Struck From the Jury
63I had always felt a bit cheated. Everyone in my family except me had been called on for jury duty at one time or another, and some had been called on several times. They would complain about the call to duty, while I longed for the chance to be called upon.
Finally the day came that a summons for jury duty arrived! For twenty-eight days I would be in a pool of potential jurors for the Superior Court of the State of Washington!
Upon arrival, we were given instructions and put into groups. We were to call a number each evening to see if our group was required to show up the next day. If so, we were to show up, and sit and wait . . . and wait . . . and wait some more.
One day our number was called. Each of us was given a questionaire to fill out. From the questions on the form, it was obvious that we were going to hear a case involving child molestation. There were many questions on a couple of pages. I answered each as honestly and thoroughly as possible.
We were taken to a courtroom, and seated in the audience section. The prosecutor, a lady, and a child sat at a table to the front and left of us. The defense attorney and the defendant sat at a table to the front and right of us. The judge sat in the jury box to the left of the prosecutor. I was juror seventeen of thirty!
We were told that each side was going to be able to ask us questions. We were to answer the questions under the penalty of perjury. Each side could strike some of the jurors for no reason at all. The prosecutor would ask questions first, and, after a break, the defense would ask questions of the remaining jurors.
The prosecutor began asking some of my fellow jurors some questions. It seemed he was going in order, and had no questions for me. However, after asking questions of jurors with higher numbers than mine, he came back to me.
"Juror seventeen," he began, "you answered the question 'Can a sexual abuser be rehabilitated?' with 'I am not qualified to answer this.' What do you mean you are not qualified?"
"It means I have had no formal training in rehabilitation of sexual abusers," I said. "I presume that time proves whether someone was truly rehabilitated based on whether or not they reoffend."
"Do you believe in the 'Three Strikes and You're Out' law," he asked.
"I suppose so," I answered, "provided the convictions are for violent crimes."
He then asked, "How about 'Two Strikes and You're Out' when it comes to child molestation?"
I replied, "All I can say is, if it is my child, it's one strike and you better hope the cops catch you."
"Interesting," he said. "You also answered 'Have you ever had a bad experience with the justice system?' with 'Yes.' Would you explain what happened?"
"About eight years ago I broke up a fight between my cousin and one of his kids, and was cited for domestic violence," I told him. "I wouldn't accept a plea bargain, so the prosecutor tried me."
He asked, "Were you found innocent?"
"No. I was found guilty because I had a lousy lawyer," I said.
"Who was your lawyer?"
"Me. I defended myself because I was innocent and didn't qualify for free counsel."
"Well, if you had a trial and were found guilty, what was your problem with the justice system?" he asked.
I told him, "Before that experience, I always thought that prosecutors were interested in truth and justice. However, I learned from that experience that prosecutors are merely lawyers who try to win cases regardless of the truth. So, despite that the assailant in that case was the defendant, and that my cousin who actually fought with his child was found innocent, I was found guilty despite that nobody was hit once I arrived and broke up the fight."
He asked, "Did you regret not taking the plea agreement afterward?"
"No," I said. "The judge's sentence was less than what I was offered in the plea bargain, and he chewed out the prosecutor for even trying me. He also suggested I appeal the decision, but I didn't since it was only a misdemeanor."
He seemed to be egging me on with, "So, you didn't hire an attorney, you got convicted, and you didn't appeal the decision, and you consider that a bad experience with the justice system? Was I the prosecutor in that case?"
"No," I said. "It was some other asshole."
The judge grinned, and then excused us.
When we returned, six jurors were excused, including me. I've not been called for jury duty again.
Go figure!
PrintShare it! — Rate it: up down flag this hub
Comments
LOL!! I've sat on one case - 2nd degree incest. It was the roughest thing I've ever had to listen to and not be able to discuss it with anyone. I've been called 3 other times, but never got to trial. Loved your answers, and loved the judge's grin..they do have a sense of humor! You missed out on being served lunches in the 'hot house' living out the movie "12 angry men". Maybe next time!!
I agree with Candie, I loved your answers and when the judge grinned! Great story, you had me laughing by the end. :D
Ivorwen, a fellow Heliumite I see! Thank you for the comment. May you continue to be fortunate, from your perspective, as they continue to call you to duty!
Hi Candie! I'm not sure how I would have fared through testimony and evidence, but I'm certain I would have been fair. I feel like I missed out on more than the lunches, and first-hand 12 angry men experience. Thank you for the hope for next time!
K@ri, my dear! I'm happy I made you laugh! I wanted to be on the jury, but the damn prosecutor had to go and piss me off!
Very funny, Tom. However, not so funny when we find out that the justice system is skewed and that prosecutors are not out for the truth, but for the win. Ironic that the juror is supposed to be fair, but the prosecutor is not and justice is not always.....
Well, Connie, it's about time you showed up! I wrote this just to keep my promise to you, and I expected you to be waiting by your keyboard for a week to read it!
Seriously, though, it's a shame when a scoundrel like Governor Ryan is more concerned about justice than are prosecutors.
I don't know which side struck me since both would have reasons to do it. I prefer to think of it as balance, since I was the subject!
Sorry to disappoint you, Tom....though I do spend an inordinate time lurking around Hubpages, I think I was sleeping (for a change) when this was first published. As always, I enjoy your work and find that, not only are you a man of depth and reason, you are quite funny to boot!
Fab article Tom, and pleased you were so honest throughout, (enough to get your point across brilliantly). Luckily for me, living in Guernsey I am very unlikely to ever get called for Jury duty as we have no really serious crimes warranting a Jury.
Loved your story! Thanks for sharing!
I've always wanted to serve on a jury, but was called once many years ago, but we were dismissed because one of the sides wasn't ready. Back in early April I received a summons instructing me that I would be on a 3 month pool. I was instructed to call every weekend. They got close to my number, but I was never called. Today was the final day of my 3 month term. *sigh* maybe next time.
You are never a disappointment, Connie. Now I feel bad that I didn't wait until you were awake to publish it. Thank you for the nice compliment. I'd say you are as sweet as you are . . . oh wait - I already used that line on you! Oh well, you are both sweet and good looking!
Hi misty! I wish I could say the same thing about where I live. It doesn't sound so good when I say we haven't had a triple murder since last night! Thank you for the compliment, and for stopping by!
Hi KCC! I'm happy that you loved the story! Here's to hoping you get some lunches and first-hand 12 angry men experience next time you get a summons!
Aha! You've admitted it is a line. Guilty as charged lol. Oh well, I liked it anyway.
I may be guilty, but I am not remorseful. Hopefully, you'll go easy on me with the sentence!
I'm glad you liked it. I hope you smiled!
















Ivorwen says:
6 months ago
I've been called more times than I care to count. Fortunately, the cases have always been solved before they went to Court.