-I have put together some logical generalizations which I feel can't be proven wrong with logic, only faith. I welcome correction.

 

-Faith contradicts Logic.

If I said something which was logically correct, it couldn't be proven wrong with logic, it could only be proven wrong with faith. If it was logically incorrect, then it could be proven wrong with logic without the use of faith. When finding logic, faith is not needed. Faith is a barrier to finding logic.

 

-Faith is Absolute Belief.

I feel faith is absolute belief because it believes without need for logic. If logic was used, the belief wouldn't need faith. Can someone have faith in belief without the belief being absolute? I think so as long as the person believes faith isn't absolute.

 

-Absolute belief is a contradiction to having an individual mind.

What happens when belief is absolute? When the belief is absolute, the belief is content with what it knows and could refuse new knowledge. When a person has the ability to learn new things everyday, why should a belief need or want to be content? Dependency? I think so.

 

-Dependent belief equals a dependent mind.

If someone is dependent on an absolute belief, they obviously have a dependent mind. Which is stronger, a dependent mind or an individual mind? I think the logical answer is the individual mind which is non dependent on an absolute belief. When a person allows themselves to become dependent on others for a taught belief, they forfeit the ability to develop individual belief. Everyone is born individual, however most are dependent on a group belief.

 

-Grouped belief equals security.

We are trained and it is logically correct that power is in numbers. The more that share the same belief is the more power the group has. More power = more control. It's very easy to speak up when you have others that share your belief than when you have an individual belief. It takes a much stronger person to write or speak individual belief that it does for a grouped belief. Why? The group wishes to ridicule the individual belief in "protection" of the grouped belief.

 

-Individuals are the founders, Grouped believers are the followers.

It takes an individual mind to form a grouped belief for the followers. The followers are trained or incapable of forming individual belief, so they rely on a taught belief. The individual controls the belief of the followers to maintain order. If all of the followers realized their individual belief, there would be no control of the grouped belief. Individual belief contradicts the group belief.

 

-Most governments use the same belief system as the bible.

Which does a government want, followers or individuals? What does the bible want, individuals or followers? With followers, there is control and agreement. With individuals, there is doubt and disagreement. It is much easier to run a government with believing followers than it is with unbelieving individuals. What is any governments agenda? Control. What is the bibles agenda? Control. What is the easiest way to control any group of people? Make them believe using faith. Faith overpowers logic when speaking of a faithful believer. If a believer has absolute faith, they will never question logic. What does belief without logic require? Faith. Any governing body or religion strives for faith. Faith is unbreakable to the follower until they realize individual logic.

Does a team win by functioning as individuals or as a group? Any winning coach knows that the individuals must be cut or coached into a leader to have a winning team. Does the coach simply tell the team to go win or does the coach give the team faith to believe they will win? The coach knows that the team is incapable to win unless they believe they can win. What does the coach do? He makes them work as a team to develop a team belief.

Does the bible strive for a group belief or to teach people to form individual belief? The bible does not want individuals. Individuals challenge the bibles teachings. It teaches believers to become followers of a team belief to control the team. It gives the team of believers faith that they will win by getting a favored afterlife for their belief.

 

-Faith is stronger than logic

If you give a dying person two options, one option being to have faith they will go to a peaceful afterlife, the other option is telling them that logically it could be the end of their existence or that you don't know what happens when they die.

Which option will they choose to believe? Faith of an afterlife or the logic of death or not knowing? Most would pick faith. Why? It's much easier to pick a faith to believe than a logical answer to believe. If the person has faith they will to a favored afterlife and you logically tell them they might not, the person will likely have an emotional reaction to protect faith of their belief.

 

-Faith Is The Secret Formula Of the Bible

If there is a secret formula of the bibles ability to capture the believer, it is faith. Faith is the "key" of unlocking how the bible works. The bible makes promises of favored afterlife for having faith and threats of hell for not having faith. The bible does not reward favoritism for having logic. Without a faithful mind to believe in the bible, it would have no credibility.

 

-Everyone is Ignorant

Yes, everyone is ignorant in at least one area of life knowledge whether it be individual or educational knowledge. No one knows everything. Someone can have a genius ability in learning one thing an be completely ignorant in learning another. Saying everyone is ignorant shouldn't be taken as an insult, it is a logical fact. The difference is in those who refuse ignorance and those who accept it. Those that refuse ignorance always strive to learn what they don't know realizing how little they do know. Those that are content with ignorance are happy with what they believe they already know possibly refusing new knowledge to protect previous teachings or faith.

 

-Emotions Contradict Logical Decisions

The best example I can use on this one is the situation of a cop. Say the cop is on the job when a call comes in. The cops family members have just been murdered. The cop is in an emotional rage. He wishes to take justice into his own hands killing the ones that murdered his family. The cops superior takes him off the job. Why? The cops emotions contradicted his ability to have a logical mind.

Cops are taught to control emotions in any situation so they can make a logical decision. In the cop example I used, say the family that was murdered now has no relation to the cop. Would the cop still try to kill the criminals or would the cop simply make an arrest? The logical decision would be to make an arrest. The cops logical thinking tells them that if they killed the criminals, their job and life would be destroyed along with the criminals.