opponents. Like humans, ants wage war to capture territory and food resources from other ant colonies. Sometimes ant wars lead to the total defeat of an opponent and the survivors are captured and held as slaves.
Of course, war in itself may not be a great example of intelligence. But the organization, planning and coordination required to wage war is the product of intelligence.
In contrast to the war waging behaviour of many ant colonies, some ant species settle their difference in single combat between champions chosen by each colony. Bert Holldobler, in an article entitled Tournaments and Slavery in a Desert Ant, noted that a species of desert ant conducts tournaments "in which hundreds of ants perform highly stereotyped displayfights". The losing ant colony is then enslaved.
Ant battle outside the Amherst Historical Society
Ants Capture Slaves
Ant wars will often result in the defeated survivors being kept as slaves by the victorious ant colony. They are incorporated into the new colony and made to work for the victors.
We must not equate ant slavery with the human experience. Obviously human slavery is morally reprehensible and wrong from a political, moral and economic perspective. Still, the taking of prisoners and using them as slaves is a behaviour that is both complex and unique to ants and humans.
When other animals defeat a foe, they either kill it or allow it to retreat. For example, if two male mountain goats fight over a female, they will ram their horns against each other until one either dies or retreats. If the loser retreats, the winner will win right to mate with the female goat. No animal would then make the loser his slave.
Ants, on the other hand, have figured out that defeated enemies can be useful. They can be spared and put to work for the good of the colony.
The ants' behaviour in capturing and enslaving other ants shows an understanding of 1) deferred benefit (it is better to use the slave ants for future work than to eat them now) and 2) organization (slave ants must be supervised and put to work on assigned tasks).
Ants Teach and Communicate
A recent study has demonstrated that ants can pass on knowledge from one ant to another and teach other ants how to find food.
Ants have been observed to use a teaching technique called "tandem running" in which an ant that knows where to find food, will lead a new ant to the spot. The teacher ant will slow his pace to allow the student ant; if the student ant falls behind.
The teacher ant's behaviour does not provide a benefit to the teacher. If the teacher were not leading the student ant, it could locate and collect the food about four times faster. But by taking time to lead a novice ant to a food source, it allows other ants to locate the food faster than they would have discovered it on their own. As a result, the entire ant nest benefits.
Scientists believe that this ant behaviour represents "the first time a demonstration of formal teaching has been recognised in any non-human animal". Once again, humans and ants have something in common.
Ants Cooperate and Exhibit Teamwork
Ants are tiny, but they can cooperate to an amazing degree. Their cooperation exhibits purpose, planning, and command and control. Below are some amazing videos of ants moving large objects, and other ants cutting down a tree.
Their behaviour parallels that of humans. Imagine an ancient workforce of Egyptian labourers building the pyramids by moving giant limestone blocks, and you will have a good comparison to the amazing ants.
Ant Teamwork
Interesting Links to More Ant Information
- The Amazing World of Ants
More information about how ants live and their amazing world. - Ants
A description of the ants' caste system. - Species of Ants
There are over 11,000 known ant species. - Using Ant Behavior in Robotics
Scientists are learning to make computers and robots smarter by modelling ant behaviour.
Ant Intelligence
Ants are the most successful species on earth. They have survived and thrived for millions of years; they have conquered and colonized every continent and environment except Antarctica. Ants can be found in burning deserts, in jungles, and in cities. Ants exhibit many behaviours consistent with intelligence and civilization: they build cities, farm, communicate, and accomplish tasks through collective, highly organized goal-driven behaviour. If ants were apes, or some other hominid, we would doubtlessly recognize them as intelligent.
When it comes to ants, however, most people overlook these hallmarks of intelligence and attribute these bahaviours to blind instinct. They are just bugs, after all. They are creepy, crawly things. And they have tiny brains. Could they possibly be intelligent?
Comments
Stephen Joyce wrote a highly informative book, Teaching an Anithill to Fetch. He makes some of the same points that you do. That in fact in some respects ants exhibit more intelligence than humans. Not that they do brillant things but that the work together brillantly. They are great collaborators. While humans let their creative intelligence keep them competing rather that collaborating.
