Smoking Bans: Discrimination at it finest
73Contradictions
As a smoker I am told on a daily basis about the benefits of quitting. I am told that in only a few short hours that my lungs begin to repair the damage that I've inflicted upon them with the horrible smoke that I continuously put into them. That in only a few short days after I quit that my lungs can break up pockets of tar and mucus that have accumulated over the years and after a few short weeks that I will no longer feel the need to smoke. I am also told that the effects of second hand smoke on others is horrible and can cause cancer along with causing irrevocable damage to those who are around me. I am told that I can no longer smoke in public areas such as restaurants, movies, or the mall. I have even been told that I can not smoke with in a hundred feet of an entrance of any business. My question is this, if I quit smoking and all of these wonderful things happen so quickly how can it effect a non-smoker so horrifically when they are not consuming smoke at the rate or quantity that I do. It's no longer good enough that if I want to smoke I must stand in the wind, cold, rain, or heat but I also have to do it far enough away from everywhere that it's a joke. I don't have a child that screams at the top of its lungs in public places and it damages my hearing so we should put a ban on screaming kids. That sounds ridiculous doesn't it, to me seeing a group of adults huddled in a circle in the middle of a parking lot to smoke is ridiculous.
Shunned
You can go to a bar and drink until you are physically sick but you are no longer aloud to smoke inside. It is okay for those who are intoxicated to jump behind the wheel of their cars and cause hundreds of fatalities but God forbid they get lung cancer from second hand smoke. Before I wasn't aloud to smoke in a restaurant I had to sit in the very back next to the restrooms. Is that where you would want to sit if you were going to have a meal? I know I didn't enjoy watching people walk in and out as I tried to eat and I didn't find the sound of a toilet flushing exactly soothing. Instead of letting the owners of a business determine whether or not to allow smoking in their own buildings our government has decided to tell them that it's no longer an option. Why not let the owners decide for themselves or give them the option of either smoking or non-smoking clients. I know prohibition didn't work and this new crack down on tobacco is going to fail as well but how long will it take before we say enough is enough. I don't like the government telling me I can't smoke because it's bad for me, I don't like the government telling me I can't have trans fat, and I really don't like the government telling me how I should live my life. If I want to smoke two packs a day, eat deep fried french fries that taste good, and use styrofoam I should have the right to do so.
PrintShare it! — Rate it: up down flag this hub
Comments
I agree and thank you I did enjoy it
I am a former smoker, and no, I don't stand on my soapbox and berate current smokers. It is a hard habit to break, and when I did stop smoking, after developing pneumonia, I gained weight. I often find that giving up one bad habit simply leads to picking up another.
There are no simple cures for stopiing any self-dangerous habit, and I can't tell you which is worse - smoking as I did, or being overweight as I am now.
As for the ban, well, agree with it or not, it is the law. There are certainly many laws with which I do not agree. I am certain that some accomodation could have been made for smokers, but right now we are a society that sees things only interms of right and wrong. The greys have all been either blackened out or bleached out, and that is a sad thing for us. Fanatics of any nature make me nervous, even if they are fighting for what they believe to be a just cause.
My dad used to tell us as we were growing up, "You're right ends, where my nose begins." For a greater good, individuals always suffer some sacrifice. You have the right to harm yourself...but the government tries to pass rules for the greater good. (well -- supposedly....) I don't like government control of much; less government is normally good. I can't feel sorry for the smokers, tho... I don't want to inhale the smoke and I agree, I'm probably subjecting myself to worse pollutants in the air already.
But, again as my dad used to say; two wrongs don't make a right, meaning, just because the air is contaminated, doesn't mean we can't eliminate some of the contaminates.
And, my dad was a smoker. I didn't nag, but I didn't buy his cigarettes. He had a heart attack at 62 - lived to be 81. For some, they might think that was a long life. Heart surgery is not a good experience and I wasn't ready to give him up at 81.
I don't like any group to be picked on, not even smokers. When any one loses rights, everyone loses rights. But could you please step outside if you're gonna light one up? LOL
happy hubbing...
I agrre that smokers should be more considerate. I don't know how many times I've seen people light up right next to small children. I have a child of my own and never smoke in the same room as her. It is a hasle to leave the room sometimes but I do it all the same. I think that if they are going to ban smoking make outdoor areas in which we can smoke and be warm in.
People behind this and most causes become crusaders that without a crusade are useless. If alcohol was banned MADD would go after cell phones or make up while driving. THe ridiculous legal system is again the culprit for creating something out of nothing. The free market should dictate who does and doesnt allow smoking. Once this issue is settled you will see, and have already seen, the crusaders go after baggy pants, fat and loud music playing.
No one other than smokers care about this issue but wait until it is their turn for the system to go after. I hope that people will see this and it will open their eyes to the fact that this is not exceptable.
There is no reason to smoke other than to feed an addiction. If you are content being addicted to a drug that happens to be legal that is certainly your prerogative. I smoked at one time. It was a very unpleasant and expensive habit. Quitting is simple. You simply put out the cigarette you are smoking and do not light another.
I can recall a number of times, before restrictions were put in place, when my dining experience was even less enjoyable than yours were as you sat by the rest rooms. It was on those occasions when the table next to mine was occupied by four or five people lighting up at every opportunity. The smoke wafting from their table did wonders for my appetite. I agree that some restrictions have gone too far. I felt that smoking/non smoking sections in restaurants were adequate. Smoking in the workplace is counter productive.
The bottom line is clear and indisputable; that shit will very likely kill you. But who wants to live forever, right?
this isnt prohibition. its cultural discrimination, and it has successfully reduced the numbers of you filthy vermin from 50% to 20% in 'merica. now we need to ridicule and marginalize drinkers and loud children also. its not insane, the only way to get sheeple to stop being stupid is shift the staus qou against such stupidity.
|
The Easy Way to Stop Smoking: Join the Millions Who Have Become Non-Smokers Using Allen Carr's Easyway Method
Price: $8.59
List Price: $14.95 |
|
LifeSign QuitKey Smoking Cessation Computer
Price: $49.95
List Price: $59.95 |
|
Boiron Care Kit, Quit Smoking, 1 kit
Price: $9.50
List Price: $10.99 |
|
Quit: Read This Book and Stop Smoking (Running Press Miniature Editions)
Price: $1.54
List Price: $4.95 |












David Cowley says:
2 years ago
Great article Agro.
It is ok to pick on smokers because we are the minority today but what about tomorrow? It is time we rise up and fight. Here is another article on smoking you might enjoy.
http://www.dfcinvestment-team.com/a04-lets-go-beat