Lincoln_ And His Legacy

56
rate or flag this page

By mpaskel



I quote Lincoln often. He is one of my favorite Americans. He famously observed, “A house divided against itself cannot stand”. Lincoln knew a thing or two about divided houses. His election to the Presidency in 1860 was foreshadowed by a threatening secession movement among southern states desperate to retain slavery as an institution. By the time of his swearing in ceremony in April 1861, the confederacy had begun to coalesce and Lincoln was now the president of a country half the size it was on Election Day the previous November.

The war that followed bathed in blood the land that he called “the last best hope for man”. Lincoln surmised that the use of every tool at his disposal, including the suspension of certain constitutional guarantees if necessary, would be justified in holding the country from being torn asunder.

Shelby Foote, the late southern author said that before the civil war it was proper to say “the United States are” but afterward it had become clear that it was now only acceptable to say “the United States is…” “The war”, he said “had changed us from an ARE into an IS”.

The original text of the Pledge of Allegiance said rightly that the union was indissoluble. Prior to the inclusion of “under God” into the pledge after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, the pledge was meant to say just that…

“I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation indivisible, with liberty and justice for all”.

As a nation, we have been unified ever since; though as a people we are a dynamic and changing lot, roiling with opinion, ever adjusting and modifying our views. We are capable of great things and fearless in the pursuit of monumental undertakings; the Manhattan Project, Apollo, WWII, just to name a few.

We have also stumbled badly at times and had to search for our collective soul in some very dark places. Racism, gay rights, capital punishment, Vietnam, the civil rights movement of the 50s and 60s and the current, seemingly endless, debate over abortion and stem cell research have caused us to choose sides in ways that occasion great enmity and even greater courage.

It seems inevitable that issues will always find champions and adherents as well as the passions to fuel them. Such is the national rhetorical exercise today about the war in Iraq. Republicans, and those who self-apply the term conservatives are among the most ardent supporters of the current occupation of Iraq; while those labeled as liberals, chiefly Democrats, are clamoring evermore loudly to end this intractable conflict. I identify myself with the latter; as readers of my occasional rants could hardly fail to have noticed. What may not be clear to most, however, is that I am really not trying to change any minds. I’m simply advocating that those of us who are now in the majority stand up and say we oppose this continued involvement in Iraq and insist that our Government instead expend our resources on efforts that are more likely to make us safer than we have been since this madness began. By taking a more public stand against this we are less likely to be marginalized and dismissed as unpatriotic “surrender monkeys”, as we have been occasionally described by those who favor this war.

But we cannot dissolve ourselves from those sacred bonds that Lincoln said joined us as Americans, even when we so deeply abhor the aspirations of those we oppose.

Agreement, when not possible, must inevitably give way to consensus; but at the end of the day, we are still bound together inextricably as the sons and daughters of Washington, Jefferson and Lincoln.

As in the past, America again wrestles with it conscience. We’re not likely to be allowed the luxury of ignoring this debate given its intensity, the importance of the issues, and the ramifications of the outcome. But the process of finding our moral compass in a treacherous and dangerous world is far more important to our survival than the single answer to any of the problems we face. Because that process will not only teach us, but also our children and the world that now observes us, how a democracy that Jefferson once said must occasionally be refreshed with blood, can renew itself using instead of it’s fists, it’s ability to persuade others.


M Paskel's RSS Feed

  • Mission Accomplished:Five Years later

    “Major combat operations in Iraq have ended. In the battle of Iraq, the United States and our allies have prevailed. And now our coalition is engaged in securing and reconstructing that country…..President... - 2 years ago

  • The Gold Standard For Leading A Nation To War

    At 3:00 in the afternoon of August 3rd 1914, British Foreign Secretary Edward Grey took the floor of the British Parliament, the oldest and most practiced parliamentary body in the world. His purpose was to... - 2 years ago

  • McCain: Product Of A Circuitous Life

    John McCain at an early age displayed three defining characteristics that he would struggle with for the rest of his life. By the time he entered the Naval Academy at the age of 17, McCain admitted that his... - 2 years ago

  • The Protect America Act Of 2007. It's Cover Your Ass Time For George W. Bush

    If you want to see the most egregious C.Y.A. exercise ever birthed in Washington, keep your eyes and ears tuned to a little piece of work called the “Protect America Act of 2007”. It was passed by congress... - 2 years ago

  • $2 Trillion Can Buy A Lot Of Stuff

    It’s hard to comprehend what 2 trillion dollars can buy. I tried it this morning and developed my list. Do it yourself on the back of an envelope and see what you come up with. Two trillion, that’s 12... - 2 years ago

  • The Case For Universal Health-Care In The U.S.

    Which one of the following statements is true? -The U.S. has the best health-care system in the world. -Universal health-care in the U.S. would be too expensive. The answer is- they’re both flat wrong.... - 2 years ago

  • Truth: The First Casualty Of The War In Iraq

    "The Iraqi regime possesses biological and chemical weapons, is rebuilding the facilities to make more and, according to the British government, could launch a biological or chemical attack in as little as... - 2 years ago

  • What Do 33 Million Canadians Have That 300 Million Americans Do Not?

    The population of Canada is about the same as California but its area is roughly that of the continental U.S. They have a lot of room up there We share a common border and except for Quebec, a common... - 2 years ago


Comments

RSS for comments on this Hub

stanskill profile image

stanskill  says:
2 years ago

Do you think the way presidential candidates, Senate and House leaders pass off individual anonymity to the states is devisive? For example: Gay marriage allotted to state privilege. Does that seem to devide us as a country. The right to file jointly is still denied. I believe if the gay community were to take themselves out of the limelight, the poverty, hunger, homelessness and other problems afflicting our country would be seen more clearly. The Amish are so ignored we hardly know they're there. Couldn't the homosexual community go the same route, leaving the country to tend to more important matters?

Submit a Comment

Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.


optional


  • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
  • Comments are not for promoting your hubs or other sites

working