I was just in a discussion about the political issues of the day, namely the nomination of Judge Sonia Sotomayor for Justice of the Supreme Court of the U.S.  I was criticized heavily for not supporting a liberal Hispanic woman on the Supreme Court.  I was asked if I "suppose America would be in a better state of being if we did not have those in office now? Should we maintain the white supremacist ideology that has tainted and permeated American government for too many generations as it is? Does diversity not matter; especially, when that is the only thing that is going to, even in the slightest manner, offer some degree of balance to the ideology of those serving in public leadership in America today so that we can move toward a better way of life?"

Here is the way I see things.  I 100% believe that we would be better off without the current leadership in office, in the White House as well as in Congress.  We have been on a downward spiral into socialism for years and now we are head first diving into it.  Socialism is a failed system of government, not to mention an unethical one.  The assertion that this is a matter of white supremacy is garbage.  I could not care less about someone's ethnic background.  That is the whole point of "all men are created equal".  I vehemently disagree with appointing someone as judge, electing someone to Congress, or to the presidency simply based upon racial background or sex.

Following the Constitution and rule of law has nothing to do with race.  It has to do with being a nation of law and following law.  As a nation we should not concern ourselves with "diversity".  Since when should we forsake our rule of law for the sake of having a diverse representation?  Let us take that concept to its logical conclusion.  If we were indeed to have a true representation of diversity in our government, 12 - 14 % of our governmental employees, representatives, expenditures, and operations would be Negro.  14+ percent would be Hispanic.  The majority would still be white.  About 1 - 2% would be Asian.  Obviously, none of this holds true in the name of "diversity".

Is the definition of "a better way of life" one that rapes the American taxpayer and funnels money and benefits the way of minorities in the name of reparations, fairness, or correcting any perceived (usually incorrectly) disadvantages?  That is just plain unethical, fiscally unsound, and the lazy person's way out of their own paradigm of despair.  It is a false hope.  It is unfairly burdening my children, grandchildren, and all of yours as well, with massive debt and constraints far greater than those some wish to remove.

The values I espouse are the very ones that drove tens of thousands of white men to die in the name of freeing enslaved people.  They are the same values that brought the Civil Rights Act.  They are the values that say you can succeed if you put forth the right effort.  Yet there is no guarantee of success, just the equal opportunity to try.  The world and our culture are based upon the equal right to strive, not the equal right to outcome.  That is socialism or communism and is just plain illogical, failed socially and financially, and one of corruption.

And yet we have Democrats championing themselves as the saviors of values and of the minorities in America.  Democrats were the ones who fought to keep the enslavement of a race of people here in America.  Democrats were the ones who founded the KKK.  Democrats were the ones who passed Jim Crowe Laws.  Democrats were the ones who stood against integration and wanted blacks to ride in the back of the bus.  It was Democrats who fought to keep blacks out of the public schools.  It is Democrats who keep telling minorities that they are not smart enough, not good enough, and not able to make it in this country without the help of the government at the expense of everyone else.  That is just one form of enslavement for another.  Physical enslavement has been replaced with a profound dependency upon Uncle Sam.

We, as Americans, should be more concerned with what is best for our nation, not what is the best make up of ethnicity of our representation.  Good representatives will do their job regardless of the color of their skin.  Having a black man in office does not guarantee good results for blacks. I have no regard for white folks in office, either.  I care about their VALUES, not their skin color.  If their values are correct, their actions will be correct for the nation, not one particular group.  I will vote for (and have) a black man or woman who has the right core values over an ignorant, liberal white guy any day.