Ralph Nader Writes a Novel - Only the Super-Rich Can Save Us
69Ralph Nader - Only the Super-Rich Can Save Us
In his new book, Only the Super-Rich Can Save Us, Ralph Nader takes on the corporate state in the form of a utopian novel. Nader's concern that the mismatch between the corporate dominated government and the needs of the people are deteriorating American society. The new novel is Ralph Nader's answer to The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged, the famous novels of Ayn Rand who claimed "altruism is deadly, compassion is lethal."
Only the Super-Rich Can Save Us
|
"Only the Super-Rich Can Save Us!"
Price: $16.36
List Price: $27.50 |
|
The Seventeen Traditions
Price: $5.84
List Price: $19.95 |
Nader imagines a group of older super-rich Americans who, past the accumulation of wealth stage of their lives, decide they want to make some kind of significant contribution to their country. He uses real people to populate the plot including Warren Buffet, Phil Donahue, Bill Cosby, Yoko Ono, Ross Perot, Ted Turner, and (the now deceased) Paul Newman.
The group believes that America had been robbed of its democratic birthright and that corporate power has turned the United States into a plutocracy. Confident that having an in-depth understanding of their adversary, they will be able to redirect social-political-economic progress.
Pivitol points in their plan include an improvement of fuel, health care, and housing costs as well as the establishment of a real living wage for all working Americans.
In order to achieve their goals, the group realizes that they need to counter the power of corporate lobbyists and gain influence over Congress. Mass media can be addressed, they feel, through funding as they pool their significant wealth. Right wing talk show hosts are distracted with decoy issues such as the suggestion that we change the National Anthem from the Star Spangled Banner to America the Beautiful and rewrite the Pledge of Allegiance to 'with liberty and justice for some." The right wing talk show hosts take the bait and run with it.
While the noisier factions of the right are horrified that the suggested last line of the Pledge of Allegiance actually gains popularity, the group realizes that they need to alter the poverty of the justice movement.
Only the Super-Rich Can Save us Book Talk with Ralph Nader
They buy local banks, small insurance companies, and small businesses to create a sustainable sub-economy in order to counteract the power of the corporate megalith. New small business groups establish trade associations and crate a mascot to represent their ideals through TV ads and other mass media outlets.
People are mobilized by large, urban, lunch time rallies, parades, and solar energy festivals. As the new movement gains momentum, the two forces collide as the the energy of a few, idealistic super-rich create a political battle between factions representing the corporate state and the justice movement, representing the needs of the people.
On a book tour for Only the Super-Rich Can Save Us, Ralph Nader begins his talk in his famous dry style. But as his talk progresses, Nader gradually becomes animated,punctuating the summery of a serious yet playful idea with wit and humor. The audience of admirers interrupt his talk with laughter and applause.
At the book talk that I attended, one man asked in an aggressive tone, ' How much money do you make?"
As highlighted in the novel, it's not how much money you make but what you do with your wealth and the power that wealth conveys upon people in leadership roles.
According to an article in the New York Times, data shows that the wealthiest 300,000 Americans earned almost as much money as the bottom 150 million Americans. Per person, the highest earning group received 440 X as much as the average person on the bottom half.
Nancy Birdsall founding president of the Center for Global Development points out that a certain economic disparity is healthy for a stable society. Constructive inequality of wealth distribution encourages growth and benefits the common good. But, she points out, that destructive inequality is inefficient, constrains growth, and contributes to civil unrest.
How can democracy function when corporate power holds dominion over all? Robert D. Kaplan pointed out that 500 of the world's largest corporations account for 70% of world trade.
In his novel, Only the Super-Rich Can Save Us, Ralph Nader points out the dangers of economic disparity and the increasing power of corporate America. He suggests that in order for the United States to survive as the democracy that is our birthright, a downsizing of corporate power is a necessity.
|
|
The Big Squeeze: Tough Times for the American Worker
Price: $7.15
List Price: $14.95 |
The Big Squeeze - Tough Times for the American Worker
- Book Review - \'The Big Squeeze,\' by Steven Greenhouse - Review - NYTimes.com
The outlook for the American worker: increasingly hostile.
|
Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America
Price: $2.00
List Price: $14.00 |
|
Nickel & Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America
Price: $9.85
|
Barbara Ehrenreich investigages the working poor by working at low income jobs
- Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting by in America Summary & Study Guide - Barbara Ehrenreich - e
Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting by in America summary and study guide with notes, essays, quotes, analysis and pictures
|
|
Crashing the Party: Taking on the Corporate Government in an Age of Surrender
Price: $1.94
List Price: $14.95 |
|
Crashing the Parties 2004 - Third Party Presidential Candidates - Documentary DVD
Price: $19.95
|
Ralph Nader - Crashing the Party
In Crashing the Party - Taking on the Corporate Government in an Age of Surrender, Ralph Nader claims that the US has allowed business interests too much say in local, state, and federal government. The huge lobbying industry has increased the power of corporations to the detriment of the average American
Ralph Nader - Direct Democracy - What if the People Ran the Country
In Direct Democracy - What if the People Ran the Country, Ralph Nader calls upon American citizens to regain control of the United States and allow the country to become a nation of self government by the people, for the people, and of the people.