We can/should all take a lesson from ants. If we wish to accomplish more, then we would be well advised to collagorate more.
to reason, to plan, to solve problems, to think abstractly, to comprehend ideas, to use language, and to learn. These are some words that humans could use to describe intelligence. Ants are able to make at least simple plans based on the fact that they can find food, tell others and secure food in an organized fashion. They can solve problems based on the fact that if there is something blocking their path, they eventually find a way around it. They communicate with the use of chemicals. You have already stated they can teach each other how to work. Can they reason? If tht means to understand that you are hungry and need food or the colony needs to move to a better position, then yes. If that means weather they think about weather or not fighting other colonies to get food or territory is "moral or not", perhaps no. That would also corespond with thinking abstractly.
Because of the fact that a lot of ants spend most of their time underground, and there fore can not see well, the only way to protect themselves is by distinguishing between enemy and foe through sent. This means they would naturally not be able to communicate with other colonies, or it would be harder to do so if they wanted to. Ants also lack opposable thumbs, so they can not as easily mold the environment as we can, which would show their intelligence. However, because of the amount of weight they can lift, they are able to mold their environment.
If intelligence is also dependant on morals, than it may seem like we are and they are not. But we don't know what they communicate and how indepth it is or how fast they do it. Further more, the only reason humans developed morals was because of the fact that we eventually became too efficient at killing each other and because we could not stand independantly and defend ourselves from the environment, we had to start becoming more "moral" towards each other or become extinct and we had the brain capacity to do it. This leads into the fact that every species on earth evolves and is as intelligent as it needs to be to suit its needs. Humans, being so weak, developed brain power to compensate that fact. Elephants, being so large and strong stayed relatively unintelligent because there was no need. The people of Africa who were brought over to the US as slaves had no reason to develop so much technology because they had plenty of room and did not need to leave, it was not because they were inferior. So with ants, because they are strong enough to get food, make a home and are fertile enough to replace their losses, they do not need to become any more intelligent than they were when they first apeared.
If intelligence is dependant on feelings, than ants would be intelligent because pain is just a negative reaction to a harful situation that a being escapes from in order to live. Fear is a feeling one must get before pain in order to avoid death. Both of these are nessecary for a species to survive. Love is the bond between one and another, especially child of a social species (and some non social) that is nessecary for the more powerful to protect new life and to ensure their child, which is their purpose, survives or when a creature in a society has to protect another because of the instinct of communal relationship that brought them together in the first place (shown when ants or bees put their lives on the line before alowing an invader to attack). Love is also a feeling made up by humans to describe the feeling of meeting their match. This can be explained by the nessecary function of reproduction and the fact that people, because genetic defects can occur when multiplying with many people, must only find one person, so it becomes a random choice from society. No one knows why two people find each other, but in ant society,because of the fact that the male lives for such a short time, they are probbaly very agressive and get anyone they can. Which does not allow for "love". Most ants, due to the fact that they are female would not love each other which explains their effectiveness (one less feeling). Sadness is a feeling that most mammals have because we must be connected in society, because we are stronger together. We don't know if ants feel sad when they lose a comrade, but they certainly do something with the dead bodies they carry somewhere.
When you say we should work together instead of fight and that we should look at the ants you can also look at the fact that ants fight each other of different colonies, yet it is in their intrest to work together. like i said, it is very hard for them to communicate, but the overriding factor is that they do not need to change and we chage to fast for them to adapt. The same goes for humans, we have no IMMEDIATE reason to change and it is hard to see into the future, especially when our leaders are not making the effort. The only way we will change is when we face immediate extinction, but because it could be an unatural extinction we all might die.
In any case, there is no reason why you should hurt an ant, just for being different. Intelligent or not, logically, they must have certain feelings such as pain and fear. And if that is true, than killing an ant is no different than killing a human, you just won't hear pleading to stop or begging, so it is like killing a mute baby. Accedents happen, killing one or two ants by stepping on them because you cant see them is not that bad and the colony is not going to stop working, but i can not agree with steppng on ants just because they are smaller. I actually think they are cute, seriously. And if you belive in God, i do not understand how you could kill another living being other than when it is for food. Wouldn't he be mad?
Oh Yeah, one more thing, they are not bugs despite what society says. According to a book on insects, a bug is "an insect with front wings that are thick and tough at the base, yet delicate and see-through twoard the tips". That is the reason why some insects have the word bug in their name. Although I think a cicada might be a true bug. Don't try arguing with anyone about it though, they probably won't listen. Just like if you stated ants felt love because they have an unexplainable need to protect each other. Thanks for listening and I hope i contributed to your argument. It's about time someone stood up for arthropods, the back bone of planet Earth.
