Keats: on the Necessity of Poetry
72Vita Brevis, indeed
|
|
Complete Poems and Selected Letters of John Keats (Modern Library Classics)
Price: $9.17
List Price: $16.00 |
|
|
Keats: Poems Published in 1820
Price: $15.73
List Price: $23.75 |
Poetry as an Absolute
John Keats didn't live very long (1795-1821). He was twenty-six or so when he died, slowly and painfully, of tuberculosis. Treatments prescibed included althernating between bleeding the patient with giving him opium, meat, and red wine. TB was commonly known as "consumption," because that's what tuberculosis does -- it consumes the patient, and when one of Keats's lungs hemorrhaged he was aware of what would come next, since both his mother and brother had died of TB. In fact, death surrounded Keats's childhood -- his father died in a riding accident and his apprenticeship with a surgeon, Dr. Edmondson, exposed him to the realities of disease and the relentless and inexorable manner in which death itself consumes every living thing.
This is perhaps what makes his poetry so vividly, visually, sensuously beautiful. Ironically, instead of dwelling on death, he chose to examine what life is, and his poems are famous for their blending of sensory perceptions -- the gorgeous synesthesia of Eve of St. Agnes, always a favorite of students, is cinematic in its rich detailing of the scene. (We tend to dwell so much on the sumptuousness of the seduction scene that we forget the fact that the lovers run off into uncertainty, and in a raging storm, to boot. The poem ends with the death of the old nurse, and the monk frozen, reciting his rosary -- hardly a happy ending, by anyone's standards.)
But the poem that explains (for me, at least) Keats's view of the necessity of poetry is "A Thing of Beauty is a Joy Forever," which almost reads as a manifesto: here are the first two stanzas --
A thing of beauty is a joy for ever:
Its loveliness increases; it will never
Pass into nothingness; but still will keep
A bower quiet for us, and a sleep
Full of sweet dreams, and health, and quiet breathing.
Therefore, on every morrow, are we wreathing
A flowery band to bind us to the earth,
Spite of despondence, of the inhuman dearth
Of noble natures, of the gloomy days,
Of all the unhealthy and o'er-darkened ways
Made for our searching: yes, in spite of all,
Some shape of beauty moves away the pall
From our dark spirits. Such the sun, the moon,
Trees old, and young, sprouting a shady boon
For simple sheep; and such are daffodils
With the green world they live in; and clear rills
That for themselves a cooling covert make
'Gainst the hot season; the mid-forest brake,
Rich with a sprinkling of fair musk-rose blooms:
And such too is the grandeur of the dooms
We have imagined for the mighty dead;
All lovely tales that we have heard or read:
An endless fountain of immortal drink,
Pouring unto us from the heaven's brink.
Nor do we merely feel these essences
For one short hour; no, even as the trees
That whisper round a temple become soon
Dear as the temple's self, so does the moon,
The passion poesy, glories infinite,
Haunt us till they become a cheering light
Unto our souls, and bound to us so fast
That, whether there be shine or gloom o'ercast,
They always must be with us, or we die.
There's a third stanza, but it wanders off into an encomium on Endymion. These two seem complete in themselves, don't they? They even end with the word "die." Sounds final to me.
The first five lines are about everything that was lacking in Keats's brief life, including sweet dreams, and quiet breathing. The simple, unforced, statements here are quietly lyrical and pensively cogent. For Keats, life itself was a "thing of beauty" despite the ugliness of disease, and its translation into an abstract perception of beauty, he understood, was a constant that could never die. This idea is not new -- ars longa, vita brevis, after all -- but for Keats we sense a special poignancy and heightened response to the beauty that is life: the stakes, perhaps, were higher for him.
This gave his poetry a force that does indeed shine a light "unto our souls" and we cannot help but be caught up in the "passion poesy" that whirls him into an ecstasy, even while conscious of the brevity of its durance.
On a different note, however, I'd like to look at Keats's lines and line breaks. Horribly technical, I know, and it seems callous to poke at his beautiful verses -- but he shows us real mastery of the formation of easy-flowing lines that are to be admired and emulated. The beginning poet often is unsure or careless of how lines are broken, whether they are end-stopped or enjambed (run-ons). The beginning poet can sometimes end lines awkwardly with prepositions and thus leave lines dangling in mid air like broken coat hangers. Each line of poetry (technically a verse, but let's not confuse the issue) should have its own internal logic. The first line of Keats's poem speaks for itself: "A thing of beauty is a joy forever:" -- it's endstopped (it could be a complete thought; he could have ended the line with a period), but he ends with a colon: a signal that he is going to explain himself. "Its loveliness increases; it will never/ Pass into nothingness;" here, the enjambment (running on of the sense) forces us to keep reading this list of the attributes of beauty.