PrintShare it! — Rate it: up down flag this hub
Comments
He does have several obviously good points, Dolores. I wonder what your take is :) I also wonder whether or not he actually has a means to reach the ends he perceives as being the solution to our economic woes...Sorry, I guess I'm cheating by wanted to know the answer without reading the book! I'll read it now! Thanks for the review.
okay, I'm interested. As pissed as I was with Nader when they gave Bush the election and Gore lost, he still makes good points. Whether or not I like reading his novel remains to be seen, but I'm open minded. And, I give him credit for fighting the good fight for years and winning some major battles to protect "we" the consumers. Thanks Dolores!
loveofnight - Nader was entertaining but had some serious points. Thanks for stopping by.
dohn - I think he is bringing up a very serious theme...my take on it? It's a delusional fantasy, God bless him. I appreciate your interest.
kartika, like you, I was not very happy with the old consumer watchdog, in fact argued with friends over their thrown away vote. But maybe if more people who actually agreed with him voted, it would have been enough votes to make the powers that be sit up and pay attention. Probably not. Thanks.
Dolores Concur on the delusional fantasy, the system we have is a terrible one until you compare it to the rest of the world..
You have covered his new novel well and all we can hope for is a little more de-corporatizing of our government
Hmrjmr1. The system that we have now is not the intent of our forefathers who established the Us as a government by the people, not run by corporate interests. When there are business that are too big to fail, whose failure can take down the whole economy, even the world's economy - something has to change. Those megabusinesses are not capitalism but something else, something dangerous, and a threat to out national security. Thank you for commenting. I appreciate your visit!
juneaukid - Whatever one thinks of Ralph Nader (and I had not always banged a drum for him), he does have a point, even though the story seems pretty far-fetched. But, who knows? Watching the Ken Burns series on our National Parks, it seems like John D. Rockerfeller, Jr. used his wealth and power to save and preserve some our most beautiful national treasures.
Wow, awesome Dolores! I hadn't heard of the book, but now I'll have to read it. I like the tongue in cheek take off on Rand, who continues to impress people I know not why. She can't write, her ideas are bad, and she was unpleasant and ruthless--it's almost like, hmmmm, how can I get permission to be a raving narcissist? I know! I'll write novels make it a virtue! Good on Ralph for penning an antidote. :)
Delores - not to prolong an argument, I never said we didn't need to change. We do, in fact it's a pretty sad commentary when the Chinese Communists are better capitalist than we are. But I still wouldn't want to live there.. Love ya Kiddo keep it up!
Thanks, Pam. I plowed through the Fountainhead but quit in the middle of Atlas Shrugged, it was just way too much. I mean, she does have some points but it all winds up sounding just self-centered and to hell with everybody. The idea that the rich and powerful just earned all that power and money by themselves is bunk. They got to their position through the labor of others. It has nothing to do with sharing. Labor creates wealth. Usually for other people. I appreciate your comment.
Hmrjmr - Maybe China is better at capitalism because they have few standards. It's okay to use lead paint in childrens' toys over there. Lots of American companies have moved operations to countries who have less restrictions on manufacturing operations than we do, and they can get away with paying people less as the standard of living is not as high as in the US. The global economy is good for the people who had nothing, but now have a little more and it's great for the bog boys who can boost profits by bypassing safety measures and emission standards. Thank you for stopping in again and commenting! Hugs right back at you, soldier!
Back when the government enforced anti-trust laws and the bigger companies could not keep gobbling up the smaller ones therefore ensuring less competition...things were better. Mom and Pop enterprises could still exist and help their communities.
That Ken Burns series on the National Parks was great! And yes...there are some good wealthy people...like J.D. Rockefeller, Jr. who decided to use his wealth for the benefit of all of us. Other people were also mentioned as doing the same.
Sounds like Ralph Nader has come up with an interesting (but Utopian) novel that will spur discussion and thought. Thanks for the review.
Thanks, Peggy. I saw the Ken Burns series and, wow, the JD Rockefeller sure used his wealth to make the country a better place to live, what a hero!
The Nader book is some 700 pages long, which is a bit to Ayn Randish for me, but, yes, it's a serious situation that must be discussed. The very fact that we have these companies whose failure is capable of destroying the world economy is unbelievable. How could we have let that happen? It's a threat to national security.
Well at least the government is trying to enforce some antitrust laws with the Health Care companies now so we've got that going for us. Well written Dolores, a pleasure a smooth read. I enjoyed your cogent analysis of Nader's speech especially.
Ben - and recent noise is being made concerning 'businesses that are too big to fail' so thank God they are finally addressing the mega-monopolies. Some economists claim that at some point just before the big bank bail-out, we were hours away from a global crash. Thanks for stopping by and commenting!


















loveofnight says:
2 months ago
this is very interesting, i'll have 2 reread it later, according to the video he seems very entertaining