Thanks everyone for your comments. As you can probably tell from my article I have always been fascinated by ants and their society. I think that we truly underestimate their intelligence. Obviously they have limitations - ants do not make tools, and cannot make fire, etc, but to ignore signs of ants' intelligence says a lot about our species chauvenism and how we treat our natural world.
Jason I agree that we should not harm ants, whether they are intelligent or not. People are brought up to treat insects with contempt and squish them because they are smaller, but I think that this is wrong on so many levels. I always try not to step on ants, even accidentally.
I never viewed ants in this way. Pretty interesting stuff you have here. Thanks for all the information. :-)
After reading this, I now believe that ants are more intelligent than some people. Haha! :D
This is a fascinating article! Thumbs up.
I am surprised at all the positive feed back. I was sure someone was going to say something rude about the topic of this article. Not that I am complaining.
Um, how do I start this um lets see all my life i have loved ants i love every single movie it makes ants seem so much realer than they r. In this world GOD created everything as John knows but it is a fact in the bible if you read it the earth is only 6,000 yrs old well thats what i read and i read the king james so its true i dont want to argue. Anyways i love ants in fact im sorry to say this i want an ant colony (ant farm)for my b-day next month and im turning 14 i think its childish but anywho were was i oh yeah. GOd is the creator and i think and acctually i know that GOD made ants to be either smarter in some cases or close to humans thoughts, actions,ect. and they r so wonder ful my dogs like to eat the ants which is weired but yah know they r the way they r.anyways um but yeah i went to the colony today and i didnt feel good i felt as if a bad deed but i did it anyways i helped them fix up there mound thing and i actually made them a little something you know how likw on the bully or bugs life they hide out in like cans and stuff well i took some string and some grassy type stuff and i weaved it all togeather so when they r tired of working and want somerest they can go and relax but personally to me im like mental when it comes to this stuff cause i act like a child when it comes to ants and thats 1 reasone i love them so i get to act like a child and enjoy it and i love it
Hay awsum article! thankz for all this info.. yall makin ants sound more interesting! kewl keep up tha nice work :]
Ants are fantastic. Thanks for the great article!
This is amazing!! maby its time we humans take a page out the ants book!! talk about sustainable living !!! instead of steamrolling rainforest we could make much better use of recycling and things.
I agree Daniel. Our arrogance towards the natural world often keeps us from seeing the wonders around us, so we destroy them.
This is profoundly irritating.
Your arguments, and the general observations of the previous posters, suggest that the behaviour of an ant society as a collective is representative of their capabilities as individuals. This is demonstrably untrue. Ant actions do not arise as a result of planning, experience, or an ability to make value judgements. It is merely the result of a number of attenuated, delicately specialised, instinctual traits, which, when present within an entire species result in an impressive facility for cooperation.
I have a great fondness for ants; they are, after humans, perhaps my favourite species on this planet. They exhibit a stunningly elegant social system, but let's not pretend for a second that this makes an ant "intelligent". At best, an ant can be considered a neural path within the colony's brain. That doesn't stop ants being stupid.
Closet Elephant, I respect your opinion but I think it is unnecessary to find that individual ants are intelligent to conclude that ant colonies collectively are intelligent. The fact is that their behaviours result in exactly the things which we find to be the hallmarks of civilization: city building, engineering, farming, animal husbandry. I think our species prejudice prevents us from acknowledging that what we see is the product of intelligence.
However I disagree that ant behaviour is due simply to pre-programmed traits. After all, ants show remarkable adaptability to new situations. Even as individuals separated from their colony they are able to get around obstacles, forage for food, and problem solve (for example find the best route to a destination) which indicates that they are aware of their environment and process information to solve problems.
This summer I had a problem with ants getting into my kitchen. I was reluctant to kill them so I would capture them and but them in a jar with a lid until I had collected a few of them and then I would take them out into the garden and release them. At first the ants would sit at the bottom of the jar or randomly explore the sides of the jar looking for a way out. But very quickly the ants that had been caught earlier learned that I opened the lid, to throw more ants in. They then started waiting near the top of the lid and when I would open the lid to throw another ant in, the rest would jump out. They had also figured out that they should take up positions at different sides of the jar opening and when they escaped they all scattered in different directions. You can call it instinct, but the fact is that ants have no historical genetically programmed behaviour pattern designed to help them escape from a human holding them captive in a glass jar.
It's also interesting that even though the jar was transparent they were not fooled in thinking that the clear sides held the key to escape but instead understood that the lid, which is opaque and offers no apparent escape route was in fact the way out.
