The Internet is destroying freedom
60Your personal freedoms--destroyed by the internet. How?
The only thing that stands between you and the complete destruction of the freedoms we've come to appreciate in America is a vigilant press corps. The idea of freedom of the press was so important to the framers of the constitution, they made it the first explicit right in the first ten amendments to the document. The Bill of Rights seems pretty straight forward when speaking about the freedom of the press. That freedom of reporting, and the oversight role that media plays in watching the government activity, is being destroyed by the internet.
Newspapers are going bankrupt all over America. The Tribune companies, publishers of the Chicago Tribune, have already declared bankruptcy. The New York Times and its sister paper the Los Angeles Times are in deep financial trouble. Gannett Newspapers, including USA Today, have been laying off employees and cutting expenses rapidly in an attempt to stay afloat. Newspapers are going out of business at an alarming rate.
The economy has certainly caused a great deal of the problem. Advertising has slumped drastically in the past 24 months. Papers have lots huge amounts of dollars in revenue to internet advertising. Meanwhile, the cost of printing, delivering and reporting the news just continues to rise unabated.
Its suggested that newspapers failure is systemic of a
technology that's long past its time. Like the telegraph, wagon trains,
or typewriters, newspapers are well on their way to the scrap heap of
history. Already most of us get what news we do consume from social
media, or RSS feeds from web sites. Some people even watch the news on
that ancient technology known as television.
The mainstream
media have earned their reputation for slanted and jaded reporting.
While practitioners of the art will claim to only "seek the truth", the
reality for anyone facing a reporter is you will either confirm or deny
the version of the story they've already determined to write. Its
called the angle, and its the beginning of most every story you'll find
in print or online.
The loss of newspapers isn't the bad part of this story and the
cost to freedom. The cost comes in the removal of reporters who are
your eyes and ears to make sure government does as it says.
Watergate
would have been a simple break in without the determination of the
Washington Post reporters Woodward and Berstein. Their push for the
truth destroyed the presidency of Richard Nixon. Other scandals big and
small have been uncovered by the press. John Edwards and Gary Hart's
marital infidelity, Elliot Spitzer's fascination with call girls while
he was Governor of New York or the hidden files of September 11th are
all stories that came to light because their were newspaper reporters
working for the truth.
Its not as simple as putting the
stories online and reporting. There are costs to reporting because news
is NOT a commodity. There's fact checking, rewriting, and confirmation
of sources. Freedom of the press did not come with the freedom to libel
people, which seems to be a hallmark of a lot of online "journalism."
Without journalism, we'd have Katie Couric passing herself off
as a bona fide newsperson, or TMZ.com, and PerezHilton.com as true news
sources. Its not bad when its the fluff that most of these products
deliver as news. Can you imagine TMZ.com doing coverage in Iraq? Or
PerezHilton.com explaining the latest tax hike from the Obama
Administration?
News events are commodities. Every news source
can get pretty much the same spin from the newsmaker from the same
event. Our current White House press treatment shows the danger when
reporters are so enamored with the subject they are covering, they
forget to do their jobs.
Its the story behind the story. Its the questions that must be
asked on your behalf. You can accept the "official" story that there
were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, or you can look deeper to see
if it is true. You can accept the "official" story that Pat Tillman was
killed by enemy fire in Afghanistan, or you can find the truth.
The truth costs money. The truth is what is needed to protect freedom. The question is what value do you place on the truth.
The Internet is destroying freedom in the News
- TSA Backs Down, Withdraws Legal Threats Against BloggersMashable2 days ago
In the wake of last Friday’s unsuccessful attempt to blow up a Northwest Airlines flight, the U.S. Transportation Security Administration (TSA) began to impose some temporary security screening measures , including thorough pat downs and limitations on what passengers can do during the last hour of flight. However, for two travel bloggers, posting the unclassified details about these procedures ...
- Top ScoopsScoop.co.nz3 days ago
Is Congress planning to destroy every Middle East TV Channel that criticizes Israel?
