The Breast Contest | Kim Kardashian VS Britney Spears
73|
|
Kim Kardashian Lot of 4 Candid Paparazzi Photos
Current Bid: $1.25
|
|
|
Kim Kardashian: Fit In Your Jeans by Friday 3 DVDs NEW!
Current Bid: $39.99
|
|
|
KIM KARDASHIAN ADHESIVE BACK SEXY (butt key mag)
Current Bid: $.99
|
|
|
Kim Kardashian 24X36 Poster Red Carpet Sexy #RC04
Current Bid: $16.99
|
|
|
Kim Kardashian 36X48 Poster Red Carpet Sexy! #03
Current Bid: $19.99
|
|
|
LOT OF 6 MAXIM & COSMOPOLITAN MAGAZINES KIM KARDASHIAN
Current Bid: $.99
|
Now some people might say that far too much attention is being paid to the likes of Kim Kardashian and Britney Spears for almost no reason at all. However, I would disagree. There is a reason, a very strong, compelling reason. That reason is that they both have breasts. Breasts that they seem to delight in sharing with the world. Now Britney has certainly managed to share vast amounts of her breasts with the world at large, especially of late, whereas Kim has, thus far, kept hers under control. That is if you don't count her sex tape. Damn, where it once seemed obvious who would win this initial round of the breast contest, things are suddenly a little more complex.
What it really comes down to is this, the infamous...
SAG FACTOR
Due to the rigors of having had two children, Britney's breasts are unfortunately rather saggy. If she wore a bra, we would never have known, but this is Britney and she shuns underwear like fish shun the desert. I heard somewhere that she runs the risk of actually dying if underwear touches her skin, which would totally explain why she hasn't worn any in such a long time.
Kim, on the other hand, is relatively unsaggy. However due to the size of her breasts, they can appear rather saggesque. These are no Scarlett Johansson, up-by-my-nose breasts. No, Kim's are large, and though she often doesn't wear a bra either, she manages to carry it off, probably due to the fact that she has never had a baby sucking at her.
Interestingly enough, although Kim appears younger than Britney Spears, she is, in fact, a couple of years older. Which just goes to show you how important it is to maintain a plastic surgery regime. A good cosmetic surgeon means that age will never catch up with you. Of course, Britney reportedly had fairly extensive surgery to get her back into shape after the divorce, but if she denied it, I'd probably believe her. I'm trusting like that.
The Winner?
Kim seems determined to win all the prizes when it comes to Hollywood beauty, and as long as she continues to have any wrinkles ironed out of her face as soon as they appear, and doesn't accidentally breed any time soon, she may just win them. Because her breasts (which would appear to this untrained eye to be fairly fake) are more perkalicious than Britney's, then on the surface, surely they must win. Then again, Britney is au naturelle, and so so generous with them.
You decide. I can't.
PrintShare it! — Rate it: up down flag this hub
Comments
I'm going with Kim.
Breasts have little to do with it. Kim Kardashian's brand of beauty, eye-catching as it is, is the glossy stuff of the anonymous "Playboy" magazines airbrushed assembly line. Britney Spears is an unmistakeable original, pure gold in the pan.











Mike Paahana says:
2 years ago
Kimmy all the way u down girl the hottest girl on the web right now