No Brainer: Small Cars Are Dangerous
58
It shouldn't take a government or industry study to prove the obvious,
but a report from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) has
confirmed what mostly everyone already knows: small cars can be
dangerous to your health, even deadly. Yes, if you took physics then
you know that when two objects moving at the same speed hit each other,
the one that weighs less will suffer more damages.
The IIHS
study comes just as some consumers are considering moving to smaller
vehicles in a bid to save on gas and/or to reduce their so-called
carbon footprint. Smaller, lighter vehicles can return improved fuel
economy, but those changes could come at the expense of occupant safety.
"There
are good reasons people buy minicars," says Institute president Adrian
Lund. "They're more affordable, and they use less gas. But the safety
trade-offs are clear from our new tests. Equally clear are the
implications when it comes to fuel economy. If automakers downsize cars
so their fleets use less fuel, occupant safety will be compromised.
However, there are ways to serve fuel economy and safety at the same
time."
The IIHS did not pair up small cars with pickup trucks
and sport/utility vehicles when conducting their study nor did they
choose vehicles from different manufacturers. When a subcompact car was
chosen from one manufacturer the IIHS chose a slightly larger vehicle
from that same car company.
For example, the IIHS crashed a Toyota Yaris into a larger Toyota Camry; a smart fortwo into a Mercedes-Benz C-Class (both made by Daimler); and a Honda Fit
into a Honda Accord. Each vehicle was traveling at 40 miles per hour.
All three small cars performed poorly, while the larger vehicles were
rated good or acceptable. The small cars tested, however, receive good
ratings in government-conducted crash tests with fixed barriers.
All
three small cars performed well in government barrier tests where they
are rammed into a stationery object. However, when meeting “head on”
with a larger vehicle, the results were obvious and would be
catastrophic for human occupants.
What should the IIHS study
do for people shopping for a new or used car? Consider the law of
physics, that's what. Short term savings in fuel economy could prove
dangerous in a crash, even deadly.
- Dutch Automaker Said to Extend Offer for Saab - New York Times
ABC News Dutch Automaker Said to Extend Offer for Saab New York Times Spyker Cars, the tiny Dutch automaker that is seeking to buy Saab from General Motors, extended its offer for the beleaguered... - 39 minutes ago
- Ford gets with the wi-fi in its groovy cars - TG Daily
UberGizmo (blog) Ford gets with the wi-fi in its groovy cars TG Daily ... Ford has embarked on a grand plan to transform its vehicles into rolling WiFi hot spots with the second-generation Sync... - 22 minutes ago
- Morning rush starts with two crashes involving overturned cars - Newsday (subscription)
Morning rush starts with two crashes involving overturned cars Newsday (subscription) The Monday morning rush-hour has just begun, and already the New York State Department of Transportation is... - 7 hours ago
- Sales of golf cars charged by federal tax credit for electric vehicles that ... - WQAD
Sales of golf cars charged by federal tax credit for electric vehicles that ... WQAD Sales have been brisk at Lincolnway Golf Cars in Lisbon and Harris Golf Cars in Peosta has sold 60 golf carts in... - 2 hours ago
PrintShare it! — Rate it: up down flag this hub
Comments
As much as i love another convertible Beetle, had one many moons ago, small cars are too too dangerous. You are right, this is a no brainer! Timely!
Good Hub and matter after my own heart. Aside from fuel efficiency, I think small cars are adorable - but they can be death traps. When I was a kid my father had a big, old, 50's Buick Roadmaster. Some teenage kid (driving less than a month) hit our car at 70 mph. The Buick was sent up on two wheels but bounced back down, and none of the adults or children in the car (including a baby) were hurt. I've known other people in bigger cars who have had accidents with similar outcomes. As you said, nobody needs a study to have noticed that if they've lived more than sixteen years. When my children were little I would never put them in a small car. I'm sure, too, it's why so many people disregard fuel inefficiency and aim for bigger vehicles.
About ten years after my father's car was hit I was in a small car and again hit by someone coming 70 mph on the wrong side of the road. One friend and I survived. The other did not. We, two survivors, had plenty of injuries. The young woman who hit us was in a big, old, Oldsmobile and walked away with a bumped head. I still say there's something to be said for big, old, GM cars.
You're right it is a no brainer. People who want these tiny cars are no brainers! Keep on Hubbing!
Your logic is backwards. The huge gas-hog SUVs harm drivers of small cars, but the small cars are dangerous? That's like saying that the person shot by a drug gang member is dangerous. Moreover, small cars can be designed to be quite safe in crashes. As fuel efficiency standards are increased the number of huge cars will and the number of non-commercial cars will increase and safety will be improved. Here's a link to a study that shows that fuel economy can be improved without sacrificing safety.













Hawkesdream says:
8 months ago
How very true , from experience in a Talbot Samba, these small cars are deadly, have ever since had and driven large cars and always with a bonnet and boot.