Charles  says:
3 months ago

Cross dressing is an unfortunate term which is applied to a much broader range of things than it logically should. Is everyone still born naked, or is it that males are born trousered and females in a skirt over trousers? Only anatomical differences should be taken into account in calling something cross dressing. A bra is female by anatomy; an athletic supporter is male by anatomy. Calling males in skirts cross dressed is not a fact---it is rather, a strategy---an underhanded strategy to STOP men from having purely HUMAN clothing choices. But then, psychiatry is not only useless, it is dangerous to civil liberties and is the direct continuation of the incredibly barbaric Holy Roman Catholic Inquisition and the protestant witch hunts. Greek soldiers wear a pleated skirt as part of their uniform (I'm talking 2009, not 2009AD) and Fijian policemen wear skirts. Male Dervishes in over a dozen nations wear full skirts. Any social phenomenon not a majority activity WILL be slandered as "mental disorder" by the conformity cult (the NY Times, May 27, 1876, page 6 editorial, "A Curious Disease" said women in pants were suffering from "permanent mental hallucination" and needed "the usual remedies in use at the best conducted hospitals for the insane.") As late as 1958, psychologist Horace English still tried to slap the "transvestite" label on women in pants. In 393AD Rome confiscated property of men in pants and sent them into exile, and over a thousand years later the Italians laughed at the pants worn by Pantalone, the top CLOWN of the Comedy of the Arts. There is only one "problem" with clothing and that is the denial of personal choice and the stupid attempts to suggest that "normal biology causes only females to want to wear skirts" gee what about the Roman legions and Alexander the Great? There is only one suitable response to the Mental Health Cult and that is---"Leave Us Alone---Can't You See We're Busy?"