Also interesting was the fact that as new ants were added, they did not explore the jar, but rather joined the others in waiting by the mouth of the jar. This implies that the new ants were learning from the prisoners who had been there longer.
Saying ants are intelligent is a stretch. Individual ants are "stupid" they have very little thought capability and limited memory. Saying everything is instinctual is not correct either, the instinct is not that extensive. What makes ants collectively intelligent is the way they interact. This is called emergent behavior and/or complexity behavior. It's amazing what such a group of simple organisms can accomplish, but at no point is there what we would term "intelligence" even if the effect is strikingly similar.
Not really, Math Guy, because what are we, humans, but a large group of individual organisms that push towards a common purpose? The effect of that is the same thing as what these ants create, a complex system with a complex outcome. Without the rest of the group, the ants would be nothing, but without the rest of our organs, tissues, or cells we would also be nothing. And one person alone could indeed be driven to insanity due to no interaction with other humans, rendering themself as useless as a single ant. Sure the opposite's true but that just makes good documentaries.
What ants can do is incredibly impressive and reading this article, ants are crazy.
However there are a few things that us humans have that I'm differentiates us from ants. Such as abstract and artistic thought, morals, the ability to use tools created for a specific purpose, and the ability to make love for the hell of it.
No, they're not.
Actually, it really is emergent bahavior. A human that goes away from civilization can still reason, think abstractly. An ant cannot, it never could. It's various achievements come from very simple rules, that spread out among a million ants, form complex systems.
These ants aren't amazing, evolution is.
An individual human and an individual ant are very differant in intelligence, as Vash pointed out. Comparing a single human to an ant colony is a more interesting line of thought. To some degree, a human is just a bunch of pieces each doing some small function. The differance is that in humans, this gives rise to thought. An ant colony does not "think": it does not analyse, it does not remember, It has no sense of self.
(If anyone has read Prey by Michael Crighton, this is discussed brilliantly there)
ants aren't the only animals aside from humans that wage wars, chimpanzees have been documented to wage war on other groups of chimpanzees, they will form hunting groups and attack anythin including other chimpanzees that intrude on their territory, they also have organized raiding parties they use to expand their territory. it is more like gang warfare, but it is still warfare.
You have a nice article here. Ants are actually intelligent in my own understanding. Nice work! Thumbs up!
Incredible story, Quotations. I've been fascinated, and impressed, with ants all of my life. Every nature or science show about ants has everyone in the room captivated and going "wow." I watch them every time they're on.
Are ants intelligent? Absolutely!
I never realised how awesome ants really were, but in regards to your belief that the ants were able to tell the difference between the opaque escape route and the transparent glass walls, apparantly ants see primarily in the UV spectrum, which would mean that from their perspective, the glass (which absorbs UV light) would be opaque and the lid would be more transparent.
Awesome article! Thanks for all the information. I wonder if ants are aware of human existence? I know... it seems to be a bit of a stretch but who knows. Somewhere there is probably a race of highly intelligent beings who are reading a similar article about humans. "Are humans intelligent?"
Love the ants! I always had an uncle Milton ant afram as as kid!. I think ant colonies are kind on the same premise as the Borg from star trek.. One collective..
good hub!
Incredible article! Very interesting.
Very interesting article! I also enjoyed the way in one of your comments you brought your own observations to bear on the subject. Always good to balance your own experience against widely accepted orthodoxies.
There is a short story by H.G. Wells which you might want to take a look at if you've never read it before. In it, there is a species of ant which does develop the capacity to make tools, and which does start a purposeful war on humans. And the story makes it pretty clear we wouldn't stand a chance if that really happens. The story is called "Empire of the Ants" and you can read it online free at this link: http://www.readbookonline.net/readOnLine/9398/
Thanks for the great hub!
No doubt Ants are intellegent enough after Human, & also we look around find many other examples of intellegence, as Dog, Dolphine etc. But the matter of fact is, every other species other then Human is the part of nature. They only work for their surviver, don't look for moving forward.
e.g Ants are farming from million years, and man just started 6,000 yrs back, but yet Ant only farm for the fungus, they don't know to crop any other thing. while Man has achieve a level, just because he look for improvement, more & more. & u can see 1000s of other examples, like man started to built houses just 20,000 yrs ago, still man is a way ahead of ants.