Having said that, let's perform more surgical shenanigans and try this:
"A thing of beauty is a joy for ever: Its loveliness increases; it will never pass into nothingness; but still will keep a bower quiet for us, and a sleep full of sweet dreams, and health, and quiet breathing. Therefore, on every morrow, are we wreathing a flowery band to bind us to the earth, spite of despondence, of the inhuman dearth of noble natures, of the gloomy days, of all the unhealthy and o'er-darkened ways made for our searching: yes, in spite of all, some shape of beauty moves away the pall from our dark spirits. Such the sun, the moon, trees old, and young, sprouting a shady boon for simple sheep; and such are daffodils with the green world they live in; and clear rills that for themselves a cooling covert make 'gainst the hot season; the mid-forest brake, rich with a sprinkling of fair musk-rose blooms: and such too is the grandeur of the dooms we have imagined for the mighty dead; all lovely tales that we have heard or read: an endless fountain of immortal drink, pouring unto us from the heaven's brink. Nor do we merely feel these essences for one short hour; no, even as the trees that whisper round a temple become soon dear as the temple's self, so does the moon, the passion poesy, glories infinite, haunt us till they become a cheering light unto our souls, and bound to us so fast that, whether there be shine or gloom o'ercast, they always must be with us, or we die."
Present the same words as a piece of prose, and we see that last sentence build the glories of life, piling one upon another, upon another, which we either revel in -- or we die. That last chilling alternative strikes us hard. And so it should.
|
|
The Age of Wonder: How the Romantic Generation Discovered the Beauty and Terror of Science
Price: $21.97
List Price: $40.00 |
|
|
After the Golden Age: Romantic Pianism and Modern Performance
Price: $21.17
List Price: $29.95 |
|
|
Single Woman of a Certain Age: Romantic Escapades, Shifting Shapes, and Serene Independence
Price: $4.60
List Price: $14.95 |
|
|
The Age of Wonder: How the Romantic Generation Discovered the Beauty and Terror of Science (Hardcover)
Price: $36.09
|
PrintShare it! — Rate it: up down flag this hub
Comments
Elena -- thank you for stopping by -- it is a great poem, innit?
It's wonderful!
You can say that again, Teresa! And you are great too, for opening my eyes to this wondrous composition!! Why, I'm totally blow over by this!
Teresa,
Love what you did to Keats' poem here. Makes all perfect sense - you have exposed him in such a way that he is no longer some high-brow poet but a dreamy one that could be understood by anybody regardless of background. The prose form did sound "practical" but I still like the original. The highs and lows, the stops and go's. Just as he had preferred it. Thanks for this wonderful experience! :D
Thanks, LondonGirl and Elena. I've been lucky to have been forced to teach the Romantic poets, as the experience taught me a lot about poetics. (And Keats was heavily influenced by his reading of Shakespeare, my main area of study.)
Thanks, Cris -- Keats was a kid whose childhood sucked, and whose life ended long before it should have. He was universally mourned -- people everywhere who knew him really did feel his loss; and they all really did seem to have liked him, too.
Hi Teresa,
Thanks for your reflections. If this has done one thing for me, it is that i'm going to get out my Keats again and start re-reading. :-)
Best,
The Communicator
I did some Keat for A level English Lit - a great poet.
Do all American children do Shakespeare at school?
Thanks, Communicator -- he's really worth the effort.
And LondonGirl: I'm not sure how much Shakespeare they do at the high school level here -- they mostly seem to be familiar with Romeo and Juliet by the time they come to university and I get my hands on them. I think it depends on the individual states --
I remember studying for my A levels trying to remember quotations to use in the essays.
I can still quote great chunks of Antony & Cleopatra, and Hamlet, from A levels!
I seem to remember studying Measure for Measure at A level, but I also studied Romeo and Juliet, Hamlet and Macbeth at some point, and can manage great chunks of all four. Possibly I just saw one or two of them at the theatre, as I doubt my Comprehensive was that big on the classics (LOL!) It's a long time ago now though!
It was great to re-visit Keats, Teresa. I haven't read him in a long time, and I hadn't really pondered on his short life before, despite the fact that a namesake of mine travelled to Rome with Keats (Joseph Severn). I must ask my brother (a keen geneaologist) whether we're related. Severn is an unusual name so it's possible.
Let me know what you find out, Amanda -- might make for an interesting hub, eh?
I remember clearly - Ant & Cleo and Hamlet for A level, and Romeo & Juliet and Othello for GCSE.
That's a good thought. I need all the inspiration I can get!
LondonGirl -- I think we did Macbeth at O level and Coriolanus at A level. I can also recite chunks of Milton's Comus, and some E. M. Foster (A Passage to India).
My mother did Ant & Cleo for A level, and my Dad Hamlet, so I got lots of er.... "help"!
Now E.M. Forster is definitely one of my favourites. I've read Room with a View about a dozen times. I'm not so keen on Passage to India though.
I remember doing some dreadful Iris Murdoch novel at A Level, plus the Metaphysical Poets, which was much more my cup of tea!
I've always found PAssage to India over-rated as well, I agree with you that Room with a View is better.
Thanks for the tip on A Room with a View -- to be honest, after Howards End and Passage to India, I didn't want to read any more Forster, so I'll give Room a go.
