At the last two Planning Board meetings here in Selma, we have taken up the issue of limiting the sort of lodging establishments that can be built in town.  There is a proposal to prohibit motels from being built and only allowing hotel type lodging.  This does not affect existing businesses, but rather future growth or replacement structures.

The difference between a hotel and a motel, as proposed by the town, is the manner of construction.  A motel would be defined as having room access from the exterior of the building whereas a hotel would have interior corridors.  It is argued that a hotel type business attracts (in general) a higher class of customer and brings in higher taxes than a motel.

I do a significant amount of traveling in my job and personal life.  Just recently, I stayed at a fine Best Western motel (as defined by proposed Selma ordinance).  I have stayed at some fine hotels, as well.

It was the opinion of the Planning Board that the town ought not adopt an ordinance discriminating against motel type facilities in favor of hotels.  The reasons were several, including the infringement upon the private property rights of a motel franchisee, discrimination against a viable form of business, and losing potential tax revenue from fine motel type establishments.

Let's face it, Selma will never attract a Hilton Garden or Embassy Suites.  We are a crossroads on Interstate 95 and not a major tourist, convention, or business destination.  Interstate travelers are looking for a clean, comfortable, affordable room, not a luxury suite.

Let's also face this fact.  Selma does indeed have several establishments that I would term "flea bag motels".  At one time, I am sure that they were decent establishments.  Now they are aged, lacking in amenities, attract a lot of drug users and dealers, and some are high crime areas.  It is precisely these sorts of clients that the town seeks to eliminate.  I am all for that, but at what price?  Sure, you are not as likely to find that sort of activity at the Holiday Inn Express or Hampton Inn.  That is the nature of the franchises and clients to whom they cater, not necessarily construction.

The Village Inn in Smithfield has been a well run motel for years, as have several others.  On the other hand, there were several fine motels that degraded into drug havens and cesspools.  Some have since been torn down to make way for nicer businesses.  That is all about the commitment to fine management and respect for the community versus trying to get a few bucks from a sleazy clientele roster.

If one of our craptacular motels here in Selma was to burn down or be demolished (which would not hurt my feelings.  I will refrain from naming business names), the proposed ordinance would prohibit any type of lodging establishment that did not offer only interior corridors for room access. 
Don't get me wrong, I love Microtel and have a stack of hotel rewards program cards for different hotel chains in my desk.  However, if a Best Western, Red Roof Inn, Motel 6, or other company wanted to build a nice, clean, new facility that just happened to provide rooms accessible from the exterior of the building, I have a hard time with the Town of Selma saying, "Sorry, but we do not want your million dollar facility on our tax rolls, we are holding out for hallways."

Furthermore, unless one of our existing motels is indeed demolished, there are few places for the construction of a new facility. However, since we are not a major tourist destination, I doubt we will attract much more than we already have.  Roanoke Rapids attracted a Hilton Garden, but they also have a major music theater on site, and we see how negatively that whole scenario worked out for the town.

I have a few thoughts about the argument that a hotel brings in more tax revenue than a motel.  First, show me some hard numbers and I may soften my position, but property rights still prevail in my estimation.  Second, I had guests in July and will have family here in September.  Both parties elected to stay in a local lodging establishment since we do not have much room for accommodations at the house.  Both parties chose lodging near the Factory Stores.  Selma lost tax revenue since I advised against the flea bag motels, and the corridor edifices in town exceeded the cost they were willing to pay.

I do not know what the Town Council will decide on this issue, as they have been known to ignore recommendations by the Planning Board for various reasons.  Will we uphold property rights and freedom while potentially missing out on property and room taxes from establishments that do not conform to fancier corridor construction?