In short, "May be ants are more intellegent then Human, but they don't have a free will to go out of nature, and also they don't race"
If got time will continue my comments.. :)
I think you are making two fatal errors: 1) failing to distingush between the colloquial definition of "intelligence" and the scientific definition of "intelligence" and 2) anthropomorphizing ants. Ants seem "intelligent" because they appear to be doing things that would require a great deal of smarts on the part of humans to pull off, and also because to humans, such collectivity seems like a pretty good thing. However, the behavior exhibited in ants is hard wired. It is not learned through imittion, nor is it based on trial and error or by learning from mistakes. Ant workers come out of fully equipped to do what they need to do for the hive -- not out of devotion, love, work ethic, but because that's what they're made to do, similar to how a computer is made to carry out its many functions.
While computers may do some amazing things, rather than calling the computer "smart" or "clever", credit is generally given to the mechanism that created it (a person or a programmer). Likewise, as someone mentioned earlier, credit in the case of ants can be given to the mechanism of evolution which, through millions of years of behavioral traits being successful or failing, more and more complex behavioral patterns have emergerd, ending up in what you see today.
I would also caution against using your animal husbandry and agriculture analogies. In the case of ants and aphids, it is a symbiotic relationship; the aphids and ants have ended up in a relationship beneficial to one another. This and ants' fungus cultuvation requirs nowhere near the behavioral complexity and species specific knowledge necessary to locate suitable animal and plant species, domesticate them and, through selective breeding, create varieties suitable for human use.
In any case, ants are remarkable, yes, but not intelligent in the sense of possessing "intelligence", but appear to be intelligent due to their behavior which, if mirrored by humans, would take smarts.
Thank you AdamAnt for your insightful comments. I am truly greatful for the intelligent and thought provoking debate that this topic has generated.
I would like to address some of the points that you raise.
1. "Ants seem "intelligent" because they appear to be doing things that would require a great deal of smarts on the part of humans to pull off, and also because to humans, such collectivity seems like a pretty good thing. However, the behavior exhibited in ants is hard wired" -- I think that this actually supports my theory. If we accept that we humans are intelligent, I think that we must acknowledge that behaviour in other species that approximates human behaviour and oragnization must be the result of intelligence. The fact that ant behavior may be hard wired is not determinative that these creatures are not intelligent. Also we do not know how much of their behaviour is learned as opposed to being hard wired. For example, we know that ant workers care for the pupae in nurseries, could it be that they pass on knowledge and behaviours through biochemical secretions? If we encountered an alien civilization that was able to pass on acquired behaviours genetically to its offspring would we decide that they were not truly intelligent just based on that criteria? We might be able to if their level of technology was low, so that we might dismiss them as mere animals/creatures. But if this hypothetical race's level of sophistication included metal working, for example, we could not dismiss them as merely animals simply because they had hard wired knowledge. In fact, being hard wired may be an advantage over a species like ours that must learn everything from birth.
2. "Ant workers come out of fully equipped to do what they need to do for the hive -- not out of devotion, love, work ethic" -- in this case I think that you are anthropomorphizing by making making the standard for intelligence all too human. Just because a creature does not share human emotions or values such as love or a work ethic does not make it less intelligent. It is very human-centric of us to assume that our way of being is the only way. For example, can we say that ants are not intelligent because their hives do not distribute food based on a cash or barter system? Obviously not.
3. "credit in the case of ants can be given to the mechanism of evolution" -- I believe in evloution as it pertains to animals and to humans. We humans and our intelligence are both the product of evolution. The fact that ants also are the product of evolution does not make them necessarily unintelligent.
4. "I would also caution against using your animal husbandry and agriculture analogies. In the case of ants and aphids, it is a symbiotic relationship" -- but there is also a symbiotic relationship between man and his food. Wheet and rice would not be such wide spread plants if we humans did not plant and eat them. We benefit from these crops because the entire human race eats them in varying proportions. At the same time, rice and wheat benefit because we plant them, irrigate them, and keep pests and weeds away from them. The relationship is symbiotic. Similarly, many animals we eat have a symbiotic relationship with us. Take cows, for example. There are no wild cows because they could not survive in the wild. Leaving aside for the moment whether it is moral to raise them for food ( I am a vegetarian) the fact is that cows "benefit" collectively from the fact that we eat them. How? If they did not provide humans with food, we humans would not keep away the wolves, provide them with grazing land and barns to shelter in. The relationship may be more in favour of humans, but it is symbiotic nevertheless. So it is not a valid objection to say that ant farming of aphids etc is not evidence of intelligence because there is a symbiotic relationship between the ants and what they eat. Yes there is a symbiotic relationship, but that is true of all animal husbandry and farming. If what humans do is evidence of intelligence, so must ant behaviour. I think that in evaluating ant behaviour, we need to look at the fact that it is very similar to human behaviour and extremely different from all other insect and animal behaviour. The behaviour that they mimic is the same behaviour that is the hallmark of human intelligence: engineering, farming, city building, social organization. If these ant behaviours were so "unintelligent" one would expect them to be widespread in the animal and insect kingdom.