And as for the Metaphysical poets -- definitely -- astoundingly clever images.
Teresa, Maurice is also very good. I think it may have been published posthumously, as homosexual literature was very much frowned on in Forster's day! The other one I enjoyed was Where Angels Fear to Tread.
Noted! Great -- I've got some reading to do!
Teresa - nicely done. The 'does it work as prose' test is one many people would benefit from learning.
BTW - unless you actually like the double spacing, the best way to set out poems on Hubpages with single spacing is to use Heading 4 instead of paragraph text. Then it will look like this http://hubpages.com/hub/Paper It took me some experimenting to find that out.
What a lovely hub. My mother read poetry to us when we were small--all kinds of poetry, and I do think there is something about cadence and the line breaks that is so fundamental to words becoming a poem. The line breaks signal both a mental and rhythmic pause and as you point out, there is an internal logic to placing them exactly as they are. Those spaces are not so evident in prose. I think the musical quality to good poetry has to do with space and emptiness. Keat's poetry especially seems to highlight how important the empty bits are, if even for a breath. Thank you for this. I enjoyed it so much.
Thank you -- both Paraglider, and pgrundy (who I know more about than I ever thought I would -- enjoyed your auto-Hub!).
Paraglider -- thanks for the tip about line spacing -- I straightaway edited all the hubs I've written to get rid of the double spacing, as you can see (that is, after I perused the sad but inevitable demise of Paper and Garagula (would I be correct in assuming that Claude Huaud ascribed to the hollow earth theory, and that perhaps these ill-fated isles now reside in paradise in the center of our planet?).
pgrundy -- I read your hubs with pleasure -- thanks for dropping by. Incidentally, on the Grundy theme, I remember visiting a restaurant in Dublin called Grundy's that had a human-sized pig-statue, fully clothed, seated at one of the tables. I'm not sure I ever found out why.
Thank you,Teresa, for a most interesting take on my favorite poet. Your analysis of his early and middle poetry forms are spot on. I do find his later poems, particularly his " When I have Fears that I may Cease to Be " , to dwell on the inevitability of Death and its consequences to our spiritual being. You have mentioned his " A Thing of Beauty is a Joy Forever ". The use of " nothingness " in both poems is striking. Great Hub...look forward to joining your fan club and reading more on the " Necessity of Poetry " which you have so beautifully written in this Hub.
Thank you, Maven, for the kind comments. It is striking how vital Keats's poems are (and even "When I have fears. . ." is crammed full of harvest images that are "teeming"; although the harvest indicates the coming winter and end of life, of course).
I LOVE that--a human sized pig statue sitting at a restaurant table. If I ever get to run a restaurant, I'm doing that, seriously. I might do it in my house. That is too cool. It sounds like my last name would be fairly ordinary in Britain. I guess everybody is normal somewhere, even me!
Dublin isn't in Britain, though....
(LondonGirl -- it can be quite confusing that the British Isles are not also referred to as Britain, as a collective noun). Which reminds me of some of the questions I've been asked over the years by students, my (least) favorite of which was if the larger island is called Great Britain, why isn't the other island called Lesser Britain? Ouch! You can imagine how that one led to a long discussion about political versus geographical nomenclature in general, and the history of Ireland in particular.
On a similar note, I taught the British Literature survey classes, which the (otherwise) excellent Norton anthologies refer to as English Literature, and found myself having to refer to British and Irish authors, spending the first day of each semester explaining the differences. I could understand why it got confusing!
Teresa..since college days,I had not touched Keats..you brought back memories of our English Professor reading it out soo beautifully and and we used to be transported to a magical world of words,expressing joy,sorrow,hope and everything!The prose form is soo soo awesome.Thanks!Maybe,I'll dust my Keats Poetry books and start all over again!I have forgotten most and thanks for reminding me!Shelly,Keats and Wordsworth used to my fav!
Well, Laila -- thanks for reading, and for enjoying Keats. He is awesome, indeed.
Teresa, very informative and stirring piece you wrote on this poem. Now I want to explore Keats more. Because of the line breaking intricacies, I found his Endymion (thru "flowers and green") even harder to memorize than "The Raven," but what a sweet reward, eh?
Keats rocks, if you'll pardon the expression.
Great HUB Teresa! I am new to Keats, (sorry for that!) But I must say, I am glad that maven101 introduced him to me... Next, he is filling me in on Walter Benton! I can't wait! Thanks so much. You are very inspiring. (now I have a head start on my lesson!)
Hey MamaDragonfly -- it's great to hear enthusiasm and joy -- yes, Keats is wonderful. Have fun with your lessons!




















Elena. says:
12 months ago
Teresa, that was wonderful! Dare I say in prose form it sounds even more powerful to me, because I read it as a continuum that build up in energy? With the verses, I took the "natural" stops, breathed in between, thought about it, but in prose it felt like a torrent!
I just LOVED this hub, thank you!!