July 4th - The Day and the Document

59
rate or flag this page

By Pete Maida


July 4, 1776, is considered the day our nation was born. This was the day, after two days of study, that the Continental Congress approved the wording in the declaration. The first part of the document is designed to establish basic rights and to justify our reasons for the ongoing revolution. Thomas Jefferson started the reasoning with these two lines.

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.”

These lines are considered the most important lines in modern democracy. What is even more amazing is that as inspiring as these lines are, our founding fathers created a government that would allow us to improve on them. No blame can be leveled at Mr. Jefferson for writing “all men are created equal”; he had no idea there was another way to think about the status of women. The United States Constitution allows amendments to improve our basic ideals as we become more enlightened. Though it reads “all men are created equal;” Americans now see “everyone is created equal” and amendments to the constitution reflect that new truth.

We still need the ability to amend the constitution because we have yet to achieve the founding fathers goal. We still are controlled by fear and doctrine and this control stops us from fulfilling the notion that all Americans have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. There is still a part in too many American’s minds that add the two words, “like us” to the statement making it “that all men like us are created equal”. There are too many that will still deny life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness to American citizens because of the way the worship or their choice of life partner. There were no exceptions in the declaration but there still are in too many American minds.

This declaration also points to the duty and right to challenge an unfair government’s authority. We are at a difficult time in our democracy; enemies have found new ways to strike. Our soldiers our away trying to hunt down and destroy the head of the snake, but it still may lash out again. The fear of an attack and the painful memory of 9/11 make us wary of our neighbors and make us wonder about tougher laws and suspension of rights. Cicero, the great writer of Ancient Rome, said, “Laws are silent in times of war.” In many ways that statement is true today. When faced with danger we will trample on the rights of others and even give up our own freedom. This flies in the face of a statement of our own founding father Benjamin Franklin who said, “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety”.

Before supporting the bugging your neighbor’s place of worship because you are sure it is a den of evil; remember your place of worship could be next. Before you hook up GPS tracking to your car or support the installation of neighborhood surveillance cameras; consider who will use them and why. The old response to resistance to constant surveillance is, “If you’re not doing anything wrong; there’s nothing to worry about.” The question is who defines the term anything wrong? Today things might be fine and all of the surveillance may be in the hands of people that respect a citizen’s privacy, but what about tomorrow? It’s Pandora’s Box; once it’s open it will never be closed.

My good friend John always says that being a police officer or an investigator in the United States is a very tough job. A case has to be made based on witness accounts and evidence obtained by lawful means. He says if the job is too hard for some officials then he suggests that they move to a country that allows doors to be kicked down and people to be watched. We have laws to protect our citizens from everyone including the government and to give them up is to tear up that great document officially proclaimed on July 4, 1776 and, if he were here, you would see Thomas Jefferson shed a tear.

These are my novels; please check them out.

500 Years From Home 500 Years From Home
Price: $15.49
List Price: $15.50
The Long Journey Home The Long Journey Home
Price: $15.36
List Price: $19.95

RSS for comments on this Hub

SweetiePie profile image

SweetiePie  says:
7 months ago

Interesting hub, but to be honest I am glad not to have been a lawyer or an officer. Also, I am glad not to have ever had to sit on a jury, although I came close once. The thing that scares me about the judicial process is even when all the evidence is presented on both sides, there are people that are guilty who are set free, and others who are innocent that are convicted. Overall I believe our judicial system does a pretty fair job, but I would not want to have to be involved with the day to day decisions of law making.

someonewhoknows profile image

someonewhoknows  says:
7 months ago

Yono a British loyalist has been the subject of five videos at the weblink below.You may find them very interesting Two on American sovergnty in particular at http://www.human-dog.com/lab/?cat=7

Lady Rogue profile image

Lady Rogue  says:
7 months ago

Pretty cool, Pete! It's nice to remember the point of the holiday aside from the bar-b-que. It's also good to remind ourselves to be vigilant. Although our rights are "guaranteed", no person or government is perfect. At least we have the ability and opportunity to keep ours in check...If we remember to use it.

James A Watkins profile image

James A Watkins  says:
7 months ago

Very interesting subject.  It seems to me the most important section here is "Endowed by their Creator" because this means that our rights are not granted by our government but protected by our government and granted by God.  Many Atheists do not agree but that is what it says and in the history of political thought that is unequivocally what it means. 

Pete Maida profile image

Pete Maida  says:
7 months ago

I'm sorry I have to disagree James. It says that because it had to say that. No document of the time would have to taken seriously without ackowledging the Creator. There was no room for a second opinion on it. It was also a way of expressing that one person does not have absolute rule over another person. No one of the time would have challenged the rule of God.

James A Watkins profile image

James A Watkins  says:
7 months ago

The documents of the French Revolution did not have God in them.

Madame X profile image

Madame X  says:
7 months ago

Great hub Pete - I think it says "Endowed by their Creator" because they truly believed that. They weren't being PC!!

Pete Maida profile image

Pete Maida  says:
7 months ago

Yes they truly believed that. They also truly believed in holding African slaves. The Creator was in the document but that doesn't make it part of the government and separation of church and state will see that it is never part of the government. We have many people who believe in many faiths. The only way for all to feel free is to keep our beliefs separate from our governing.

James A Watkins profile image

James A Watkins  says:
7 months ago

Ah, the Slavery card! 

It is not about a particular religion ruling the government; it is about where do our rights come from?  Clearly our Founding Fathers believed our rights as human beings came from God, while some today, think our rights come from the government—and there is a huge difference in the morality of a government taking our rights away as from whence they originate.

someonewhoknows profile image

someonewhoknows  says:
7 months ago

There are so called "new age" groups out there that don't know that there are people in their ranks ,usually those in charge who profess freedom but practice the belief that to be free we must destroy those who would resist their viewpoint of what freedom entails in their minds if you want to join them you should watch your back ,like the people in the past who joined jim jones and others who give up everything they own to the "group" (leader) in order to join requires a vow of poverty sharing equally and slavery as well.There is a big difference between the common wealth and communisim or socialism,or even pure capitalism ,which is really fasim (corporate rule)through control of the media,as well as the government leaders.The voters can usually only pick from a candidate that the oorporations and the federal reserve banks together back first

Pete Maida profile image

Pete Maida  says:
7 months ago

I agree the government doesn't give us our rights. I just don't think a supreme being does either. They are ours by birhtright, and if they are not then it is slavery.

Submit a Comment

Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.


optional


  • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
  • Comments are not for promoting your hubs or other sites

working