I think the reason we do not recognize intelligence in ants is that they are so nonhuman in appearance. If we found a colony of apes that did any of these things we would conclude that they were intelligent. But because of our human-centric biases we rationalize and come up with reasons to explain away the obvious
I would love to see the research behind this
I wouldn't say ants are intelligent individually, but their collective behavior, driven by their instincts, seems (or is) intelligent due to the phenomenon of emergence. Ants don't "think" because they don't have language, as far as we know, and if they don't think, how intelligent can one ant be?
Ants have been farming for millions of years, but humans have only been doing it for 6,000, you say? Well, we humans have robots that can farm for us now, but ants are stuck doing it "by hand". Ants only progress technologically as fast as evolution will permit them, but we humans can use our minds to speed up the process.
wow, this is an interesting hub, and the comments too. ants are fascinating little creatures but sometimes they could also be annoying. LOLs
Just stumbled on your article. An excellent job! Thumbs up! Your work is a masterpiece and really inspiring. It is beyond question that ants are absolutely intelligent. They stand out for their uniqueness of all other creatures. In fact, they seem to surpass human beings in certain aspects of intelligence. Little wonder the Bible specifically commands us: "Go to the ANTS, you SLUGGARD, consider its ways and be wise!" (Proverbs 6:6).
In my latest book, Ants: More Than Just Insects with "Little Strength" - Wisdom for Purposeful Living, a 160-page book with 13 chapters, you will discover some amazing truth about ants that will convince you that they are more human than insect. Talk about skills and specialisation - the ants have them. And we humans can learn vital lessons on purpose living from these absolutely incredible creatures.
We can learn enterprise, foresight, industry, organisation, productivity, intelligent planning and sustainable development.
If ants are not intelligent, then God would't have asked man to go to the University of Ants for a degree in wisdom. Please kindly request Math Guy and Joe Entomologist to get hold of my latest book in order to consider the truth about the intelligence of ants to corroborate what you have said from another perspective. Best wishes!
Ken; regarding your "ants don't think because they don't have language" viewpoint, ant's do have a "language" of sorts. Of course language in human terms carries with it connotations towards vocal and literary methods, but it is essentially a form of communication. And ants do have a form of communication, and that is through the use of chemicals, which they use for everything from alarm/warning signals to "signposts" towards a foodsource. So even by your standards ants do definitely "think."
Also, I'm pretty sure that if ants somehow were gifted with tiny little opposable thumbs or some other means of crafting tools, they would have quite possibly outstripped us by now in the technology department, if not only because of their little headstart.
You are confusing intelligence with technology.
Lastly, i think we need to come to a conclusion on whether we are viewing the ant's intelligence as a collective or as individuals. Right now it's like we're debating whether or not a nerve cell's function in the human brain makes it smart. You can't answer that question because it's asking something that can't be legitimately answered. (eg. "smart? are you asking about the brain or the nerve cell?", "what functions are you talking about", and "wait, define smart.")
We're trying to answer an undefined question here, and we're having trouble getting a definite answer here because it's undefined.
I think I've seen them have funerals. Fun and interesting Hub. Thanks.
Dear author of this post. I put my email address in by mistake. In the URL field.
Can you please do me a huge favour? Can you kindly edit my comment and remove my email address so I don't get spam?
Thank you.
Ant War
PrintShare it! — Rate it: up down flag this hub
Comments
awesome article...i never knew they were so smart...my favorite fact about them is the fact that two warring ant cities will have their respective champion fight each other instead of an all out war between the two cities...reminds of the beginning of the movie Troy....amazing!
G-Ma Johnson says:
2 years ago
Yes they are..I had an ant hill 3-4 feet high..they only ate bugs and kept my yard bug free...but I was afraid the children I was in care of might get hurt if they fell into the ant hill...I mean they do bite. any way all creatures were placed here on earth for a purpose...even ants. and we shouldn't doubt that...so be gentle and kind to them and everyone you come in contact with...God Bless G-Ma :o) hugs HAPPY EASTER