- Perez Hilton
Since 2004, Hollywood's most hated website has been delivering the juiciest celebrity gossip. The blog is The go-to source for daily happenings in Hollywood. Written by the internet's most notorious gossip columnist, Perez Hilton (Mario Lavandeira). - The New York Times - Breaking News, World News & Multimedia
Find breaking news, multimedia, reviews & opinion on Washington, business, sports, movies, travel, books, jobs, education, real estate, cars & more. - Celebrity News | TMZ.com
Celebrity Gossip and Entertainment News, Covering Celebrity News and Hollywood Rumors. Get All The Latest Gossip at TMZ - Thirty Mile Zone - USA Today.com
Breaking news on weather, sports, world, science, financial, technology, travel, national, economy, and entertainment news provided by USATODAY.com. USATODAY.com provides video, sudoku, RSS feeds, crossword puzzles, audio, photo galleries, and email.
PrintShare it! — Rate it: up down flag this hub
Comments
I don't work for a newspaper, never have. The "everything is free" on the internet will in my opinion be a major problem in our society. When readers of internet pages can't discern truth from fiction, we have a problem. When government controls media, we have a problem. Guess what? We have a problem.
Wow, that's crazy. Sorry, I don't mean to be so blunt, but let's face it. Newspapers have never really been anything but partisans of one particular viewpoint or another. We do, after all, have a term for it: yellow journalism. Few can argue today that the Left in the US has mass media as its outlet and the Right has talk news radio as its.
The beauty of the Internet is that it is the largest marketplace of ideas the world has ever seen. Like any market, ideas can be exchanged, tested, agreed with, disagreed with, etc. Why is this a threat to newspapers? It's a threat to all mass media for that matter.
You think that this marketplace of ideas will make it impossible for people to discern truth from fiction. First let me ask you, how is that different from reading an article by a biased reporter with no ability to access other facets of a story? Second, you must really have a low opinion of people if you believe there are not those who can use reason and rational thought to formulate well thought out opinions.
How do you figure the government controls the Ineternet? I'd argue that governments dislike the Internet because it interferes with government propaganda. Check out the following article for a discussion on mass media and government control: http://mises.org/story/3060
I'm not quite sure that you know what the true problem is. Gennady Stolyarov was a refugee from the USSR. He understood, better than most, what true repression was. We'd do well to learn from his experiences.
Newspapers would claim not to have a point of view. I, as do you, disagree with the notion. I would fully agree with your position and view of the media leanings.
My opinion of people's ability to discern and reason is clearly mine. I believe its been born out in the current political and economic climate in the country.
Nothing about the page says anything about government control of the internet. Although clearly that exists in many parts of the world.
Ideas are not the problem. I love the internet as a forum for ideas, much as the one we are discussing here. The point of the article is news is not a commodity. The public is best served when questioning is encouraged, and reporting unemcumbered. As reporters are removed for economic reasons, questions stop. A rant or a random post seen by 6 people is not questioning, its a rant. When government can act without fear of exposure, your freedom is damaged.
Of course news is a commodity. In what way is it not? People have, at different times, paid for their supper by traveling and passing along news of other places in return for hospitality. Merchants in ancient bazzars would tell tales of wonder and far off places in addtion to hawking their wares. Newspapers ask people to exchange money for news. News is a commodity.
The public is best served when they are taught critical thinking, rational thought and expected to act like adults, not like perpetual children like today. An enfantile populace is the great danger to liberty, not a great forum like the Internet.











someonewhoknows says:
6 months ago
You might just have that mixed up the fredom of the internet is destroying your newspaper
Maybe if you made an announcement that your newspaper was having a going out of business sale or something interesting like that make it "buy the last issue before we shutdown and make them think it would be worth a lot as a collectors item ,they might just believe it and buy ten copies!
I forgot you make money on Advertising.Maybe you go into the information business like google